How is losing £700,000 a year good news. It was privatised because it was a drain on public funds. It’s still a drain.Max B Gold wrote: ↑Sat Apr 12, 2025 11:00 amGood news for the workers.
Another failed Thatcherite privatisation. Let's hope its water next then the trains and then another 200 top companies.
Labour Watch
Moderator: Long slender neck
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1825
- Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2019 7:43 pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 219 times
Re: Labour Watch
- Dunners
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9926
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 1219 times
- Been thanked: 2739 times
Re: Labour Watch
It's not a drain. We need steel. It's of strategic national interest. So if it costs us just £700K a year to not be dependent on risky and increasingly expensive global supply chains, it's a bargain. Plus, we print the money anyway.
We should have done it for Port Talbot too.
We should have done it for Port Talbot too.
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1825
- Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2019 7:43 pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 219 times
Re: Labour Watch
Sorry , as my first post £700k a day. Still a bargainDunners wrote: ↑Sat Apr 12, 2025 5:29 pm It's not a drain. We need steel. It's of strategic national interest. So if it costs us just £700K a year to not be dependent on risky and increasingly expensive global supply chains, it's a bargain. Plus, we print the money anyway.
We should have done it for Port Talbot too.
- Father Ted Crilly
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2019 11:17 am
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 73 times
Re: Labour Watch
£700k per day = £255.5M Pa. In terms of our economy it’s a tiny amount to retain the crucial ability to produce steel.
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1825
- Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2019 7:43 pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 219 times
Re: Labour Watch
It isn’t. How about all of our other businesses that struggle or fail because of cheaper imports. Shall we subsidise them all. We have tried all that before. It doesn’t workFather Ted Crilly wrote: ↑Sat Apr 12, 2025 8:48 pm £700k per day = £255.5M Pa. In terms of our economy it’s a tiny amount to retain the crucial ability to produce steel.
- Father Ted Crilly
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2019 11:17 am
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 73 times
Re: Labour Watch
Read dunners post above. Not sure why you’re going on about subsidising other industries.George M wrote: ↑Sat Apr 12, 2025 8:54 pmIt isn’t. How about all of our other businesses that struggle or fail because of cheaper imports. Shall we subsidise them all. We have tried all that before. It doesn’t workFather Ted Crilly wrote: ↑Sat Apr 12, 2025 8:48 pm £700k per day = £255.5M Pa. In terms of our economy it’s a tiny amount to retain the crucial ability to produce steel.
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1825
- Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2019 7:43 pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 219 times
Re: Labour Watch
Because there are other important industries that need support . Therefore, if you support one , support them all. Our steel industry has been inefficient and loss making for decades. We rely on the rest of the world for most things now. Why not steel.
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1825
- Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2019 7:43 pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 219 times
Re: Labour Watch
Coking coal and iron ore is being imported from the USA and Australia. Do you still think it’s a good deal for the UKs limited funds to keep a loss making business running. I’m sure the Yanks and Aussies will be delighted with such stupidity
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1283
- Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2024 12:08 pm
- Has thanked: 299 times
- Been thanked: 396 times
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 5468
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:48 pm
- Has thanked: 2463 times
- Been thanked: 1930 times
Re: Labour Watch
So it's bad that we rely on the rest of the world for most things, but we should add something else to the list? Not sure I understand.
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1825
- Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2019 7:43 pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 219 times
Re: Labour Watch
Who said it’s bad ?Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Tue Apr 15, 2025 9:22 amSo it's bad that we rely on the rest of the world for most things, but we should add something else to the list? Not sure I understand.
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1825
- Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2019 7:43 pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 219 times
Re: Labour Watch
Ignore it thenCEB2ElectricBoogaloo wrote: ↑Tue Apr 15, 2025 8:55 amThe “therefore” doesn’t make sense in that post
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 5468
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:48 pm
- Has thanked: 2463 times
- Been thanked: 1930 times
Re: Labour Watch
Y....you did?George M wrote: ↑Tue Apr 15, 2025 9:53 amWho said it’s bad ?Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Tue Apr 15, 2025 9:22 amSo it's bad that we rely on the rest of the world for most things, but we should add something else to the list? Not sure I understand.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13405
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 2730 times
Re: Labour Watch
It would be cheaper and better for the environment if we reopened one of our coal mines and used our own coal instead of importing it from the other side of the world
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 5468
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:48 pm
- Has thanked: 2463 times
- Been thanked: 1930 times
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4955
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 3:36 pm
- Has thanked: 1227 times
- Been thanked: 854 times
Re: Labour Watch
You reckon? I think you need to consider how much it would take to "re-open" a coal mine as most have been flattened and/or built over by now.RedDwarf 1881 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 15, 2025 1:04 pmIt would be cheaper and better for the environment if we reopened one of our coal mines and used our own coal instead of importing it from the other side of the world
- Dunners
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9926
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 1219 times
- Been thanked: 2739 times
Re: Labour Watch
Can't we just invade some third-world failed state, shoot the locals, and then steal their oil? And sink a few Spanish galleons on the way home just for good measure.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13405
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 2730 times
Re: Labour Watch
I didn't know they were all built over or flattened . Short sighted if they are .BoniO wrote: ↑Tue Apr 15, 2025 3:07 pmYou reckon? I think you need to consider how much it would take to "re-open" a coal mine as most have been flattened and/or built over by now.RedDwarf 1881 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 15, 2025 1:04 pmIt would be cheaper and better for the environment if we reopened one of our coal mines and used our own coal instead of importing it from the other side of the world
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1825
- Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2019 7:43 pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 219 times
Re: Labour Watch
Read Dunners post and it doesn’t hold water. If we have to import the raw materials to produce steel then we don’t have national security anyway. And , by the way , we don’t have it with food eitherFather Ted Crilly wrote: ↑Sun Apr 13, 2025 9:26 amRead dunners post above. Not sure why you’re going on about subsidising other industries.George M wrote: ↑Sat Apr 12, 2025 8:54 pmIt isn’t. How about all of our other businesses that struggle or fail because of cheaper imports. Shall we subsidise them all. We have tried all that before. It doesn’t workFather Ted Crilly wrote: ↑Sat Apr 12, 2025 8:48 pm £700k per day = £255.5M Pa. In terms of our economy it’s a tiny amount to retain the crucial ability to produce steel.
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 15184
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2692 times
- Been thanked: 3486 times
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1825
- Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2019 7:43 pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 219 times
Re: Labour Watch
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvg7q0e77exo
To all those who foolishly believed that we were already protected from migrants with criminal intent
To all those who foolishly believed that we were already protected from migrants with criminal intent
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 15184
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2692 times
- Been thanked: 3486 times
Re: Labour Watch
Criminal intent?
Article clearly says
Terrorists, war criminals and any other criminals whose offences carry a sentence of one year or more can already be refused asylum under the Refugee Convention
Article clearly says
Terrorists, war criminals and any other criminals whose offences carry a sentence of one year or more can already be refused asylum under the Refugee Convention
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1825
- Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2019 7:43 pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 219 times
Re: Labour Watch
And sex offenders .And if they don’t have passports they don’t have history !Long slender neck wrote: ↑Tue Apr 29, 2025 7:38 am Criminal intent?
Article clearly says
Terrorists, war criminals and any other criminals whose offences carry a sentence of one year or more can already be refused asylum under the Refugee Convention