Statement from Nigel Travis

[Ronnie Hotdogs]

What actually happened against Southend?

[Beradogs]

Not suitable for the network. Please phone me.

[Smendrick Feaselberg]

"Please take this as a strong warning. There will be no exceptions, regardless of the individual’s position or history with the Club."

I'm OFFicially intrigued. Great statement mind.

Nothing to be intrigued about. He's just making its clear to absolutely everyone about the club's position. Sometimes some people are inclined to read something and think that somehow it does not apply to them. This disabuses them of that.

The fact Travis needed to word it like that when sending out an OFFicial warning is telling though. Why say that unless there was evidence of abuse from someone, irrespective of who they are, with special club privileges?

[Story of O]

OFF was not there.

[Smendrick Feaselberg]

OFF was not there.

Yes, that's already been raised in another thread. The message from Travis mentions future action to be taken for future abuse though and he's clearly warning certain people, not just OFF, that they might want to think twice if they fancied gobbing off with racial abuse in future.

[Ronnie Hotdogs]

OFF was not there.

Yes, that's already been raised in this thread. The message from Travis mentions future action to be taken for future abuse though and he's clearly warning certain people, not just OFF, that they might want to think twice before gobbing off.

Nigel has not mentioned anything about 'gobbing off'. It's clearly to do with racialist comments.

Why if OFFs name even being dragged into this?

[Smendrick Feaselberg]

OFF was not there.

Yes, that's already been raised in this thread. The message from Travis mentions future action to be taken for future abuse though and he's clearly warning certain people, not just OFF, that they might want to think twice before gobbing off.

Nigel has not mentioned anything about 'gobbing off'. It's clearly to do with racialist comments.

Why if OFFs name even being dragged into this?

I should have clarified that when I said gobbing off I meant gobbing off with racial abuse. I'll edit my post to make that clear. But I've clearly said it's a warning to all people irrespective of their history and standing within the club, not just OFF.

[Ronnie Hotdogs]

Why the need to add the 'not just OFF' comment though?

[Smendrick Feaselberg]

Because he has been raised in this thread already.

[Ronnie Hotdogs]

By you.

[Smendrick Feaselberg]

By you.

I think you'll find it was the below post where it was brought up.

"Please take this as a strong warning. There will be no exceptions, regardless of the individual’s position or history with the Club."

I'm OFFicially intrigued. Great statement mind.

And then he was referred to again in the below before I commented to support that.

OFF was not there.

[Rich Tea Wellin]

Think it’s a bit harsh to bring him into it. He might not be everyone’s cup of tea but for all his berating of the opposition, it’s never racist.

[aylesburyos]

Matt was not even there. no need to bring him into it. He is most certainly not racist

[P&O]

Sorry chaps, but I think I’m missing something.

Who is OFF?

[Lucky7]

Why is Matt even been mentioned in this thread ?

[Lucky7]

Sorry chaps, but I think I’m missing something.

Who is OFF?

No 1 Orient super fan I say that very loosely sits in the West editor of pandamonium sits on the loft committee likes the opposing dug out to hear his voice

[P&O]

Sorry chaps, but I think I’m missing something.

Who is OFF?

No 1 Orient super fan I say that very loosely sits in the West editor of pandamonium sits on the loft committee likes the opposing dug out to hear his voice

And is a racist?

[Ronnie Hotdogs]

At last, some sense has been restored. The message from Nigel on racism has nothing to do with OFF. Can we now please drop his name from the subject?

[spen666]

Censorship

[Lucky7]

Sorry chaps, but I think I’m missing something.

Who is OFF?

No 1 Orient super fan I say that very loosely sits in the West editor of pandamonium sits on the loft committee likes the opposing dug out to hear his voice

And is a racist?

Absolutely NOT!!!!

[BoniO]

Censorship

Sinking ship.

[P&O]

Censorship

After your first two attempts to get a reaction on this thread failed miserably this is what you’re reduced to?

Absolutely staggering that not only did you manage to weasel out of a perma ban but escaped re-banning after being caught out breaking the rules again with multiple accounts.

I’m sure that your grovelling promise to the mods to behave after you avoided a repeat ban didn’t include sticking up for nonces and wumming on a thread about racism.

Have no idea what the mods are thinking letting you continuously break the rules without punishment.

[spen666]

Censorship

After your first two attempts to get a reaction on this thread failed miserably this is what you’re reduced to?

Absolutely staggering that not only did you manage to weasel out of a perma ban but escaped re-banning after being caught out breaking the rules again with multiple accounts.

I’m sure that your grovelling promise to the mods to behave after you avoided a repeat ban didn’t include sticking up for nonces and wumming on a thread about racism.

Have no idea what the mods are thinking letting you continuously break the rules without punishment.

Snowflake alert


Saying censorship is hardly Wumming.

It's a perfect description of what I was commenting on?

BTW before you threw you toys out of the pram with your rant, do you even know what I was referring to by the word "censorship"?

No, thought not

Censorship by moderators would prevent people accusing OFF of something he is not here to defend himself from.

Or do you just prefer to mindlessly abuse people?

It's ironic you get so worked up about me suggesting censorship may be a way to solve a problem raised by others and then you demand censorship of me (by banning me posting) for suggesting censorship

How hypocritical?

[P&O]

Censorship

After your first two attempts to get a reaction on this thread failed miserably this is what you’re reduced to?

Absolutely staggering that not only did you manage to weasel out of a perma ban but escaped re-banning after being caught out breaking the rules again with multiple accounts.

I’m sure that your grovelling promise to the mods to behave after you avoided a repeat ban didn’t include sticking up for nonces and wumming on a thread about racism.

Have no idea what the mods are thinking letting you continuously break the rules without punishment.

Snowflake alert


Saying censorship is hardly Wumming.

It's a perfect description of what I was commenting on?

BTW before you threw you toys out of the pram with your rant, do you even know what I was referring to by the word "censorship"?

No, thought not

Censorship by moderators would prevent people accusing OFF of something he is not here to defend himself from.

Or do you just prefer to mindlessly abuse people?

It's ironic you get so worked up about me suggesting censorship may be a way to solve a problem raised by others and then you demand censorship of me (by banning me posting) for suggesting censorship

How hypocritical?

Asking for the mods to reinstate the ban you received for breaking the board rules (and then continuing to break rules after your ban was lifted) is not “censorship”.

I suppose you think it was “censorship” when all the fake accounts you were using were shut down as well?

Why the mods decided to make you untouchable really is beyond me. It appears that no matter what rule you break you are able to get away with it.

Baffling.

[Long slender neck]

Big statement yet the club have a 'proud' racist forking the pitch at half time.