Dan Potts

[moonwalk19]

With Beckles being injured last night . Dan Potts has had his short term contract expired with Charlton.He is a C/h come Full back who we can sign till the end of the season. Has played this season so must be fit

[essexfootball]

I think these sort of players would be perfect, short-term deal with option for longer, player comes in wanting to prove themselves, can obviously play at this level or a be a squad player

It is time to get the cheque book out in a sensible way

[B.whitehouse+10more]

Why did Charlton not sign him ?

[Berin]

He's 5'8" and played 1 league game and 2 trophy games this season. Pass.

[essexfootball]

Why did Charlton not sign him ?

Just didn't play him, no real injury record, looks like Nathan Jones just didn't rate/fancy him

[georgeleyo]

Injury prone imissed most of last season with a bad one

[Omygawd]

He's 5'8" and played 1 league game and 2 trophy games this season. Pass.

God, I first speed read that as 58.

[PKM]

Injury prone imissed most of last season with a bad one

Should fit in well then, get him in the building Lingy

[redintheface]

Scored the winning penalty at Wembley to put Luton Town in the PL in 2023. If Beckles injury is a long term one then we could do far worse than enquiring about a short term deal with Potts imho.

[RedDwarf 1881]

Scored the winning penalty at Wembley to put Luton Town in the PL in 2023. If Beckles injury is a long term one then we could do far worse than enquiring about a short term deal with Potts imho.

Simpson is back shortly so we should have 3 fit centre backs . We should be OK with the CB positions .Use that money for a midfielder or striker instead.

[DelightInE10]

would rather spend the money on a striker, but with perkins apparently being signed on a perm, we could potentially get a striker in on loan (mainly as backup to kelman) and as we wouldn't have to spend as much (obviously wages), we could bring in dan potts. Kelmans eventually gonna have fitness issues if we play him twice a week every week, he needs a backup

[The Mindsweep]

would rather spend the money on a striker, but with perkins apparently being signed on a perm, we could potentially get a striker in on loan (mainly as backup to kelman) and as we wouldn't have to spend as much (obviously wages), we could bring in dan potts. Kelmans eventually gonna have fitness issues if we play him twice a week every week, he needs a backup

Perkins is being signed because we are over our loan quota for matchday squads (5). Any newbies will be perms or temps.

[DelightInE10]

would rather spend the money on a striker, but with perkins apparently being signed on a perm, we could potentially get a striker in on loan (mainly as backup to kelman) and as we wouldn't have to spend as much (obviously wages), we could bring in dan potts. Kelmans eventually gonna have fitness issues if we play him twice a week every week, he needs a backup

Perkins is being signed because we are over our loan quota for matchday squads (5). Any newbies will be perms or temps.

frees up a loan spot to get a striker in on loan to back up Kelman

[The Mindsweep]

would rather spend the money on a striker, but with perkins apparently being signed on a perm, we could potentially get a striker in on loan (mainly as backup to kelman) and as we wouldn't have to spend as much (obviously wages), we could bring in dan potts. Kelmans eventually gonna have fitness issues if we play him twice a week every week, he needs a backup

Perkins is being signed because we are over our loan quota for matchday squads (5). Any newbies will be perms or temps.

frees up a loan spot to get a striker in on loan to back up Kelman

We already have too many loans (6), that is why Perkins is being signed!

[DelightInE10]

Perkins is being signed because we are over our loan quota for matchday squads (5). Any newbies will be perms or temps.

frees up a loan spot to get a striker in on loan to back up Kelman

We already have too many loans (6), that is why Perkins is being signed!

Sorry didnt realise that, I am an idiot

[moonwalk19]

would rather spend the money on a striker, but with perkins apparently being signed on a perm, we could potentially get a striker in on loan (mainly as backup to kelman) and as we wouldn't have to spend as much (obviously wages), we could bring in dan potts. Kelmans eventually gonna have fitness issues if we play him twice a week every week, he needs a backup

We have our on loan quota of 5 without Perkins being one of them. That’s the reason why Perkins has not played recently. No point in getting another loanee if he can’t be included in the match day squad

[moonwalk19]

would rather spend the money on a striker, but with perkins apparently being signed on a perm, we could potentially get a striker in on loan (mainly as backup to kelman) and as we wouldn't have to spend as much (obviously wages), we could bring in dan potts. Kelmans eventually gonna have fitness issues if we play him twice a week every week, he needs a backup

We have our on loan quota of 5 without Perkins being one of them. That’s the reason why Perkins has not played recently. No point in getting another loanee if he can’t be included in the match day squad

Sorry forrepeating that somebody has already said