Harris v. Trump

Chat about Leyton Orient (or anything else)

Moderator: Long slender neck

User avatar
Hoover Attack
Regular
Regular
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:41 am
Has thanked: 608 times
Been thanked: 1219 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by Hoover Attack »

I don’t really do American politics but never mind policies, am I right in thinking the best candidates the Democrats could offer up in the last 8 years have been Hilary Clinton, Jo Biden and Kamala Harris? That’s not very good really, is it.
RedDwarf 1881
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12430
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 2543 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by RedDwarf 1881 »

Hoover Attack wrote: Thu Nov 07, 2024 12:19 am I don’t really do American politics but never mind policies, am I right in thinking the best candidates the Democrats could offer up in the last 8 years have been Hilary Clinton, Jo Biden and Kamala Harris? That’s not very good really, is it.
No , it's not . In fact is bloody abysmal .
Yanzi Gravy
Fresh Alias
Posts: 211
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2024 2:55 pm
Has thanked: 136 times
Been thanked: 23 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by Yanzi Gravy »

Dunners wrote: Wed Nov 06, 2024 5:57 pm
I think Tromp said the same about Hull’s Leader when they elected him.
User avatar
Dunners
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 8919
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
Has thanked: 1053 times
Been thanked: 2479 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by Dunners »

Dunners wrote: Wed Nov 06, 2024 6:09 pm
Currywurst and Chips wrote: Wed Nov 06, 2024 4:11 pm For the older boarders and politics/history aficionados on the board.

Better comeback than Nixon?
Yes. It's incredible.
This clip shows how the political establishment tried to mock and humiliate him. The condescending smugness of Obama now makes him look ridiculous in retrospect.

We can agree that Trump is an abhorrent person, but anyone who doesn't now respect his determinism and resilience is doomed to forever underestimate their opponents and always blames others for their own shortcomings.

CEB2ElectricBoogaloo
Fresh Alias
Posts: 630
Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2024 12:08 pm
Has thanked: 181 times
Been thanked: 191 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by CEB2ElectricBoogaloo »

I don’t think he’s “resilient” so much as he’s just incapable of dealing with not getting what he wants, with the resources to never have to stop trying. Wouldn’t say that that’s particularly worthy of respect.
Give it to Jabo
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2636
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 9:34 pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 409 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by Give it to Jabo »

Long slender neck wrote: Wed Nov 06, 2024 2:54 pm Have the violent protests started yet?
I see that Biden is going to help Trump with the transfer of power and that Harris HAS conceded. The offer was NOT reciprocated when Trump lost. We should expect civility from politicians..
User avatar
Dunners
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 8919
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
Has thanked: 1053 times
Been thanked: 2479 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by Dunners »

CEB2ElectricBoogaloo wrote: Thu Nov 07, 2024 9:17 am I don’t think he’s “resilient” so much as he’s just incapable of dealing with not getting what he wants, with the resources to never have to stop trying. Wouldn’t say that that’s particularly worthy of respect.
That clip was from 2011. 13 years ago. Aside from Trump, the only other person I know who cannot let something go and will keep at it for that length of time is you.
oxo
Fresh Alias
Posts: 341
Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 8:46 am
Has thanked: 324 times
Been thanked: 110 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by oxo »

Long slender neck wrote: Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:01 pm Why don't the goodies have some policies that would actually excite and inspire people?
Corbyn’s policies, when put to voters, were very popular but the RW press was very successful at painting him personally as unfit for office cos he didn’t wear a tie or ate lentils or whatever

https://ukandeu.ac.uk/john-curtice-labo ... -policies/
oxo
Fresh Alias
Posts: 341
Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 8:46 am
Has thanked: 324 times
Been thanked: 110 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by oxo »

Dunners wrote: Thu Nov 07, 2024 9:20 am
CEB2ElectricBoogaloo wrote: Thu Nov 07, 2024 9:17 am I don’t think he’s “resilient” so much as he’s just incapable of dealing with not getting what he wants, with the resources to never have to stop trying. Wouldn’t say that that’s particularly worthy of respect.
That clip was from 2011. 13 years ago. Aside from Trump, the only other person I know who cannot let something go and will keep at it for that length of time is you.
Pathological narcissism is a helluva drug

Edit: in case it’s unclear I’m referring to Trump not see eee bee
oxo
Fresh Alias
Posts: 341
Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 8:46 am
Has thanked: 324 times
Been thanked: 110 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by oxo »

RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:57 am
Hoover Attack wrote: Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:54 am
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:49 am

The problem is there's no point branding your political opponents things like that while having no answers for fixing the problems that you , yourself created . Trump is back in power because of the failure of left wing policies . Edit . I agree with your second point . I don't think the Democrats could have chosen a worse candidate who in turn chose the worse running mate . I still believe anybody half decent who actually knew what they were talking about would have given Trump a much tougher race
😂

What left wing?
What are the Democrats ? Answers on a postcard please . Anyway I know you're not that thick Tuffers . I know you just like to tease . :D
They’re centrists, American politicians doesn’t have a functioning left wing
oxo
Fresh Alias
Posts: 341
Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 8:46 am
Has thanked: 324 times
Been thanked: 110 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by oxo »

Wally Banter wrote: Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:04 am The most depressing element here is how far we are away from a society in which most people (including myself in this) can:

- understand political issues (like the economy) at even a rudimentary level;
- recognise non-defensively the influences of power and oppression
- properly appraise information and its credibility (including media bias)
- explore their individual unconscious biases and insecurities, and how these might affect their decisions
- listen to opposing views with openness and empathy, rather than blaming, attacking and judging which only widens the divide with others

I wish these things would be prioritised in education, so that we might end up with future generations of astute, politically engaged, reasonable people.
Maybe someone should send this to matey from Hope Not Hate?
Mistadobalina
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2410
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 1:13 pm
Has thanked: 239 times
Been thanked: 1118 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by Mistadobalina »

Dunners wrote: Thu Nov 07, 2024 9:08 am
Dunners wrote: Wed Nov 06, 2024 6:09 pm
Currywurst and Chips wrote: Wed Nov 06, 2024 4:11 pm For the older boarders and politics/history aficionados on the board.

Better comeback than Nixon?
Yes. It's incredible.
This clip shows how the political establishment tried to mock and humiliate him. The condescending smugness of Obama now makes him look ridiculous in retrospect.

We can agree that Trump is an abhorrent person, but anyone who doesn't now respect his determinism and resilience is doomed to forever underestimate their opponents and always blames others for their own shortcomings.

Isn't this a bit of a retcon? Trump had been spending years promoting a racist conspiracy theory about Obama, which is what really launched his political career. That being a racist didn't immediately disqualify the guy but actually gave him a platform to build from his a key part of his rise.
User avatar
Long slender neck
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 14252
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
Has thanked: 2490 times
Been thanked: 3274 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by Long slender neck »

oxo wrote: Thu Nov 07, 2024 9:26 am
Long slender neck wrote: Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:01 pm Why don't the goodies have some policies that would actually excite and inspire people?
Corbyn’s policies, when put to voters, were very popular but the RW press was very successful at painting him personally as unfit for office cos he didn’t wear a tie or ate lentils or whatever

https://ukandeu.ac.uk/john-curtice-labo ... -policies/
If only he didnt love terrorists etc.
User avatar
Dunners
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 8919
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
Has thanked: 1053 times
Been thanked: 2479 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by Dunners »

oxo wrote: Thu Nov 07, 2024 9:33 am
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:57 am
Hoover Attack wrote: Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:54 am

😂

What left wing?
What are the Democrats ? Answers on a postcard please . Anyway I know you're not that thick Tuffers . I know you just like to tease . :D
They’re centrists, American politicians doesn’t have a functioning left wing
I read that many trade unions are increasingly aligned with the Republicans. Depending on the definition of left wing, if true*, that would increasingly make the GOP the party of the working class, and the Democrats the party of the liberal progressive class.


*I genuinely have no idea if it's true or not and have no intention of looking it up.
User avatar
Hoover Attack
Regular
Regular
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:41 am
Has thanked: 608 times
Been thanked: 1219 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by Hoover Attack »

Long slender neck wrote: Thu Nov 07, 2024 9:50 am
oxo wrote: Thu Nov 07, 2024 9:26 am
Long slender neck wrote: Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:01 pm Why don't the goodies have some policies that would actually excite and inspire people?
Corbyn’s policies, when put to voters, were very popular but the RW press was very successful at painting him personally as unfit for office cos he didn’t wear a tie or ate lentils or whatever

https://ukandeu.ac.uk/john-curtice-labo ... -policies/
If only he didnt love terrorists etc.
See above - the RW press were very successful at painting a lifelong anti-war, anti-racism man as a terrorist loving racist.

Some thickos still believe it to this day.
User avatar
Dunners
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 8919
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
Has thanked: 1053 times
Been thanked: 2479 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by Dunners »

True. But then there were plenty of reasons for us smart people to also conclude that he was unfit for office (i.e. his response to the Russian state murdering people in Salisbury, his terrible management of his own party when dealing with his opponents and the 2019 election campaign, the Hamas funeral thing, etc).
User avatar
Hoover Attack
Regular
Regular
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:41 am
Has thanked: 608 times
Been thanked: 1219 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by Hoover Attack »

You’re right. May and then Johnson were so much more ‘fit for office’, whatever that means.
User avatar
Dunners
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 8919
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
Has thanked: 1053 times
Been thanked: 2479 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by Dunners »

Hoover Attack wrote: Thu Nov 07, 2024 10:05 am You’re right. May and then Johnson were so much more ‘fit for office’, whatever that means.
Hi Terry.
User avatar
Dunners
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 8919
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
Has thanked: 1053 times
Been thanked: 2479 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by Dunners »

Blimey. The Democrats couldn't even buy a win.

Image
CEB2ElectricBoogaloo
Fresh Alias
Posts: 630
Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2024 12:08 pm
Has thanked: 181 times
Been thanked: 191 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by CEB2ElectricBoogaloo »

Dunners wrote: Thu Nov 07, 2024 9:20 am
CEB2ElectricBoogaloo wrote: Thu Nov 07, 2024 9:17 am I don’t think he’s “resilient” so much as he’s just incapable of dealing with not getting what he wants, with the resources to never have to stop trying. Wouldn’t say that that’s particularly worthy of respect.
That clip was from 2011. 13 years ago. Aside from Trump, the only other person I know who cannot let something go and will keep at it for that length of time is you.
Exactly. Not letting something go isn’t something that takes effort - it’s a compulsion. He doesn’t deserve respect for it (and I certainly don’t deserve respect for the “not letting stuff go” thing - if anything I’m self aware enough to get that that’s an obnoxious barrier to me actually communicating well :D)
User avatar
Hoover Attack
Regular
Regular
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:41 am
Has thanked: 608 times
Been thanked: 1219 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by Hoover Attack »

Dunners wrote: Thu Nov 07, 2024 10:08 am Blimey. The Democrats couldn't even buy a win.

Image
Helps to keep your costs down when you know a bloke at Twitter…
CEB2ElectricBoogaloo
Fresh Alias
Posts: 630
Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2024 12:08 pm
Has thanked: 181 times
Been thanked: 191 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by CEB2ElectricBoogaloo »

Hoover Attack wrote: Thu Nov 07, 2024 10:05 am You’re right. May and then Johnson were so much more ‘fit for office’, whatever that means.
This is what is meant by the unwillingness of the left to reflect. May and Johnson were indeed unfit for office, but that doesn’t deal with the criticisms of Corbyn.

And I suspect that if the left want to get anywhere near power again, they will absolutely need to properly engage with the criticisms of left wing figures that have actual substance.

Otherwise, the left will be actively playing its part in politics being done without them.
Dohnut
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2872
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:03 pm
Has thanked: 308 times
Been thanked: 659 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by Dohnut »

Hoover Attack wrote: Thu Nov 07, 2024 9:59 am
Long slender neck wrote: Thu Nov 07, 2024 9:50 am
oxo wrote: Thu Nov 07, 2024 9:26 am

Corbyn’s policies, when put to voters, were very popular but the RW press was very successful at painting him personally as unfit for office cos he didn’t wear a tie or ate lentils or whatever

https://ukandeu.ac.uk/john-curtice-labo ... -policies/
If only he didnt love terrorists etc.
See above - the RW press were very successful at painting a lifelong anti-war, anti-racism man as a terrorist loving racist.

Some thickos still believe it to this day.
Some thickos are actually right.
Dohnut
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2872
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:03 pm
Has thanked: 308 times
Been thanked: 659 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by Dohnut »

Hoover Attack wrote: Thu Nov 07, 2024 10:16 am
Dunners wrote: Thu Nov 07, 2024 10:08 am Blimey. The Democrats couldn't even buy a win.

Image
Helps to keep your costs down when you know a bloke at Twitter…
Really!
User avatar
Dunners
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 8919
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
Has thanked: 1053 times
Been thanked: 2479 times

Re: Harris v. Trump

Post by Dunners »

Even some of the Novara mob are beginning to get it (which means they'll be hounded as traitors next).

Post Reply