Silly question. But is the rule that someone can’t have two consecutive terms or two terms total?Mistadobalina wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 12:37 pmIf I was really squinting my eyes for a glimmer of hope, it'd that overall turnout was down on the last election. Trump of 2024 loses to 2020 vote number wise. The Democrat vote simply didn't vote.Dunners wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 12:05 pm Some excellent analysis by Lewis Goodall.
" Trump won everywhere. He's going to win the popular vote. He did better across the demographics. He grew his coalition, better with black voters, Latinos, young voters. The US become less racially divided by party." Ouch.
However, 2028 is probably too late for the Democrats to get their arse into gear (if they are even capable of it). The Republicans will likely control every branch of government and use that power to bolt the door closed. Trump could get 2-3 supreme court picks in this term, meaning 2-3 more ultra conservative, young justices. He could put in a hard right massive majority on the court that will exist for longer than most boarders on here will live for.
They - and by extension - we are f*cked.
Harris v. Trump
Moderator: Long slender neck
- Rich Tea Wellin
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10549
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:01 pm
- Has thanked: 4569 times
- Been thanked: 3248 times
Re: Harris v. Trump
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 705
- Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2024 12:08 pm
- Has thanked: 193 times
- Been thanked: 227 times
- Hoover Attack
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 5045
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 636 times
- Been thanked: 1271 times
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4707
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 3:36 pm
- Has thanked: 1119 times
- Been thanked: 757 times
Re: Harris v. Trump
Agree, and it was obvious this would be the most likely outcome even before we voted Brexit. We’ve been part of a Global Economy for decades. The only protection was to be part of a collective. To go it alone was way beyond stupid.Mistadobalina wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 11:41 amWe are completely isolated. I don't know what else Labour can do in this situation. We have put up massive barriers with our main trading partner and now our second main trading partner is in the hands of an isolationist who is proposing 10-20% on all imports. The nonsense we were sold about Global Britain is looking like a cruel cosmic joke - we couldn't have timed it worse.Rich Tea Wellin wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 11:02 amWell, luckily we have a strong Labour government who will stand up to Trump and his friends and not bend over backwards for them…
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 14325
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2511 times
- Been thanked: 3301 times
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 705
- Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2024 12:08 pm
- Has thanked: 193 times
- Been thanked: 227 times
- Currywurst and Chips
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6233
- Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:40 am
- Has thanked: 389 times
- Been thanked: 1487 times
Re: Harris v. Trump
She hasn’t conceded yet, very concerning as a smooth transfer of power is vital to democracy!
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2657
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 9:34 pm
- Has thanked: 102 times
- Been thanked: 411 times
Re: Harris v. Trump
I reckon she will, though.Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 3:18 pm She hasn’t conceded yet, very concerning as a smooth transfer of power is vital to democracy!
- Currywurst and Chips
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6233
- Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:40 am
- Has thanked: 389 times
- Been thanked: 1487 times
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2661
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 3:54 pm
- Has thanked: 1027 times
- Been thanked: 919 times
- Currywurst and Chips
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6233
- Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:40 am
- Has thanked: 389 times
- Been thanked: 1487 times
Re: Harris v. Trump
For the older boarders and politics/history aficionados on the board.
Better comeback than Nixon?
Better comeback than Nixon?
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2023 11:44 am
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Harris v. Trump
Time for Kamala to ask how Trump knew he was going to win big at his last rally. The polls were still showing neck and neck. A conspiracy theory in the making and if Kamala states doubts often enough people might believe it. That's how the master operates.
- Dunners
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9043
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 1075 times
- Been thanked: 2500 times
- Dunners
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9043
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 1075 times
- Been thanked: 2500 times
Re: Harris v. Trump
Yes. It's incredible.Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 4:11 pm For the older boarders and politics/history aficionados on the board.
Better comeback than Nixon?
- Rich Tea Wellin
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10549
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:01 pm
- Has thanked: 4569 times
- Been thanked: 3248 times
Re: Harris v. Trump
It did cross my mind…65AndCounting wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 5:19 pm Time for Kamala to ask how Trump knew he was going to win big at his last rally. The polls were still showing neck and neck. A conspiracy theory in the making and if Kamala states doubts often enough people might believe it. That's how the master operates.
- Currywurst and Chips
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6233
- Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:40 am
- Has thanked: 389 times
- Been thanked: 1487 times
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1249
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 7:54 am
- Has thanked: 242 times
- Been thanked: 685 times
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 14325
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2511 times
- Been thanked: 3301 times
Re: Harris v. Trump
Why don't the goodies have some policies that would actually excite and inspire people?
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1295
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 11:11 pm
- Has thanked: 178 times
- Been thanked: 418 times
Re: Harris v. Trump
Neither of them seemed to have any policies at all. Harris didn’t speak of any, and all Trump did was to say “I’ll fix this” and that was it. No plans, no costing, nothing.
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 7:59 am
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 6 times
Re: Harris v. Trump
Should have said “Fully Costed, Fully Funded”. That strategy seems to be worth a few votes ! Trump has plenty of policies (border wall, legal immigration only, illegals deportation, trade tariffs particularly on China, manufacturing jobs in USA, energy production, reduce gas prices, NATO countries paying their way, No men in womens sport, Peace through strength, extending tax cuts, etc). These policies seem to have won Trump plenty of votes !
As for Harris, well it was just carry on as before. Not what the voters wanted to hear !
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2597
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:15 am
- Has thanked: 106 times
- Been thanked: 627 times
Re: Harris v. Trump
This shouldn't be surprising economic migrants love the concept of shutting the door behind them, so those they left behind don't get the same benefit as them.RedDwarf 1881 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 11:19 amI heard on the radio that they reckon 1 on 4 black men voted Republican plus the highest ever number of Hispanics and Asian Americans voted Republican . Not bad for a Nazi , wouldn't you say . Of course all those Democrat smears was just a load of old bollocks .Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 11:10 am Looking at the results it appears Trump has won convincingly thanks in part to improving his numbers massively with typical white supremacist demographics such as non white voters and young voters
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 7:59 am
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 6 times
Re: Harris v. Trump
I believe the USA accepts over 1m legal migrants every year. I guess that included Nigel Travis at some point. So the message for all those that want to follow in Nigel’s footsteps is fill in the paperwork and wait your turn. Seems fair.Adz wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 11:37 pmThis shouldn't be surprising economic migrants love the concept of shutting the door behind them, so those they left behind don't get the same benefit as them.RedDwarf 1881 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 11:19 amI heard on the radio that they reckon 1 on 4 black men voted Republican plus the highest ever number of Hispanics and Asian Americans voted Republican . Not bad for a Nazi , wouldn't you say . Of course all those Democrat smears was just a load of old bollocks .Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 11:10 am Looking at the results it appears Trump has won convincingly thanks in part to improving his numbers massively with typical white supremacist demographics such as non white voters and young voters
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4725
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:48 pm
- Has thanked: 2071 times
- Been thanked: 1696 times
Re: Harris v. Trump
Hahahaha I went to Uni with him. One of those pol-geeks who went straight from graduation to standing as a Cllr until he finally got a seat. Incredible that he's Leader of the Council.
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4725
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:48 pm
- Has thanked: 2071 times
- Been thanked: 1696 times
Re: Harris v. Trump
There's just no other way.Long slender neck wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:01 pm Why don't the goodies have some policies that would actually excite and inspire people?