Harris v. Trump
Moderator: Long slender neck
- Dunners
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9043
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 1075 times
- Been thanked: 2500 times
- Dunners
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9043
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 1075 times
- Been thanked: 2500 times
- Dunners
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9043
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 1075 times
- Been thanked: 2500 times
Re: Harris v. Trump
The UK Labour party aren't the only ones to have committed a diplomatic faux pas.
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 230
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2024 2:55 pm
- Has thanked: 154 times
- Been thanked: 25 times
Re: Harris v. Trump
That Zelenskyy a bigger liability than Trump for sure. He is an inexperienced maniac.
- Dunners
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9043
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 1075 times
- Been thanked: 2500 times
Re: Harris v. Trump
We can expect loads more of this codswallop. Meaningless soundbites and phrases uttered without any substance from a political class who still sleep under a pre-2008 comfort blanket.
I mean, what does "pro-climate" or "pro-women" even mean?
I mean, what does "pro-climate" or "pro-women" even mean?
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1249
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 7:54 am
- Has thanked: 242 times
- Been thanked: 685 times
Re: Harris v. Trump
The most depressing element here is how far we are away from a society in which most people (including myself in this) can:
- understand political issues (like the economy) at even a rudimentary level;
- recognise non-defensively the influences of power and oppression
- properly appraise information and its credibility (including media bias)
- explore their individual unconscious biases and insecurities, and how these might affect their decisions
- listen to opposing views with openness and empathy, rather than blaming, attacking and judging which only widens the divide with others
I wish these things would be prioritised in education, so that we might end up with future generations of astute, politically engaged, reasonable people.
- understand political issues (like the economy) at even a rudimentary level;
- recognise non-defensively the influences of power and oppression
- properly appraise information and its credibility (including media bias)
- explore their individual unconscious biases and insecurities, and how these might affect their decisions
- listen to opposing views with openness and empathy, rather than blaming, attacking and judging which only widens the divide with others
I wish these things would be prioritised in education, so that we might end up with future generations of astute, politically engaged, reasonable people.
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 343
- Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 8:46 am
- Has thanked: 330 times
- Been thanked: 110 times
Re: Harris v. Trump
Probably the most clear-headed post I’ve ever seen on hereWally Banter wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:04 am The most depressing element here is how far we are away from a society in which most people (including myself in this) can:
- understand political issues (like the economy) at even a rudimentary level;
- recognise non-defensively the influences of power and oppression
- properly appraise information and its credibility (including media bias)
- explore their individual unconscious biases and insecurities, and how these might affect their decisions
- listen to opposing views with openness and empathy, rather than blaming, attacking and judging which only widens the divide with others
I wish these things would be prioritised in education, so that we might end up with future generations of astute, politically engaged, reasonable people.
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2433
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 1:13 pm
- Has thanked: 244 times
- Been thanked: 1126 times
Re: Harris v. Trump
UK really pissing in the wind now, USA free trade deal was the big 'prize' of Brexit. Instead we're going to get hammered by trade tariffs without an economic bloc to attach ourselves to as the world gets a lot more protectionist.
- Hoover Attack
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 5045
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 636 times
- Been thanked: 1271 times
Re: Harris v. Trump
Agreed this is the state of things but it’s not by chance.Wally Banter wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:04 am The most depressing element here is how far we are away from a society in which most people (including myself in this) can:
- understand political issues (like the economy) at even a rudimentary level;
- recognise non-defensively the influences of power and oppression
- properly appraise information and its credibility (including media bias)
- explore their individual unconscious biases and insecurities, and how these might affect their decisions
- listen to opposing views with openness and empathy, rather than blaming, attacking and judging which only widens the divide with others
I wish these things would be prioritised in education, so that we might end up with future generations of astute, politically engaged, reasonable people.
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 705
- Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2024 12:08 pm
- Has thanked: 193 times
- Been thanked: 227 times
Re: Harris v. Trump
Yep. “We’ve had enough of experts” springs to mind.
Trump has always just been someone who happened to be very well placed to benefit from what Wally says
Trump has always just been someone who happened to be very well placed to benefit from what Wally says
- Hoover Attack
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 5045
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 636 times
- Been thanked: 1271 times
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1249
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 7:54 am
- Has thanked: 242 times
- Been thanked: 685 times
Re: Harris v. Trump
Of course; what powerful person would want a politically educated public?Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:16 amAgreed this is the state of things but it’s not by chance.Wally Banter wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:04 am The most depressing element here is how far we are away from a society in which most people (including myself in this) can:
- understand political issues (like the economy) at even a rudimentary level;
- recognise non-defensively the influences of power and oppression
- properly appraise information and its credibility (including media bias)
- explore their individual unconscious biases and insecurities, and how these might affect their decisions
- listen to opposing views with openness and empathy, rather than blaming, attacking and judging which only widens the divide with others
I wish these things would be prioritised in education, so that we might end up with future generations of astute, politically engaged, reasonable people.
- Dunners
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9043
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 1075 times
- Been thanked: 2500 times
Re: Harris v. Trump
So, who is against a climate? That suggests there are people who think a climate is a bad idea.Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:20 am‘Pro’ means for. It comes from the Latin word ‘pro’, which means ‘for’.
- Rich Tea Wellin
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10549
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:01 pm
- Has thanked: 4569 times
- Been thanked: 3248 times
- Rich Tea Wellin
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10549
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:01 pm
- Has thanked: 4569 times
- Been thanked: 3248 times
Re: Harris v. Trump
It’s bollocks - trump is clearly very pro-womenDunners wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:25 amSo, who is against a climate? That suggests there are people who think a climate is a bad idea.Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:20 am‘Pro’ means for. It comes from the Latin word ‘pro’, which means ‘for’.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12502
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 2555 times
Re: Harris v. Trump
That's because we have the wrong party in power .Mistadobalina wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:15 am UK really pissing in the wind now, USA free trade deal was the big 'prize' of Brexit. Instead we're going to get hammered by trade tariffs without an economic bloc to attach ourselves to as the world gets a lot more protectionist.
- Hoover Attack
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 5045
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 636 times
- Been thanked: 1271 times
Re: Harris v. Trump
Not sure where you’re going with this?Dunners wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:25 amSo, who is against a climate? That suggests there are people who think a climate is a bad idea.Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:20 am‘Pro’ means for. It comes from the Latin word ‘pro’, which means ‘for’.
- Dunners
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9043
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 1075 times
- Been thanked: 2500 times
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12502
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 2555 times
Re: Harris v. Trump
Actually , I'm amazed Harris managed to get as many votes as she did . Ah, latest score has just come up on TV 276 for Trump 219 for Harris .
- Dunners
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9043
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 1075 times
- Been thanked: 2500 times
Re: Harris v. Trump
Has she actually managed to perform worse than Biden did in the last election in every county?
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12502
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 2555 times
Re: Harris v. Trump
I don't know but I don't think Biden could have done any worse . Bloke on TV has just said Trump blew it out the park
Last edited by RedDwarf 1881 on Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Harris v. Trump
Well done to Trump and the Republicans, who won well. A victory for fascists, Nazis and garbage everywhere.
Hard not to feel sympathy for the Democrat leadership and liberal elite who chose probably the only person who could have lost to Trump. They put identity politics above competence and have paid the price.
Hard not to feel sympathy for the Democrat leadership and liberal elite who chose probably the only person who could have lost to Trump. They put identity politics above competence and have paid the price.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12502
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 2555 times
Re: Harris v. Trump
The problem is there's no point branding your political opponents things like that while having no answers for fixing the problems that you , yourself created . Trump is back in power because of the failure of left wing policies . Edit . I agree with your second point . I don't think the Democrats could have chosen a worse candidate who in turn chose the worse running mate . I still believe anybody half decent who actually knew what they were talking about would have given Trump a much tougher racefaldO wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:43 am Well done to Trump and the Republicans, who won well. A victory for fascists, Nazis and garbage everywhere.
Hard not to feel sympathy for the Democrat leadership and liberal elite who chose probably the only person who could have lost to Trump. They put identity politics above competence and have paid the price.
- Currywurst and Chips
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6233
- Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:40 am
- Has thanked: 389 times
- Been thanked: 1487 times