Irrelevant as Wrexham were bought when they didn't own their ground. Wasn't purchased until 2022 when bought from Wrexham University., The takeover happened in 2020 when they were Non League.Adz wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2024 10:12 pmYeah, but when you're an established top flight team the ancillary money you make from using your ground is insignificant compared to the TV money. For a league 1 team it is not.Bandy Legs wrote: ↑Sun Oct 27, 2024 3:41 pmEtihad not owned by Man City but by Manchester City Council.
St James Park not owned by Newcastle but by Newcastle City Council
Stamford Bridge not owned by Chelsea but by Chelsea pitch owners
London Stadium not owned by West Ham but by the Greater London Authority
AS Roma Lazio Inter & Ac Milan
4 other Huge clubs who Do Not OWN the ground they play in.
This belief that not owning your own ground will negate investment seems a little off
Would we be better off in L2?
Moderator: Long slender neck
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 353
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2024 8:37 pm
- Has thanked: 64 times
- Been thanked: 40 times
Re: Would we be better off in L2?
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2605
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:15 am
- Has thanked: 106 times
- Been thanked: 627 times
Re: Would we be better off in L2?
You're saying irrelevant to me and using Wrexham as an example? They were bought by a bunch of billionaires with a monetisation plan of a tv show, that was totally unique model, and unlikely to ever work again. There's obviously gonna be exceptions but looking at 90% of the teams, what I said is the norm.Bandy Legs wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2024 11:59 pmIrrelevant as Wrexham were bought when they didn't own their ground. Wasn't purchased until 2022 when bought from Wrexham University., The takeover happened in 2020 when they were Non League.Adz wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2024 10:12 pmYeah, but when you're an established top flight team the ancillary money you make from using your ground is insignificant compared to the TV money. For a league 1 team it is not.Bandy Legs wrote: ↑Sun Oct 27, 2024 3:41 pm
Etihad not owned by Man City but by Manchester City Council.
St James Park not owned by Newcastle but by Newcastle City Council
Stamford Bridge not owned by Chelsea but by Chelsea pitch owners
London Stadium not owned by West Ham but by the Greater London Authority
AS Roma Lazio Inter & Ac Milan
4 other Huge clubs who Do Not OWN the ground they play in.
This belief that not owning your own ground will negate investment seems a little off
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 353
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2024 8:37 pm
- Has thanked: 64 times
- Been thanked: 40 times
Re: Would we be better off in L2?
Again Irrelevant, 1 media company has a great show, other media companies will want a show with similar ratings.Adz wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 1:09 amYou're saying irrelevant to me and using Wrexham as an example? They were bought by a bunch of billionaires with a monetisation plan of a tv show, that was totally unique model, and unlikely to ever work again. There's obviously gonna be exceptions but looking at 90% of the teams, what I said is the norm.Bandy Legs wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2024 11:59 pmIrrelevant as Wrexham were bought when they didn't own their ground. Wasn't purchased until 2022 when bought from Wrexham University., The takeover happened in 2020 when they were Non League.
It's not like Hilary & Tensing are the only people who have ever conquered Everest now is it