Would we be better off in L2?

Chat about Leyton Orient (or anything else)

Moderator: Long slender neck

Bandy Legs
Fresh Alias
Posts: 353
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2024 8:37 pm
Has thanked: 64 times
Been thanked: 40 times

Re: Would we be better off in L2?

Post by Bandy Legs »

Adz wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 10:12 pm
Bandy Legs wrote: Sun Oct 27, 2024 3:41 pm
o-no wrote: Sun Oct 27, 2024 3:28 pm

Let’s keep Barry’s packet out of it, but the fact is because of the self serving changes Barry made, the club is a lot less appealing than many others to any passing billionaire.
Etihad not owned by Man City but by Manchester City Council.
St James Park not owned by Newcastle but by Newcastle City Council
Stamford Bridge not owned by Chelsea but by Chelsea pitch owners
London Stadium not owned by West Ham but by the Greater London Authority
AS Roma Lazio Inter & Ac Milan
4 other Huge clubs who Do Not OWN the ground they play in.

This belief that not owning your own ground will negate investment seems a little off
Yeah, but when you're an established top flight team the ancillary money you make from using your ground is insignificant compared to the TV money. For a league 1 team it is not.
Irrelevant as Wrexham were bought when they didn't own their ground. Wasn't purchased until 2022 when bought from Wrexham University., The takeover happened in 2020 when they were Non League.
Adz
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2605
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:15 am
Has thanked: 106 times
Been thanked: 627 times

Re: Would we be better off in L2?

Post by Adz »

Bandy Legs wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 11:59 pm
Adz wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 10:12 pm
Bandy Legs wrote: Sun Oct 27, 2024 3:41 pm

Etihad not owned by Man City but by Manchester City Council.
St James Park not owned by Newcastle but by Newcastle City Council
Stamford Bridge not owned by Chelsea but by Chelsea pitch owners
London Stadium not owned by West Ham but by the Greater London Authority
AS Roma Lazio Inter & Ac Milan
4 other Huge clubs who Do Not OWN the ground they play in.

This belief that not owning your own ground will negate investment seems a little off
Yeah, but when you're an established top flight team the ancillary money you make from using your ground is insignificant compared to the TV money. For a league 1 team it is not.
Irrelevant as Wrexham were bought when they didn't own their ground. Wasn't purchased until 2022 when bought from Wrexham University., The takeover happened in 2020 when they were Non League.
You're saying irrelevant to me and using Wrexham as an example? They were bought by a bunch of billionaires with a monetisation plan of a tv show, that was totally unique model, and unlikely to ever work again. There's obviously gonna be exceptions but looking at 90% of the teams, what I said is the norm.
Bandy Legs
Fresh Alias
Posts: 353
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2024 8:37 pm
Has thanked: 64 times
Been thanked: 40 times

Re: Would we be better off in L2?

Post by Bandy Legs »

Adz wrote: Wed Oct 30, 2024 1:09 am
Bandy Legs wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 11:59 pm
Adz wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 10:12 pm

Yeah, but when you're an established top flight team the ancillary money you make from using your ground is insignificant compared to the TV money. For a league 1 team it is not.
Irrelevant as Wrexham were bought when they didn't own their ground. Wasn't purchased until 2022 when bought from Wrexham University., The takeover happened in 2020 when they were Non League.
You're saying irrelevant to me and using Wrexham as an example? They were bought by a bunch of billionaires with a monetisation plan of a tv show, that was totally unique model, and unlikely to ever work again. There's obviously gonna be exceptions but looking at 90% of the teams, what I said is the norm.
Again Irrelevant, 1 media company has a great show, other media companies will want a show with similar ratings.

It's not like Hilary & Tensing are the only people who have ever conquered Everest now is it
Post Reply