Got any evidence for that?Pagan Orient wrote: ↑Thu Oct 03, 2024 4:25 pmNot wanting to reduce politics to juvenile superficiality, but have you all noticed that on average the Tory women MPs are more attractive than their Labour counterparts? Could be a vote winner in 2029.
Labour Watch
Moderator: Long slender neck
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 14325
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2511 times
- Been thanked: 3301 times
Re: Labour Watch
- Hoover Attack
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 5045
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 636 times
- Been thanked: 1271 times
Re: Labour Watch
What sore of evidence do you want to see that he finds Tory lady MPs more attractive than Labour lady MPs?Long slender neck wrote: ↑Thu Oct 03, 2024 4:28 pmGot any evidence for that?Pagan Orient wrote: ↑Thu Oct 03, 2024 4:25 pmNot wanting to reduce politics to juvenile superficiality, but have you all noticed that on average the Tory women MPs are more attractive than their Labour counterparts? Could be a vote winner in 2029.
- Currywurst and Chips
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6233
- Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:40 am
- Has thanked: 389 times
- Been thanked: 1487 times
Re: Labour Watch
I’ll be impressed if anyone can find more than 5 attractive MPs of either sex on either side of the aisle
- Pagan Orient
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2024 9:52 pm
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 20 times
Re: Labour Watch
Some things are beyond science & belong to universal truths. Beauty is objective.Long slender neck wrote: ↑Thu Oct 03, 2024 4:28 pmGot any evidence for that?Pagan Orient wrote: ↑Thu Oct 03, 2024 4:25 pmNot wanting to reduce politics to juvenile superficiality, but have you all noticed that on average the Tory women MPs are more attractive than their Labour counterparts? Could be a vote winner in 2029.
Anyway, I was discussing it with my mates in the pub & we all agreed
- Admin
- Site Admin
- Posts: 3213
- Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2019 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 346 times
- Been thanked: 1125 times
Re: Labour Watch
Penny and her hair has been a serious loss on this front.Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Thu Oct 03, 2024 4:33 pm I’ll be impressed if anyone can find more than 5 attractive MPs of either sex on either side of the aisle
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2900
- Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:03 pm
- Has thanked: 308 times
- Been thanked: 661 times
Re: Labour Watch
Latest poll (OK I know their value is limited) shows the current Government is less popular than the one it replaced. Wow, that takes some doing. And the Budget still to come. After this latest embarrassment perhaps the budget will be curbed a little. They gotta do something to halt the slide.
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4707
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 3:36 pm
- Has thanked: 1119 times
- Been thanked: 757 times
Re: Labour Watch
Subjective mate, beauty is subjective - you’re welcome.Pagan Orient wrote: ↑Thu Oct 03, 2024 4:39 pmSome things are beyond science & belong to universal truths. Beauty is objective.Long slender neck wrote: ↑Thu Oct 03, 2024 4:28 pmGot any evidence for that?Pagan Orient wrote: ↑Thu Oct 03, 2024 4:25 pm
Not wanting to reduce politics to juvenile superficiality, but have you all noticed that on average the Tory women MPs are more attractive than their Labour counterparts? Could be a vote winner in 2029.
Anyway, I was discussing it with my mates in the pub & we all agreed
- Pagan Orient
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2024 9:52 pm
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 20 times
Re: Labour Watch
Interesting. So you don’t think there are objective realities?BoniO wrote: ↑Thu Oct 03, 2024 10:39 pmSubjective mate, beauty is subjective - you’re welcome.Pagan Orient wrote: ↑Thu Oct 03, 2024 4:39 pmSome things are beyond science & belong to universal truths. Beauty is objective.
Anyway, I was discussing it with my mates in the pub & we all agreed
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2900
- Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:03 pm
- Has thanked: 308 times
- Been thanked: 661 times
Re: Labour Watch
That’s what happens when you get a free keir-do, sorry Hair-do. Was the hairdresser a pensioner? Another poor cut.
What a shambles.
Re: Labour Watch
Keir Starmer has handed over the strategically important British overseas territory the Chagos Islands - where the military base on Diego Garcia is - to Mauritius. The controversial agreement will cost the taxpayer hundreds of millions of pounds and will see the UK paying Mauritius until as late as 2164.
It means that for the first time in more than 200 years, the sun will finally set on the British Empire. The location of the Chagos Islands in the Indian Ocean meant that at any point of the day, at least part of Britain or its territories would be in daylight. When the islands are finally handed over, this will no longer be true.
Starmer has also evaded questions about whether the Falklands and Gibraltar are next.
It means that for the first time in more than 200 years, the sun will finally set on the British Empire. The location of the Chagos Islands in the Indian Ocean meant that at any point of the day, at least part of Britain or its territories would be in daylight. When the islands are finally handed over, this will no longer be true.
Starmer has also evaded questions about whether the Falklands and Gibraltar are next.
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1295
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 11:11 pm
- Has thanked: 178 times
- Been thanked: 418 times
Re: Labour Watch
faldO wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2024 10:39 pm Keir Starmer has handed over the strategically important British overseas territory the Chagos Islands - where the military base on Diego Garcia is - to Mauritius. The controversial agreement will cost the taxpayer hundreds of millions of pounds and will see the UK paying Mauritius until as late as 2164.
It means that for the first time in more than 200 years, the sun will finally set on the British Empire. The location of the Chagos Islands in the Indian Ocean meant that at any point of the day, at least part of Britain or its territories would be in daylight. When the islands are finally handed over, this will no longer be true.
Starmer has also evaded questions about whether the Falklands and Gibraltar are next.
“Strategically important”. Maybe in the 1800’s, but now? Don’t be so f*cking daft.
Re: Labour Watch
In what way were the Chagos Islands "strategically important" in the 1800s? Nothing much went on there then.Stowaway wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2024 11:22 pmfaldO wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2024 10:39 pm Keir Starmer has handed over the strategically important British overseas territory the Chagos Islands - where the military base on Diego Garcia is - to Mauritius. The controversial agreement will cost the taxpayer hundreds of millions of pounds and will see the UK paying Mauritius until as late as 2164.
It means that for the first time in more than 200 years, the sun will finally set on the British Empire. The location of the Chagos Islands in the Indian Ocean meant that at any point of the day, at least part of Britain or its territories would be in daylight. When the islands are finally handed over, this will no longer be true.
Starmer has also evaded questions about whether the Falklands and Gibraltar are next.
“Strategically important”. Maybe in the 1800’s, but now? Don’t be so f*cking daft.
The government described Diego Garcia as "strategically significant" in their press release yesterday (https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-m ... itary-base). Likewise the US government.
Are you saying the Labour government is "f*cking daft"?
- Dunners
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9043
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 1075 times
- Been thanked: 2500 times
Re: Labour Watch
LOL. Is everyone now going to get all argumentative over an island archipelago most, of not all, of you have never given a second's thought to in your lives?
- Admin
- Site Admin
- Posts: 3213
- Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2019 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 346 times
- Been thanked: 1125 times
- Currywurst and Chips
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6233
- Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:40 am
- Has thanked: 389 times
- Been thanked: 1487 times
Re: Labour Watch
“A long-overdue and vital decision which ensures stability and security for our country in this region for decades to come”
Said Xi Jinping.
Said Xi Jinping.
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 14325
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2511 times
- Been thanked: 3301 times
- Currywurst and Chips
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6233
- Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:40 am
- Has thanked: 389 times
- Been thanked: 1487 times
Re: Labour Watch
The country that now owns the freehold if you will is beholden to the CCP’s belt and road debt bondage
- Rich Tea Wellin
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10549
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:01 pm
- Has thanked: 4569 times
- Been thanked: 3248 times
- Currywurst and Chips
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6233
- Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:40 am
- Has thanked: 389 times
- Been thanked: 1487 times
- Rich Tea Wellin
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10549
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:01 pm
- Has thanked: 4569 times
- Been thanked: 3248 times
- Currywurst and Chips
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6233
- Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:40 am
- Has thanked: 389 times
- Been thanked: 1487 times
Re: Labour Watch
Ah, I thought it was some Gen Z word or a Dwarf from Middle Earth by how it sounded.
- Currywurst and Chips
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6233
- Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:40 am
- Has thanked: 389 times
- Been thanked: 1487 times
Re: Labour Watch
Doubts grow over Labour’s VAT plan for private schools - confusion over 1 January start date as unions, tax experts and school leaders say it is unworkable
https://www.theguardian.com/education/2 ... te-schools
The Treasury on Saturday night refused to confirm that the plan to impose 20% VAT on private school fees would go ahead from 1 January, as confirmed by the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, in July, instead saying it would be introduced “as soon as possible”. Later, however, after publication of this story, the Treasury changed its line and said it was planning to stick by the 1 January deadline.
https://www.theguardian.com/education/2 ... te-schools
The Treasury on Saturday night refused to confirm that the plan to impose 20% VAT on private school fees would go ahead from 1 January, as confirmed by the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, in July, instead saying it would be introduced “as soon as possible”. Later, however, after publication of this story, the Treasury changed its line and said it was planning to stick by the 1 January deadline.
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 183
- Joined: Sat May 25, 2019 8:07 pm
- Has thanked: 300 times
- Been thanked: 44 times
Re: Labour Watch
Some land thousands of miles away is only strategically important if you're an imperialist servant the empire.faldO wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2024 11:44 pmIn what way were the Chagos Islands "strategically important" in the 1800s? Nothing much went on there then.Stowaway wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2024 11:22 pmfaldO wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2024 10:39 pm Keir Starmer has handed over the strategically important British overseas territory the Chagos Islands - where the military base on Diego Garcia is - to Mauritius. The controversial agreement will cost the taxpayer hundreds of millions of pounds and will see the UK paying Mauritius until as late as 2164.
It means that for the first time in more than 200 years, the sun will finally set on the British Empire. The location of the Chagos Islands in the Indian Ocean meant that at any point of the day, at least part of Britain or its territories would be in daylight. When the islands are finally handed over, this will no longer be true.
Starmer has also evaded questions about whether the Falklands and Gibraltar are next.
“Strategically important”. Maybe in the 1800’s, but now? Don’t be so f*cking daft.
The government described Diego Garcia as "strategically significant" in their press release yesterday (https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-m ... itary-base). Likewise the US government.
Are you saying the Labour government is "f*cking daft"?
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 183
- Joined: Sat May 25, 2019 8:07 pm
- Has thanked: 300 times
- Been thanked: 44 times
Re: Labour Watch
Some land thousands of miles away is only strategically important if you're an imperialist servant the empire.faldO wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2024 11:44 pmIn what way were the Chagos Islands "strategically important" in the 1800s? Nothing much went on there then.Stowaway wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2024 11:22 pmfaldO wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2024 10:39 pm Keir Starmer has handed over the strategically important British overseas territory the Chagos Islands - where the military base on Diego Garcia is - to Mauritius. The controversial agreement will cost the taxpayer hundreds of millions of pounds and will see the UK paying Mauritius until as late as 2164.
It means that for the first time in more than 200 years, the sun will finally set on the British Empire. The location of the Chagos Islands in the Indian Ocean meant that at any point of the day, at least part of Britain or its territories would be in daylight. When the islands are finally handed over, this will no longer be true.
Starmer has also evaded questions about whether the Falklands and Gibraltar are next.
“Strategically important”. Maybe in the 1800’s, but now? Don’t be so f*cking daft.
The government described Diego Garcia as "strategically significant" in their press release yesterday (https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-m ... itary-base). Likewise the US government.
Are you saying the Labour government is "f*cking daft"?