Ratings
Moderator: Long slender neck
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2661
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 3:54 pm
- Has thanked: 1027 times
- Been thanked: 919 times
Ratings
Great win and only positives.
Hemming. 8. Joint MOM. Bit generous maybe as you could argue a professional should be making those saves but being a keeper is a lonely old existence following a string of errors and he stepped up.
Currie. 7.5. Doesn’t look especially bulky but he hates letting people run past him. Neat and tidy on the ball. Just what we have been missing.
Beccles. 7.5. Great game. Won all his headers and duals.
Happe. 7. See Beccles. A nuisance in the oppos box as well.
James. 7.5. We are a better team with him playing. One of those times when he really fancied it.
Clare. 8. Joint MOM. A revelation in midfield. I called him a journeyman after his recent efforts but today was like a different player. Did he give the ball away once?
Brown. 7.5. Two vital blocks in succession following one Reading attack and worked hard all over the pitch.
Gailbraith. 8. Like the Duracell bunny. Non stop effort for 97 minutes.
Agyei 6.5. Doesn’t look happy playing wide. Ran into a few dead ends and nothing really incisive to threaten Readings goal.
O,Neill. 6. Needs to put on a stone. Was rag dolled in one tackle. Not convinced about him yet.
Kelman 7.5 Nice goal albeit a keeper mistake. Ran himself into the ground.
Subs. Ball 7. Like the look of him. Perkins 5.5. Had a shot rather than going into the corner in the last couple of minutes that sent Wellens potty. Simpson and Graham 6.5
Wellens. 8. Whatever he said and how we set up worked like a dream. We were the far better team first half. More even in the second but we still looked threatening on the break.
Reading. 5. It was all our good work that made them look poor.
Ref. 5. We had 5 bookings for time wasting?
Hemming. 8. Joint MOM. Bit generous maybe as you could argue a professional should be making those saves but being a keeper is a lonely old existence following a string of errors and he stepped up.
Currie. 7.5. Doesn’t look especially bulky but he hates letting people run past him. Neat and tidy on the ball. Just what we have been missing.
Beccles. 7.5. Great game. Won all his headers and duals.
Happe. 7. See Beccles. A nuisance in the oppos box as well.
James. 7.5. We are a better team with him playing. One of those times when he really fancied it.
Clare. 8. Joint MOM. A revelation in midfield. I called him a journeyman after his recent efforts but today was like a different player. Did he give the ball away once?
Brown. 7.5. Two vital blocks in succession following one Reading attack and worked hard all over the pitch.
Gailbraith. 8. Like the Duracell bunny. Non stop effort for 97 minutes.
Agyei 6.5. Doesn’t look happy playing wide. Ran into a few dead ends and nothing really incisive to threaten Readings goal.
O,Neill. 6. Needs to put on a stone. Was rag dolled in one tackle. Not convinced about him yet.
Kelman 7.5 Nice goal albeit a keeper mistake. Ran himself into the ground.
Subs. Ball 7. Like the look of him. Perkins 5.5. Had a shot rather than going into the corner in the last couple of minutes that sent Wellens potty. Simpson and Graham 6.5
Wellens. 8. Whatever he said and how we set up worked like a dream. We were the far better team first half. More even in the second but we still looked threatening on the break.
Reading. 5. It was all our good work that made them look poor.
Ref. 5. We had 5 bookings for time wasting?
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12502
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 2555 times
Re: Ratings
Thanks for the ratings Bera. I feel almost happier with Hemming today than I am with the win ......almost . I don't expect him to be a brick wall but a decent keeper is the foundation of a good team .
- B.whitehouse+10more
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1361
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 6:25 pm
- Has thanked: 177 times
- Been thanked: 470 times
Re: Ratings
Thanks for the ratings, strange how nearly an hour has gone since you posted them and only two replies obviously every one is well happy with the team. This is how it should be when we win
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2021 8:07 pm
- Has thanked: 34 times
- Been thanked: 65 times
Re: Ratings
I don’t think the ref deserved a 5 some bookings seemed bizarre. Hemmings made a couple brilliant saves, must give him a chance and RW obviously sees something in him. In RW we trust
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2020 12:06 am
- Has thanked: 13 times
- Been thanked: 28 times
- B.whitehouse+10more
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1361
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 6:25 pm
- Has thanked: 177 times
- Been thanked: 470 times
-
- Regular
- Posts: 3502
- Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 3:20 pm
- Has thanked: 645 times
- Been thanked: 866 times
Re: Ratings
At least RW managed to avoid a booking todayB.whitehouse+10more wrote: ↑Sat Sep 14, 2024 6:49 pm The bookings are not good the team need to look at them and RW
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2757
- Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2021 4:54 pm
- Has thanked: 736 times
- Been thanked: 747 times
Re: Ratings
Thanks for the ratings dogs a deserved win I feelBeradogs wrote: ↑Sat Sep 14, 2024 5:33 pm Great win and only positives.
Hemming. 8. Joint MOM. Bit generous maybe as you could argue a professional should be making those saves but being a keeper is a lonely old existence following a string of errors and he stepped up.
Currie. 7.5. Doesn’t look especially bulky but he hates letting people run past him. Neat and tidy on the ball. Just what we have been missing.
Beccles. 7.5. Great game. Won all his headers and duals.
Happe. 7. See Beccles. A nuisance in the oppos box as well.
James. 7.5. We are a better team with him playing. One of those times when he really fancied it.
Clare. 8. Joint MOM. A revelation in midfield. I called him a journeyman after his recent efforts but today was like a different player. Did he give the ball away once?
Brown. 7.5. Two vital blocks in succession following one Reading attack and worked hard all over the pitch.
Gailbraith. 8. Like the Duracell bunny. Non stop effort for 97 minutes.
Agyei 6.5. Doesn’t look happy playing wide. Ran into a few dead ends and nothing really incisive to threaten Readings goal.
O,Neill. 6. Needs to put on a stone. Was rag dolled in one tackle. Not convinced about him yet.
Kelman 7.5 Nice goal albeit a keeper mistake. Ran himself into the ground.
Subs. Ball 7. Like the look of him. Perkins 5.5. Had a shot rather than going into the corner in the last couple of minutes that sent Wellens potty. Simpson and Graham 6.5
Wellens. 8. Whatever he said and how we set up worked like a dream. We were the far better team first half. More even in the second but we still looked threatening on the break.
Reading. 5. It was all our good work that made them look poor.
Ref. 5. We had 5 bookings for time wasting?
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12502
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 2555 times
Re: Ratings
Shithousary helped us win League Two so the only thing that bothers me are suspensions .
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 7698
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:24 pm
- Has thanked: 3391 times
- Been thanked: 1750 times
Re: Ratings
Agree, there's no prizes for fair playRedDwarf 1881 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 14, 2024 7:16 pmShithousary helped us win League Two so the only thing that bothers me are suspensions .
- Hoover Attack
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 5045
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 636 times
- Been thanked: 1271 times
Re: Ratings
Fair ratings. Clare definitely MOTM, given Richie some big selection problems with that performance.
Lots of people being harsh on Agyei. He’s playing a wide left role when out of possession (which requires a lot of running and pressing and tracking, not easy for a big guy) but then hops up top with Kelman when we have the ball and change to a 4-2-2-2. I’m happy with how he played it today.
Lots of people being harsh on Agyei. He’s playing a wide left role when out of possession (which requires a lot of running and pressing and tracking, not easy for a big guy) but then hops up top with Kelman when we have the ball and change to a 4-2-2-2. I’m happy with how he played it today.
- B.whitehouse+10more
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1361
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 6:25 pm
- Has thanked: 177 times
- Been thanked: 470 times
-
- Regular
- Posts: 3502
- Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 3:20 pm
- Has thanked: 645 times
- Been thanked: 866 times
Re: Ratings
He made two excellent saves today and probably was the difference for us to win.
Notice their keeper made an error for our goal
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2021 8:07 pm
- Has thanked: 34 times
- Been thanked: 65 times
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10027
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:59 pm
- Has thanked: 244 times
- Been thanked: 898 times
Re: Ratings
Pretty much spot on I personally would rather see a yoof striker instead of Perkins ( just my opinion of course ).Beradogs wrote: ↑Sat Sep 14, 2024 5:33 pm Great win and only positives.
Hemming. 8. Joint MOM. Bit generous maybe as you could argue a professional should be making those saves but being a keeper is a lonely old existence following a string of errors and he stepped up.
Currie. 7.5. Doesn’t look especially bulky but he hates letting people run past him. Neat and tidy on the ball. Just what we have been missing.
Beccles. 7.5. Great game. Won all his headers and duals.
Happe. 7. See Beccles. A nuisance in the oppos box as well.
James. 7.5. We are a better team with him playing. One of those times when he really fancied it.
Clare. 8. Joint MOM. A revelation in midfield. I called him a journeyman after his recent efforts but today was like a different player. Did he give the ball away once?
Brown. 7.5. Two vital blocks in succession following one Reading attack and worked hard all over the pitch.
Gailbraith. 8. Like the Duracell bunny. Non stop effort for 97 minutes.
Agyei 6.5. Doesn’t look happy playing wide. Ran into a few dead ends and nothing really incisive to threaten Readings goal.
O,Neill. 6. Needs to put on a stone. Was rag dolled in one tackle. Not convinced about him yet.
Kelman 7.5 Nice goal albeit a keeper mistake. Ran himself into the ground.
Subs. Ball 7. Like the look of him. Perkins 5.5. Had a shot rather than going into the corner in the last couple of minutes that sent Wellens potty. Simpson and Graham 6.5
Wellens. 8. Whatever he said and how we set up worked like a dream. We were the far better team first half. More even in the second but we still looked threatening on the break.
Reading. 5. It was all our good work that made them look poor.
Ref. 5. We had 5 bookings for time wasting?
- Hoover Attack
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 5045
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 636 times
- Been thanked: 1271 times
Re: Ratings
We don’t have any youth strikers anywhere near good enough.
If we’re playing 2 up top, which looks as if it will mostly be the case, we really need 3 proper players to cover those positions.
If we’re playing 2 up top, which looks as if it will mostly be the case, we really need 3 proper players to cover those positions.
-
- Regular
- Posts: 3502
- Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 3:20 pm
- Has thanked: 645 times
- Been thanked: 866 times
Re: Ratings
Perkins did little to make me think that he would be a good back up for Kelman and/or Agyei .BIGRON wrote: ↑Sat Sep 14, 2024 11:17 pmPretty much spot on I personally would rather see a yoof striker instead of Perkins ( just my opinion of course ).Beradogs wrote: ↑Sat Sep 14, 2024 5:33 pm Great win and only positives.
Hemming. 8. Joint MOM. Bit generous maybe as you could argue a professional should be making those saves but being a keeper is a lonely old existence following a string of errors and he stepped up.
Currie. 7.5. Doesn’t look especially bulky but he hates letting people run past him. Neat and tidy on the ball. Just what we have been missing.
Beccles. 7.5. Great game. Won all his headers and duals.
Happe. 7. See Beccles. A nuisance in the oppos box as well.
James. 7.5. We are a better team with him playing. One of those times when he really fancied it.
Clare. 8. Joint MOM. A revelation in midfield. I called him a journeyman after his recent efforts but today was like a different player. Did he give the ball away once?
Brown. 7.5. Two vital blocks in succession following one Reading attack and worked hard all over the pitch.
Gailbraith. 8. Like the Duracell bunny. Non stop effort for 97 minutes.
Agyei 6.5. Doesn’t look happy playing wide. Ran into a few dead ends and nothing really incisive to threaten Readings goal.
O,Neill. 6. Needs to put on a stone. Was rag dolled in one tackle. Not convinced about him yet.
Kelman 7.5 Nice goal albeit a keeper mistake. Ran himself into the ground.
Subs. Ball 7. Like the look of him. Perkins 5.5. Had a shot rather than going into the corner in the last couple of minutes that sent Wellens potty. Simpson and Graham 6.5
Wellens. 8. Whatever he said and how we set up worked like a dream. We were the far better team first half. More even in the second but we still looked threatening on the break.
Reading. 5. It was all our good work that made them look poor.
Ref. 5. We had 5 bookings for time wasting?
Can’t remember him getting on the ball much apart that crazy late shot when all we had to do was to keep possession.
Don’t think Richie was too happy about that.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12502
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 2555 times
Re: Ratings
My prediction before the season started was we would bring in a new striker during the January transfer window . Whether that comes true or not , who knows .Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Sat Sep 14, 2024 11:40 pm We don’t have any youth strikers anywhere near good enough.
If we’re playing 2 up top, which looks as if it will mostly be the case, we really need 3 proper players to cover those positions.
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 755
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:08 am
- Has thanked: 178 times
- Been thanked: 293 times
Re: Ratings
Be great to have Theo back, but we’re definitely a striker short , imv. I thought DJ could play there but he looks unfit to me. Perkins yet to show anything, but there’s time tbf.
- Hoover Attack
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 5045
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 636 times
- Been thanked: 1271 times
Re: Ratings
Perkins won’t do anything.
Agree with Adz, it may well be we go back to just the 1 up top when we have some wingers back. In which case, just the 2 options for 1 spot is ok(ish)
Agree with Adz, it may well be we go back to just the 1 up top when we have some wingers back. In which case, just the 2 options for 1 spot is ok(ish)
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12502
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 2555 times