Would we be better off without Martin Ling?

Chat about Leyton Orient (or anything else)

Moderator: Long slender neck

Mistadobalina
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2441
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 1:13 pm
Has thanked: 244 times
Been thanked: 1127 times

Re: Would we be better off without Martin Ling?

Post by Mistadobalina »

Hoover Attack wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2024 2:08 pm
Mistadobalina wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2024 1:34 pm
Always a bit baffled by bad appointments being Ling's fault, but good appointments being luck. Wellens is probably the best manager I've seen at Orient. Ling has obviously played a part in bringing and keeping him here.
Steve Davis, Ross Emblefud (multiple times), Carl Fletcher, Jobi, Kenny Jackett were all duff appointments. Clearly the trend is to make bad appointments.

Justin and Richie are outliers in this data set.
Personally willing to cut a lot of slack to how the club handled the managerial situation post Edinburgh. It was horrid and I can see why they erred towards familiar faces to make what was essentially a grieving period a bit easier for everyone.

Fletcher was a complete, weird disaster, 100%.

Jackett was on paper the most successful managerial appointment we've probably made over the last few decades. Obviously didn't work out but think people were chuffed to bits at the time.

Davis was awful but again extenuating circumstances in that Ling was also building an football club from scratch.

Most managers don't really work out. But 6 years of near continuous improvement despite often difficult circumstances isn't bad.
User avatar
OyinbO
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2080
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:28 pm
Location: London
Has thanked: 1419 times
Been thanked: 709 times

Re: Would we be better off without Martin Ling?

Post by OyinbO »

Mistadobalina wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2024 2:18 pm
Hoover Attack wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2024 2:08 pm
Mistadobalina wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2024 1:34 pm
Always a bit baffled by bad appointments being Ling's fault, but good appointments being luck. Wellens is probably the best manager I've seen at Orient. Ling has obviously played a part in bringing and keeping him here.
Steve Davis, Ross Emblefud (multiple times), Carl Fletcher, Jobi, Kenny Jackett were all duff appointments. Clearly the trend is to make bad appointments.

Justin and Richie are outliers in this data set.
Personally willing to cut a lot of slack to how the club handled the managerial situation post Edinburgh. It was horrid and I can see why they erred towards familiar faces to make what was essentially a grieving period a bit easier for everyone.

Fletcher was a complete, weird disaster, 100%.

Jackett was on paper the most successful managerial appointment we've probably made over the last few decades. Obviously didn't work out but think people were chuffed to bits at the time.

Davis was awful but again extenuating circumstances in that Ling was also building an football club from scratch.

Most managers don't really work out. But 6 years of near continuous improvement despite often difficult circumstances isn't bad.
Actually agree with Hoov's general argument, but some qualifications: Jobi never really had the chance to prove himself, he was actually on a decent run until Ling told most of the squad that their contracts would not be renewed. He was also the first appointment that was taken out of Ling's hands. Since then, the appointments have been a group decision with him playing a much less central role (hence the infamous "take him for a coffee" stuff when Jackett was appointed).
User avatar
The Reverend
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2262
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 4:12 pm
Has thanked: 817 times
Been thanked: 936 times

Re: Would we be better off without Martin Ling?

Post by The Reverend »

Has anyone entertained the idea that Ling is a decent DoF but doesn’t get everything right 100% of the time, with him being human and all?

Seems like the choice is between “Ling is god” or “Ling must go”. The truth is somewhere in the middle.
Mistadobalina
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2441
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 1:13 pm
Has thanked: 244 times
Been thanked: 1127 times

Re: Would we be better off without Martin Ling?

Post by Mistadobalina »

I think that's what those of us defending Ling's overall record are saying. He's just above par for me, with a real question to be asked as to whether he's hit his limit now there's a greater need to over perform on our budget from both a footballing perspective and also financial seeing as we need to start flipping players.
User avatar
Long slender neck
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 14349
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
Has thanked: 2523 times
Been thanked: 3312 times

Re: Would we be better off without Martin Ling?

Post by Long slender neck »

Most clubs would kill for a DOF that gets you 2 titles and promotions in 5 years.
User avatar
OyinbO
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2080
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:28 pm
Location: London
Has thanked: 1419 times
Been thanked: 709 times

Re: Would we be better off without Martin Ling?

Post by OyinbO »

Long slender neck wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2024 2:57 pm Most clubs would kill for a DOF that gets you 2 titles and promotions in 5 years.
Amazing that we've managed to hold on to him then, isn't it?
User avatar
Qin
Fresh Alias
Posts: 318
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2020 2:19 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 136 times

Re: Would we be better off without Martin Ling?

Post by Qin »

Long slender neck wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2024 2:57 pm Most clubs would kill for a DOF that gets you 2 titles and promotions in 5 years.
Justin & Richie gave us 2 titles in 5 years

We achieved that despite Ling, not because of him
Proposition Joe
Regular
Regular
Posts: 4738
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:48 pm
Has thanked: 2083 times
Been thanked: 1702 times

Re: Would we be better off without Martin Ling?

Post by Proposition Joe »

See that now we've signed an experienced player who's almost exclusively played at Championship level, it's not being referred to on this thread? Assume Ling is on holiday and had nothing to do with it 🤷‍♂️
Mistadobalina
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2441
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 1:13 pm
Has thanked: 244 times
Been thanked: 1127 times

Re: Would we be better off without Martin Ling?

Post by Mistadobalina »

'He's a sick note', 'why didn't we sign him earlier, other clubs seem to get their business done way before us' etc.
User avatar
Long slender neck
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 14349
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
Has thanked: 2523 times
Been thanked: 3312 times

Re: Would we be better off without Martin Ling?

Post by Long slender neck »

Qin wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2024 6:25 pm
Long slender neck wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2024 2:57 pm Most clubs would kill for a DOF that gets you 2 titles and promotions in 5 years.
Justin & Richie gave us 2 titles in 5 years

We achieved that despite Ling, not because of him
And who appointed them? Who signed players for them?
Post Reply