I don’t necessarily disagree with any of this, however I would point out that there’s a bit more to it than Wellens just being a “popular manager”.CEB2ElectricBoogaloo wrote: ↑Mon Sep 09, 2024 7:47 pm It seems like on here, for some the role of DoF is “punching bag when we’d ideally not turn on the manager”
The reality is that the whole point of a DoF is to take care of a longer term view, immune from direct responsibility for, say, a run of bad results.
In practice, when there’s a popular manager and new signings haven’t worked out or seem cheap, it seems like it’s just a quite lazy option to suddenly turn on the DoF after several years of growth and development.
It may well be that Ling does have a ceiling of what he can do, but the time to judge that should be after an extended period of the club seeming to lack direction or a vision. That doesn’t seem to be what’s happening at the moment
Right now, i would say that that doesn’t seem to
In interviews he has frequently mentioned specific positions / types of player (e.g. experienced) that he would like to complete his squad. And yet time and again the signings that Wellens has indicated he wants have not materialised. So what’s going on?
1. Is Wellens talking pish in these interviews and he doesn’t really want the types of player he is talking about?
This would be quite an odd thing for him to do.
2. Is Wellens being serious but making demands that are deemed unreasonable/unfeasible to those who actually make/approve signings?
Then someone up top needs to have a word with Wellens to prevent him continually undermining those who pay his wages in interviews.
3. Is Wellens being serious, and the demands are reasonable/feasible but for some reason we’re failing to make those signings
Then it’s not unreasonable to question whether the DoF is doing a good job.