Would we be better off without Martin Ling?

Chat about Leyton Orient (or anything else)

Moderator: Long slender neck

User avatar
Qin
Fresh Alias
Posts: 260
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2020 2:19 pm
Been thanked: 112 times

Would we be better off without Martin Ling?

Post by Qin »

So, 23 out of 24 league 1 clubs don't have Ling as DOF, and they appear to all be doing better than us, so would we be better off without Ling?

Either a different DOF, or even no DOF. Does Ling do anything better than other DOF?
So what do you all think?

Would we be better off without Ling?
User avatar
OyinbO
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1975
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:28 pm
Location: London
Has thanked: 1351 times
Been thanked: 679 times

Re: Would we be better off without Martin Ling?

Post by OyinbO »

Given that fans' loyalty is being monetised to the max, it's inevitable that more will ask whether that money is being put to good use. Is he value for money?
User avatar
Long slender neck
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 13894
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
Has thanked: 2417 times
Been thanked: 3161 times

Re: Would we be better off without Martin Ling?

Post by Long slender neck »

23 out of 24 league two clubs didnt have Ling as DOF when we won the league.

Astonishing logic.
Loyal_Supporter
Fresh Alias
Posts: 850
Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 3:38 pm
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 212 times

Re: Would we be better off without Martin Ling?

Post by Loyal_Supporter »

Qin wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2024 4:57 pm So, 23 out of 24 league 1 clubs don't have Ling as DOF, and they appear to all be doing better than us, so would we be better off without Ling?

Either a different DOF, or even no DOF. Does Ling do anything better than other DOF?
So what do you all think?

Would we be better off without Ling?
Never thought I would EVER see Orient win 2 league titles in the space of 7 seasons so that says ML has done his job well. Loads of 'fans' forget that without understanding what goes on.

Sadly, scapegoats are needed for most of our fans. The younger ones who have joined the fan base recently think doing well is the norm at Leyton Orient. Reality check: IT IS NOT EVEN CLOSE!!
Loyal_Supporter
Fresh Alias
Posts: 850
Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 3:38 pm
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 212 times

Re: Would we be better off without Martin Ling?

Post by Loyal_Supporter »

OyinbO wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2024 5:13 pm Given that fans' loyalty is being monetised to the max, it's inevitable that more will ask whether that money is being put to good use. Is he value for money?
Nigel wants a DOF and thinks ML is doing a good job in that role. End of.
User avatar
Bergen
Regular
Regular
Posts: 4082
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:07 pm
Has thanked: 356 times
Been thanked: 813 times

Re: Would we be better off without Martin Ling?

Post by Bergen »

Our owners have been ruthless towards some of our managers (Davis, Fletcher, Jackett) and they would never have kept Ling as DOF if they didn`t think he was doing a good job.
PKM
Fresh Alias
Posts: 672
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:08 am
Has thanked: 168 times
Been thanked: 273 times

Re: Would we be better off without Martin Ling?

Post by PKM »

What a disrespectful question and thread
2 champions as DOF
One promotion as manager.
ML is a true Leyton Orient legend.
User avatar
OyinbO
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1975
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:28 pm
Location: London
Has thanked: 1351 times
Been thanked: 679 times

Re: Would we be better off without Martin Ling?

Post by OyinbO »

Loyal_Supporter wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2024 5:51 pm
OyinbO wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2024 5:13 pm Given that fans' loyalty is being monetised to the max, it's inevitable that more will ask whether that money is being put to good use. Is he value for money?
Nigel wants a DOF and thinks ML is doing a good job in that role. End of.
It’s not the “end of” though is it? That’s why this keeps coming up. And you might have noticed that Nigel himself is coming in for a bit of flak recently. Whether or not you think that’s justified, no-one has total authority.

Put it another way: when Nigel sells up, can you imagine new owners wanting to keep Ling on?
Norlington Road
Fresh Alias
Posts: 45
Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2024 8:58 am
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: Would we be better off without Martin Ling?

Post by Norlington Road »

I think he does a good job , but he’s far too slow , with his “due process” whatever that is, and sometimes maybe not bold enough with our signings . Sometimes you need to be a maverick , Lingy is very safe. He’s very dedicated
User avatar
Rich Tea Wellin
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 10192
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:01 pm
Has thanked: 4418 times
Been thanked: 3090 times

Re: Would we be better off without Martin Ling?

Post by Rich Tea Wellin »

I think he’s done the job he was out there for and credit to him. Lots of missed but a few crucial hits.

However, like anyone in football I think there’s a real question mark over if he’s capable of taking us to the next level in his role. Just like players and coaches, you have to look really hard at the talent needed to continue improving and replace it in order to compete. Imo ling has reached his ceiling, which is nothing to be ashamed of, but I don’t think think he has enough energy, new thinking, speed or agility (not that way) to take us to that next level
Loyal_Supporter
Fresh Alias
Posts: 850
Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 3:38 pm
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 212 times

Re: Would we be better off without Martin Ling?

Post by Loyal_Supporter »

OyinbO wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2024 7:19 pm
Loyal_Supporter wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2024 5:51 pm
OyinbO wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2024 5:13 pm Given that fans' loyalty is being monetised to the max, it's inevitable that more will ask whether that money is being put to good use. Is he value for money?
Nigel wants a DOF and thinks ML is doing a good job in that role. End of.
It’s not the “end of” though is it? That’s why this keeps coming up. And you might have noticed that Nigel himself is coming in for a bit of flak recently. Whether or not you think that’s justified, no-one has total authority.

Put it another way: when Nigel sells up, can you imagine new owners wanting to keep Ling on?
Nigel deserves no flak whatsoever...he is funding a football club out of his own pocket even though he is losing £4m per year. In terms of ML, it would all depend on if any possible new owners lived in the UK or not.

It disgusts me that people are turning their back on the people who saved our football club.
User avatar
EliotNes
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 10413
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:14 pm
Location: Retired (4182)
Has thanked: 1974 times
Been thanked: 851 times

Re: Would we be better off without Martin Ling?

Post by EliotNes »

BTT

No.
Give it to Jabo
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2564
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 9:34 pm
Has thanked: 98 times
Been thanked: 402 times

Re: Would we be better off without Martin Ling?

Post by Give it to Jabo »

what price loyalty? Ling IN
User avatar
Max B Gold
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12041
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
Has thanked: 945 times
Been thanked: 2746 times

Re: Would we be better off without Martin Ling?

Post by Max B Gold »

What strikes me about criticism of ML is that it comes not only from anonymous posters but from people who know nothing about the job of identifying and bringing players to the club. Its often time consuming and complex and involves slippery agents and nefarious "go betweens".

In short, its a difficult job and whilst I don't particularly like the DoF position I can understand that we probably need it because of the residence situation of our owners.

Has ML done a good job? On balance, probably he has.
Chief crazy horse
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2780
Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 8:02 pm
Has thanked: 424 times
Been thanked: 582 times

Re: Would we be better off without Martin Ling?

Post by Chief crazy horse »

PKM wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2024 7:13 pm What a disrespectful question and thread
2 champions as DOF
One promotion as manager.
ML is a true Leyton Orient legend.
I think you're underrating him - the man's a genius.
Hedmans Header
Fresh Alias
Posts: 376
Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 6:47 am
Has thanked: 98 times
Been thanked: 163 times

Re: Would we be better off without Martin Ling?

Post by Hedmans Header »

Max B Gold wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2024 8:32 pm What strikes me about criticism of ML is that it comes not only from anonymous posters but from people who know nothing about the job of identifying and bringing players to the club. Its often time consuming and complex and involves slippery agents and nefarious "go betweens".

In short, its a difficult job and whilst I don't particularly like the DoF position I can understand that we probably need it because of the residence situation of our owners.

Has ML done a good job? On balance, probably he has.
Where the DOF and the transfer committee
haven’t done a good job is by sitting in the
hands and obliging a “ due diligence “
mentality whilst other clubs maybe swoop
In and the target is missed ..
I get and understand that players will rightly
pick a Birmingham, Wrexham or Huddersfield
over us as unfortunately we can’t mix it
with them ..
But for to long now and over a great many years
We have sat in the bargain bucket corridor
whilst everyone else passes thru picking
Up favourable new recruits..
As I posted previously “ Quantity over Quality”
seems to the way of the world in E10 ..
User avatar
Max B Gold
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12041
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
Has thanked: 945 times
Been thanked: 2746 times

Re: Would we be better off without Martin Ling?

Post by Max B Gold »

Hedmans Header wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2024 8:56 pm
Max B Gold wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2024 8:32 pm What strikes me about criticism of ML is that it comes not only from anonymous posters but from people who know nothing about the job of identifying and bringing players to the club. Its often time consuming and complex and involves slippery agents and nefarious "go betweens".

In short, its a difficult job and whilst I don't particularly like the DoF position I can understand that we probably need it because of the residence situation of our owners.

Has ML done a good job? On balance, probably he has.
Where the DOF and the transfer committee
haven’t done a good job is by sitting in the
hands and obliging a “ due diligence “
mentality whilst other clubs maybe swoop
In and the target is missed ..
I get and understand that players will rightly
pick a Birmingham, Wrexham or Huddersfield
over us as unfortunately we can’t mix it
with them ..
But for to long now and over a great many years
We have sat in the bargain bucket corridor
whilst everyone else passes thru picking
Up favourable new recruits..
As I posted previously “ Quantity over Quality”
seems to the way of the world in E10 ..
We shop in the bargain bin for a reason. £4m of them last year.
gshaw
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 7417
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:24 pm
Has thanked: 3247 times
Been thanked: 1677 times

Re: Would we be better off without Martin Ling?

Post by gshaw »

PKM wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2024 7:13 pm 2 champions as DOF
Those were won by the talented managers who came in and turned an ailing club around. The credit for those goes to JE and RW.

The DoF presided over some appalling managerial choices in between, which seem to get brushed away (Fletcher or Embleton "the best manager the club can get") as well as the McMahon "set piece coach" nonsense last season that was destabilising the team.

On the recruitment side also add Embleton and Jackett's January transfer window shambles, plus the one this year that derailed Richie's playoff push. This summer appears to be another one with the goalkeeping debacle so hardly a glowing report card once you take that all into account.

Then you've got the academy that has a large roll call of staff but minimal output, seems to be a black hole money keeps going into.

Did Ling do a good job getting the club back on its feet... absolutely, much credit for that.

Does that mean his performance going forward can't be questioned at this level... absolutely not. Contrast to, say Peterborough who make good money from their recruitment and there's a lot of room for improvement.
PoundhillO
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2101
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:41 am
Has thanked: 344 times
Been thanked: 428 times

Re: Would we be better off without Martin Ling?

Post by PoundhillO »

OyinbO wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2024 7:19 pm
Loyal_Supporter wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2024 5:51 pm
OyinbO wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2024 5:13 pm Given that fans' loyalty is being monetised to the max, it's inevitable that more will ask whether that money is being put to good use. Is he value for money?
Nigel wants a DOF and thinks ML is doing a good job in that role. End of.
It’s not the “end of” though is it? That’s why this keeps coming up. And you might have noticed that Nigel himself is coming in for a bit of flak recently. Whether or not you think that’s justified, no-one has total authority.

Put it another way: when Nigel sells up, can you imagine new owners wanting to keep Ling on?
Not a chance.
User avatar
Max B Gold
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12041
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
Has thanked: 945 times
Been thanked: 2746 times

Re: Would we be better off without Martin Ling?

Post by Max B Gold »

gshaw wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2024 11:43 pm
PKM wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2024 7:13 pm 2 champions as DOF
Those were won by the talented managers who came in and turned an ailing club around. The credit for those goes to JE and RW.

The DoF presided over some appalling managerial choices in between, which seem to get brushed away (Fletcher or Embleton "the best manager the club can get") as well as the McMahon "set piece coach" nonsense last season that was destabilising the team.

On the recruitment side also add Embleton and Jackett's January transfer window shambles, plus the one this year that derailed Richie's playoff push. This summer appears to be another one with the goalkeeping debacle so hardly a glowing report card once you take that all into account.

Then you've got the academy that has a large roll call of staff but minimal output, seems to be a black hole money keeps going into.

Did Ling do a good job getting the club back on its feet... absolutely, much credit for that.

Does that mean his performance going forward can't be questioned at this level... absolutely not. Contrast to, say Peterborough who make good money from their recruitment and there's a lot of room for improvement.
What are Peterbrough ding different that we need to learn from? Where does their money go? As far as I can see they are a yo yo club.
o-no
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1441
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:06 pm
Has thanked: 152 times
Been thanked: 431 times

Re: Would we be better off without Martin Ling?

Post by o-no »

Max B Gold wrote: Sat Sep 07, 2024 1:30 am
gshaw wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2024 11:43 pm
PKM wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2024 7:13 pm 2 champions as DOF
Those were won by the talented managers who came in and turned an ailing club around. The credit for those goes to JE and RW.

The DoF presided over some appalling managerial choices in between, which seem to get brushed away (Fletcher or Embleton "the best manager the club can get") as well as the McMahon "set piece coach" nonsense last season that was destabilising the team.

On the recruitment side also add Embleton and Jackett's January transfer window shambles, plus the one this year that derailed Richie's playoff push. This summer appears to be another one with the goalkeeping debacle so hardly a glowing report card once you take that all into account.

Then you've got the academy that has a large roll call of staff but minimal output, seems to be a black hole money keeps going into.

Did Ling do a good job getting the club back on its feet... absolutely, much credit for that.

Does that mean his performance going forward can't be questioned at this level... absolutely not. Contrast to, say Peterborough who make good money from their recruitment and there's a lot of room for improvement.
What are Peterbrough ding different that we need to learn from? Where does their money go? As far as I can see they are a yo yo club.
Some of this might be nice though https://inews.co.uk/sport/football/pete ... ry-2332961
Lifelongfan
Fresh Alias
Posts: 738
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2021 2:23 pm
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 178 times

Re: Would we be better off without Martin Ling?

Post by Lifelongfan »

No. The club want a DOF. 2 titles . End of
User avatar
ChorizO
Fresh Alias
Posts: 290
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2023 7:12 am
Has thanked: 63 times
Been thanked: 67 times

Re: Would we be better off without Martin Ling?

Post by ChorizO »

Qin wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2024 4:57 pm So, 23 out of 24 league 1 clubs don't have Ling as DOF, and they appear to all be doing better than us, so would we be better off without Ling?

Either a different DOF, or even no DOF. Does Ling do anything better than other DOF?
So what do you all think?

Would we be better off without Ling?
Bizarre thinking. Truly.
User avatar
OyinbO
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1975
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:28 pm
Location: London
Has thanked: 1351 times
Been thanked: 679 times

Re: Would we be better off without Martin Ling?

Post by OyinbO »

It feels a bit like the less Ling does, and the less we see of him, the more people like him. That feels like a good way to resolve this.
RedDwarf 1881
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12052
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 2445 times

Re: Would we be better off without Martin Ling?

Post by RedDwarf 1881 »

For arguments sake , let's just say the club had twice the budget for players . What difference do you think this would make for Lingy ? Do you think he would be the same or do you think he would be able to attract better players ?
Post Reply