The Board Have Not Backed Richie
Moderator: Long slender neck
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2664
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 9:34 pm
- Has thanked: 102 times
- Been thanked: 418 times
Re: The Board Have Not Backed Richie
The equation more money invested in players means automatic success is not always proven. Ask Russell Slade.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12539
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 2567 times
Re: The Board Have Not Backed Richie
Only because you could see he gave us everything he had . The unfortunate fact though that wasn't nearly enough .Sid Bishop wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2024 3:00 pmTo many on this forum, Alibi was a sort of cult hero !RedDwarf 1881 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2024 2:58 pmA players previous club's supporters are not usually wrong . For example Tranmere fans were laughing at us taking Alabi . Look how right they were .Lets just hope Richie can get more out of DJ than Charlton did .Sid Bishop wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2024 2:51 pm
From what we hear, fans from Charlton did not rate DJ very highly, we shall see ? At least with GM you knew what you had, at least at the worst, a good 30 or 40 minutes worth off the bench.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12539
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 2567 times
Re: The Board Have Not Backed Richie
How much does the club want to stay in League One and even mount a challenge for the play offs . If that's what they want they had better do what you've just suggested or its going to be an arduous seasongshaw wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2024 10:04 amI really hope you're right though at present I have concerns as we don't have a strong spine in this squad at present. An experienced CM, new LB and replacement GK before the window shuts would make it a lot better though we'll be lucky to see even one of thoseRich Tea Wellin wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2024 8:00 am I don’t think we’ll be in trouble this year (aside from a big batch of key injuries) but the problem will be matching Richie’s ambition, and the fans ambition if we finish 15th
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4445
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 4:12 pm
- Has thanked: 896 times
- Been thanked: 963 times
Re: The Board Have Not Backed Richie
I’d love to know if Coley is calling in his debts after what he did to Vitesse.
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 993
- Joined: Mon Apr 15, 2019 1:46 pm
- Location: Nailed to a wall in Chiswick
- Has thanked: 333 times
- Been thanked: 337 times
Re: The Board Have Not Backed Richie
The key word here is of course "invest" which loosely defines as to put (money) into schemes, shares, property, or a commercial venture with the expectation of achieving a profit.PoundhillO wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2024 12:51 pmI believe they have taken as far as they can, so they can either invest more themselves or bring in investors that will bring in the massive investment needed to get us further.As the old saying goes get off the pot or start pissing.Scuba Diver wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2024 12:46 pmNone of us (including you) know how much money the "board of millionaires & multi-millionaires" actually have.Qin wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2024 9:40 pm Not only have they not backed Richie, they have let him and the supporters down in a big way
Richie is frustrated as hell, listening to him in today's after match interview.
He desperately want some experience in the side, but all the board have given him are non proven kids.
Everyone brought in this summer have been from the bargain bucket.
We have a board of millionaires & multi millionaires, so what's going on? Why are they not spending anything?
Richie deserves better than this, much better
The club lost £4m last season - so whatever they Did have, as a collective they're 4m down.
Perhaps you'd like to join the board and get spending? No, I thought not.
Just because they have money; it doesn't mean they automatically want to throw it away on folly- good sense (as far as possible) has to be employed.
They're no doubt richer than you ( and I ) but we don't know how rich.
To put it another way- you live in the property you live in because it's no doubt the one you can afford.
If I came and stood outside your place screaming at you to buy a bigger one - it would make no difference - you can't afford to live in another property. Perhaps the board are stretched to the limit already, and fans screaming at them to spend more is simply a physical impossibility.
They might be "millionaires", but a million goes nowhere in the game of football these days.
Invest does not equal - p*** money up a wall. And based on the recent losses from the club that's what the current "investors" are doing.
Savvy investors expect a return (or, they won't invest).
We are a club surrounded by much bigger ones, with a hardcore support of circa 5,000 (this is what crowds will be in Feb if we are near the bottom of L1), who do not own their own ground . So on the surface, this looks a precarious investment indeed.
You could say we need to move grounds - -that's £20m required there straight away (with no guarantee of return on investment)
Or, that we need a deep-pocketed billionaire tyoe.
We already did that, and I don't need to tell you how that went- but of course we ended up playing Woking and Havant.
It's easy to shout for money/investors etc etc. It's much harder in the real world actually finding that. Don't hold your breath
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 557
- Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2024 3:49 pm
- Has thanked: 303 times
- Been thanked: 88 times
Re: The Board Have Not Backed Richie
Or PepGive it to Jabo wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2024 4:00 pm The equation more money invested in players means automatic success is not always proven. Ask Russell Slade.
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 121
- Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2021 7:03 pm
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 17 times
Re: The Board Have Not Backed Richie
Didn't they say their 6 year plan was to be a settled Championship club? Something like that? Can't see much reason not to trust them overall at the moment.
Really and truly at the moment it's a goalkeeping c**kup and I hope to see that definitively rectified this week otherwise yes, questions raised.
Only other recent questions raised for me was the two - in hindsight at least - loan signings in January....
Really and truly at the moment it's a goalkeeping c**kup and I hope to see that definitively rectified this week otherwise yes, questions raised.
Only other recent questions raised for me was the two - in hindsight at least - loan signings in January....
Last edited by idontkn0 M on Mon Aug 26, 2024 9:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 5962
- Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2019 10:12 am
- Has thanked: 5615 times
- Been thanked: 1071 times
Re: The Board Have Not Backed Richie
Only because you could see he gave us everything he had . The unfortunate fact though that wasn't nearly enough .RedDwarf 1881 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2024 4:01 pmOnly because you could see he gave us everything he had . The unfortunate fact though that wasn't nearly enough .Sid Bishop wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2024 3:00 pmTo many on this forum, Alibi was a sort of cult hero !RedDwarf 1881 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2024 2:58 pm
A players previous club's supporters are not usually wrong . For example Tranmere fans were laughing at us taking Alabi . Look how right they were .Lets just hope Richie can get more out of DJ than Charlton did .
[/quote]
Horses for courses. His strength was to have a long ball played over the top for him to to run onto, trouble was we did not play that particular tactic which was something actually suited what he could do. See this video............
Chester FC striker James Alabi scores 4 goals in first 45 minutes
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 993
- Joined: Mon Apr 15, 2019 1:46 pm
- Location: Nailed to a wall in Chiswick
- Has thanked: 333 times
- Been thanked: 337 times
Re: The Board Have Not Backed Richie
The plan was I think to be back in L1 in 5 years, which of course has been achieved with aplomb.idontkn0 M wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2024 7:55 pm Didn't they say their 6 year plan was to be a settled Championship club? Something like that? Can't see much reason not to trust them overall at the moment.
Really and truly at the moment it's a goalkeeping c**lip and I hope to see that definitively rectified this week otherwise yes, questions raised.
Only other recent questions raised for me was the two - in hindsight at least - loan signings in January....
I'm sure the Champhionship wasn't mentioned. It would've been crazy to state that since we were a non league club (at the time) and have not been in the Championship since 1982. I am sure it was a L1 plan.
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 121
- Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2021 7:03 pm
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 17 times
Re: The Board Have Not Backed Richie
https://leytonlaureate.wordpress.com/20 ... -level-up/Scuba Diver wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2024 9:35 pmThe plan was I think to be back in L1 in 5 years, which of course has been achieved with aplomb.idontkn0 M wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2024 7:55 pm Didn't they say their 6 year plan was to be a settled Championship club? Something like that? Can't see much reason not to trust them overall at the moment.
Really and truly at the moment it's a goalkeeping c**lip and I hope to see that definitively rectified this week otherwise yes, questions raised.
Only other recent questions raised for me was the two - in hindsight at least - loan signings in January....
I'm sure the Champhionship wasn't mentioned. It would've been crazy to state that since we were a non league club (at the time) and have not been in the Championship since 1982. I am sure it was a L1 plan.
"To grow orient into a club that can compete sustainably at Championship level."
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 7738
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:24 pm
- Has thanked: 3421 times
- Been thanked: 1771 times
Re: The Board Have Not Backed Richie
Have the rules changed this season? Having let a number of senior pros go and signed more youths and loans just wondering how we could be so close to the limit already
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 993
- Joined: Mon Apr 15, 2019 1:46 pm
- Location: Nailed to a wall in Chiswick
- Has thanked: 333 times
- Been thanked: 337 times
Re: The Board Have Not Backed Richie
Fair enough. That's from February 2024.idontkn0 M wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2024 11:08 pmhttps://leytonlaureate.wordpress.com/20 ... -level-up/Scuba Diver wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2024 9:35 pmThe plan was I think to be back in L1 in 5 years, which of course has been achieved with aplomb.idontkn0 M wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2024 7:55 pm Didn't they say their 6 year plan was to be a settled Championship club? Something like that? Can't see much reason not to trust them overall at the moment.
Really and truly at the moment it's a goalkeeping c**lip and I hope to see that definitively rectified this week otherwise yes, questions raised.
Only other recent questions raised for me was the two - in hindsight at least - loan signings in January....
I'm sure the Champhionship wasn't mentioned. It would've been crazy to state that since we were a non league club (at the time) and have not been in the Championship since 1982. I am sure it was a L1 plan.
"To grow orient into a club that can compete sustainably at Championship level."
I thought you were referring to the 5 year plan from when they took over.
A new '6 year plan' to take us to the championship, and would take us to 2030.And since we haven't played there for 42 seasons, that wouldn't seem unreasonable..
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2167
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 396 times
- Been thanked: 434 times
Re: The Board Have Not Backed Richie
Going to reduce debt by £1 million this year and again the following year, that’s why we are not buying any proven, quality players that are playing at our level or above and bringing in inexperienced kids as loans. Can’t see Ritchie staying past January unless things change drastically, home attendances will drop as fans become fed up with unrealistic gate prices and poor football.idontkn0 M wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2024 11:08 pmhttps://leytonlaureate.wordpress.com/20 ... -level-up/Scuba Diver wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2024 9:35 pmThe plan was I think to be back in L1 in 5 years, which of course has been achieved with aplomb.idontkn0 M wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2024 7:55 pm Didn't they say their 6 year plan was to be a settled Championship club? Something like that? Can't see much reason not to trust them overall at the moment.
Really and truly at the moment it's a goalkeeping c**lip and I hope to see that definitively rectified this week otherwise yes, questions raised.
Only other recent questions raised for me was the two - in hindsight at least - loan signings in January....
I'm sure the Champhionship wasn't mentioned. It would've been crazy to state that since we were a non league club (at the time) and have not been in the Championship since 1982. I am sure it was a L1 plan.
"To grow orient into a club that can compete sustainably at Championship level."
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2599
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:15 am
- Has thanked: 106 times
- Been thanked: 627 times
Re: The Board Have Not Backed Richie
No players are cheap any more. Youngsters starting out in the prem are on 100k+ and expect something similar when they move. We're probably still paying some of piggot and moncurs wages, so haven't cut much. I know it's not fun, but we need to be patient and build up the squad for a promotion push over a few years, cutting the cruft and improving gradually