Prince Andrew

[Disoriented]

‘I did not suspect Epstein’s behaviour.’



Good to see the Duke ‘clarifying facts’.

[BIGRON]

Nah he was to busy shagging the thousand plus woman hes allegedly had

[ComeOnYouOs]

Buckingham Palace are getting mighty desperate, thats for sure

[DonaldRocks]

‘I did not suspect Epstein’s behaviour.’



Good to see the Duke ‘clarifying facts’.

Convenient. Me thinks this is going to linger.

[Max B Gold]

‘I did not suspect Epstein’s behaviour.’



Good to see the Duke ‘clarifying facts’.

He didn't need to suspect anything because he still hung around with him after he was convicted of sex crimes.

“A man is known by the company he keeps”

[RedDwarf 1881]

‘I did not suspect Epstein’s behaviour.’



Good to see the Duke ‘clarifying facts’.

He didn't need to suspect anything because he still hung around with him after he was convicted of sex crimes.

“A man is known by the company he keeps”

Spot on . Prince Andrew is a creep.

[Lovejoy]

Nah he was to busy shagging the thousand plus woman hes allegedly had

Nearly as many as you Big Ron!

[Proposition Joe]

‘I did not suspect Epstein’s behaviour.’



Good to see the Duke ‘clarifying facts’.

He didn't need to suspect anything because he still hung around with him after he was convicted of sex crimes.

“A man is known by the company he keeps”

Exactly. I hung out with a prominent *convicted* sex offender but had no idea of the kind of behaviour he got up to.

Also, that statement refers to Epstein's lifestyle. He wasn't having affairs or going dogging, he was a f*cking trafficker of underage girls. That's not a 'lifestyle choice'. Get the f*** out.

[BIGRON]

Nah he was to busy shagging the thousand plus woman hes allegedly had

Nearly as many as you Big Ron!

I wished , i can acctually count the women ive done the deed with

[Eat The Rich]

I'm sure there'll be a robust and entirely impartial investigation into HRH's association with a known child rapist and trafficker. Yup. Yup.Yup.

[spen666]

I'm sure there'll be a robust and entirely impartial investigation into HRH's association with a known child rapist and trafficker. Yup. Yup.Yup.

Epstein has as many convictions for clid rape as you or i

[Eat The Rich]

I'm sure there'll be a robust and entirely impartial investigation into HRH's association with a known child rapist and trafficker. Yup. Yup.Yup.

Epstein has as many convictions for clid rape as you or i

What do you call it when someone has sex with a person unable to give consent?

[Clive Evans]

Spen69 The Paedo's Advocate.

[spen666]

Spen69 The Paedo's Advocate.

I'm not advocating anything other than the truth.

Sorry if facts and truth offend you

[BoniO]

Andrew will weather the storm as people of his status almost always do. In another few days, weeks at most, this will all be old news. The media will have moved on. Unless some hard evidence of his taking part in under age sex comes to light he's in the clear. Even if it does emerge he can probably just buy his way out of it.

At the very least, his judgement is obviously terrible, at worst it's certainly not unreasonable to question Andrews motives in continuing his association with a convicted paedophile and trafficker of under age girls. We can all come to our own conclusions why Andrew chose to continue his association with scum like Epstein.

[F*ck The Poor & Fat]

‘I did not suspect Epstein’s behaviour.’



Good to see the Duke ‘clarifying facts’.

He didn't need to suspect anything because he still hung around with him after he was convicted of sex crimes.

“A man is known by the company he keeps”

Sort of destroys Andy’s defence don’t it. His not knowing stuff is just plain stupid. Course he fecking did. What he didn’t know was the the whole sordid story would come out.

[Clive Evans]

Sorry Spen69, I did you a mis-justice. Should read The Rich & Powerful Paedo's Advocate.

[spen666]

Sorry Spen69, I did you a mis-justice. Should read The Rich & Powerful Paedo's Advocate.

Amazing how stupid you can be without trying.

I have not advocated anything other than stating a fact

[Andersonitis]

Can he play in midfield.

[greyhound]

Can he play in midfield.

no he plays up front.

[StockholmO]

Roll on the Revolution and he'll be one of the first up against the wall.

[EH16]

Sorry Spen69, I did you a mis-justice. Should read The Rich & Powerful Paedo's Advocate.

Amazing how stupid you can be without trying.

I have not advocated anything other than stating a fact

Yes. One fact. There may very well be other facts. Just because we are not yet aware of them doesn't mean they don't exist. If I were you I would shut up about this until all the facts are available.

[BoniO]

Roll on the Revolution and he'll be one of the first up against the wall.

Bit harsh on Spen but then again.......

[spen666]

Sorry Spen69, I did you a mis-justice. Should read The Rich & Powerful Paedo's Advocate.

Amazing how stupid you can be without trying.

I have not advocated anything other than stating a fact

Yes. One fact. There may very well be other facts. Just because we are not yet aware of them doesn't mean they don't exist. If I were you I would shut up about this until all the facts are available.

Calm down.....


I started that Epstein had been convicted of as many rapes as you or I.

I started nothing more than that. I didn't say he had not had not raped anyone.

The fact is that unless you have a rape conviction, then Epstein has been convicted of as many rapes as you and me.

Stop trying to twist that into my defending or otherwise Epstein.

I am neither defending nor accusing him of anything as I have the sense to know I am not in possession of all the relevant evidence

[Max B Gold]

Amazing how stupid you can be without trying.

I have not advocated anything other than stating a fact

Yes. One fact. There may very well be other facts. Just because we are not yet aware of them doesn't mean they don't exist. If I were you I would shut up about this until all the facts are available.

Calm down.....


I started that Epstein had been convicted of as many rapes as you or I.

I started nothing more than that. I didn't say he had not had not raped anyone.

The fact is that unless you have a rape conviction, then Epstein has been convicted of as many rapes as you and me.

Stop trying to twist that into my defending or otherwise Epstein.

I am neither defending nor accusing him of anything as I have the sense to know I am not in possession of all the relevant evidence

Yes, yes but by taking that tack you are deflecting away from the sex crimes he was convicted of. That is an old trick often used by those in the legal profession to protect and stand up for their client. Tell us more about his convictions instead.