Ruel gone

Chat about Leyton Orient (or anything else)

Moderator: Long slender neck

User avatar
Currywurst and Chips
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 6234
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:40 am
Has thanked: 389 times
Been thanked: 1488 times

Re: Ruel gone

Post by Currywurst and Chips »

Mightynewsman wrote: Sun Jun 23, 2024 12:00 pm The deal is done his agreed to pastures new. apparently it’s either Peterborough, Wrexham or Wycombe but the deal is done.
Good luck for the future
Mightynewsman wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:06 pm You all laughed but I gave you the news wish him all the best


You spelt Bristol Rovers wrong
Brigs
Fresh Alias
Posts: 608
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2024 6:30 pm
Has thanked: 140 times
Been thanked: 77 times

Re: Ruel gone

Post by Brigs »

Mightynewsman wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:06 pm You all laughed but I gave you the news wish him all the best
Mightynewsman wrote: Sun Jun 23, 2024 12:00 pm The deal is done his agreed to pastures new. apparently it’s either Peterborough, Wrexham or Wycombe but the deal is done.
Good luck for the future
You sure?
User avatar
Bergen
Regular
Regular
Posts: 4148
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:07 pm
Has thanked: 358 times
Been thanked: 828 times

Re: Ruel gone

Post by Bergen »

Very disappointing news, but not a surprise. Good luck, Ruel.
RedDwarf 1881
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12507
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 2556 times

Re: Ruel gone

Post by RedDwarf 1881 »

Currywurst and Chips wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:08 pm
Mightynewsman wrote: Sun Jun 23, 2024 12:00 pm The deal is done his agreed to pastures new. apparently it’s either Peterborough, Wrexham or Wycombe but the deal is done.
Good luck for the future
Mightynewsman wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:06 pm You all laughed but I gave you the news wish him all the best


You spelt Bristol Rovers wrong
Exactly 😁 . Anyway, even a broken clock is right twice a day
User avatar
Bergen
Regular
Regular
Posts: 4148
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:07 pm
Has thanked: 358 times
Been thanked: 828 times

Re: Ruel gone

Post by Bergen »

Story of O
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2876
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 12:29 pm
Has thanked: 31 times
Been thanked: 566 times

Re: Ruel gone

Post by Story of O »

Bergen wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:29 pm
"But if you had paid me more I would have stayed"
RedDwarf 1881
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12507
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 2556 times

Re: Ruel gone

Post by RedDwarf 1881 »

gshaw wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:04 pm https://www.leytonorient.com/news/2024/ ... on-Orient/
we have an agreed budget and wage structure here and it is important for the long-term stability of the club that we stick to that. Myself and all of the footballing staff are aligned on that.
No surprise there, tries to hold the club to ransom each time his contract ends. Glad they've not given in, he's not worth paying through the nose for. Now get someone who wants to be here and preferably can trap a ball and pass it
It’s made it even more interesting to see who our two new strikers are.
gshaw
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 7700
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:24 pm
Has thanked: 3393 times
Been thanked: 1750 times

Re: Ruel gone

Post by gshaw »

RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:35 pm
gshaw wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:04 pm https://www.leytonorient.com/news/2024/ ... on-Orient/
we have an agreed budget and wage structure here and it is important for the long-term stability of the club that we stick to that. Myself and all of the footballing staff are aligned on that.
No surprise there, tries to hold the club to ransom each time his contract ends. Glad they've not given in, he's not worth paying through the nose for. Now get someone who wants to be here and preferably can trap a ball and pass it
It’s made it even more interesting to see who our two new strikers are.
We now need 3 (or 2 and Ruel's place goes to a wide player or CAM)
Orient Punxx
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2135
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 10:30 pm
Has thanked: 1850 times
Been thanked: 417 times

Re: Ruel gone

Post by Orient Punxx »

Story of O wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:31 pm
Bergen wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:29 pm
"But if you had paid me more I would have stayed"
That’s a question that will need answering.
Mightynewsman
Fresh Alias
Posts: 62
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2020 1:26 pm
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: Ruel gone

Post by Mightynewsman »

2 Strikers are kids one from Bournemouth
User avatar
Rich Tea Wellin
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 10551
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:01 pm
Has thanked: 4569 times
Been thanked: 3251 times

Re: Ruel gone

Post by Rich Tea Wellin »

I’m sad because he was an academy product and a very Richie type player that was flexible positionally . Great finisher too but also had long dry spells and no irreplaceable. A bit worrying we can’t match Bristol Rovers wage wise but if he’s getting paid more than fair play.

This news will look good or bad depending on who we replace him with.
Brigs
Fresh Alias
Posts: 608
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2024 6:30 pm
Has thanked: 140 times
Been thanked: 77 times

Re: Ruel gone

Post by Brigs »

Rich Tea Wellin wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:55 pm I’m sad because he was an academy product and a very Richie type player that was flexible positionally . Great finisher too but also had long dry spells and no irreplaceable. A bit worrying we can’t match Bristol Rovers wage wise but if he’s getting paid more than fair play.

This news will look good or bad depending on who we replace him with.
Rovers have an 11k capacity We have 8.7k capacity
Literally 2.5 thousand extra £20 notes every other Saturday on a full house The Sooner we increase capacity the better
User avatar
Long slender neck
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 14325
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
Has thanked: 2511 times
Been thanked: 3301 times

Re: Ruel gone

Post by Long slender neck »

Sad.

And boooo
BiggsyMalone
Regular
Regular
Posts: 4444
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 4:12 pm
Has thanked: 895 times
Been thanked: 963 times

Re: Ruel gone

Post by BiggsyMalone »

Rich Tea Wellin wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:55 pm I’m sad because he was an academy product and a very Richie type player that was flexible positionally . Great finisher too but also had long dry spells and no irreplaceable. A bit worrying we can’t match Bristol Rovers wage wise but if he’s getting paid more than fair play.

This news will look good or bad depending on who we replace him with.
He’s not a great finisher. He scores great goals.
PKM
Fresh Alias
Posts: 758
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:08 am
Has thanked: 181 times
Been thanked: 293 times

Re: Ruel gone

Post by PKM »

Brigs wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:04 pm
Rich Tea Wellin wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:55 pm I’m sad because he was an academy product and a very Richie type player that was flexible positionally . Great finisher too but also had long dry spells and no irreplaceable. A bit worrying we can’t match Bristol Rovers wage wise but if he’s getting paid more than fair play.

This news will look good or bad depending on who we replace him with.
Rovers have an 11k capacity We have 8.7k capacity
Literally 2.5 thousand extra £20 notes every other Saturday on a full house The Sooner we increase capacity the better
Last year Rovers 8,190
Orient 8,172
So nothing in it. The fact that Rovers were able to pay more than we could for Ruel is disappointing and a tad surprising.
User avatar
Rich Tea Wellin
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 10551
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:01 pm
Has thanked: 4569 times
Been thanked: 3251 times

Re: Ruel gone

Post by Rich Tea Wellin »

BiggsyMalone wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:13 pm
Rich Tea Wellin wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:55 pm I’m sad because he was an academy product and a very Richie type player that was flexible positionally . Great finisher too but also had long dry spells and no irreplaceable. A bit worrying we can’t match Bristol Rovers wage wise but if he’s getting paid more than fair play.

This news will look good or bad depending on who we replace him with.
He’s not a great finisher. He scores great goals.
Sorry, he’s the best finisher at the club (before today)
PKM
Fresh Alias
Posts: 758
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:08 am
Has thanked: 181 times
Been thanked: 293 times

Re: Ruel gone

Post by PKM »

Difference could be length of contract
Ruel has got himself a 3 year deal with an option of another year on top

https://www.bristolrovers.co.uk/news/i- ... -interview
Brigs
Fresh Alias
Posts: 608
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2024 6:30 pm
Has thanked: 140 times
Been thanked: 77 times

Re: Ruel gone

Post by Brigs »

PKM wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:13 pm
Brigs wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:04 pm
Rich Tea Wellin wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:55 pm I’m sad because he was an academy product and a very Richie type player that was flexible positionally . Great finisher too but also had long dry spells and no irreplaceable. A bit worrying we can’t match Bristol Rovers wage wise but if he’s getting paid more than fair play.

This news will look good or bad depending on who we replace him with.
Rovers have an 11k capacity We have 8.7k capacity
Literally 2.5 thousand extra £20 notes every other Saturday on a full house The Sooner we increase capacity the better
Last year Rovers 8,190
Orient 8,172
So nothing in it. The fact that Rovers were able to pay more than we could for Ruel is disappointing and a tad surprising.
We rarely had 8172
Plus they had over 10k at home for a 3rd round cup tie.
I can see why Nigel is desperate for a cup run
gshaw
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 7700
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:24 pm
Has thanked: 3393 times
Been thanked: 1750 times

Re: Ruel gone

Post by gshaw »

PKM wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:13 pm
Brigs wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:04 pm
Rich Tea Wellin wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:55 pm I’m sad because he was an academy product and a very Richie type player that was flexible positionally . Great finisher too but also had long dry spells and no irreplaceable. A bit worrying we can’t match Bristol Rovers wage wise but if he’s getting paid more than fair play.

This news will look good or bad depending on who we replace him with.
Rovers have an 11k capacity We have 8.7k capacity
Literally 2.5 thousand extra £20 notes every other Saturday on a full house The Sooner we increase capacity the better
Last year Rovers 8,190
Orient 8,172
So nothing in it. The fact that Rovers were able to pay more than we could for Ruel is disappointing and a tad surprising.
Not necessarily surprising, he was seen by RW as a bench player here so I'm glad we haven't paid first XI wages for him.
User avatar
OyinbO
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2067
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:28 pm
Location: London
Has thanked: 1414 times
Been thanked: 707 times

Re: Ruel gone

Post by OyinbO »

Rich Tea Wellin wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:55 pm I’m sad because he was an academy product and a very Richie type player that was flexible positionally . Great finisher too but also had long dry spells and no irreplaceable. A bit worrying we can’t match Bristol Rovers wage wise but if he’s getting paid more than fair play.

This news will look good or bad depending on who we replace him with.
More likely he was promised regular starts, and we wouldn't do that. And we'd be right not to.
RedDwarf 1881
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12507
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 2556 times

Re: Ruel gone

Post by RedDwarf 1881 »

PKM wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:13 pm
Brigs wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:04 pm
Rich Tea Wellin wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:55 pm I’m sad because he was an academy product and a very Richie type player that was flexible positionally . Great finisher too but also had long dry spells and no irreplaceable. A bit worrying we can’t match Bristol Rovers wage wise but if he’s getting paid more than fair play.

This news will look good or bad depending on who we replace him with.
Rovers have an 11k capacity We have 8.7k capacity
Literally 2.5 thousand extra £20 notes every other Saturday on a full house The Sooner we increase capacity the better
Last year Rovers 8,190
Orient 8,172
So nothing in it. The fact that Rovers were able to pay more than we could for Ruel is disappointing and a tad surprising.
Maybe we couldn't afford it because we're buying El-Miz and the money couldn't stretch that far . I'll make my mind up about our transfer activity when the transfer window closes .
Brigs
Fresh Alias
Posts: 608
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2024 6:30 pm
Has thanked: 140 times
Been thanked: 77 times

Re: Ruel gone

Post by Brigs »

RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:30 pm
PKM wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:13 pm
Brigs wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:04 pm

Rovers have an 11k capacity We have 8.7k capacity
Literally 2.5 thousand extra £20 notes every other Saturday on a full house The Sooner we increase capacity the better
Last year Rovers 8,190
Orient 8,172
So nothing in it. The fact that Rovers were able to pay more than we could for Ruel is disappointing and a tad surprising.
Maybe we couldn't afford it because we're buying El-Miz and the money couldn't stretch that far . I'll make my mind up about our transfer activity when the transfer window closes .
:lol:
redintheface
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1306
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2019 11:21 am
Has thanked: 216 times
Been thanked: 323 times

Re: Ruel gone

Post by redintheface »

PKM wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:17 pm Difference could be length of contract
Ruel has got himself a 3 year deal with an option of another year on top

https://www.bristolrovers.co.uk/news/i- ... -interview
You may be right but the impression I gained from Wellens’ comments on the O’s website was that the club’s wage structure and player budget ( or maybe lack of it?) was a significant factor. RS often flattered to deceive imho and was never a particular favourite of mine but he was our leading goal scorer and can hopefully be replaced satisfactorily.
RedDwarf 1881
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12507
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 2556 times

Re: Ruel gone

Post by RedDwarf 1881 »

Brigs wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:34 pm
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:30 pm
PKM wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:13 pm

Last year Rovers 8,190
Orient 8,172
So nothing in it. The fact that Rovers were able to pay more than we could for Ruel is disappointing and a tad surprising.
Maybe we couldn't afford it because we're buying El-Miz and the money couldn't stretch that far . I'll make my mind up about our transfer activity when the transfer window closes .
:lol:
Well I think if we sign El-Miz we would have to pay a fee for him . Ipswich took up the option of extending his contract .
User avatar
MassiveForehead
Fresh Alias
Posts: 237
Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 9:35 am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 40 times

Re: Ruel gone

Post by MassiveForehead »

Feel like it's a sideways moves in terms of teams, but if he gets a longer contract then fine for him. He did a decent service for us without being always prolific.
Post Reply