Wellens avoids touchline ban.

Chat about Leyton Orient (or anything else)

Moderator: Long slender neck

Dohnut
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2917
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:03 pm
Has thanked: 309 times
Been thanked: 662 times

Re: Wellens charged by the FA

Post by Dohnut »

gshaw wrote: Sat Mar 02, 2024 10:29 pm
Dohnut wrote: Sat Mar 02, 2024 8:53 pm The current clampdown by the FA is as a result of increasing bad behaviour creeping into the game. They are trying to stop this creep and this season have been applying the rules more rigorously. Many types of behaviour like surrounding referees and technical area offences have declined already. Dissent cautions have increased as part of this clampdown but the FA expect this to decline one player/coach behaviour improves.

We have seen a marked increase in time added on for time-wasting and all this surrounding the referee and kicking the ball away at free kicks is disappearing.

Wellens offences are covered by the Laws, law 12, and he is clearly in breach of them. He knows it too and is not contesting the latest one because now he knows the rules he realises he was wrong. No matter how he chooses to describe it.

Thinking the rules are crap is fine, but they are the rules and need to be adhered to. No referees = no football. Think about it!
All of the above stuff they're clamping down on... who bloody cares apart from the suits?

Technical area... who cares, it's great to see managers running up the line with passion

Dissent... get the decisions right then, we're seeing basic errors increasing like not giving fouls on a keeper clearing a ball, and these referees want respect? :roll:

What we have is too much meddling in the rougher edges of the game by those who have never played it. Fans don't want the sport sanitised, neither do players, managers or pundits.

In short, reverse all the recent changes, get back to simple definitions of basics like handball, added time and keep it consistent. The rest would follow but this authoritarian, punitive method is just driving an increasing wedge between those "running" the game and those watching and playing it.

As Richie says in his interview, they drain him and I get the same feeling every time VA-farce crops up in MOTD and the same watching inept officials at our level.
You may not care but football, life in general, needs laws. It’s absolutely astounding to think that anyone would believe sport does not need laws/rules. I accept peoples views on whether laws are good or bad but whatever feelings may be, they need to be followed.

RW is a professional and is governed by a set of laws. He may not like them but frankly that’s tough. Lobby to change them, abide by them or get out of the game. If you break them accept you will be punished. Thats life for us all in so many ways. RW needs to Grow up and stop acting like a mate talking down the pub. He is a professional and needs to act like it.
User avatar
Hoover Attack
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 5173
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:41 am
Has thanked: 655 times
Been thanked: 1316 times

Re: Wellens charged by the FA

Post by Hoover Attack »

Richie isn’t querying the laws.

He’s just - understandably - frustrated by the clowns that try to administer them.
User avatar
Top of the JES
Regular
Regular
Posts: 3654
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:38 pm
Has thanked: 1252 times
Been thanked: 1255 times

Re: Wellens charged by the FA

Post by Top of the JES »

Given a £2400 fine but no touchline ban or other sporting sanction, good but expensive news for RW.

I think they accepted his version of events,
Story of O
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2880
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 12:29 pm
Has thanked: 31 times
Been thanked: 567 times

Re: Wellens avoids touchline ban.

Post by Story of O »

Then why fine him?
oriboy
Fresh Alias
Posts: 233
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2019 4:35 pm
Has thanked: 23 times
Been thanked: 82 times

Re: Wellens charged by the FA

Post by oriboy »

Top of the JES wrote: Thu Mar 07, 2024 4:35 pm Given a £2400 fine but no touchline ban or other sporting sanction, good but expensive news for RW.

I think they accepted his version of events,
Just giving page to pay RW fine anyone?
User avatar
Currywurst and Chips
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 6277
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:40 am
Has thanked: 393 times
Been thanked: 1493 times

Re: Wellens avoids touchline ban.

Post by Currywurst and Chips »

Agree, let’s pay the fine for a former professional footballer turned manager, he must be on the breadline
User avatar
Rich Tea Wellin
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 10578
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:01 pm
Has thanked: 4586 times
Been thanked: 3266 times

Re: Wellens avoids touchline ban.

Post by Rich Tea Wellin »

Sounds like it was worth it
User avatar
ComeOnYouOs
Regular
Regular
Posts: 3841
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 12:22 pm
Awards: Colossal berk
Has thanked: 79 times
Been thanked: 1054 times

Re: Wellens avoids touchline ban.

Post by ComeOnYouOs »

That's good news. I was certain a 5 or 6 match touchline ban was imminent.
As Richie himself said, it'll be beans on toast this month in the Wellens household.
User avatar
Hoover Attack
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 5173
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:41 am
Has thanked: 655 times
Been thanked: 1316 times

Re: Wellens charged by the FA

Post by Hoover Attack »

Top of the JES wrote: Thu Mar 07, 2024 4:35 pm Given a £2400 fine but no touchline ban or other sporting sanction, good but expensive news for RW.

I think they accepted his version of events,
What a bizarre turn of events.
User avatar
Top of the JES
Regular
Regular
Posts: 3654
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:38 pm
Has thanked: 1252 times
Been thanked: 1255 times

Re: Wellens avoids touchline ban.

Post by Top of the JES »

Story of O wrote: Thu Mar 07, 2024 5:09 pm Then why fine him?
They couldn’t let RW off it would make it look like they were not backing the referee and as we know they always look after their own.
gshaw
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 7765
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:24 pm
Has thanked: 3434 times
Been thanked: 1774 times

Re: Wellens avoids touchline ban.

Post by gshaw »

Richie wins this round, a token fine is basically admitting he's not really done anything wrong but the FA can't lose face in letting him off the hook completely
User avatar
The Reverend
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2291
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 4:12 pm
Has thanked: 818 times
Been thanked: 948 times

Re: Wellens avoids touchline ban.

Post by The Reverend »

gshaw wrote: Thu Mar 07, 2024 7:07 pm Richie wins this round, a token fine is basically admitting he's not really done anything wrong but the FA can't lose face in letting him off the hook completely
£2400 is an expensive token!
soloman
Fresh Alias
Posts: 641
Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2019 8:26 pm
Has thanked: 359 times
Been thanked: 180 times

Re: Wellens avoids touchline ban.

Post by soloman »

The Reverend wrote: Thu Mar 07, 2024 8:54 pm
gshaw wrote: Thu Mar 07, 2024 7:07 pm Richie wins this round, a token fine is basically admitting he's not really done anything wrong but the FA can't lose face in letting him off the hook completely
£2400 is an expensive token!
That depends on what gshaw's wages are .
User avatar
ChorizO
Fresh Alias
Posts: 323
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2023 7:12 am
Has thanked: 72 times
Been thanked: 69 times

Re: Wellens charged by the FA

Post by ChorizO »

Dohnut wrote: Sat Mar 02, 2024 10:52 pm
gshaw wrote: Sat Mar 02, 2024 10:29 pm
Dohnut wrote: Sat Mar 02, 2024 8:53 pm The current clampdown by the FA is as a result of increasing bad behaviour creeping into the game. They are trying to stop this creep and this season have been applying the rules more rigorously. Many types of behaviour like surrounding referees and technical area offences have declined already. Dissent cautions have increased as part of this clampdown but the FA expect this to decline one player/coach behaviour improves.

We have seen a marked increase in time added on for time-wasting and all this surrounding the referee and kicking the ball away at free kicks is disappearing.

Wellens offences are covered by the Laws, law 12, and he is clearly in breach of them. He knows it too and is not contesting the latest one because now he knows the rules he realises he was wrong. No matter how he chooses to describe it.

Thinking the rules are crap is fine, but they are the rules and need to be adhered to. No referees = no football. Think about it!
All of the above stuff they're clamping down on... who bloody cares apart from the suits?

Technical area... who cares, it's great to see managers running up the line with passion

Dissent... get the decisions right then, we're seeing basic errors increasing like not giving fouls on a keeper clearing a ball, and these referees want respect? :roll:

What we have is too much meddling in the rougher edges of the game by those who have never played it. Fans don't want the sport sanitised, neither do players, managers or pundits.

In short, reverse all the recent changes, get back to simple definitions of basics like handball, added time and keep it consistent. The rest would follow but this authoritarian, punitive method is just driving an increasing wedge between those "running" the game and those watching and playing it.

As Richie says in his interview, they drain him and I get the same feeling every time VA-farce crops up in MOTD and the same watching inept officials at our level.
You may not care but football, life in general, needs laws. It’s absolutely astounding to think that anyone would believe sport does not need laws/rules. I accept peoples views on whether laws are good or bad but whatever feelings may be, they need to be followed.

RW is a professional and is governed by a set of laws. He may not like them but frankly that’s tough. Lobby to change them, abide by them or get out of the game. If you break them accept you will be punished. Thats life for us all in so many ways. RW needs to Grow up and stop acting like a mate talking down the pub. He is a professional and needs to act like it.
I am sure your pontificating will make all the difference.
CEB

Re: Wellens avoids touchline ban.

Post by CEB »

I see ChipolatO has skulked out of his regular log in and used the sock account as a safe outlet for his self loathing
Post Reply