Alias's / Suspected Alias / Outed Alias Thread

[CreamofSumYungGai]

I obviously recognise you, too x

[Wally Banter]

.._______
|...........|
|...........0______________
|........... _______________\
|..........\__/
\________/

[ComeOnYouOs]

How do people notice things like this?

With the exception of 1 or 2 people on here who I half respect - that scotch bloke and the podcast goon - I basically treat everyone else as one homogeneous awful boarder to argue and disagree with. There are too many name changes and red this and red that to identify individuals.

EDIT - The Prez also stands out because he's that much worse than everyone else.

Well you changed your name from the last board......so pot calling the kettle black, maybe?

[CreamofSumYungGai]

How do people notice things like this?

With the exception of 1 or 2 people on here who I half respect - that scotch bloke and the podcast goon - I basically treat everyone else as one homogeneous awful boarder to argue and disagree with. There are too many name changes and red this and red that to identify individuals.

EDIT - The Prez also stands out because he's that much worse than everyone else.

Well you changed your name from the last board......so pot calling the kettle black, maybe?

Some b*stard stole my old name.

But regardless, I stand out and am memorable (as are you I admit, although for differing reasons).

[Disoriented]

How do people notice things like this?

With the exception of 1 or 2 people on here who I half respect - that scotch bloke and the podcast goon - I basically treat everyone else as one homogeneous awful boarder to argue and disagree with. There are too many name changes and red this and red that to identify individuals.

EDIT - The Prez also stands out because he's that much worse than everyone else.

Well you changed your name from the last board......so pot calling the kettle black, maybe?

Some b*stard stole my old name.

But regardless, I stand out and am memorable (as are you I admit, although for differing reasons).

Should be a ban on anyone using red in their name. Way too confusing.

[BoniO]

How do people notice things like this?

With the exception of 1 or 2 people on here who I half respect - that scotch bloke and the podcast goon - I basically treat everyone else as one homogeneous awful boarder to argue and disagree with. There are too many name changes and red this and red that to identify individuals.

EDIT - The Prez also stands out because he's that much worse than everyone else.

Well you changed your name from the last board......so pot calling the kettle black, maybe?

Some b*stard stole my old name.

Which one?

[Admin]

How do people notice things like this?

With the exception of 1 or 2 people on here who I half respect - that scotch bloke and the podcast goon - I basically treat everyone else as one homogeneous awful boarder to argue and disagree with. There are too many name changes and red this and red that to identify individuals.

EDIT - The Prez also stands out because he's that much worse than everyone else.

Well you changed your name from the last board......so pot calling the kettle black, maybe?

Some b*stard stole my old name.

But regardless, I stand out and am memorable (as are you I admit, although for differing reasons).

Spen’s relinquished OTH if you want it back

[Disoriented]

What about the PAM alias?

[Redcard]

I have only ever used one boarding name at the same time, and have never used multiple sign ins.
People that post under several names do so because they want to give their dubious argument some support and make it appear that others (themselves really) are in agreement with them.For my part they are INSECURE , AND DECEITFUL , and when caught should be banned. So how about it , an amnesty and opportunity to remove multiples, thereafter a banning for future offenders.

[Disoriented]

I have only ever used one boarding name at the same time, and have never used multiple sign ins.
People that post under several names do so because they want to give their dubious argument some support and make it appear that others (themselves really) are in agreement with them.For my part they are INSECURE , AND DECEITFUL , and when caught should be banned. So how about it , an amnesty and opportunity to remove multiples, thereafter a banning for future offenders.

You do appear to take life rather too seriously. I am sure FTC and the other one have matters in hand.

[Redcard]

The only people who I suspect would object are those with duplicate user names.

[jamespevans]

How do people notice things like this?

With the exception of 1 or 2 people on here who I half respect - that scotch bloke and the podcast goon - I basically treat everyone else as one homogeneous awful boarder to argue and disagree with. There are too many name changes and red this and red that to identify individuals.

EDIT - The Prez also stands out because he's that much worse than everyone else.

I'd be offended by Hooky's post (even allowing for me getting him mixed up with Smendrick) except I can't be bothered to post on here much these days.

[CreamofSumYungGai]

Oh pevans, of course you're not included in that x

[Disoriented]

Oh pevans, of course you're not included in that x

You have a lot to answer for fella.

[Long slender neck]

Who is BiggsyMalone?

[Omygawd]

Who is BiggsyMalone?

OrientTony

[Lucky7]

Who is BiggsyMalone?

OrientTony

Who is Lester I wonder?

[P&O]

Let me get this straight.

Spen and Esteban were both permanently banned for arguing with each other.

For unknown reasons Spens ban was lifted whilst Esteban, presumably, remained banned.

Then Esteban was accused of having aliases and those accounts were also banned. The main Esteban account remained banned.

Then it turns out that Spen had also been using multiple accounts. But instead of having his permanent ban reinstated he was allowed to get away with it. His only punishment was having the fake accounts shut down.
He was allowed to subvert a reinstatement of his permanent ban by promising to behave himself on this board and stop winding people up.

Within days he was back winding people up. He continues to do this (see his latest thread about the Salford result)

What kind of system of rules is this board operating on? Where one member gets permanently banned whilst another gets his ban for the same offence lifted and then continues to break board rules without being banned again.

[CreamofSumYungGai]

Hi, Esta.

Make you right though. No idea what the mods are playing at here.

[Lucky7]

Let me get this straight.

Spen and Esteban were both permanently banned for arguing with each other.

For unknown reasons Spens ban was lifted whilst Esteban, presumably, remained banned.

Then Esteban was accused of having aliases and those accounts were also banned. The main Esteban account remained banned.

Then it turns out that Spen had also been using multiple accounts. But instead of having his permanent ban reinstated he was allowed to get away with it. His only punishment was having the fake accounts shut down.
He was allowed to subvert a reinstatement of his permanent ban by promising to behave himself on this board and stop winding people up.

Within days he was back winding people up. He continues to do this (see his latest thread about the Salford result)

What kind of system of rules is this board operating on? Where one member gets permanently banned whilst another gets his ban for the same offence lifted and then continues to break board rules without being banned again.

It’s called the Este ban rules
How did you get through the heat sensors and trip wires this time round?

[Long slender neck]

P&O
Byways1

[P&O]

P&O
Byways1

Willing to stick money on that?

[Byways1]

P&O
Byways1

Willing to stick money on that?

Lost your bet.

[Long slender neck]

Who is Lucky7?

[Smendrick Feaselberg]

And Orient1881