Fernandes Penalty - Wigan
Moderator: Long slender neck
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2597
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:15 am
- Has thanked: 106 times
- Been thanked: 627 times
Re: Fernandes Penalty - Wigan
DCL's red card which the ref didn't give, then was told to go to the screen by the VAR and then changed to give has been rescinded. VAR should be replaced by automated decisions, the opinion stuff is completely flawed.
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2657
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 9:34 pm
- Has thanked: 102 times
- Been thanked: 411 times
Re: Fernandes Penalty - Wigan
Give it to Jabo wrote: ↑Tue Jan 09, 2024 12:46 pm Okay, I'll say it - if only we had VAR at the game......
- Rich Tea Wellin
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10549
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:01 pm
- Has thanked: 4569 times
- Been thanked: 3248 times
Re: Fernandes Penalty - Wigan
Watching the games at non prem grounds, I loved not having var.
The problem now is that the standard of reffing risks getting lower the more they rely on var. they know that if they mess up they have var to fall back on. I think they shy away from some big decisions for that reason. However, the way var works today means that the on field decision can affect the outcome.
The problem now is that the standard of reffing risks getting lower the more they rely on var. they know that if they mess up they have var to fall back on. I think they shy away from some big decisions for that reason. However, the way var works today means that the on field decision can affect the outcome.
-
- Regular
- Posts: 3357
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 12:08 pm
- Has thanked: 1158 times
- Been thanked: 496 times
Re: Fernandes Penalty - Wigan
Do you mean an "off field" decision?Rich Tea Wellin wrote: ↑Wed Jan 10, 2024 9:46 am Watching the games at non prem grounds, I loved not having var.
The problem now is that the standard of reffing risks getting lower the more they rely on var. they know that if they mess up they have var to fall back on. I think they shy away from some big decisions for that reason. However, the way var works today means that the on field decision can affect the outcome.
On field decisions have affected outcomes from when referees were first introduced
- Rich Tea Wellin
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10549
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:01 pm
- Has thanked: 4569 times
- Been thanked: 3248 times
Re: Fernandes Penalty - Wigan
No, I mean on field decisions.spen666 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 10, 2024 9:49 amDo you mean an "off field" decision?Rich Tea Wellin wrote: ↑Wed Jan 10, 2024 9:46 am Watching the games at non prem grounds, I loved not having var.
The problem now is that the standard of reffing risks getting lower the more they rely on var. they know that if they mess up they have var to fall back on. I think they shy away from some big decisions for that reason. However, the way var works today means that the on field decision can affect the outcome.
On field decisions have affected outcomes from when referees were first introduced
In the context of Var, as I stated, the rules around var dictate that a decision is changed if a clear and obvious error has been made by the on-field officials. Therefore, in some, but not all cases, a ref not giving a pen because they effectively bottle it and want var to check may lead to a different var outcome to if they did give it onfield
- Hoover Attack
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 5045
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 636 times
- Been thanked: 1271 times
- Rich Tea Wellin
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10549
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:01 pm
- Has thanked: 4569 times
- Been thanked: 3248 times
Re: Fernandes Penalty - Wigan
Well, I guess they see it as an objective rule. You either are or aren’t offside. Pens aren’t as clear cutHoover Attack wrote: ↑Wed Jan 10, 2024 10:20 am Offsides are not treated to this 'clear and obvious' edict?
-
- Regular
- Posts: 3357
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 12:08 pm
- Has thanked: 1158 times
- Been thanked: 496 times
Re: Fernandes Penalty - Wigan
its clear and obvious that their definition of clear and obvious varies from cases to case and some ( not me) would say its clear and obvious that the use of the clear and obvious test is biased in favour of the big clubsHoover Attack wrote: ↑Wed Jan 10, 2024 10:20 am Offsides are not treated to this 'clear and obvious' edict?
Is this clear and obvious