Fernandes Penalty - Wigan

Chat about Leyton Orient (or anything else)

Moderator: Long slender neck

Adz
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2615
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:15 am
Has thanked: 107 times
Been thanked: 628 times

Re: Fernandes Penalty - Wigan

Post by Adz »

DCL's red card which the ref didn't give, then was told to go to the screen by the VAR and then changed to give has been rescinded. VAR should be replaced by automated decisions, the opinion stuff is completely flawed.
Give it to Jabo
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2708
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 9:34 pm
Has thanked: 103 times
Been thanked: 427 times

Re: Fernandes Penalty - Wigan

Post by Give it to Jabo »

Give it to Jabo wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 12:46 pm Okay, I'll say it - if only we had VAR at the game......
User avatar
Rich Tea Wellin
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 10631
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:01 pm
Has thanked: 4605 times
Been thanked: 3288 times

Re: Fernandes Penalty - Wigan

Post by Rich Tea Wellin »

Watching the games at non prem grounds, I loved not having var.
The problem now is that the standard of reffing risks getting lower the more they rely on var. they know that if they mess up they have var to fall back on. I think they shy away from some big decisions for that reason. However, the way var works today means that the on field decision can affect the outcome.
spen666
Regular
Regular
Posts: 3357
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 12:08 pm
Has thanked: 1160 times
Been thanked: 496 times

Re: Fernandes Penalty - Wigan

Post by spen666 »

Rich Tea Wellin wrote: Wed Jan 10, 2024 9:46 am Watching the games at non prem grounds, I loved not having var.
The problem now is that the standard of reffing risks getting lower the more they rely on var. they know that if they mess up they have var to fall back on. I think they shy away from some big decisions for that reason. However, the way var works today means that the on field decision can affect the outcome.
Do you mean an "off field" decision?

On field decisions have affected outcomes from when referees were first introduced
User avatar
Rich Tea Wellin
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 10631
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:01 pm
Has thanked: 4605 times
Been thanked: 3288 times

Re: Fernandes Penalty - Wigan

Post by Rich Tea Wellin »

spen666 wrote: Wed Jan 10, 2024 9:49 am
Rich Tea Wellin wrote: Wed Jan 10, 2024 9:46 am Watching the games at non prem grounds, I loved not having var.
The problem now is that the standard of reffing risks getting lower the more they rely on var. they know that if they mess up they have var to fall back on. I think they shy away from some big decisions for that reason. However, the way var works today means that the on field decision can affect the outcome.
Do you mean an "off field" decision?

On field decisions have affected outcomes from when referees were first introduced
No, I mean on field decisions.

In the context of Var, as I stated, the rules around var dictate that a decision is changed if a clear and obvious error has been made by the on-field officials. Therefore, in some, but not all cases, a ref not giving a pen because they effectively bottle it and want var to check may lead to a different var outcome to if they did give it onfield
User avatar
Hoover Attack
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 5342
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:41 am
Has thanked: 687 times
Been thanked: 1362 times

Re: Fernandes Penalty - Wigan

Post by Hoover Attack »

Offsides are not treated to this 'clear and obvious' edict?
User avatar
Rich Tea Wellin
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 10631
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:01 pm
Has thanked: 4605 times
Been thanked: 3288 times

Re: Fernandes Penalty - Wigan

Post by Rich Tea Wellin »

Hoover Attack wrote: Wed Jan 10, 2024 10:20 am Offsides are not treated to this 'clear and obvious' edict?
Well, I guess they see it as an objective rule. You either are or aren’t offside. Pens aren’t as clear cut
spen666
Regular
Regular
Posts: 3357
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 12:08 pm
Has thanked: 1160 times
Been thanked: 496 times

Re: Fernandes Penalty - Wigan

Post by spen666 »

Hoover Attack wrote: Wed Jan 10, 2024 10:20 am Offsides are not treated to this 'clear and obvious' edict?
its clear and obvious that their definition of clear and obvious varies from cases to case and some ( not me) would say its clear and obvious that the use of the clear and obvious test is biased in favour of the big clubs

Is this clear and obvious
Post Reply