Sensible laws of football changes
Moderator: Long slender neck
Sensible laws of football changes
Following on from the penalty thread
Feel free to add suggestions or explain how these are stupid/unworkable
1: yellow cards: for purposes of in-game discipline, a yellow carded player who is substituted has his yellow card transferred over to the player who replaces him. If the substitute gets a yellow card, he is sent off (though without a suspension for a second yellow)
Purpose: to stop cynical use of tactical yellow cards spread amongst the team, with zero consequences now there are more substitutions available.
2: penalties: awarded for denial of a goal scoring opportunity anywhere on the pitch. Perhaps use a threshold of a number on the expected goals scale for whether it constitutes a penalty?
3: goalkeeper time wasting - yellow card for first offence
Feel free to add suggestions or explain how these are stupid/unworkable
1: yellow cards: for purposes of in-game discipline, a yellow carded player who is substituted has his yellow card transferred over to the player who replaces him. If the substitute gets a yellow card, he is sent off (though without a suspension for a second yellow)
Purpose: to stop cynical use of tactical yellow cards spread amongst the team, with zero consequences now there are more substitutions available.
2: penalties: awarded for denial of a goal scoring opportunity anywhere on the pitch. Perhaps use a threshold of a number on the expected goals scale for whether it constitutes a penalty?
3: goalkeeper time wasting - yellow card for first offence
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1253
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 7:54 am
- Has thanked: 243 times
- Been thanked: 685 times
Re: Sensible laws of football changes
I'd like to see a 'long penalty' introduced, for less serious / consequential fouls in the box. If you're slightly tripped and throw yourself over while running away from goal, not sure why that should merit a free shot from 12 yards. Make those ones a shot from the edge of the D instead.
- Hoover Attack
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 5342
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 687 times
- Been thanked: 1362 times
Re: Sensible laws of football changes
You can't bring all that analysis/betting bollocks into refereeing decisions.
If it's a denial of a goal scoring opportunity, it's a red card, isn't that punishment enough?
- Hoover Attack
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 5342
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 687 times
- Been thanked: 1362 times
Re: Sensible laws of football changes
Futsal has a secondary, further out penalty spot so it's a concept with precedent. I like it.Wally Banter wrote: ↑Tue Jan 09, 2024 11:31 am I'd like to see a 'long penalty' introduced, for less serious / consequential fouls in the box. If you're slightly tripped and throw yourself over while running away from goal, not sure why that should merit a free shot from 12 yards. Make those ones a shot from the edge of the D instead.
-
- Regular
- Posts: 3357
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 12:08 pm
- Has thanked: 1160 times
- Been thanked: 496 times
Re: Sensible laws of football changes
You are either tripped or you are not trippedWally Banter wrote: ↑Tue Jan 09, 2024 11:31 am I'd like to see a 'long penalty' introduced, for less serious / consequential fouls in the box. If you're slightly tripped and throw yourself over while running away from goal, not sure why that should merit a free shot from 12 yards. Make those ones a shot from the edge of the D instead.
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1253
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 7:54 am
- Has thanked: 243 times
- Been thanked: 685 times
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1411
- Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2021 5:53 am
- Has thanked: 443 times
- Been thanked: 333 times
Re: Sensible laws of football changes
The laws don’t need changing, they just need to be enforced properly. I recall a rule of bringing the game into disrepute. I assume this still exists? This covers diving and cheating. It should be enforced.
Re: Sensible laws of football changes
Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Tue Jan 09, 2024 11:32 amYou can't bring all that analysis/betting bollocks into refereeing decisions.
If it's a denial of a goal scoring opportunity, it's a red card, isn't that punishment enough?
No, because the detriment of a red card Vs a penalty differs at differing times of the game: a red card in the third minute is much worse than a red card in the 90th minute
- The Reverend
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2324
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 4:12 pm
- Has thanked: 821 times
- Been thanked: 961 times
- Hoover Attack
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 5342
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 687 times
- Been thanked: 1362 times
Re: Sensible laws of football changes
Yep, accepted.CEB wrote: ↑Tue Jan 09, 2024 11:41 amHoover Attack wrote: ↑Tue Jan 09, 2024 11:32 amYou can't bring all that analysis/betting bollocks into refereeing decisions.
If it's a denial of a goal scoring opportunity, it's a red card, isn't that punishment enough?
No, because the detriment of a red card Vs a penalty differs at differing times of the game: a red card in the third minute is much worse than a red card in the 90th minute
Give the opponent the choice of a penalty or a red card then, rather than both. If it's early, they might choose the man advantage, if late on, they'd take the pen.
- Hoover Attack
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 5342
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 687 times
- Been thanked: 1362 times
- The Reverend
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2324
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 4:12 pm
- Has thanked: 821 times
- Been thanked: 961 times
Re: Sensible laws of football changes
Ok, 5-a-side rules: it’s replaced with a kick in but the kick in can’t go above waist height
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1253
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 7:54 am
- Has thanked: 243 times
- Been thanked: 685 times
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4886
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:48 pm
- Has thanked: 2145 times
- Been thanked: 1747 times
Re: Sensible laws of football changes
I think it's a bad outcome overall but I'm increasingly in favour of saying any time the ball hits someone's hand in the box, intentional or otherwise, it's a penalty. Would instantly take away all the bollocks, interpretation and tiresome subsequent debate about how far someone's hands are away from their body, unnatural position, how far away the cross/shot taker was etc.
Or, we could go back to how it used to be which seemed considerably less mental.
Or, we could go back to how it used to be which seemed considerably less mental.
- Top of the JES
- Regular
- Posts: 3655
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:38 pm
- Has thanked: 1254 times
- Been thanked: 1255 times
Re: Sensible laws of football changes
A sin bin. Any team that gets four or more yellow cards has a player put in the sin bin for 10 minutes. ( I realise we would often be playing with ten) Yellow cards should impact the game they are accrued in.
-
- Regular
- Posts: 3357
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 12:08 pm
- Has thanked: 1160 times
- Been thanked: 496 times
Re: Sensible laws of football changes
That will delay the game longer than VAR...imagine needing to wait for the result of court hearing...will make a 5 minute VAR delay seems speedy
-
- Regular
- Posts: 3357
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 12:08 pm
- Has thanked: 1160 times
- Been thanked: 496 times
Re: Sensible laws of football changes
They trialed this in the Isthmian League a few years back, but it was not a success, so it was not proceeded with
Re: Sensible laws of football changes
What would constitute “success” in this scenario? Or absence of it?
-
- Regular
- Posts: 3357
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 12:08 pm
- Has thanked: 1160 times
- Been thanked: 496 times
Re: Sensible laws of football changes
You would need to ask those who ran the trial.
I was not watching Isthmian League Football in that era, so can't answer, but a google search produces lots of answers, below are a couple of them
https://the18.com/en/soccer-entertainme ... experiment
https://www.nonleaguematters.co.uk/foru ... ost=561466
Re: Sensible laws of football changes
Interesting - though it seems bizarre because that seems entirely predictable as the outcome, to the extent that I assumed that those advocating for kick-ins wanted them to be equivalent to free kicks and to be more an attacking set piece
-
- Regular
- Posts: 3200
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 9:03 pm
- Has thanked: 1667 times
- Been thanked: 909 times
Re: Sensible laws of football changes
I'd also add that anyone yellow'd for diving or dissent should be automatically sin binned.Top of the JES wrote: ↑Tue Jan 09, 2024 12:24 pm A sin bin. Any team that gets four or more yellow cards has a player put in the sin bin for 10 minutes. ( I realise we would often be playing with ten) Yellow cards should impact the game they are accrued in.
- Hoover Attack
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 5342
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 687 times
- Been thanked: 1362 times
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 7801
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:24 pm
- Has thanked: 3456 times
- Been thanked: 1782 times
Re: Sensible laws of football changes
Offside = daylight rule
Semi automated offside system from WC implemented
Scrap VAR in its entirety
Semi automated offside system from WC implemented
Scrap VAR in its entirety
-
- Regular
- Posts: 3357
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 12:08 pm
- Has thanked: 1160 times
- Been thanked: 496 times
Re: Sensible laws of football changes
That won't change anything. The argument will then be over what is "daylight". Whatever system or definition you use, there will always be those marginal cases, unless you screaaped offside completely ( and no I am not suggesting that is the way to go!
Wouldn't that semi-automated offside be a form of VAR? [I'm not really sure what you mean by the semi automated system from WC]
Semi automated offside system from WC implemented
Scrap VAR in its entirety