Alias accounts

[The Reverend]

You can carry this on as long as you like, my friend. I’ve having a fine time watching it unfold.

So you don’t have me on foe anymore?

[CEB]

Why would I? I’m enjoying reading your posts now

[B.whitehouse+10more]

If CEB is me …and I am the Rev …. Who is the Masked Singer ? …..answers on a postcode please….

[The Reverend]

Why would I? I’m enjoying reading your posts now

Just to confirm, are you:

A. Denying that after serving a ban you decided to come back, pull up threads from weeks ago and use them to have digs at me

Or

B. Admitting that A is correct but a feud that you went out of your way to continue ends when you unilaterally decide it does?

[CEB]

I’m not sure those two questions cover all the bases. Can you structure the question more robustly please mate?

[The Reverend]

I’m not sure those two questions cover all the bases. Can you structure the question more robustly please mate?

I’ll make it simpler for you:

Did you, or did you not, after serving a ban decide to dig up threads from weeks ago to have digs at me?

[CEB]

Who?

[CEB]

Fact is brains, you’re just not bright enough to do the forensic schtick. It all just looks like you’re floundering over wrongly accusing me of being B.Whitehouse.
It’s embarrassing

[The Reverend]

Fact is brains, you’re just not bright enough to do the forensic schtick. It all just looks like you’re floundering over wrongly accusing me of being B.Whitehouse.
It’s embarrassing

CEB: you’re floundering over accusing me of using aliases

Also CEB: floundering over the fact that after receiving a ban CEB immediately pulled up a load of threads to continue a feud

[CEB]

This thread was started while I had Rev on foe…

[The Reverend]

This thread was started while I had Rev on foe…

You’ve been very vocal about how you don’t apparently use alias accounts so why would this thread be anything to do with you.

LSN asked me for a theory and I gave him one.

By the way I’m aware that you’re now digging up old threads in an attempt to consume the whole board with this feud (that apparently you don’t want to continue) which you are hoping will result in me getting a perma ban and you getting away with a temp one.

Your behaviour is so transparent.

[CEB]

Would be nice if the moderators/admin could clamp down on this. Individuals using multiple accounts to harass users and continue feuds that they apparently want to end really ruins the enjoyment of this otherwise excellent board.

It’s incredibly sad and strange behaviour but it’s quite blatant that it goes on. Is there anything which can be down to address this?

It happens fairly regularly. Individual users become the target. At the moment it’s me but in the past it has been others and no doubt it’ll carry on into the future if nothing is done.

A real shame as if seriously negatively impacts the experience of this board.

“ Individuals using multiple accounts to harass users and continue feuds that they apparently want to end really ruins the enjoyment of this otherwise excellent board.”

Which didn’t happen, and so the apparent dispute was, as far as I was concerned, already over when you got this particular bee in your bonnet.

“ It’s incredibly sad and strange behaviour but it’s quite blatant that it goes on.”

you’ve not yet clarified that you recognise that I am not B.Whitehouse. Would you concede that if I’m not him, then in fact I did not engage in this “incredibly sad and strange behaviour” and in fact your antipathy towards me is, in no small part, informed by a mistake you’ve made?

“ happens fairly regularly”

I’ve never used an alias to deceive, and have had any feuds I’ve had openly.


“ Is there anything which can be down to address this?”

I want CEB banned, because I’ve convinced myself he’s using aliases despite having no evidence.


Dearie me. You’ve had a shocker here mate. I’m sorry that you were still wound up by me when you found yourself irritated by B Whitehouse, but the fact is you’ve got yourself worked up about me over an entirely false premise.

[CEB]

This thread was started while I had Rev on foe…

You’ve been very vocal about how you don’t apparently use alias accounts so why would this thread be anything to do with you.

LSN asked me for a theory and I gave him one.

By the way I’m aware that you’re now digging up old threads in an attempt to consume the whole board with this feud (that apparently you don’t want to continue) which you are hoping will result in me getting a perma ban and you getting away with a temp one.

Your behaviour is so transparent.

I do love the delicious irony of you saying I’m transparent when you are so aware of the lack of credibility of your “lol what makes you think this thread about you?!?!” take that you immediately gave a half arsed attempt at explaining away the fact that you literally named me in the second post.

As I said a few weeks ago, you’re not good enough for this schtick.

[The Reverend]

Would be nice if the moderators/admin could clamp down on this. Individuals using multiple accounts to harass users and continue feuds that they apparently want to end really ruins the enjoyment of this otherwise excellent board.

It’s incredibly sad and strange behaviour but it’s quite blatant that it goes on. Is there anything which can be down to address this?

It happens fairly regularly. Individual users become the target. At the moment it’s me but in the past it has been others and no doubt it’ll carry on into the future if nothing is done.

A real shame as if seriously negatively impacts the experience of this board.

“ Individuals using multiple accounts to harass users and continue feuds that they apparently want to end really ruins the enjoyment of this otherwise excellent board.”

Which didn’t happen, and so the apparent dispute was, as far as I was concerned, already over when you got this particular bee in your bonnet.

“ It’s incredibly sad and strange behaviour but it’s quite blatant that it goes on.”

you’ve not yet clarified that you recognise that I am not B.Whitehouse. Would you concede that if I’m not him, then in fact I did not engage in this “incredibly sad and strange behaviour” and in fact your antipathy towards me is, in no small part, informed by a mistake you’ve made?

“ happens fairly regularly”

I’ve never used an alias to deceive, and have had any feuds I’ve had openly.


“ Is there anything which can be down to address this?”

I want CEB banned, because I’ve convinced myself he’s using aliases despite having no evidence.


Dearie me. You’ve had a shocker here mate. I’m sorry that you were still wound up by me when you found yourself irritated by B Whitehouse, but the fact is you’ve got yourself worked up about me over an entirely false premise.

I still think you might be b.whitehouse.

Aren’t you the guy who was incredulous that people genuinely don’t like being called a c*** on a message board, insinuating that it’s faux-outrage, and yet here you are having (another) tantrum because somebody has suggested that you might be using another account.

You really just need to drop this now. I tried ignoring you but you have made it perfectly clear that you want to continue this.

My policy on the matter is simple:

From now on I will ignore you unless you:

A. Mention me directly
B. Continue to like every comment I post & go back to posts from over a year ago to like them
C. Mention me in snide “nudge nudge wink wink” ways

My actions will be the following:

A. I’ll respond when mentioned directly depending on the context in how you are mentioning me
B. I’ll continue to let others know that you are engaging in this attention seeking behaviour
C. I’ll call out instances where I think you are making snide comments with an explanation of why I think so

Balls in your court now. Let’s see who REALLY is the one who wants to continue this.

[CEB]

“I still think you might be b.whitehouse.”

Genuine LOL at you doubling down on that.

I’m guessing you don’t have a qualification in logic as “you think swearing is OK but don’t think it’s OK basing a vendetta on an incorrect presumption... Bit hypocritical!”
is, to use your phrasing, very odd behaviour.

But anyway - the substance of your reply - essentially “I will do as you ask but phrase it as if I’m asking it” is of course acceptable to me, since that’s what I asked for.

Fingers crossed you don’t convince yourself I’m using an alias to be able to continue this regardless of my actions (or lack thereof) though!

[The Reverend]

“I still think you might be b.whitehouse.”

Genuine LOL at you doubling down on that.

I’m guessing you don’t have a qualification in logic as “you think swearing is OK but don’t think it’s OK basing a vendetta on an incorrect presumption... Bit hypocritical!”
is, to use your phrasing, very odd behaviour.

But anyway - the substance of your reply - essentially “I will do as you ask but phrase it as if I’m asking it” is of course acceptable to me, since that’s what I asked for.

Fingers crossed you don’t convince yourself I’m using an alias to be able to continue this regardless of my actions (or lack thereof) though!

What exactly am I doing that you’ve asked me to do?

I’m just going back to doing what I was already trying to do - ignoring you - but I have made the stipulations about the times I won’t ignore you much clearer.

But you can tell yourself that you made me ignore you and that you “won”, I suppose it’ll satisfy the odd control fetish that you have.

[The Reverend]

“I still think you might be b.whitehouse.”

Genuine LOL at you doubling down on that.

I’m guessing you don’t have a qualification in logic as “you think swearing is OK but don’t think it’s OK basing a vendetta on an incorrect presumption... Bit hypocritical!”
is, to use your phrasing, very odd behaviour.

But anyway - the substance of your reply - essentially “I will do as you ask but phrase it as if I’m asking it” is of course acceptable to me, since that’s what I asked for.

Fingers crossed you don’t convince yourself I’m using an alias to be able to continue this regardless of my actions (or lack thereof) though!

Questioning peoples intelligence whilst failing to understand the nuanced difference between swearing and being directly abusive to people via swearing at them is very very funny

[CEB]

Have you started ignoring me yet? Or did Brian Whitehouse post?

[The Reverend]

Have you started ignoring me yet? Or did Brian Whitehouse post?

Refer to my latest comment to LSN on the “how do you upload images” thread.

I’m going to wait until LSN has had a chance to respond. If you continue to comment until then that will be a clear indication that you’re trying to drag this out as long as possible.

[CEB]

Have you started ignoring me yet? Or did Brian Whitehouse post?

Refer to my latest comment to LSN on the “how do you upload images” thread.

I’m going to wait until LSN has had a chance to respond. If you continue to comment until then that will be a clear indication that you’re trying to drag this out as long as possible.

That’s weird, I’m *sure* you’ve taken issue with people preempting your posts by stating what your continued posting would imply…