Ratings.
Moderator: Long slender neck
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2656
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 3:54 pm
- Has thanked: 1025 times
- Been thanked: 918 times
Ratings.
Brynn. 6.5. A couple of routine stops. Not much to do
James. 7. Good solid game albeit Cambridge offered no attacking threat.
Beccles 8. Him and Happe won’t have an easier 90 minutes.
Happe. 8. Back to his best.
Galbraith. 7. All the defence can score high marks as I don’t think Cambridge had a clear cut chance in 90 minutes.
Archibald. 8 joint MOM. All our threats in the first half came through him. One absolute blasteroony that hit the crossbar.
Brown. 7.5. Industrious performance and was always in the right place at the right time.
El Miz. 7. Didn’t need to get out of second gear.
Saunders. 6.5. Grew into it but perhaps one of our weaker performers.
Forde. 7. Great outlet. Just wish his final ball was better. Gets in good positions then loses it.
Agyei. Joint MOM 8. Going to be a real player for us. Full of pace and power.
Subs. Pigott. 6 fluffed his lines when clean through. As soon he replaced Agyei we lost our momentum. Others. 6.
Wellens. 7. Not having Ruel forced his hand but we are a better team without him in the side.Marks are high but it’s Christmas.
Cambridge. 5. Awful although to be fair they have a lot of injuries.
Ref. 5. Yellow card happy although our constant kicking the ball away really grates. Where did the fourth official get 8 mins added on from.
James. 7. Good solid game albeit Cambridge offered no attacking threat.
Beccles 8. Him and Happe won’t have an easier 90 minutes.
Happe. 8. Back to his best.
Galbraith. 7. All the defence can score high marks as I don’t think Cambridge had a clear cut chance in 90 minutes.
Archibald. 8 joint MOM. All our threats in the first half came through him. One absolute blasteroony that hit the crossbar.
Brown. 7.5. Industrious performance and was always in the right place at the right time.
El Miz. 7. Didn’t need to get out of second gear.
Saunders. 6.5. Grew into it but perhaps one of our weaker performers.
Forde. 7. Great outlet. Just wish his final ball was better. Gets in good positions then loses it.
Agyei. Joint MOM 8. Going to be a real player for us. Full of pace and power.
Subs. Pigott. 6 fluffed his lines when clean through. As soon he replaced Agyei we lost our momentum. Others. 6.
Wellens. 7. Not having Ruel forced his hand but we are a better team without him in the side.Marks are high but it’s Christmas.
Cambridge. 5. Awful although to be fair they have a lot of injuries.
Ref. 5. Yellow card happy although our constant kicking the ball away really grates. Where did the fourth official get 8 mins added on from.
- EliotNes
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10590
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:14 pm
- Location: Retired (4182)
- Has thanked: 2024 times
- Been thanked: 875 times
Re: Ratings.
That's about it. Spot on.
Except I'd give Brynn a 7, though how does one really rate him, when he has so little to do?
Except I'd give Brynn a 7, though how does one really rate him, when he has so little to do?
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 7681
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:24 pm
- Has thanked: 3381 times
- Been thanked: 1747 times
Re: Ratings.
This, far better upfront without Sotiriou constantly losing the ball. Agyei held it up well and will be a real handful. Hopefully the front 3 today can stay fit and available going forward as the starters. Need a better option from the bench though as Pigott continues to look well off the level.
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 883
- Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 3:38 pm
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 221 times
Re: Ratings.
Certainly agree that we looked better without Ruel. Think Sanders was a 7 but pretty much spot on. Tempted to give the lads who got booked half a mark downwards though, simply because they were so petulant and unnecessary. That has to be sorted.
- Hoover Attack
- Regular
- Posts: 4937
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 617 times
- Been thanked: 1234 times
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2757
- Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2021 4:54 pm
- Has thanked: 736 times
- Been thanked: 747 times
Re: Ratings.
Good ratings, thoroughly deserved win, a good performance second-half. Your absolutely right about not having Ruel in the side although Fordes control isn’t much better than Ruels imo.Beradogs wrote: ↑Mon Jan 01, 2024 5:20 pm Brynn. 6.5. A couple of routine stops. Not much to do
James. 7. Good solid game albeit Cambridge offered no attacking threat.
Beccles 8. Him and Happe won’t have an easier 90 minutes.
Happe. 8. Back to his best.
Galbraith. 7. All the defence can score high marks as I don’t think Cambridge had a clear cut chance in 90 minutes.
Archibald. 8 joint MOM. All our threats in the first half came through him. One absolute blasteroony that hit the crossbar.
Brown. 7.5. Industrious performance and was always in the right place at the right time.
El Miz. 7. Didn’t need to get out of second gear.
Saunders. 6.5. Grew into it but perhaps one of our weaker performers.
Forde. 7. Great outlet. Just wish his final ball was better. Gets in good positions then loses it.
Agyei. Joint MOM 8. Going to be a real player for us. Full of pace and power.
Subs. Pigott. 6 fluffed his lines when clean through. As soon he replaced Agyei we lost our momentum. Others. 6.
Wellens. 7. Not having Ruel forced his hand but we are a better team without him in the side.Marks are high but it’s Christmas.
Cambridge. 5. Awful although to be fair they have a lot of injuries.
Ref. 5. Yellow card happy although our constant kicking the ball away really grates. Where did the fourth official get 8 mins added on from.
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 7681
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:24 pm
- Has thanked: 3381 times
- Been thanked: 1747 times
Re: Ratings.
Forde can beat a man thoughMonkey Boy wrote: ↑Mon Jan 01, 2024 5:47 pm
Good ratings, thoroughly deserved win, a good performance second-half. Your absolutely right about not having Ruel in the side although Fordes control isn’t much better than Ruels imo.
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2020 12:06 am
- Has thanked: 13 times
- Been thanked: 28 times
Re: Ratings.
Our attacking threat owed everything to Agyei's presence in the team.Sotiriou or Forde is a toss-up in my opinion, but Agyei showed desire,pace,power,skill and the know-how,to dominate a poor Cambridge side
- B.whitehouse+10more
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1360
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 6:25 pm
- Has thanked: 177 times
- Been thanked: 470 times
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 7681
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:24 pm
- Has thanked: 3381 times
- Been thanked: 1747 times
Re: Ratings.
No that's mostly Pigott given what he's costing us as our main striker to sit on the bench. Sotiriou just isn't anywhere near as good as some think, more suited as a sub option than a starter imo
- Hoover Attack
- Regular
- Posts: 4937
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 617 times
- Been thanked: 1234 times
Re: Ratings.
Agreed, he looks the real deal.Perry Combover wrote: ↑Mon Jan 01, 2024 6:07 pm Our attacking threat owed everything to Agyei's presence in the team.Sotiriou or Forde is a toss-up in my opinion, but Agyei showed desire,pace,power,skill and the know-how,to dominate a poor Cambridge side
- The Reverend
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2237
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 4:12 pm
- Has thanked: 811 times
- Been thanked: 928 times
Re: Ratings.
Isn’t it strange how this account, which I’ve never engaged with before, starts digging me out just as “CEB” apparently foed me.B.whitehouse+10more wrote: ↑Mon Jan 01, 2024 6:14 pmBetter ask The Reverend he’s in charge of those decisions
Surly just a complete coincidence….
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1246
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 7:54 am
- Has thanked: 241 times
- Been thanked: 683 times
- B.whitehouse+10more
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1360
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 6:25 pm
- Has thanked: 177 times
- Been thanked: 470 times
Re: Ratings.
The Reverend wrote: ↑Mon Jan 01, 2024 7:54 pmIsn’t it strange how this account, which I’ve never engaged with before, starts digging me out just as “CEB” apparently foed me.B.whitehouse+10more wrote: ↑Mon Jan 01, 2024 6:14 pmBetter ask The Reverend he’s in charge of those decisions
Surly just a complete coincidence….
Re: Ratings.
Dear oh dear.
After I said I’d put him on foe, then I went about my new year, Rev really has been all over the board accusing me of hypocrisy and “strange behaviour”…. because he thinks that I was so compelled to engage with him that I did it under my Brian Whitehouse alias???
I’m genuinely intrigued as to how he’ll spin it that it’s totally cool that he did all that for good reasons that make me the baddie, when the penny drops that he’s dropped a bollock here?
After I said I’d put him on foe, then I went about my new year, Rev really has been all over the board accusing me of hypocrisy and “strange behaviour”…. because he thinks that I was so compelled to engage with him that I did it under my Brian Whitehouse alias???
I’m genuinely intrigued as to how he’ll spin it that it’s totally cool that he did all that for good reasons that make me the baddie, when the penny drops that he’s dropped a bollock here?
- The Reverend
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2237
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 4:12 pm
- Has thanked: 811 times
- Been thanked: 928 times
Re: Ratings.
“I have no interest in pursuing a feud with Rev, apart from when the first thing I did after serving a ban was going through posts which were weeks old to have multiple digs at him”CEB wrote: ↑Mon Jan 01, 2024 9:56 pm Dear oh dear.
After I said I’d put him on foe, then I went about my new year, Rev really has been all over the board accusing me of hypocrisy and “strange behaviour”…. because he thinks that I was so compelled to engage with him that I did it under my Brian Whitehouse alias???
I’m genuinely intrigued as to how he’ll spin it that it’s totally cool that he did all that for good reasons that make me the baddie, when the penny drops that he’s dropped a bollock here?
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 258
- Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2019 2:39 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 134 times
Re: Ratings.
Agree with the above, I think we’re a better side away from home without Ruel as Sanders made us more solid.
Overall a pretty comfortable win. Cements the view we are a pretty decent mid table side in this league. I make RW right that we do tend to struggle against the bigger boys but hardly lose against the mid table / lower sides in the league. Which also confirms to me that there is a pretty sizeable gap between those ‘bigger’ sides and the rest of the league.
As half seasons go, going in 12th into 2024, most fans would’ve taken this and I’m pretty pleased with where we are.
A note to add on Ageyi, who I thought was excellent and added that little extra spark we’ve been crying out for. Mentions for Galbraith, Beckles and Theo too
Overall a pretty comfortable win. Cements the view we are a pretty decent mid table side in this league. I make RW right that we do tend to struggle against the bigger boys but hardly lose against the mid table / lower sides in the league. Which also confirms to me that there is a pretty sizeable gap between those ‘bigger’ sides and the rest of the league.
As half seasons go, going in 12th into 2024, most fans would’ve taken this and I’m pretty pleased with where we are.
A note to add on Ageyi, who I thought was excellent and added that little extra spark we’ve been crying out for. Mentions for Galbraith, Beckles and Theo too
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2757
- Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2021 4:54 pm
- Has thanked: 736 times
- Been thanked: 747 times
Re: Ratings.
I posted a couple of weeks ago about the gulf in the top 6/8 and the rest,as mentioned above for me Beckles has been the difference in the last few games,his partnership with Happe has improved the defence it’s bought a little bit more experience to the side. However we have been playing teams that have played hoofball against us. If we play against a more mobile footballing side it may be a different story. I think we will be ok this season due to the fact that there are some poor teams in this division. Next season if we remain could be a very different proposition. I expect there will be some strong teams promoted and relegated. The summer recruitment will be crucial very much more than this window of which I don’t expect much activity by the club?
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 1:26 pm
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: Ratings.
I only wish Graham was fit. Him and Agyei in the same side is a real threat. Bases of a really strong team next year/season.
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 822
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2021 2:23 pm
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 200 times
Re: Ratings.
GShaw never has a good work about him Sweeney or Brown. He hates young players especially those from the Academy like Happe. It is a theme
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2757
- Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2021 4:54 pm
- Has thanked: 736 times
- Been thanked: 747 times
Re: Ratings.
For me Lifelong, it’s not that Ruel is a bad player but he’s being used in the wrong position imo. He not good enough to lead the line on his own but would be better if he had another forward alongside him,however is control of the ball is diabolical and needs to be worked onLifelongfan wrote: ↑Wed Jan 03, 2024 10:40 amGShaw never has a good work about him Sweeney or Brown. He hates young players especially those from the Academy like Happe. It is a theme
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2757
- Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2021 4:54 pm
- Has thanked: 736 times
- Been thanked: 747 times
Re: Ratings.
Monkey Boy wrote: ↑Wed Jan 03, 2024 10:55 amFor me Lifelong, it’s not that Ruel is a bad player but he’s being used in the wrong position imo. He not good enough to lead the line on his own but would be better if he had another forward alongside him,however his control of the ball is diabolical and needs to be worked onLifelongfan wrote: ↑Wed Jan 03, 2024 10:40 amGShaw never has a good work about him Sweeney or Brown. He hates young players especially those from the Academy like Happe. It is a theme
- Hoover Attack
- Regular
- Posts: 4937
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 617 times
- Been thanked: 1234 times
Re: Ratings.
Agreed he shouldn't be leading the line, he's not strong or fast enough. The only reason he was doing so is that others weren't available, it's not something Richie wanted to do.Monkey Boy wrote: ↑Wed Jan 03, 2024 10:55 amFor me Lifelong, it’s not that Ruel is a bad player but he’s being used in the wrong position imo. He not good enough to lead the line on his own but would be better if he had another forward alongside him,however is control of the ball is diabolical and needs to be worked onLifelongfan wrote: ↑Wed Jan 03, 2024 10:40 amGShaw never has a good work about him Sweeney or Brown. He hates young players especially those from the Academy like Happe. It is a theme
He won't have another forward alongside him, we don't play like that, so he has to develop his game as a wide man or 10, something he has been doing well this season.
Absolutely nonsense to say his control is diabolical. His issue is that he does everything at 100 mph, when he doesn't always need to.
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2757
- Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2021 4:54 pm
- Has thanked: 736 times
- Been thanked: 747 times
Re: Ratings.
Hoover Attack wrote: ↑Wed Jan 03, 2024 11:43 amAgreed he shouldn't be leading the line, he's not strong or fast enough. The only reason he was doing so is that others weren't available, it's not something Richie wanted to do.Monkey Boy wrote: ↑Wed Jan 03, 2024 10:55 amFor me Lifelong, it’s not that Ruel is a bad player but he’s being used in the wrong position imo. He not good enough to lead the line on his own but would be better if he had another forward alongside him,however is control of the ball is diabolical and needs to be worked onLifelongfan wrote: ↑Wed Jan 03, 2024 10:40 am
GShaw never has a good work about him Sweeney or Brown. He hates young players especially those from the Academy like Happe. It is a theme
He won't have another forward alongside him, we don't play like that, so he has to develop his game as a wide man or 10, something he has been doing well this season.
Absolutely nonsense to say his control is diabolical. His issue is that he does everything at 100 mph, when he doesn't always need to.
Yes I agree with your point on the formation issue and your correct that Wellens doesn’t play with a front two however don’t agree with your assessment of his control,yes he does do things 100 mph but he has little or no control whatsoever, and a consequence of that is our attacks break down as soon as he receives the ball on 9 out of 10 times. But I take your point
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2416
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 1:13 pm
- Has thanked: 242 times
- Been thanked: 1119 times
Re: Ratings.
I don't think he has it in him to play as a no.10. He isn't a creative player and becomes a bit of a passenger in the build up play when he's in that position. It's the same issue as when he's on the wing - he's just too peripheral, his decision making too poor and too lacking in physicality to really impose himself on the game. Has looked occasionally passable in those positions isn't the same as doing well.
I think he could be a decent League 1 forward option as a no.9 as part of a front 2, but otherwise he isn't good enough for this level.
I think he could be a decent League 1 forward option as a no.9 as part of a front 2, but otherwise he isn't good enough for this level.