CEB wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 5:49 pm
Anyway, here’s the deal - I’m now choosing to put you on “foe” as I think this has run its course.
That will mean that I don’t get to see your posts unless I choose to. You’re welcome to do the same. I won’t see your reply to this, so you even get to have the last word.
And, the great thing is, if you put me on foe, then it’ll be - for you - as if I have been banned, so absolutely no problem for either of us.
Happy new year, and thanks a lot for the engagement, I appreciate it x
A sensible compromise. I’m well aware of the foe function. I use it on that clown Spen.
If you do choose to look at this reply:
Have a good new year. Agree, it has been fun doing battle with you.
Goodness me. I hope to never see that goalie in an Orient shirt ever again. Having a non-league standard keeper in our starting line up is embarrassing.
The Reverend wrote:
I’ve always thought that booing your own players and staff is crass and entitled behaviour. Booing players in particular is poor form. I can forgive booing managers in some circumstances. There have been occasions, both home and away, where I’ve been very disappointed with a result or performance so when the final whistle goes I got up and left. I’ve never felt the need to abuse people trying to do their job.
Goodness me. I hope to never see that goalie in an Orient shirt ever again. Having a non-league standard keeper in our starting line up is embarrassing.
The Reverend wrote:
I’ve always thought that booing your own players and staff is crass and entitled behaviour. Booing players in particular is poor form. I can forgive booing managers in some circumstances. There have been occasions, both home and away, where I’ve been very disappointed with a result or performance so when the final whistle goes I got up and left. I’ve never felt the need to abuse people trying to do their job.
The funny thing is, I did have him on foe, and the fact that he thinks you’re me seems to have sparked him to completely abandon the “fair enough! Was fun having an online feud with you!!! Happy new year!” response he gave me, and to instead seemingly have posted incessantly about me in the mean time, all based on not accepting that someone might agree with me.
I wonder if he will say “ah, sorry, I did jump to conclusions and my behaviour now seems a bit odd”
My money is on that he won’t. I wonder though, if he’ll double down or quietly just abandon the idea that I’ve been using aliases to keep up a feud that I don’t have any interest in pursuing?
Fascinating stuff.
CEB wrote: ↑Mon Jan 01, 2024 9:51 pm
The funny thing is, I did have him on foe, and the fact that he thinks you’re me seems to have sparked him to completely abandon the “fair enough! Was fun having an online feud with you!!! Happy new year!” response he gave me, and to instead seemingly have posted incessantly about me in the mean time, all based on not accepting that someone might agree with me.
I wonder if he will say “ah, sorry, I did jump to conclusions and my behaviour now seems a bit odd”
My money is on that he won’t. I wonder though, if he’ll double down or quietly just abandon the idea that I’ve been using aliases to keep up a feud that I don’t have any interest in pursuing?
Fascinating stuff.
“I did have him on foe, apart from that time I was reading every post of his since I had him on foe”
CEB wrote: ↑Mon Jan 01, 2024 10:22 pm
Yes, what’s happening this evening is the manifestation of my intense discomfort at your laser sharp delineation of my hypocrisy… Ouch, it stings!!!
*logs out, then logs into B.Whitehouse to try to recover some dignity*
You can sneer all you want but you genuinely are a hypocrite. Which is amusing because you favour accusing others of this trait.
I’ve thought it over and I can only rationalise this by concluding that you’re having a massive **** (fool) over this because you get a sexual kick out of beclowning yourself
Let me know when you get to the vinegar strokes and I’ll post up the search results of how many times my name has been mentioned by you Vs how many times you’ve mentioned me. That should finish you off nicely
CEB wrote: ↑Mon Jan 01, 2024 10:31 pm
I’ve thought it over and I can only rationalise this by concluding that you’re having a massive **** (fool) over this because you get a sexual kick out of beclowning yourself
Let me know when you get to the vinegar strokes and I’ll post up the search results of how many times my name has been mentioned by you Vs how many times you’ve mentioned me. That should finish you off nicely
“Someone is providing multiple examples of my hypocritical behaviour, I’ll ignore this and make a masturbation joke in response”
