Ratings
Moderator: Long slender neck
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2416
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 1:13 pm
- Has thanked: 242 times
- Been thanked: 1119 times
Ratings
Have no idea how the third goal went in so caveat on the below:
Brynn - 5. Absolute stinker for the opener, otherwise didn't do much wrong. Vigs made errors like that so not going to be too harsh on him.
James - 7. Played well, some good crosses into the box and defensively didn't give that much away.
Turns - 4. Consistently awful on the ball and off of it, albeit Theo did no favours for him on the left. He's young and learning, but he's struggling with the step up.
Happe - 5. Abysmal in possession, defensively ropey.
Cooper - 6. I don't remember any specific mess ups from him but our defensive shape was shocking so can't give him higher than that.
Archibald - 5. Shortcomings as a wing back on display. Good occasional attacking moments, but was a liability in defence.
Brown - 5. Struggled in a two man midfield.
Mizouni - 6. Also struggled in the set up, but battled hard in a difficult situation and never shied away from the ball.
Ruel - 6. Banging finish and drove at Oxford, but doesn't suit the 10 role.
Drinan - 6. Battled away in a thankless role and created the odd bit of a chaos through application.
Piggot - 5. Hints at being a decent player but doesn't consistently do enough.
Pratley - 6. Not much impact, looked slow
Galbraith - 5. Dreadful cameo. He's been a disappointment given the hype.
Sanders and Forde - n/a, weren't involved enough.
Wellens - 5. Don't think the tactics were right but we caused enough issues to nearly somehow get a point. Set pieces actually quite good today?
Red - 7. Couple of bad decisions for both teams but otherwise nothing to criticise other than letting Oxford take the p*ss with time wasting.
Brynn - 5. Absolute stinker for the opener, otherwise didn't do much wrong. Vigs made errors like that so not going to be too harsh on him.
James - 7. Played well, some good crosses into the box and defensively didn't give that much away.
Turns - 4. Consistently awful on the ball and off of it, albeit Theo did no favours for him on the left. He's young and learning, but he's struggling with the step up.
Happe - 5. Abysmal in possession, defensively ropey.
Cooper - 6. I don't remember any specific mess ups from him but our defensive shape was shocking so can't give him higher than that.
Archibald - 5. Shortcomings as a wing back on display. Good occasional attacking moments, but was a liability in defence.
Brown - 5. Struggled in a two man midfield.
Mizouni - 6. Also struggled in the set up, but battled hard in a difficult situation and never shied away from the ball.
Ruel - 6. Banging finish and drove at Oxford, but doesn't suit the 10 role.
Drinan - 6. Battled away in a thankless role and created the odd bit of a chaos through application.
Piggot - 5. Hints at being a decent player but doesn't consistently do enough.
Pratley - 6. Not much impact, looked slow
Galbraith - 5. Dreadful cameo. He's been a disappointment given the hype.
Sanders and Forde - n/a, weren't involved enough.
Wellens - 5. Don't think the tactics were right but we caused enough issues to nearly somehow get a point. Set pieces actually quite good today?
Red - 7. Couple of bad decisions for both teams but otherwise nothing to criticise other than letting Oxford take the p*ss with time wasting.
Last edited by Mistadobalina on Sat Nov 11, 2023 6:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Rich Tea Wellin
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10507
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:01 pm
- Has thanked: 4557 times
- Been thanked: 3225 times
Re: Ratings
Happe was awful. Dunno if he had a knock but he was slower than usual and seemed well off the pace. Galbraiths cameo was embarrassing
One of those days though. Oxford will be up there and these ain’t the games we have to win imo
One of those days though. Oxford will be up there and these ain’t the games we have to win imo
- The Reverend
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2237
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 4:12 pm
- Has thanked: 811 times
- Been thanked: 928 times
Re: Ratings
How can you possibly rate Drinan higher than Pigott? Not saying that Joe had a blinder but at the very least he holds up the ball and wins the odd knock on header. Drinan just runs around aimlessly and looks like he’ll never score a goal at this level.
Who is Powers?
Who is Powers?
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 438
- Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2021 1:47 pm
- Has thanked: 49 times
- Been thanked: 121 times
Re: Ratings
Brynn had a howler. Not just the first goal but his positioning and how quickly he came out for both times they hit the woodwork was appalling.
The goal mistake you might get away with in L2, not in L1 and Oxford punished this error without mercy.
The goal mistake you might get away with in L2, not in L1 and Oxford punished this error without mercy.
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2416
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 1:13 pm
- Has thanked: 242 times
- Been thanked: 1119 times
Re: Ratings
For some reason my mind keeps mixing up Sanders and Powers. Have no idea why.The Reverend wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 6:02 pm How can you possibly rate Drinan higher than Pigott? Not saying that Joe had a blinder but at the very least he holds up the ball and wins the odd knock on header. Drinan just runs around aimlessly and looks like he’ll never score a goal at this level.
Who is Powers?
I thought drinan did alright given that his role was to chase long balls down the channel and make his presence felt. It's not a tactic I like and I agree he's not up to it, but his physicality caused some issues for Oxford.
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1701
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2023 4:24 pm
- Awards: Tuffers
- Has thanked: 691 times
- Been thanked: 235 times
Re: Ratings
Happe gets 4 from me & galbraith is pure 5hite from what Ive seen so far.Mistadobalina wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 6:11 pmFor some reason my mind keeps mixing up Sanders and Powers. Have no idea why.The Reverend wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 6:02 pm How can you possibly rate Drinan higher than Pigott? Not saying that Joe had a blinder but at the very least he holds up the ball and wins the odd knock on header. Drinan just runs around aimlessly and looks like he’ll never score a goal at this level.
Who is Powers?
I thought drinan did alright given that his role was to chase long balls down the channel and make his presence felt. It's not a tactic I like and I agree he's not up to it, but his physicality caused some issues for Oxford.
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 146
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 1:12 pm
- Has thanked: 461 times
- Been thanked: 41 times
Re: Ratings
Drinan was far more of a threat than Pigott, that’ll be why.The Reverend wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 6:02 pm How can you possibly rate Drinan higher than Pigott? Not saying that Joe had a blinder but at the very least he holds up the ball and wins the odd knock on header. Drinan just runs around aimlessly and looks like he’ll never score a goal at this level.
Who is Powers?
- The Reverend
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2237
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 4:12 pm
- Has thanked: 811 times
- Been thanked: 928 times
Re: Ratings
But Pigotts job isn’t really to be a “threat”. He’s essentially there as a target to win knock ons, hold up the ball and knock it on for advancing attackers (including Drinan!). Comparing Drinan with Pigott like for like is pointless as they do different roles. And Pigott is better at his respective job than Drinan is at his.Nad2008 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 8:17 pmDrinan was far more of a threat than Pigott, that’ll be why.The Reverend wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 6:02 pm How can you possibly rate Drinan higher than Pigott? Not saying that Joe had a blinder but at the very least he holds up the ball and wins the odd knock on header. Drinan just runs around aimlessly and looks like he’ll never score a goal at this level.
Who is Powers?
If you want to compare drinan directly then compare him to Ruel who is doing a much better job so far this season.
Drinan is seriously out of his depth at this level. Pigott isn’t setting the world alight either but at least he looks like he can play in League 1. Drinan is miles off.
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1701
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2023 4:24 pm
- Awards: Tuffers
- Has thanked: 691 times
- Been thanked: 235 times
Re: Ratings
Drinans has started what 3 games ? His role is different to Ruels & Pigots. Still keep digging out Drinan over Happe gailbrath turns etc.The Reverend wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 8:27 pmBut Pigotts job isn’t really to be a “threat”. He’s essentially there as a target to win knock ons, hold up the ball and knock it on for advancing attackers (including Drinan!). Comparing Drinan with Pigott like for like is pointless as they do different roles. And Pigott is better at his respective job than Drinan is at his.Nad2008 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 8:17 pmDrinan was far more of a threat than Pigott, that’ll be why.The Reverend wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 6:02 pm How can you possibly rate Drinan higher than Pigott? Not saying that Joe had a blinder but at the very least he holds up the ball and wins the odd knock on header. Drinan just runs around aimlessly and looks like he’ll never score a goal at this level.
Who is Powers?
If you want to compare drinan directly then compare him to Ruel who is doing a much better job so far this season.
Drinan is seriously out of his depth at this level. Pigott isn’t setting the world alight either but at least he looks like he can play in League 1. Drinan is miles off.
Last edited by Tuffers#2 on Sun Nov 12, 2023 9:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Regular
- Posts: 3490
- Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 3:20 pm
- Has thanked: 643 times
- Been thanked: 859 times
Re: Ratings
I thought that Drinan worked hard today as he always does, and did a reasonable job unsettling their big CB, as best he could. Is he good enough for L1 ?? Probably not, and I think that we are hoping that Dan Agyei will be what we’re missing up front.The Reverend wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 8:27 pmBut Pigotts job isn’t really to be a “threat”. He’s essentially there as a target to win knock ons, hold up the ball and knock it on for advancing attackers (including Drinan!). Comparing Drinan with Pigott like for like is pointless as they do different roles. And Pigott is better at his respective job than Drinan is at his.Nad2008 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 8:17 pmDrinan was far more of a threat than Pigott, that’ll be why.The Reverend wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 6:02 pm How can you possibly rate Drinan higher than Pigott? Not saying that Joe had a blinder but at the very least he holds up the ball and wins the odd knock on header. Drinan just runs around aimlessly and looks like he’ll never score a goal at this level.
Who is Powers?
If you want to compare drinan directly then compare him to Ruel who is doing a much better job so far this season.
Drinan is seriously out of his depth at this level. Pigott isn’t setting the world alight either but at least he looks like he can play in League 1. Drinan is miles off.
Ruel proved why he’s worth his place, with a great goal and looks the part.
Oxford were the best team I’ve seen in E10 and you can see why they are 2nd in the table, but we gave them a good game and maybe deserved a point……….it’s hard to blame Brynn too much, he made a fantastic save earlier before his error, but it’s these errors that cost us today, not Drinan.
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 146
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 1:12 pm
- Has thanked: 461 times
- Been thanked: 41 times
Re: Ratings
Whichever way you want to sugar coat it, Drinan was better than Pigott today.The Reverend wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 8:27 pmBut Pigotts job isn’t really to be a “threat”. He’s essentially there as a target to win knock ons, hold up the ball and knock it on for advancing attackers (including Drinan!). Comparing Drinan with Pigott like for like is pointless as they do different roles. And Pigott is better at his respective job than Drinan is at his.Nad2008 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 8:17 pmDrinan was far more of a threat than Pigott, that’ll be why.The Reverend wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 6:02 pm How can you possibly rate Drinan higher than Pigott? Not saying that Joe had a blinder but at the very least he holds up the ball and wins the odd knock on header. Drinan just runs around aimlessly and looks like he’ll never score a goal at this level.
Who is Powers?
If you want to compare drinan directly then compare him to Ruel who is doing a much better job so far this season.
Drinan is seriously out of his depth at this level. Pigott isn’t setting the world alight either but at least he looks like he can play in League 1. Drinan is miles off.
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4632
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:48 pm
- Has thanked: 2036 times
- Been thanked: 1664 times
Re: Ratings
Pigott had a decent enough game, some of his hold up play was great. What are you all on about?
Turns had an absolute stinker, Happe got worse as the game went on and poor old Galbraith didn't put a foot right the whole time he was on the pitch. In fact, all our subs were garbage and left us worse off than we had been. At 2-3 and having just hit the post, the new faces killed off any momentum we'd built up.
Turns had an absolute stinker, Happe got worse as the game went on and poor old Galbraith didn't put a foot right the whole time he was on the pitch. In fact, all our subs were garbage and left us worse off than we had been. At 2-3 and having just hit the post, the new faces killed off any momentum we'd built up.
- The Reverend
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2237
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 4:12 pm
- Has thanked: 811 times
- Been thanked: 928 times
Re: Ratings
Thank you! At least someone else gets it.Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 10:08 pm Pigott had a decent enough game, some of his hold up play was great. What are you all on about?
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1365
- Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2021 5:53 am
- Has thanked: 434 times
- Been thanked: 321 times
Re: Ratings
I think RW will have learnt some lessons from that game. I don’t think our set up in hindsight worked.
As discussed Theo was being targeted as our left back. He works so hard but is twice the player playing further forward on either flank.
I think our defence struggled as the midfield didn’t put enough pressure on their midfield. Oxford had time to pick their passes and get in between us.
Drinan, Ruel and Piggot didn’t work for me. I would have played Pratley in the middle without Drinan. Whilst we would have missed the extra man further forward I think we would have won the game in midfield.
As discussed Theo was being targeted as our left back. He works so hard but is twice the player playing further forward on either flank.
I think our defence struggled as the midfield didn’t put enough pressure on their midfield. Oxford had time to pick their passes and get in between us.
Drinan, Ruel and Piggot didn’t work for me. I would have played Pratley in the middle without Drinan. Whilst we would have missed the extra man further forward I think we would have won the game in midfield.
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 258
- Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2019 2:39 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 134 times
Re: Ratings
Thought we were poor overall and frankly 3-2 flattered us.
My major concern about this side is is our lack of creativity with Graham out injured. I felt at the time his injury was a massive blow as he offered genuine width, a great delivery and took players on.
You'd have thought with over 30 mins to go having made it 3-2 we'd really put them to the sword but they were the ones still on top and crowd went flat. I put that down to a lack of a creative outlet that dogged us throughout the 90. I know he's generally been disappointing but surely Richie could've looked to Moncur? He must be thinking his days are numbered at the club if he couldn't get on yesterday and Pratley came on ahead of him.
We'll have easier games and credit for getting back into the game but they managed the last 30 brilliantly and I was disappointed with our efforts.
My major concern about this side is is our lack of creativity with Graham out injured. I felt at the time his injury was a massive blow as he offered genuine width, a great delivery and took players on.
You'd have thought with over 30 mins to go having made it 3-2 we'd really put them to the sword but they were the ones still on top and crowd went flat. I put that down to a lack of a creative outlet that dogged us throughout the 90. I know he's generally been disappointing but surely Richie could've looked to Moncur? He must be thinking his days are numbered at the club if he couldn't get on yesterday and Pratley came on ahead of him.
We'll have easier games and credit for getting back into the game but they managed the last 30 brilliantly and I was disappointed with our efforts.
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2872
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 12:29 pm
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 565 times
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4632
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:48 pm
- Has thanked: 2036 times
- Been thanked: 1664 times
Re: Ratings
Especially when he ends up as deep as he was yesterday. He might have been a WB on paper but he was basically an out and out LB for most of the match.Story of O wrote: ↑Sun Nov 12, 2023 9:34 am Archibald playing at wing back does not help our creativity.
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:19 pm
- Has thanked: 11 times
- Been thanked: 14 times
Re: Ratings
My thoughts toDrWindy wrote: ↑Sun Nov 12, 2023 12:04 am I think RW will have learnt some lessons from that game. I don’t think our set up in hindsight worked.
As discussed Theo was being targeted as our left back. He works so hard but is twice the player playing further forward on either flank.
I think our defence struggled as the midfield didn’t put enough pressure on their midfield. Oxford had time to pick their passes and get in between us.
Drinan, Ruel and Piggot didn’t work for me. I would have played Pratley in the middle without Drinan. Whilst we would have missed the extra man further forward I think we would have won the game in midfield.
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1701
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2023 4:24 pm
- Awards: Tuffers
- Has thanked: 691 times
- Been thanked: 235 times
Re: Ratings
But he was no better than Drinan, thats the point. All 3 contributed to getting us back in the game. Happe & Turns were poor, Gailbrath should be nowhere near the 1st team at the moment. 4 Teams have put 13 goals passed us yet its Drinnan whose name is shouted first & loudest.The Reverend wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 10:19 pmThank you! At least someone else gets it.Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 10:08 pm Pigott had a decent enough game, some of his hold up play was great. What are you all on about?
- The Reverend
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2237
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 4:12 pm
- Has thanked: 811 times
- Been thanked: 928 times
Re: Ratings
Moncur would have been blowing out of his backside within 10 mins yesterday. Absolutely no way he would have been able to keep up with the tempo of Oxford. They were quick and powerful pretty much across the park.Jman wrote: ↑Sun Nov 12, 2023 8:50 am Thought we were poor overall and frankly 3-2 flattered us.
My major concern about this side is is our lack of creativity with Graham out injured. I felt at the time his injury was a massive blow as he offered genuine width, a great delivery and took players on.
You'd have thought with over 30 mins to go having made it 3-2 we'd really put them to the sword but they were the ones still on top and crowd went flat. I put that down to a lack of a creative outlet that dogged us throughout the 90. I know he's generally been disappointing but surely Richie could've looked to Moncur? He must be thinking his days are numbered at the club if he couldn't get on yesterday and Pratley came on ahead of him.
We'll have easier games and credit for getting back into the game but they managed the last 30 brilliantly and I was disappointed with our efforts.
If Moncs manages to get lost in a tedious slog again Burton Albion, he would have done a complete disappearing act yesterday.
The guy is finished at this club. As other have mentioned, the financials will make it difficult to shift him, but I can see him being on his way in Jan. probably a loan down to L2.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12457
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 2552 times
Re: Ratings
Oxford's number 7 , Mills, is the type of player we're currently missing . I thought he made all the difference yesterday . I didn't think Oxford were as good after he came off .It remains to be seen if Agyei can do the same job for us but we live in hope .
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1365
- Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2021 5:53 am
- Has thanked: 434 times
- Been thanked: 321 times
Re: Ratings
Let’s get Theo further forward now Hunt is fit again. Jordan Graham is a big loss but Theo needs to play further up the field. He’s one of our best attacking players and is wasted at left back. We have the players to be in the top eight. Only Portsmouth have played us off the park so far.