13 million votes in 2017. It dropped to 10 million in 2019.
Labour Watch
Moderator: Long slender neck
- Max Fowler
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 5497
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2021 12:18 pm
- Has thanked: 509 times
- Been thanked: 1262 times
- Dunners
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 8965
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 1061 times
- Been thanked: 2488 times
- Dunners
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 8965
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 1061 times
- Been thanked: 2488 times
Re: Labour Watch
Anyway, as part of my day job I'm currently reviewing what appears to be an emerging housing policy from the Labour Party. So far, it's a pile of w*nk.
- Max B Gold
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12289
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
- Has thanked: 975 times
- Been thanked: 2795 times
Re: Labour Watch
Why? It makes perfect sense for the Guardians of rentier capitalism to protect landlords and not the poor schmucks who vote for them because they think they will look after them.
- Max B Gold
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12289
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
- Has thanked: 975 times
- Been thanked: 2795 times
Re: Labour Watch
Men make their own history, but they do not make it as they please; they do not make it under self-selected circumstances, but under circumstances existing already, given and transmitted from the past.Dunners wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2023 11:38 am In a fantasy parallel universe, had he emerged at the same time as a switch to a PR electoral system, he could have done well. But under FPTP, 600K members and 10.3 million votes does not necessarily translate into actual power. Especially when they're mainly concentrated in constituencies that were already likely to vote Labour. The cross-party alliance to maintain the status quo just made the eventual defeat even worse (and possibly more permanent in terms of Westminster politics) than it would otherwise have been.
The tradition of all dead generations weighs like a nightmare on the brains of the living. And just as they seem to be occupied with revolutionizing themselves and things, creating something that did not exist before, precisely in such epochs of revolutionary crisis they anxiously conjure up the spirits of the past to their service, borrowing from them names, battle slogans, and costumes in order to present this new scene in world history in time-honored disguise and borrowed language.
- Dunners
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 8965
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 1061 times
- Been thanked: 2488 times
Re: Labour Watch
Cheers Karl.Max B Gold wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2023 1:37 pmMen make their own history, but they do not make it as they please; they do not make it under self-selected circumstances, but under circumstances existing already, given and transmitted from the past.Dunners wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2023 11:38 am In a fantasy parallel universe, had he emerged at the same time as a switch to a PR electoral system, he could have done well. But under FPTP, 600K members and 10.3 million votes does not necessarily translate into actual power. Especially when they're mainly concentrated in constituencies that were already likely to vote Labour. The cross-party alliance to maintain the status quo just made the eventual defeat even worse (and possibly more permanent in terms of Westminster politics) than it would otherwise have been.
The tradition of all dead generations weighs like a nightmare on the brains of the living. And just as they seem to be occupied with revolutionizing themselves and things, creating something that did not exist before, precisely in such epochs of revolutionary crisis they anxiously conjure up the spirits of the past to their service, borrowing from them names, battle slogans, and costumes in order to present this new scene in world history in time-honored disguise and borrowed language.
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1077
- Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2022 10:34 pm
- Has thanked: 218 times
- Been thanked: 186 times
Re: Labour Watch
Max, you undermining the Labour Party is never going to get you the next Tory victory you long for. Give up on your boring diatribes.
- Max B Gold
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12289
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
- Has thanked: 975 times
- Been thanked: 2795 times
Re: Labour Watch
No worries. You needed it.Dunners wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2023 1:43 pmCheers Karl.Max B Gold wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2023 1:37 pmMen make their own history, but they do not make it as they please; they do not make it under self-selected circumstances, but under circumstances existing already, given and transmitted from the past.Dunners wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2023 11:38 am In a fantasy parallel universe, had he emerged at the same time as a switch to a PR electoral system, he could have done well. But under FPTP, 600K members and 10.3 million votes does not necessarily translate into actual power. Especially when they're mainly concentrated in constituencies that were already likely to vote Labour. The cross-party alliance to maintain the status quo just made the eventual defeat even worse (and possibly more permanent in terms of Westminster politics) than it would otherwise have been.
The tradition of all dead generations weighs like a nightmare on the brains of the living. And just as they seem to be occupied with revolutionizing themselves and things, creating something that did not exist before, precisely in such epochs of revolutionary crisis they anxiously conjure up the spirits of the past to their service, borrowing from them names, battle slogans, and costumes in order to present this new scene in world history in time-honored disguise and borrowed language.
- Max B Gold
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12289
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
- Has thanked: 975 times
- Been thanked: 2795 times
Re: Labour Watch
I'm not undermining them. I am pointing out that they are not a vehicle for delivering socialism and therefore for socialists they belong in the dustbin of history.Friend or faux wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2023 1:45 pm Max, you undermining the Labour Party is never going to get you the next Tory victory you long for. Give up on your boring diatribes.
- FrankOFile
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 460
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2022 7:50 am
- Has thanked: 64 times
- Been thanked: 50 times
Re: Labour Watch
No. What did they do anyway?Max B Gold wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2023 10:13 amSo there's not an issue losing 450,000 members? OKs.FrankOFile wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2023 9:22 amGone where? Did they actually even vote for Corbyn in 2019?Max B Gold wrote: ↑Tue Jun 27, 2023 6:24 pm Labour Party Membership:
Under Corbyn - 600,000
Under Starmer - 150,000
450,000 have gone.
If so, they must have been the only ones.
Time for this obsession for a failure to end.
- Max B Gold
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12289
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
- Has thanked: 975 times
- Been thanked: 2795 times
Re: Labour Watch
Gave them about £6m in hard cash which Stalmer is trying to replace by seducing rich capitalists.FrankOFile wrote: ↑Thu Jun 29, 2023 9:43 amNo. What did they do anyway?Max B Gold wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2023 10:13 amSo there's not an issue losing 450,000 members? OKs.FrankOFile wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2023 9:22 am
Gone where? Did they actually even vote for Corbyn in 2019?
If so, they must have been the only ones.
Time for this obsession for a failure to end.
When JC was brutally deposed as leader the LP had £13m in the kitty. Not so now.
- Dunners
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 8965
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 1061 times
- Been thanked: 2488 times
Re: Labour Watch
The realignment of mainstream politics continues, with the Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer criticising the Tories for not protecting a bunch of speculative investors.
I expect she'll be offering to bail out anyone who lost on crypto next.
I expect she'll be offering to bail out anyone who lost on crypto next.
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 14289
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2501 times
- Been thanked: 3290 times
- Dunners
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 8965
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 1061 times
- Been thanked: 2488 times
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4668
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:48 pm
- Has thanked: 2054 times
- Been thanked: 1675 times
Re: Labour Watch
Kieth: "Young people should be empowered to express themselves clearly and confidently"
Young people express themselves clearly and confidently.
Kieth: "Shut up"
Young people express themselves clearly and confidently.
Kieth: "Shut up"
Re: Labour Watch
Can we not have anti-Keithism please? It doesn’t hurt Keir but it’s harmful to Keiths
- Max B Gold
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12289
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
- Has thanked: 975 times
- Been thanked: 2795 times
- Rich Tea Wellin
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10527
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:01 pm
- Has thanked: 4565 times
- Been thanked: 3230 times
Re: Labour Watch
Unbelievable from the Tory leader again
“Frankly, the left has to start caring a lot more about growth, about creating wealth, attracting inward investment and kickstarting a spirit of enterprise,” he says.
Oh
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... k-to-power
“Frankly, the left has to start caring a lot more about growth, about creating wealth, attracting inward investment and kickstarting a spirit of enterprise,” he says.
Oh
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... k-to-power
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 767
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:12 am
- Has thanked: 123 times
- Been thanked: 169 times
Re: Labour Watch
Starmer's gibberish gets more and more bizarre.Rich Tea Wellin wrote: ↑Sun Jul 16, 2023 9:36 am Unbelievable from the Tory leader again
“Frankly, the left has to start caring a lot more about growth, about creating wealth, attracting inward investment and kickstarting a spirit of enterprise,” he says.
Oh
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... k-to-power
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4668
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:48 pm
- Has thanked: 2054 times
- Been thanked: 1675 times
Re: Labour Watch
Nothing bizarre about it. He's just finally being open and honest about who he is and who his government will serve. And it isn't you or me.
- FrankOFile
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 460
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2022 7:50 am
- Has thanked: 64 times
- Been thanked: 50 times
Re: Labour Watch
As an alternative to what we have now, I will take it every day of the week.Proposition Joe wrote: ↑Sun Jul 16, 2023 3:33 pm Nothing bizarre about it. He's just finally being open and honest about who he is and who his government will serve. And it isn't you or me.
And let’s face it, there is no credible alternative. None.
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4668
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:48 pm
- Has thanked: 2054 times
- Been thanked: 1675 times
Re: Labour Watch
So you accept labour aren't a credible alternative but you'd still take them every day of the week?
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2875
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 12:29 pm
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 566 times
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4668
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:48 pm
- Has thanked: 2054 times
- Been thanked: 1675 times
Re: Labour Watch
How enthused the electorate will be by the guy in the red tie telling us better things aren't possible but give him a turn anyway.
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4682
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 3:36 pm
- Has thanked: 1103 times
- Been thanked: 741 times