RW post match interview

Chat about Leyton Orient (or anything else)

Moderator: Long slender neck

Stan1972
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2042
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2019 12:58 pm
Has thanked: 155 times
Been thanked: 550 times

Re: RW post match interview

Post by Stan1972 »

PoundhillO wrote: Sat Mar 25, 2023 10:58 pm Excuses , excuses .We were poo poo and the substitutions were terrible.it’s blatantly obvious to everyone that we should have signed a proven striker instead of to many Centre Backs. Who was ultimately responsible for not signing a proven striker and was it yet again due to penny pinching ?
It’s Nearly April and you are still going on about Jan and not signing a striker.
We all know that, it’s soooo boring hearing the same posts, we should have signed a striker, yeah we should have, but we didn’t t!! Just move on, we have to work with the players we have, and talk about now and end of season not what didn’t happen back in Jan.
Proposition Joe
Regular
Regular
Posts: 4728
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:48 pm
Has thanked: 2075 times
Been thanked: 1698 times

Re: RW post match interview

Post by Proposition Joe »

Kind of funny that he accepts the subs didn't work out at all for the second game running but he says it like it was nothing to do with him and was something that just happened.
User avatar
The Reverend
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2261
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 4:12 pm
Has thanked: 817 times
Been thanked: 936 times

Re: RW post match interview

Post by The Reverend »

POST REMOVED BY USER
Last edited by The Reverend on Wed Apr 05, 2023 2:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ronnie Hotdogs
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 13069
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
Has thanked: 831 times
Been thanked: 2637 times

Re: RW post match interview

Post by Ronnie Hotdogs »

Choosing to spend our money on Lydon and Carthorse rather than another striking option is looking like a very strange decision.
User avatar
The Reverend
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2261
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 4:12 pm
Has thanked: 817 times
Been thanked: 936 times

Re: RW post match interview

Post by The Reverend »

POST REMOVED BY USER DUE TO THREAT Of LEGAL ACTION RELATING TO CRITICISM OF A RADIO PRESENTER
Last edited by The Reverend on Wed Apr 05, 2023 2:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
CharlieO
Fresh Alias
Posts: 198
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2019 10:10 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 56 times

Re: RW post match interview

Post by CharlieO »

Proposition Joe wrote: Sat Mar 25, 2023 11:29 pm Kind of funny that he accepts the subs didn't work out at all for the second game running but he says it like it was nothing to do with him and was something that just happened.
Yes that's right. Two games we were in control of and threw away after poor substitutions.
cymruO
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1746
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:58 pm
Been thanked: 312 times

Re: RW post match interview

Post by cymruO »

Doesn't seem to be registering with some that the reason we didn't sign a striker is because RW / ML et al couldn't find one that would give us more that what we had. Hard to predict that what we had in January would become such a worry to us as we reach April. It's also difficult to understand why decent strikers didn't want to jump at the chance of coming to the League leaders and potentially playing L1 football next season - maybe there weren't the decent stikersavailable.
Ronnie Hotdogs
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 13069
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
Has thanked: 831 times
Been thanked: 2637 times

Re: RW post match interview

Post by Ronnie Hotdogs »

I thought the reason was that we didn’t have enough money to bring in 2 turgid CBs, a crocked midfielder AND a striker?
gshaw
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 7705
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:24 pm
Has thanked: 3395 times
Been thanked: 1752 times

Re: RW post match interview

Post by gshaw »

Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: Sun Mar 26, 2023 1:38 pm I thought the reason was that we didn’t have enough money to bring in 2 turgid CBs, a crocked midfielder AND a striker?
The reason given was the FFP limit, though if we really really wanted a striker there were ways around it, especially given we got rid of Smith the week after which was another big earner off the books.
User avatar
North Stand Loafer
Fresh Alias
Posts: 27
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:27 pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: RW post match interview

Post by North Stand Loafer »

Strange interview. He seems to be blaming Sweeney for the goal because of his bad decision making - surely the bad decision was taking Sweeney off.
RedDwarf 1881
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12517
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 2557 times

Re: RW post match interview

Post by RedDwarf 1881 »

gshaw wrote: Sun Mar 26, 2023 3:06 pm
Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: Sun Mar 26, 2023 1:38 pm I thought the reason was that we didn’t have enough money to bring in 2 turgid CBs, a crocked midfielder AND a striker?
The reason given was the FFP limit, though if we really really wanted a striker there were ways around it, especially given we got rid of Smith the week after which was another big earner off the books.
Exactly . It was a poor decision not to bring in another striker . Hopefully we don't live to regret it and can still win promotion
Post Reply