McAuley Bonne

Chat about Leyton Orient (or anything else)

Moderator: Long slender neck

essexfootball
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1216
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 11:24 am
Has thanked: 19 times
Been thanked: 225 times

Re: McAuley Bonne

Post by essexfootball »

Definitely be a few League One clubs after him only caveat is, most of his career he has spent in London or not far out so may depend on how much of his roots are in London and whats gets offered elsewhere
User avatar
The Reverend
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2240
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 4:12 pm
Has thanked: 812 times
Been thanked: 928 times

Re: McAuley Bonne

Post by The Reverend »

TRUMP Plumbing wrote: Thu Jan 05, 2023 4:10 pm The Reverend - Yes, it is who you think it is. Yes, he was taken to the station after the Col Utd game.

But no, there was no proof he said anything racist or even abusive so please let that go.
If he didn’t say anything abusive why was he arrested in the first place?

I find it very hard to believe that he was sitting in his chair minding his own business and the coppers decided to nick him for no reason. I find it equally hard to believe that he was arrested for shouting positive encouragement at the player.

It’s interesting to know that he is indeed the person who was arrested for being abusive (which potentially includes racist abuse) at a Leyton Orient match.

I was getting a bit confused because I had thought the person behind the fanzine account was the person who has been arrested but what when asking him directly he seems to be giving me vague answers. I suppose I’d be embarrassed too if I’d behaved in such a way that caused the police to arrest me on grounds of being racially abusive.
Last edited by The Reverend on Thu Jan 05, 2023 4:48 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Max B Gold
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12288
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
Has thanked: 975 times
Been thanked: 2795 times

Re: McAuley Bonne

Post by Max B Gold »

Harlow wrote: Thu Jan 05, 2023 4:43 pm Well said Loughton, I keep hoping a new post is something positive and it turns out to be a load of bollocks.
You mean like this post.
Harlow
Fresh Alias
Posts: 694
Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2019 8:15 pm
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 160 times

Re: McAuley Bonne

Post by Harlow »

No!!!
Paul Hague
Fresh Alias
Posts: 334
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2022 10:27 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: McAuley Bonne

Post by Paul Hague »

Lifelongfan wrote: Thu Jan 05, 2023 4:09 pm
Paul Hague wrote: Thu Jan 05, 2023 3:58 pm
Lifelongfan wrote: Thu Jan 05, 2023 2:34 pm

The disdain with Macklin from you in your social media backs it up. Ask Macklin
Wrong (for about the 30th time)

Just put up or shut up

You know bugger all
I know you had emails warning you
No you don’t. Show them then
User avatar
Max B Gold
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12288
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
Has thanked: 975 times
Been thanked: 2795 times

Re: McAuley Bonne

Post by Max B Gold »

Paul Hague wrote: Thu Jan 05, 2023 5:02 pm
Lifelongfan wrote: Thu Jan 05, 2023 4:09 pm
Paul Hague wrote: Thu Jan 05, 2023 3:58 pm

Wrong (for about the 30th time)

Just put up or shut up

You know bugger all
I know you had emails warning you
No you don’t. Show them then
It's probably best if you publish ALL the correspondence you received from the club about your behaviour. That way this can all be cleared up, put to bed and we can move on.
Lifelongfan
Fresh Alias
Posts: 827
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2021 2:23 pm
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 203 times

Re: McAuley Bonne

Post by Lifelongfan »

Paul Hague wrote: Thu Jan 05, 2023 5:02 pm
Lifelongfan wrote: Thu Jan 05, 2023 4:09 pm
Paul Hague wrote: Thu Jan 05, 2023 3:58 pm

Wrong (for about the 30th time)

Just put up or shut up

You know bugger all
I know you had emails warning you
No you don’t. Show them then
Someone at the club told me
Paul Hague
Fresh Alias
Posts: 334
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2022 10:27 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: McAuley Bonne

Post by Paul Hague »

Lifelongfan wrote: Thu Jan 05, 2023 5:17 pm
Paul Hague wrote: Thu Jan 05, 2023 5:02 pm
Lifelongfan wrote: Thu Jan 05, 2023 4:09 pm

I know you had emails warning you
No you don’t. Show them then
Someone at the club told me
We did this one before as well - name them then
Paul Hague
Fresh Alias
Posts: 334
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2022 10:27 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: McAuley Bonne

Post by Paul Hague »

Max B Gold wrote: Thu Jan 05, 2023 5:14 pm
Paul Hague wrote: Thu Jan 05, 2023 5:02 pm
Lifelongfan wrote: Thu Jan 05, 2023 4:09 pm

I know you had emails warning you
No you don’t. Show them then
It's probably best if you publish ALL the correspondence you received from the club about your behaviour. That way this can all be cleared up, put to bed and we can move on.
I think people are being a little bit thick here because if I posted up any emails from Macklin (there were three) then anyone of the usual suspects on here will say I haven’t provided all. That’s not evidence. What is evidence is the so called lifelong fan PROVING he is right, which he isn’t.

If you knew Macklin properly then you would know that even if he said he did issue such an email then he talks 100% bollocks AND if necessary I could prove that as well
Lifelongfan
Fresh Alias
Posts: 827
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2021 2:23 pm
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 203 times

Re: McAuley Bonne

Post by Lifelongfan »

Paul Hague wrote: Thu Jan 05, 2023 6:58 pm
Max B Gold wrote: Thu Jan 05, 2023 5:14 pm
Paul Hague wrote: Thu Jan 05, 2023 5:02 pm

No you don’t. Show them then
It's probably best if you publish ALL the correspondence you received from the club about your behaviour. That way this can all be cleared up, put to bed and we can move on.
I think people are being a little bit thick here because if I posted up any emails from Macklin (there were three) then anyone of the usual suspects on here will say I haven’t provided all. That’s not evidence. What is evidence is the so called lifelong fan PROVING he is right, which he isn’t.

If you knew Macklin properly then you would know that even if he said he did issue such an email then he talks 100% bollocks AND if necessary I could prove that as well
You were warned about your behaviour & if it continued your season ticket would be taken off you. I was told this & believe it. Iam only stating what I was told & believe it.
Paul Hague
Fresh Alias
Posts: 334
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2022 10:27 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: McAuley Bonne

Post by Paul Hague »

FYI Macklin issued three emails

1. When my ST was suspended. This was sent before 9pm on the day of the game in question

2. A reply to mine on Sunday morning when I informed DM that there were no charges and I expected my ST to be reinstated immediately to which his response was they needed to check with the police

3. A confirmation on Sunday evening that my ST was to be reinstated and that the club would not apologise for what was standard procedure

Now let’s see if we get, after the facts, more utter bollocks and if people are actually brave enough to try and come up with evidence that isn’t there
Paul Hague
Fresh Alias
Posts: 334
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2022 10:27 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: McAuley Bonne

Post by Paul Hague »

Lifelongfan wrote: Thu Jan 05, 2023 7:08 pm
Paul Hague wrote: Thu Jan 05, 2023 6:58 pm
Max B Gold wrote: Thu Jan 05, 2023 5:14 pm

It's probably best if you publish ALL the correspondence you received from the club about your behaviour. That way this can all be cleared up, put to bed and we can move on.
I think people are being a little bit thick here because if I posted up any emails from Macklin (there were three) then anyone of the usual suspects on here will say I haven’t provided all. That’s not evidence. What is evidence is the so called lifelong fan PROVING he is right, which he isn’t.

If you knew Macklin properly then you would know that even if he said he did issue such an email then he talks 100% bollocks AND if necessary I could prove that as well
You were warned about your behaviour & if it continued your season ticket would be taken off you. I was told this & believe it. Iam only stating what I was told & believe it.
All you are quoting is ITK or pretend ITK bullshit

Name the person then
Lifelongfan
Fresh Alias
Posts: 827
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2021 2:23 pm
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 203 times

Re: McAuley Bonne

Post by Lifelongfan »

Paul Hague wrote: Thu Jan 05, 2023 7:09 pm
Lifelongfan wrote: Thu Jan 05, 2023 7:08 pm
Paul Hague wrote: Thu Jan 05, 2023 6:58 pm

I think people are being a little bit thick here because if I posted up any emails from Macklin (there were three) then anyone of the usual suspects on here will say I haven’t provided all. That’s not evidence. What is evidence is the so called lifelong fan PROVING he is right, which he isn’t.

If you knew Macklin properly then you would know that even if he said he did issue such an email then he talks 100% bollocks AND if necessary I could prove that as well
You were warned about your behaviour & if it continued your season ticket would be taken off you. I was told this & believe it. Iam only stating what I was told & believe it.
All you are quoting is ITK or pretend ITK bullshit

Name the person then
Why should I? I was told it & believe them.
Legend
Fresh Alias
Posts: 125
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2020 10:07 pm
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: McAuley Bonne

Post by Legend »

This is supposed to be about Macauley Bonne coming to the ORient not two squabbling 80’s throwbacks squabbling about who said what - grow up and take your differences elsewhere
cymruO
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1741
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:58 pm
Been thanked: 312 times

Re: McAuley Bonne

Post by cymruO »

Well said Legend
banqo
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2203
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 11:54 am
Location: Colchester
Has thanked: 2408 times
Been thanked: 687 times

Re: McAuley Bonne

Post by banqo »

Legend wrote: Thu Jan 05, 2023 7:20 pm This is supposed to be about Macauley Bonne coming to the ORient not two squabbling 80’s throwbacks squabbling about who said what - grow up and take your differences elsewhere
Which is William and which is Harry??
User avatar
Max Fowler
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 5497
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2021 12:18 pm
Has thanked: 509 times
Been thanked: 1262 times

Re: McAuley Bonne

Post by Max Fowler »

Legend wrote: Thu Jan 05, 2023 7:20 pm not two squabbling 80’s throwbacks squabbling about who said what - grow up
😂

Well said, sir.
User avatar
Long slender neck
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 14287
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
Has thanked: 2501 times
Been thanked: 3290 times

Re: McAuley Bonne

Post by Long slender neck »

Paul Hague wrote: Thu Jan 05, 2023 7:08 pm FYI Macklin issued three emails

1. When my ST was suspended. This was sent before 9pm on the day of the game in question

2. A reply to mine on Sunday morning when I informed DM that there were no charges and I expected my ST to be reinstated immediately to which his response was they needed to check with the police

3. A confirmation on Sunday evening that my ST was to be reinstated and that the club would not apologise for what was standard procedure

Now let’s see if we get, after the facts, more utter bollocks and if people are actually brave enough to try and come up with evidence that isn’t there
Do you think the clubs procedure was correct?
User avatar
The Reverend
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2240
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 4:12 pm
Has thanked: 812 times
Been thanked: 928 times

Re: McAuley Bonne

Post by The Reverend »

Paul Hague wrote: Thu Jan 05, 2023 7:08 pm FYI Macklin issued three emails

1. When my ST was suspended. This was sent before 9pm on the day of the game in question

2. A reply to mine on Sunday morning when I informed DM that there were no charges and I expected my ST to be reinstated immediately to which his response was they needed to check with the police

3. A confirmation on Sunday evening that my ST was to be reinstated and that the club would not apologise for what was standard procedure

Now let’s see if we get, after the facts, more utter bollocks and if people are actually brave enough to try and come up with evidence that isn’t there
What does any of this have to do with Macauley Bonne?
User avatar
Dunners
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 8959
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
Has thanked: 1061 times
Been thanked: 2486 times

Re: McAuley Bonne

Post by Dunners »

Did the Colchester player apologise for the false racism accusation? And I hope some compo is due from the rozzers for the fit-up.
Lifelongfan
Fresh Alias
Posts: 827
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2021 2:23 pm
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 203 times

Re: McAuley Bonne

Post by Lifelongfan »

What irks R***r is the club did not apologise to him. Thought he was taking legal action?
User avatar
Long slender neck
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 14287
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
Has thanked: 2501 times
Been thanked: 3290 times

Re: McAuley Bonne

Post by Long slender neck »

I just hope Bonne, of Zimbabwean descent, isnt put off of signing when he reads this thread.
User avatar
Max B Gold
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12288
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
Has thanked: 975 times
Been thanked: 2795 times

Re: McAuley Bonne

Post by Max B Gold »

Paul Hague wrote: Thu Jan 05, 2023 7:08 pm FYI Macklin issued three emails

1. When my ST was suspended. This was sent before 9pm on the day of the game in question

2. A reply to mine on Sunday morning when I informed DM that there were no charges and I expected my ST to be reinstated immediately to which his response was they needed to check with the police

3. A confirmation on Sunday evening that my ST was to be reinstated and that the club would not apologise for what was standard procedure

Now let’s see if we get, after the facts, more utter bollocks and if people are actually brave enough to try and come up with evidence that isn’t there
How do we know there were only 3 emails? We've only got your word for it.

I suspect that in email No 3, and not for the first time, you were warned about future behaviour. Can we see it please?
User avatar
The Reverend
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2240
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 4:12 pm
Has thanked: 812 times
Been thanked: 928 times

Re: McAuley Bonne

Post by The Reverend »

Max B Gold wrote: Thu Jan 05, 2023 8:12 pm
Paul Hague wrote: Thu Jan 05, 2023 7:08 pm FYI Macklin issued three emails

1. When my ST was suspended. This was sent before 9pm on the day of the game in question

2. A reply to mine on Sunday morning when I informed DM that there were no charges and I expected my ST to be reinstated immediately to which his response was they needed to check with the police

3. A confirmation on Sunday evening that my ST was to be reinstated and that the club would not apologise for what was standard procedure

Now let’s see if we get, after the facts, more utter bollocks and if people are actually brave enough to try and come up with evidence that isn’t there
How do we know there were only 3 emails? We've only got your word for it.

I suspect that in email No 3, and not for the first time, you were warned about future behaviour. Can we see it please?
I’m getting really confused here. On the one hand this chap is saying to me that his isn’t the person who got arrested for abusing a Colchester United player, yet his replies to others (yourself in included) suggests that he is.

How are we to trust anything this person says when they give contradictory responses on this thread alone?
User avatar
Max B Gold
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12288
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
Has thanked: 975 times
Been thanked: 2795 times

Re: McAuley Bonne

Post by Max B Gold »

The Reverend wrote: Thu Jan 05, 2023 8:17 pm
Max B Gold wrote: Thu Jan 05, 2023 8:12 pm
Paul Hague wrote: Thu Jan 05, 2023 7:08 pm FYI Macklin issued three emails

1. When my ST was suspended. This was sent before 9pm on the day of the game in question

2. A reply to mine on Sunday morning when I informed DM that there were no charges and I expected my ST to be reinstated immediately to which his response was they needed to check with the police

3. A confirmation on Sunday evening that my ST was to be reinstated and that the club would not apologise for what was standard procedure

Now let’s see if we get, after the facts, more utter bollocks and if people are actually brave enough to try and come up with evidence that isn’t there
How do we know there were only 3 emails? We've only got your word for it.

I suspect that in email No 3, and not for the first time, you were warned about future behaviour. Can we see it please?
I’m getting really confused here. On the one hand this chap is saying to me that his isn’t the person who got arrested for abusing a Colchester United player, yet his replies to others (yourself in included) suggests that he is.

How are we to trust anything this person says when they give contradictory responses on this thread alone?
Maybe in his mind he doesn't think it was abuse but a loud truth delivered from the terraces.
Post Reply