McAuley Bonne
Moderator: Long slender neck
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1216
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 11:24 am
- Has thanked: 19 times
- Been thanked: 225 times
Re: McAuley Bonne
Definitely be a few League One clubs after him only caveat is, most of his career he has spent in London or not far out so may depend on how much of his roots are in London and whats gets offered elsewhere
- The Reverend
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2240
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 4:12 pm
- Has thanked: 812 times
- Been thanked: 928 times
Re: McAuley Bonne
If he didn’t say anything abusive why was he arrested in the first place?TRUMP Plumbing wrote: ↑Thu Jan 05, 2023 4:10 pm The Reverend - Yes, it is who you think it is. Yes, he was taken to the station after the Col Utd game.
But no, there was no proof he said anything racist or even abusive so please let that go.
I find it very hard to believe that he was sitting in his chair minding his own business and the coppers decided to nick him for no reason. I find it equally hard to believe that he was arrested for shouting positive encouragement at the player.
It’s interesting to know that he is indeed the person who was arrested for being abusive (which potentially includes racist abuse) at a Leyton Orient match.
I was getting a bit confused because I had thought the person behind the fanzine account was the person who has been arrested but what when asking him directly he seems to be giving me vague answers. I suppose I’d be embarrassed too if I’d behaved in such a way that caused the police to arrest me on grounds of being racially abusive.
Last edited by The Reverend on Thu Jan 05, 2023 4:48 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- Max B Gold
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12288
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
- Has thanked: 975 times
- Been thanked: 2795 times
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2022 10:27 am
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 11 times
Re: McAuley Bonne
No you don’t. Show them thenLifelongfan wrote: ↑Thu Jan 05, 2023 4:09 pmI know you had emails warning youPaul Hague wrote: ↑Thu Jan 05, 2023 3:58 pmWrong (for about the 30th time)Lifelongfan wrote: ↑Thu Jan 05, 2023 2:34 pm
The disdain with Macklin from you in your social media backs it up. Ask Macklin
Just put up or shut up
You know bugger all
- Max B Gold
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12288
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
- Has thanked: 975 times
- Been thanked: 2795 times
Re: McAuley Bonne
It's probably best if you publish ALL the correspondence you received from the club about your behaviour. That way this can all be cleared up, put to bed and we can move on.Paul Hague wrote: ↑Thu Jan 05, 2023 5:02 pmNo you don’t. Show them thenLifelongfan wrote: ↑Thu Jan 05, 2023 4:09 pmI know you had emails warning youPaul Hague wrote: ↑Thu Jan 05, 2023 3:58 pm
Wrong (for about the 30th time)
Just put up or shut up
You know bugger all
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 827
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2021 2:23 pm
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 203 times
Re: McAuley Bonne
Someone at the club told mePaul Hague wrote: ↑Thu Jan 05, 2023 5:02 pmNo you don’t. Show them thenLifelongfan wrote: ↑Thu Jan 05, 2023 4:09 pmI know you had emails warning youPaul Hague wrote: ↑Thu Jan 05, 2023 3:58 pm
Wrong (for about the 30th time)
Just put up or shut up
You know bugger all
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2022 10:27 am
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 11 times
Re: McAuley Bonne
We did this one before as well - name them thenLifelongfan wrote: ↑Thu Jan 05, 2023 5:17 pmSomeone at the club told me
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2022 10:27 am
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 11 times
Re: McAuley Bonne
I think people are being a little bit thick here because if I posted up any emails from Macklin (there were three) then anyone of the usual suspects on here will say I haven’t provided all. That’s not evidence. What is evidence is the so called lifelong fan PROVING he is right, which he isn’t.Max B Gold wrote: ↑Thu Jan 05, 2023 5:14 pmIt's probably best if you publish ALL the correspondence you received from the club about your behaviour. That way this can all be cleared up, put to bed and we can move on.
If you knew Macklin properly then you would know that even if he said he did issue such an email then he talks 100% bollocks AND if necessary I could prove that as well
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 827
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2021 2:23 pm
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 203 times
Re: McAuley Bonne
You were warned about your behaviour & if it continued your season ticket would be taken off you. I was told this & believe it. Iam only stating what I was told & believe it.Paul Hague wrote: ↑Thu Jan 05, 2023 6:58 pmI think people are being a little bit thick here because if I posted up any emails from Macklin (there were three) then anyone of the usual suspects on here will say I haven’t provided all. That’s not evidence. What is evidence is the so called lifelong fan PROVING he is right, which he isn’t.Max B Gold wrote: ↑Thu Jan 05, 2023 5:14 pmIt's probably best if you publish ALL the correspondence you received from the club about your behaviour. That way this can all be cleared up, put to bed and we can move on.
If you knew Macklin properly then you would know that even if he said he did issue such an email then he talks 100% bollocks AND if necessary I could prove that as well
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2022 10:27 am
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 11 times
Re: McAuley Bonne
FYI Macklin issued three emails
1. When my ST was suspended. This was sent before 9pm on the day of the game in question
2. A reply to mine on Sunday morning when I informed DM that there were no charges and I expected my ST to be reinstated immediately to which his response was they needed to check with the police
3. A confirmation on Sunday evening that my ST was to be reinstated and that the club would not apologise for what was standard procedure
Now let’s see if we get, after the facts, more utter bollocks and if people are actually brave enough to try and come up with evidence that isn’t there
1. When my ST was suspended. This was sent before 9pm on the day of the game in question
2. A reply to mine on Sunday morning when I informed DM that there were no charges and I expected my ST to be reinstated immediately to which his response was they needed to check with the police
3. A confirmation on Sunday evening that my ST was to be reinstated and that the club would not apologise for what was standard procedure
Now let’s see if we get, after the facts, more utter bollocks and if people are actually brave enough to try and come up with evidence that isn’t there
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2022 10:27 am
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 11 times
Re: McAuley Bonne
All you are quoting is ITK or pretend ITK bullshitLifelongfan wrote: ↑Thu Jan 05, 2023 7:08 pmYou were warned about your behaviour & if it continued your season ticket would be taken off you. I was told this & believe it. Iam only stating what I was told & believe it.Paul Hague wrote: ↑Thu Jan 05, 2023 6:58 pmI think people are being a little bit thick here because if I posted up any emails from Macklin (there were three) then anyone of the usual suspects on here will say I haven’t provided all. That’s not evidence. What is evidence is the so called lifelong fan PROVING he is right, which he isn’t.Max B Gold wrote: ↑Thu Jan 05, 2023 5:14 pm
It's probably best if you publish ALL the correspondence you received from the club about your behaviour. That way this can all be cleared up, put to bed and we can move on.
If you knew Macklin properly then you would know that even if he said he did issue such an email then he talks 100% bollocks AND if necessary I could prove that as well
Name the person then
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 827
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2021 2:23 pm
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 203 times
Re: McAuley Bonne
Why should I? I was told it & believe them.Paul Hague wrote: ↑Thu Jan 05, 2023 7:09 pmAll you are quoting is ITK or pretend ITK bullshitLifelongfan wrote: ↑Thu Jan 05, 2023 7:08 pmYou were warned about your behaviour & if it continued your season ticket would be taken off you. I was told this & believe it. Iam only stating what I was told & believe it.Paul Hague wrote: ↑Thu Jan 05, 2023 6:58 pm
I think people are being a little bit thick here because if I posted up any emails from Macklin (there were three) then anyone of the usual suspects on here will say I haven’t provided all. That’s not evidence. What is evidence is the so called lifelong fan PROVING he is right, which he isn’t.
If you knew Macklin properly then you would know that even if he said he did issue such an email then he talks 100% bollocks AND if necessary I could prove that as well
Name the person then
Re: McAuley Bonne
This is supposed to be about Macauley Bonne coming to the ORient not two squabbling 80’s throwbacks squabbling about who said what - grow up and take your differences elsewhere
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2203
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 11:54 am
- Location: Colchester
- Has thanked: 2408 times
- Been thanked: 687 times
- Max Fowler
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 5497
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2021 12:18 pm
- Has thanked: 509 times
- Been thanked: 1262 times
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 14287
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2501 times
- Been thanked: 3290 times
Re: McAuley Bonne
Do you think the clubs procedure was correct?Paul Hague wrote: ↑Thu Jan 05, 2023 7:08 pm FYI Macklin issued three emails
1. When my ST was suspended. This was sent before 9pm on the day of the game in question
2. A reply to mine on Sunday morning when I informed DM that there were no charges and I expected my ST to be reinstated immediately to which his response was they needed to check with the police
3. A confirmation on Sunday evening that my ST was to be reinstated and that the club would not apologise for what was standard procedure
Now let’s see if we get, after the facts, more utter bollocks and if people are actually brave enough to try and come up with evidence that isn’t there
- The Reverend
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2240
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 4:12 pm
- Has thanked: 812 times
- Been thanked: 928 times
Re: McAuley Bonne
What does any of this have to do with Macauley Bonne?Paul Hague wrote: ↑Thu Jan 05, 2023 7:08 pm FYI Macklin issued three emails
1. When my ST was suspended. This was sent before 9pm on the day of the game in question
2. A reply to mine on Sunday morning when I informed DM that there were no charges and I expected my ST to be reinstated immediately to which his response was they needed to check with the police
3. A confirmation on Sunday evening that my ST was to be reinstated and that the club would not apologise for what was standard procedure
Now let’s see if we get, after the facts, more utter bollocks and if people are actually brave enough to try and come up with evidence that isn’t there
- Dunners
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 8959
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 1061 times
- Been thanked: 2486 times
Re: McAuley Bonne
Did the Colchester player apologise for the false racism accusation? And I hope some compo is due from the rozzers for the fit-up.
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 827
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2021 2:23 pm
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 203 times
Re: McAuley Bonne
What irks R***r is the club did not apologise to him. Thought he was taking legal action?
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 14287
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2501 times
- Been thanked: 3290 times
Re: McAuley Bonne
I just hope Bonne, of Zimbabwean descent, isnt put off of signing when he reads this thread.
- Max B Gold
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12288
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
- Has thanked: 975 times
- Been thanked: 2795 times
Re: McAuley Bonne
How do we know there were only 3 emails? We've only got your word for it.Paul Hague wrote: ↑Thu Jan 05, 2023 7:08 pm FYI Macklin issued three emails
1. When my ST was suspended. This was sent before 9pm on the day of the game in question
2. A reply to mine on Sunday morning when I informed DM that there were no charges and I expected my ST to be reinstated immediately to which his response was they needed to check with the police
3. A confirmation on Sunday evening that my ST was to be reinstated and that the club would not apologise for what was standard procedure
Now let’s see if we get, after the facts, more utter bollocks and if people are actually brave enough to try and come up with evidence that isn’t there
I suspect that in email No 3, and not for the first time, you were warned about future behaviour. Can we see it please?
- The Reverend
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2240
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 4:12 pm
- Has thanked: 812 times
- Been thanked: 928 times
Re: McAuley Bonne
I’m getting really confused here. On the one hand this chap is saying to me that his isn’t the person who got arrested for abusing a Colchester United player, yet his replies to others (yourself in included) suggests that he is.Max B Gold wrote: ↑Thu Jan 05, 2023 8:12 pmHow do we know there were only 3 emails? We've only got your word for it.Paul Hague wrote: ↑Thu Jan 05, 2023 7:08 pm FYI Macklin issued three emails
1. When my ST was suspended. This was sent before 9pm on the day of the game in question
2. A reply to mine on Sunday morning when I informed DM that there were no charges and I expected my ST to be reinstated immediately to which his response was they needed to check with the police
3. A confirmation on Sunday evening that my ST was to be reinstated and that the club would not apologise for what was standard procedure
Now let’s see if we get, after the facts, more utter bollocks and if people are actually brave enough to try and come up with evidence that isn’t there
I suspect that in email No 3, and not for the first time, you were warned about future behaviour. Can we see it please?
How are we to trust anything this person says when they give contradictory responses on this thread alone?
- Max B Gold
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12288
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
- Has thanked: 975 times
- Been thanked: 2795 times
Re: McAuley Bonne
Maybe in his mind he doesn't think it was abuse but a loud truth delivered from the terraces.The Reverend wrote: ↑Thu Jan 05, 2023 8:17 pmI’m getting really confused here. On the one hand this chap is saying to me that his isn’t the person who got arrested for abusing a Colchester United player, yet his replies to others (yourself in included) suggests that he is.Max B Gold wrote: ↑Thu Jan 05, 2023 8:12 pmHow do we know there were only 3 emails? We've only got your word for it.Paul Hague wrote: ↑Thu Jan 05, 2023 7:08 pm FYI Macklin issued three emails
1. When my ST was suspended. This was sent before 9pm on the day of the game in question
2. A reply to mine on Sunday morning when I informed DM that there were no charges and I expected my ST to be reinstated immediately to which his response was they needed to check with the police
3. A confirmation on Sunday evening that my ST was to be reinstated and that the club would not apologise for what was standard procedure
Now let’s see if we get, after the facts, more utter bollocks and if people are actually brave enough to try and come up with evidence that isn’t there
I suspect that in email No 3, and not for the first time, you were warned about future behaviour. Can we see it please?
How are we to trust anything this person says when they give contradictory responses on this thread alone?