Wordle

[tuffers#1]

Just in case that's not clear, In other words, taking the skill element out of the game and just looking at the luck, you could expect lSN's results about half the time and tuffers about 1 in every 5000 times.

Credit to tufters for doubling down like this, even after being so exposed.

Exposed as a Genius, that was done an age ago , hence why Swanny calls me 160

[tuffers#1]

Should shut the trainee up a bit

Wordle 409 5/6







Concentrate on you using your Stilsons pal

Last 10 posts, probability of getting number of 'green' correct letters in the first guess.

StillSpike, 4/50 89.32% probability of doing this well or better if using a perfect strategy

Gshaw 3/50 97.09% probability of doing this well or better if using a perfect strategy

Longslenderneck 6/50 49.40% probability of doing this well or better if using a perfect strategy

Tuffers 10/50 0.02% probability of doing this well or better if using a perfect strategy.

Very poor effort from my 1st guess today
Made up for it on the 2nd guess though .
Keep using those 10 most used letters though .


Wordle 410 4/6

[tuffers#1]

Just in case that's not clear, In other words, taking the skill element out of the game and just looking at the luck, you could expect lSN's results about half the time and tuffers about 1 in every 5000 times.

Im 1 in 8 billion chap !

[Mick McQuaid]

I think you're way better than that, I've been procrastinating badly today and looking at wordle stat. I need to do some work now but rough estimate on your second guess luck is the equivalent of me picking a star at random from the entire observable universe of a trillion or so galaxies and you guessing which one I picked first time. That's some luck.

[Wally Banter]

Was it the Sun?

[Mick McQuaid]

Bugger.

[Max Fowler]

Was it the Sun?

I'd have gone for Uranus.

[tuffers#1]

I think you're way better than that, I've been procrastinating badly today and looking at wordle stat. I need to do some work now but rough estimate on your second guess luck is the equivalent of me picking a star at random from the entire observable universe of a trillion or so galaxies and you guessing which one I picked first time. That's some luck.

Huh ? youre clearly not very good at understanding stats are you. The 10 most used letters show that random probability of 1 in trillions as opposed to 1 in 26 especially as 1 in 10 are the most frequently used of the stated 26 . I'll waist no more time on year 9 & 10 mathematics to show your ludicrous comparable statistic .

[Long slender neck]

Wordle 410 5/6







Plenty of greenies for Micks stats.

[gshaw]

Wordle 410 5/6

[Max Fowler]

Wordle 410 5/6

[tuffers#1]

.

[Mick McQuaid]

Huh ? youre clearly not very good at understanding stats are you. The 10 most used letters show that random probability of 1 in trillions as opposed to 1 in 26 especially as 1 in 10 are the most frequently used of the stated 26 . I'll waist no more time on year 9 & 10 mathematics to show your ludicrous comparable statistic .

Let's ignore the fact that you're not consistently using the most common letters (e.g. 391 where you used the same vowel twice in the opening guess and got them both correct). The starting point for all my calculations is using the probability as if you were playing the perfect game for what I am measuring.

For game length I used the best bot result from here, https://freshman.dev/wordle/#/leaderboard and took the probability of winning a game in three or less (0.692)

For chance of a correctly placed letter on the first go I use the information here https://artofproblemsolving.com/blog/ar ... ing-wordle (0.546)

I then use a binomial probability calculator https://stattrek.com/online-calculator/binomial to calculate against results you have posted.

For game length I use games where you achieved three or less as the success measure (x). For first letter it's 0.546/5 as the probability for an individual letter to be correct, and then the number of correct letters in the sample size as x, number of games is also multiplied by 5. Has to be for individual letters rather than the game as a whole as you can't have more successes than trials.

The thing about being a bit better than is probable is that from a small sample it's impossible to state anything significant, so posting a 6 and saying 'Look I'm not cheating' doesn't really work.

For example rolling a 5 or better in a dice game has a probability of 1/3. The chance of rolling 5 or better 3 times out of 5 is about 20% so It will happen fairly often. Keep up that same ratio though for 30 times out of 50 and the probability of doing that well drops to 0.01%.

This is how I worked out your first 63 posts had a probability less than thst of winning the lottery - I think you had one or two where you got a 4 or more rather than the 19 or so expected. Doing that well over 10 or so games is plausible, doing it over 60+ games means you have an idea of what the word is before you start. I think your previous claim that the words aren't random and you have seen the pattern is more plausible than claiming you are especially skilled at guessing a random word in a logical way.

Where the numbers get truly astronomical is looking at frequency of individual letters guessed correctly taking into account their position. For reasons I don't understand the first letter is the least likely to be guessed on the first couple of attempts, second and third easiest and last two in the middle. A quick look at your results shows your guesses are on average pretty much exactly the wrong way round, again as if you know the word you're aiming for before you start. I might get round to doing the calculation but will have to do it manually, even the online calculator I found that gives at least 25 decimal places was giving a big fat 0 chance on the 20 game sample I put in it.

Obviously you're not cheating, and these calculations are only valid if you consider the word to guess as being randomly chosen, which as youve pointed out, it isnt.. I was doing this for my own slightly nerdy satisfaction of seeing whether it was possible to quantify how lucky someone is at wordle, I may well have the maths wrong or not considered something. I did consider Gary's suggestion that you only post the good scores but you seem to post regularly for periods then have a break of a few days, I think that pattern of doing less well in discrete chunks before returning to form is even less likely than the scores you have posted.

[Max Fowler]

Wordle 411 4/6

[Max Fowler]

Huh ? youre clearly not very good at understanding stats are you. The 10 most used letters show that random probability of 1 in trillions as opposed to 1 in 26 especially as 1 in 10 are the most frequently used of the stated 26 . I'll waist no more time on year 9 & 10 mathematics to show your ludicrous comparable statistic .

Let's ignore the fact that you're not consistently using the most common letters (e.g. 391 where you used the same vowel twice in the opening guess and got them both correct). The starting point for all my calculations is using the probability as if you were playing the perfect game for what I am measuring.

For game length I used the best bot result from here, https://freshman.dev/wordle/#/leaderboard and took the probability of winning a game in three or less (0.692)

For chance of a correctly placed letter on the first go I use the information here https://artofproblemsolving.com/blog/ar ... ing-wordle (0.546)

I then use a binomial probability calculator https://stattrek.com/online-calculator/binomial to calculate against results you have posted.

For game length I use games where you achieved three or less as the success measure (x). For first letter it's 0.546/5 as the probability for an individual letter to be correct, and then the number of correct letters in the sample size as x, number of games is also multiplied by 5. Has to be for individual letters rather than the game as a whole as you can't have more successes than trials.

The thing about being a bit better than is probable is that from a small sample it's impossible to state anything significant, so posting a 6 and saying 'Look I'm not cheating' doesn't really work.

For example rolling a 5 or better in a dice game has a probability of 1/3. The chance of rolling 5 or better 3 times out of 5 is about 20% so It will happen fairly often. Keep up that same ratio though for 30 times out of 50 and the probability of doing that well drops to 0.01%.

This is how I worked out your first 63 posts had a probability less than thst of winning the lottery - I think you had one or two where you got a 4 or more rather than the 19 or so expected. Doing that well over 10 or so games is plausible, doing it over 60+ games means you have an idea of what the word is before you start. I think your previous claim that the words aren't random and you have seen the pattern is more plausible than claiming you are especially skilled at guessing a random word in a logical way.

Where the numbers get truly astronomical is looking at frequency of individual letters guessed correctly taking into account their position. For reasons I don't understand the first letter is the least likely to be guessed on the first couple of attempts, second and third easiest and last two in the middle. A quick look at your results shows your guesses are on average pretty much exactly the wrong way round, again as if you know the word you're aiming for before you start. I might get round to doing the calculation but will have to do it manually, even the online calculator I found that gives at least 25 decimal places was giving a big fat 0 chance on the 20 game sample I put in it.

Obviously you're not cheating, and these calculations are only valid if you consider the word to guess as being randomly chosen, which as youve pointed out, it isnt.. I was doing this for my own slightly nerdy satisfaction of seeing whether it was possible to quantify how lucky someone is at wordle, I may well have the maths wrong or not considered something. I did consider Gary's suggestion that you only post the good scores but you seem to post regularly for periods then have a break of a few days, I think that pattern of doing less well in discrete chunks before returning to form is even less likely than the scores you have posted.

This is brilliant.

[Long slender neck]

Wordle 411 4/6

[Long slender neck]

What do you mean the words aren't random?

Words aren't a random sequence of letters, is that where your probability calculations are going wrong?

[Max Fowler]

What do you mean the words aren't random?

Words aren't a random sequence of letters, is that where your probability calculations are going wrong?

There is a preset list of 2,000 or so words. It’s not a random selection from all the 5 letter words in the whole world.

I think we all know why the probability calculations are going wrong.

[Mick McQuaid]

You really do wtite an awful lot of poppycock.

Last weekend 1 of the answers was
" Wedge " used during the Open golf championship

So the words arent random .
Todays wordle word is something that
occurs during the summer .

Wordle 399 3/6

[Long slender neck]

There have been times when its felt not random, I think 'party' or something came up during partygate. But wasnt the list of words set ages ago? I think I read the answer list had been hacked before.

[StillSpike]

Wordle 411 4/6






Quite proud of this one. Tricky word

[Admin]

Wordle 411 4/6






Quite proud of this one. Tricky word

Heh - I took 5 and spent ages trying to work it out. Felt rather thick when I finally got it.

[tuffers#1]

Huh ? youre clearly not very good at understanding stats are you. The 10 most used letters show that random probability of 1 in trillions as opposed to 1 in 26 especially as 1 in 10 are the most frequently used of the stated 26 . I'll waist no more time on year 9 & 10 mathematics to show your ludicrous comparable statistic .

Let's ignore the fact that you're not consistently using the most common letters (e.g. 391 where you used the same vowel twice in the opening guess and got them both correct). The starting point for all my calculations is using the probability as if you were playing the perfect game for what I am measuring.

For game length I used the best bot result from here, https://freshman.dev/wordle/#/leaderboard and took the probability of winning a game in three or less (0.692)

For chance of a correctly placed letter on the first go I use the information here https://artofproblemsolving.com/blog/ar ... ing-wordle (0.546)

I then use a binomial probability calculator https://stattrek.com/online-calculator/binomial to calculate against results you have posted.

For game length I use games where you achieved three or less as the success measure (x). For first letter it's 0.546/5 as the probability for an individual letter to be correct, and then the number of correct letters in the sample size as x, number of games is also multiplied by 5. Has to be for individual letters rather than the game as a whole as you can't have more successes than trials.

The thing about being a bit better than is probable is that from a small sample it's impossible to state anything significant, so posting a 6 and saying 'Look I'm not cheating' doesn't really work.

For example rolling a 5 or better in a dice game has a probability of 1/3. The chance of rolling 5 or better 3 times out of 5 is about 20% so It will happen fairly often. Keep up that same ratio though for 30 times out of 50 and the probability of doing that well drops to 0.01%.

This is how I worked out your first 63 posts had a probability less than thst of winning the lottery - I think you had one or two where you got a 4 or more rather than the 19 or so expected. Doing that well over 10 or so games is plausible, doing it over 60+ games means you have an idea of what the word is before you start. I think your previous claim that the words aren't random and you have seen the pattern is more plausible than claiming you are especially skilled at guessing a random word in a logical way.

Where the numbers get truly astronomical is looking at frequency of individual letters guessed correctly taking into account their position. For reasons I don't understand the first letter is the least likely to be guessed on the first couple of attempts, second and third easiest and last two in the middle. A quick look at your results shows your guesses are on average pretty much exactly the wrong way round, again as if you know the word you're aiming for before you start. I might get round to doing the calculation but will have to do it manually, even the online calculator I found that gives at least 25 decimal places was giving a big fat 0 chance on the 20 game sample I put in it.

Obviously you're not cheating, and these calculations are only valid if you consider the word to guess as being randomly chosen, which as youve pointed out, it isnt.. I was doing this for my own slightly nerdy satisfaction of seeing whether it was possible to quantify how lucky someone is at wordle, I may well have the maths wrong or not considered something. I did consider Gary's suggestion that you only post the good scores but you seem to post regularly for periods then have a break of a few days, I think that pattern of doing less well in discrete chunks before returning to form is even less likely than the scores you have posted.

Lets not ignore the fact . 391 included the letter E twice , The most used letter in the English language .

P.S
I never know the word im guessing before I start .
I know im clever but im not the author


Keep your love going though if you need

[StillSpike]

There have been times when its felt not random, I think 'party' or something came up during partygate. But wasnt the list of words set ages ago? I think I read the answer list had been hacked before.

Last weekend 1 of the answers was
" Wedge " used during the Open golf championship

But those examples of the supposed "non randomness" of the answers ONLY work once you know the word and then link it back to the ongoing event, don't they?

During Partygate - the word could have been drink, or snack, or group, or c<unt or any one of a huge number of words that might relate to a party in No 10. Similarly, during the Open, why wasn't the word picked drive, or green, or caddy, or stand or any other of the thousands of 5 letter words that could relate to golf? (one might also argue that Wedge is a more obscure link to the Open than the examples I've given). And, Partygate and the Open were hardly the only things happening at those times were they?

The words are randomly drawn from a set list of about 2,500 words that Wardle created.

[StillSpike]

Here's the last 3 correct words and links to prove they are NOT random

AUG 03 - #410 - YOUTH - Commonwealth Games is on and competitors in that tend to be quite young
AUG 02 - #409 - COYLY - Love Island ended recently
AUG 01 - #408 - QUART - I went to the pub the other day and had only 2 pints.


See how easy it is?