Ratings.

Chat about Leyton Orient (or anything else)

Moderator: Long slender neck

Beradogs
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2658
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 3:54 pm
Has thanked: 1026 times
Been thanked: 919 times

Ratings.

Post by Beradogs »

A lot of our players not bothered today which is a bit of a pisss take when people have payed out hard earned money in what is a pretty difficult economic environment. You don’t mind losing but the first 15 mins we spent passing sideways and back to Lawrence like it was funny. Have some pride.
Vigouroux. 6. Can’t remember him making a save but might be wrong.
James. 6.5. MOM. One lovely cross and hit the post with a peach of a free kick. Replaced just after half time. If we can keep him then all things possible next season.
Beccles. 6. Goal was either his or Thompsons fault. Beccles was blaming Tommo. I am not sure, perhaps someone at the game like plumber can put me right on a few things I am unsure of.
Thompson. 5.5. Looked better at right back to be honest. Favourite position today and is weakest game since back. Minus 1 if goal was his fault.
Wood. 5. Didn’t play particularly well. Will Wood start every game in a championship winning side. Probably not. Do you have to accept that some positions will be weaker than others and he will do a job next season. Probably.
Hector. 5. Oh hector. Splits opinions on here. I just don’t see it. Will he start next season? Almost impossible to know whether Wellens rates him or not.
Guess we find out in the summer.
Pratley. 4. One of the main culprits for not being bothered at all today. Hey, Darren, not really fair for all the people who made the effort is it.
Brown. 4. Couple of decent games again out of position and now back to where you would think he is more comfortable and had a shocker.
Archibald. 5. Meh. Blows hot and cold. Sometimes match to match, sometimes in one match. Frustrating. Is he perhaps slightly overrated?
Smyth. 6.5. Gets a high mark not through anything he did especially but because he actually tried and cared.
Drinnan. 6. Worked hard enough but no goal threat.

Subs. Ruel. 5. Lost the ball about 10 times. Smith. 5. Put himself about, I guess.

Wellens. 6. Funny that we finished mid table because a mid table side sums us up perfectly. To get in the top 3 places next season we need big upgrades in midfield.

Tranmere. 6. Didn’t have to do much to beat us.
gshaw
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 7686
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:24 pm
Has thanked: 3383 times
Been thanked: 1748 times

Re: Ratings.

Post by gshaw »

Thanks for the ratings, I think it's story of the season that midfield gets the lowest marks of the XI. RW interview suggested he's only looking to bring one midfielder in but I think we really need two replacements to have any chance next season.

Take one from Kyprianou, Brown, Coleman to keep in the squad as a 4th choice cup game filler player then loan the rest out to NL imo
MrB
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1989
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 12:11 pm
Has thanked: 429 times
Been thanked: 333 times

Re: Ratings.

Post by MrB »

Cheers Bera..
I make you right about Wood..Had so much space at times yet when he received the ball he was pushed of it or just gave it away..
Drinan? Personally I thought he was hopeless..
At the end of the day we were much to casual for my liking.Disappointing end to the season
User avatar
y o y o y
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1357
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:17 pm
Has thanked: 177 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: Ratings.

Post by y o y o y »

Not a good game from either side.
Difficult to rate the players when we had nothing to play for. Disappointed that we didn't put on the show that Wellens said he wanted in his pre match interview .
Great to see Tom James back ,he played well and was unlucky with a excellent free kick .
I thought Drinan? fouled their man which made him handball it. We don't do pens anyway
PutneyO
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1481
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2020 5:35 pm
Location: Putney
Has thanked: 1849 times
Been thanked: 240 times

Re: Ratings.

Post by PutneyO »

I'll give them all 5 just for turning up
RedDwarf 1881
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12476
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 2555 times

Re: Ratings.

Post by RedDwarf 1881 »

Beradogs wrote: Sat May 07, 2022 5:47 pm A lot of our players not bothered today which is a bit of a pisss take when people have payed out hard earned money in what is a pretty difficult economic environment. You don’t mind losing but the first 15 mins we spent passing sideways and back to Lawrence like it was funny. Have some pride.
Vigouroux. 6. Can’t remember him making a save but might be wrong.
James. 6.5. MOM. One lovely cross and hit the post with a peach of a free kick. Replaced just after half time. If we can keep him then all things possible next season.
Beccles. 6. Goal was either his or Thompsons fault. Beccles was blaming Tommo. I am not sure, perhaps someone at the game like plumber can put me right on a few things I am unsure of.
Thompson. 5.5. Looked better at right back to be honest. Favourite position today and is weakest game since back. Minus 1 if goal was his fault.
Wood. 5. Didn’t play particularly well. Will Wood start every game in a championship winning side. Probably not. Do you have to accept that some positions will be weaker than others and he will do a job next season. Probably.
Hector. 5. Oh hector. Splits opinions on here. I just don’t see it. Will he start next season? Almost impossible to know whether Wellens rates him or not.
Guess we find out in the summer.
Pratley. 4. One of the main culprits for not being bothered at all today. Hey, Darren, not really fair for all the people who made the effort is it.
Brown. 4. Couple of decent games again out of position and now back to where you would think he is more comfortable and had a shocker.
Archibald. 5. Meh. Blows hot and cold. Sometimes match to match, sometimes in one match. Frustrating. Is he perhaps slightly overrated?
Smyth. 6.5. Gets a high mark not through anything he did especially but because he actually tried and cared.
Drinnan. 6. Worked hard enough but no goal threat.

Subs. Ruel. 5. Lost the ball about 10 times. Smith. 5. Put himself about, I guess.

Wellens. 6. Funny that we finished mid table because a mid table side sums us up perfectly. To get in the top 3 places next season we need big upgrades in midfield.

Tranmere. 6. Didn’t have to do much to beat us.
I agree with your opening comment Bera. We played that first half like we already had our flip flops on . Second half we picked up the tempo and was unlucky not to equalise on a couple of occasions .
Harlow
Fresh Alias
Posts: 694
Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2019 8:15 pm
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 160 times

Re: Ratings.

Post by Harlow »

Beradogs, would you say to the players faces that they were not trying-they were trying but it didn't come off for them today
User avatar
Fisch
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1180
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 6:58 am
Location: Varaždin, Croatia
Has thanked: 236 times
Been thanked: 193 times
Contact:

Re: Ratings.

Post by Fisch »

Agree with your ratings Bera but l've lost confidence in Hector.
User avatar
Max Fowler
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 5497
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2021 12:18 pm
Has thanked: 509 times
Been thanked: 1262 times

Re: Ratings.

Post by Max Fowler »

What a set of ratings 😂

It’s almost as if these people weren’t even at the game.
MrB
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1989
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 12:11 pm
Has thanked: 429 times
Been thanked: 333 times

Re: Ratings.

Post by MrB »

Gary the Plumber wrote: Sat May 07, 2022 7:09 pm What a set of ratings 😂

It’s almost as if these people weren’t even at the game.
Send us your ratings Gary
User avatar
y o y o y
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1357
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:17 pm
Has thanked: 177 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: Ratings.

Post by y o y o y »

Gary the Plumber wrote: Sat May 07, 2022 7:09 pm
It’s almost as if these people weren’t even at the game.
Along the 2000+ no shows at a 'sold out" game
User avatar
Max Fowler
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 5497
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2021 12:18 pm
Has thanked: 509 times
Been thanked: 1262 times

Re: Ratings.

Post by Max Fowler »

y o y o y wrote: Sat May 07, 2022 7:16 pm
Gary the Plumber wrote: Sat May 07, 2022 7:09 pm
It’s almost as if these people weren’t even at the game.
Along the 2000+ no shows at a 'sold out" game
😃

I had a look round when they announced the 6,600 attendance and I can’t see how there were 2,000 empty seats?
User avatar
y o y o y
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1357
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:17 pm
Has thanked: 177 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: Ratings.

Post by y o y o y »

700 in the away end for starters
so about 1300 home fans missing
gshaw
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 7686
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:24 pm
Has thanked: 3383 times
Been thanked: 1748 times

Re: Ratings.

Post by gshaw »

Gary the Plumber wrote: Sat May 07, 2022 7:09 pm What a set of ratings 😂
What would you expect to see after losing without scoring? Can't rate anyone higher than a 6 on that result surely.
Cheshunto
Regular
Regular
Posts: 3496
Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 3:20 pm
Has thanked: 644 times
Been thanked: 863 times

Re: Ratings.

Post by Cheshunto »

Fair ratings really for a disappointing performance.
6,600 is still a decent attendance for a nothing game but our players looked as they had one foot on the beach already.
We certainly won’t trouble the top three next season playing like that.
Only bright spot was Tom James playing virtually an hour which I would guess makes it likely that he will sign for next season.
User avatar
Max Fowler
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 5497
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2021 12:18 pm
Has thanked: 509 times
Been thanked: 1262 times

Re: Ratings.

Post by Max Fowler »

Very clever to get James out there today, the standing ovation he received will certainly help with discussions.
RicketyCricket
Fresh Alias
Posts: 112
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 11:41 am
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: Ratings.

Post by RicketyCricket »

Agree great to see James back. What was his injury? Assume it was knee ligaments of some sort.

Kyprianou I thought played well, first half at least. Him and Clay will be decent enough next season and hopefully a midfield upgrade arriving. Just please no Pratley next season, no idea what some see in him.

Archibald is also wasted on the right.
gshaw
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 7686
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:24 pm
Has thanked: 3383 times
Been thanked: 1748 times

Re: Ratings.

Post by gshaw »

RicketyCricket wrote: Sat May 07, 2022 10:14 pm Agree great to see James back. What was his injury? Assume it was knee ligaments of some sort.
Hamstring if I remember rightly
User avatar
Max Fowler
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 5497
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2021 12:18 pm
Has thanked: 509 times
Been thanked: 1262 times

Re: Ratings.

Post by Max Fowler »

RicketyCricket wrote: Sat May 07, 2022 10:14 pm Agree great to see James back. What was his injury? Assume it was knee ligaments of some sort.

Kyprianou I thought played well, first half at least. Him and Clay will be decent enough next season and hopefully a midfield upgrade arriving. Just please no Pratley next season, no idea what some see in him.

Archibald is also wasted on the right.
Clay isn’t a good enough footballer to play the way Wellens wants.
RedDwarf 1881
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12476
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 2555 times

Re: Ratings.

Post by RedDwarf 1881 »

Gary the Plumber wrote: Sat May 07, 2022 11:45 pm
RicketyCricket wrote: Sat May 07, 2022 10:14 pm Agree great to see James back. What was his injury? Assume it was knee ligaments of some sort.

Kyprianou I thought played well, first half at least. Him and Clay will be decent enough next season and hopefully a midfield upgrade arriving. Just please no Pratley next season, no idea what some see in him.

Archibald is also wasted on the right.
Clay isn’t a good enough footballer to play the way Wellens wants.
If that's the case then neither is Kyprianou , Coleman or Brown because Clay is far better than all three of them .
User avatar
Max Fowler
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 5497
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2021 12:18 pm
Has thanked: 509 times
Been thanked: 1262 times

Re: Ratings.

Post by Max Fowler »

RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Sun May 08, 2022 12:06 am
Gary the Plumber wrote: Sat May 07, 2022 11:45 pm
RicketyCricket wrote: Sat May 07, 2022 10:14 pm Agree great to see James back. What was his injury? Assume it was knee ligaments of some sort.

Kyprianou I thought played well, first half at least. Him and Clay will be decent enough next season and hopefully a midfield upgrade arriving. Just please no Pratley next season, no idea what some see in him.

Archibald is also wasted on the right.
Clay isn’t a good enough footballer to play the way Wellens wants.
If that's the case then neither is Kyprianou , Coleman or Brown because Clay is far better than all three of them .
Clay is arguably a better harrier and presser than the players you’ve listed but he is not a better footballer than Kyprianou or Brown (not seen enough of Coleman to judge yet).

Wellens wants us to play football properly, players that can’t do that will go.
RedDwarf 1881
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12476
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 2555 times

Re: Ratings.

Post by RedDwarf 1881 »

If I understood it correctly, Martin said at the AGM that we have players under contract who will go , presumably out on loan. Maybe one or two from the names mentioned above
User avatar
Qin
Fresh Alias
Posts: 303
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2020 2:19 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 130 times

Re: Ratings.

Post by Qin »

I think we're a fair bit short of a promotion side TBH. I dont think we have enough goals in us for auto promotion, and I think we're weak in midfield.
Richie says we need two or three in.....I think we need 5 or 6 in
Just my opinion
Wasp
Fresh Alias
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2019 4:21 pm

Re: Ratings.

Post by Wasp »

Not sure about the original ratings - Thompson was outstanding on Saturday, really pleased he's signed a new deal as per the rumours, he's excellent at this level.
soloman
Fresh Alias
Posts: 640
Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2019 8:26 pm
Has thanked: 356 times
Been thanked: 180 times

Re: Ratings.

Post by soloman »

Qin wrote: Sun May 08, 2022 11:18 am I think we're a fair bit short of a promotion side TBH. I dont think we have enough goals in us for auto promotion, and I think we're weak in midfield.
Richie says we need two or three in.....I think we need 5 or 6 in
Just my opinion
Have to agree one hundred percent .
Post Reply