Ratings.

Chat about Leyton Orient (or anything else)

Moderator: Long slender neck

User avatar
Max Fowler
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 5497
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2021 12:18 pm
Has thanked: 509 times
Been thanked: 1262 times

Re: Ratings.

Post by Max Fowler »

Orient_Man_And_Boy wrote: Sat Apr 23, 2022 9:28 pm Vig’s distribution is awful. How many times per match is the ball sent into touch.

One free kick was three yards in from the touch line with the whole pitch to aim at and he sends it off the same side. FM!
:lol:

I have never seen a keeper at L2 level as good on the ball as Vigaro.
User avatar
Max Fowler
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 5497
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2021 12:18 pm
Has thanked: 509 times
Been thanked: 1262 times

Re: Ratings.

Post by Max Fowler »

Vigaro 7. Couple of incredible saves. Good distribution as ever. Thought he could have done better with the first but that’s being overly critical - no other keeper we’ve had in the past 5 years would have sniffed it.

Khan 6. Done ok. Maybe he could be a right back after all with a bit of coaching. Disappointing for the 3rd goal I think it was.

Wood 6.

Ogie 6. Needs to learn from that, yes he had every right to be angry but take it up with the bloke after the game out of the refs view.

Beckles 6.

Coleman 4. Ok defensively but offered nothing when we had the ball.

Pratley 6.

Smyth 6. Quiet by his high standards.

Ruel 5. Didn’t happen for him today. Spent more time on his arse than in his feet first half.

Drinnan 6. Worked and ran and worked. Couple of amazing crosses.

Archibald 6.

Subs

Brown 6. Big improvement on Coleman.

Mitchell 6. Agricultural.

Smith 6. Looked like he took a whack early on and carried on because he had to.

Despite the score line, that was a good game to watch and we looked decent until their 3rd went in, which looked a mile offside. Much better second half when we went 3-5-2 with Big Smith up top.

I would like to think that this time next season, we will be as well drilled and disciplined as Northampton were. If so, with he extra quality we’ve got, we’ll be alright.
Give it to Jabo
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2664
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 9:34 pm
Has thanked: 102 times
Been thanked: 418 times

Re: Ratings.

Post by Give it to Jabo »

Mitchell - 6 Agricultural :D
Lifelongfan
Fresh Alias
Posts: 837
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2021 2:23 pm
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 204 times

Re: Ratings.

Post by Lifelongfan »

Ogie has been my player of the season but looking back at the highlights he looked like he was on the beach for the first two goals. He will learn from it as he has from other issues he has encoutered
Hutch
Fresh Alias
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2019 5:38 pm
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Ratings.

Post by Hutch »

I thought Wood was the weakest link in our back four on Saturday (though Khan and Ogie certainly struggled) - the way he lost his man for their fourth goal (at a point where we should've just seen things out to go in 1-3 down and in the game) was shockingly dozy.
BoniO
Regular
Regular
Posts: 4715
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 3:36 pm
Has thanked: 1128 times
Been thanked: 763 times

Re: Ratings.

Post by BoniO »

Lifelongfan wrote: Tue Apr 26, 2022 9:28 am Ogie has been my player of the season but looking back at the highlights he looked like he was on the beach for the first two goals. He will learn from it as he has from other issues he has encoutered
I like Ogie too but he's currently flawed in a couple of ways. If he loses the ball he's not great at chasing back, he seems to give up too easily. Secondly, his sideways shuffle when ran at is becoming predictable and he'll get found out doing that as opposition teams do their homework. But he's young and hopefully RW can coach him out of these habits.
User avatar
Max Fowler
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 5497
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2021 12:18 pm
Has thanked: 509 times
Been thanked: 1262 times

Re: Ratings.

Post by Max Fowler »

Hutch wrote: Tue Apr 26, 2022 10:05 am I thought Wood was the weakest link in our back four on Saturday (though Khan and Ogie certainly struggled) - the way he lost his man for their fourth goal (at a point where we should've just seen things out to go in 1-3 down and in the game) was shockingly dozy.
Was the third goal the one where Khan gave their winger all the time in the world to swing in a perfect cross on his preferred right foot, instead of showing him down the outside onto his unfavoured left?
Dohnut
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2913
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:03 pm
Has thanked: 308 times
Been thanked: 662 times

Re: Ratings.

Post by Dohnut »

Gary the Plumber wrote: Tue Apr 26, 2022 10:45 am
Hutch wrote: Tue Apr 26, 2022 10:05 am I thought Wood was the weakest link in our back four on Saturday (though Khan and Ogie certainly struggled) - the way he lost his man for their fourth goal (at a point where we should've just seen things out to go in 1-3 down and in the game) was shockingly dozy.
Was the third goal the one where Khan gave their winger all the time in the world to swing in a perfect cross on his preferred right foot, instead of showing him down the outside onto his unfavoured left?
When khan went out wide I recall him looking for his cover. Have to have another look but I wonder if he was caught out having to mark two players and ended up marking no one well. Khan was between a rock and a hard place. Don’t think it was all down to him.
LittleMate
Regular
Regular
Posts: 3172
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 9:03 pm
Has thanked: 1643 times
Been thanked: 900 times

Re: Ratings.

Post by LittleMate »

Dohnut wrote: Tue Apr 26, 2022 1:03 pm
Gary the Plumber wrote: Tue Apr 26, 2022 10:45 am
Hutch wrote: Tue Apr 26, 2022 10:05 am I thought Wood was the weakest link in our back four on Saturday (though Khan and Ogie certainly struggled) - the way he lost his man for their fourth goal (at a point where we should've just seen things out to go in 1-3 down and in the game) was shockingly dozy.
Was the third goal the one where Khan gave their winger all the time in the world to swing in a perfect cross on his preferred right foot, instead of showing him down the outside onto his unfavoured left?
When khan went out wide I recall him looking for his cover. Have to have another look but I wonder if he was caught out having to mark two players and ended up marking no one well. Khan was between a rock and a hard place. Don’t think it was all down to him.
I think RW did and said something to the effect that he went backwards when he should have gone forwards, giving the oppo all the time he needed to pick a cross. That said Wood didn't do his job either.
User avatar
Max Fowler
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 5497
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2021 12:18 pm
Has thanked: 509 times
Been thanked: 1262 times

Re: Ratings.

Post by Max Fowler »

Dohnut wrote: Tue Apr 26, 2022 1:03 pm
Gary the Plumber wrote: Tue Apr 26, 2022 10:45 am
Hutch wrote: Tue Apr 26, 2022 10:05 am I thought Wood was the weakest link in our back four on Saturday (though Khan and Ogie certainly struggled) - the way he lost his man for their fourth goal (at a point where we should've just seen things out to go in 1-3 down and in the game) was shockingly dozy.
Was the third goal the one where Khan gave their winger all the time in the world to swing in a perfect cross on his preferred right foot, instead of showing him down the outside onto his unfavoured left?
When khan went out wide I recall him looking for his cover. Have to have another look but I wonder if he was caught out having to mark two players and ended up marking no one well. Khan was between a rock and a hard place. Don’t think it was all down to him.
The cross was down to him. He was 1 v 1, was not close enough, and didn't show the bloke onto his wrong foot. Fully accept Khan isn't a RB by trade but he should be doing better.

(I also accept Wood could and indeed should have done better).
Post Reply