We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings
Moderator: Long slender neck
- ComeOnYouOs
- Regular
- Posts: 3841
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 12:22 pm
- Awards: Colossal berk
- Has thanked: 79 times
- Been thanked: 1054 times
We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings
it's time the owners told us fans, who was really responsible for bringing in the crap players in January.
No bullshit, the truth.
We know it was Ling who brought Coleman here because he said in his interview, just before Jackett was sacked.
He said he had been following Coleman for two years, and finally was able to get him.
That was way before Jacket came here, so it was definitely Ling.
We need to know about the rest, because the whole episode was a disaster.
No bullshit, the truth.
We know it was Ling who brought Coleman here because he said in his interview, just before Jackett was sacked.
He said he had been following Coleman for two years, and finally was able to get him.
That was way before Jacket came here, so it was definitely Ling.
We need to know about the rest, because the whole episode was a disaster.
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 7700
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:24 pm
- Has thanked: 3393 times
- Been thanked: 1750 times
Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings
That post on the other board showed the initial targets for midfield but the club (DoF) failed to recruit any of them and we ended up with one from Ling's original spreadsheet, which many hoped had been shredded after the appointment of KJ.
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 258
- Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2019 2:39 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 134 times
Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings
But how do you know Jackett didn’t rubber stamp the Coleman signing? I can’t imagine if Jackett had insisted we didn’t sign the kid, we still would have ploughed ahead
ComeOnYouOs wrote: ↑Tue Mar 29, 2022 10:43 pm it's time the owners told us fans, who was really responsible for bringing in the crap players in January.
No bullshit, the truth.
We know it was Ling who brought Coleman here because he said in his interview, just before Jackett was sacked.
He said he had been following Coleman for two years, and finally was able to get him.
That was way before Jacket came here, so it was definitely Ling.
We need to know about the rest, because the whole episode was a disaster.
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 12:11 pm
- Has thanked: 429 times
- Been thanked: 333 times
Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings
We will never know,,,never!!ComeOnYouOs wrote: ↑Tue Mar 29, 2022 10:43 pm it's time the owners told us fans, who was really responsible for bringing in the crap players in January.
No bullshit, the truth.
We know it was Ling who brought Coleman here because he said in his interview, just before Jackett was sacked.
He said he had been following Coleman for two years, and finally was able to get him.
That was way before Jacket came here, so it was definitely Ling.
We need to know about the rest, because the whole episode was a disaster.
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 258
- Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2019 2:39 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 134 times
Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings
Also, to follow the theme of another thread, the signing of Nouble was shocking. Anyone could have seen that from a mile off but apparently Jackett insisted on his signing because he’d had a few good games against teams of his in the past?
That says all you need to know about Kenny’s recruitment and judging of player ability in my opinion.
That says all you need to know about Kenny’s recruitment and judging of player ability in my opinion.
- Max Fowler
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 5497
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2021 12:18 pm
- Has thanked: 509 times
- Been thanked: 1262 times
Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings
It was that or nothing. What else could KJ say?Jman wrote: ↑Tue Mar 29, 2022 10:49 pm But how do you know Jackett didn’t rubber stamp the Coleman signing? I can’t imagine if Jackett had insisted we didn’t sign the kid, we still would have ploughed aheadComeOnYouOs wrote: ↑Tue Mar 29, 2022 10:43 pm it's time the owners told us fans, who was really responsible for bringing in the crap players in January.
No bullshit, the truth.
We know it was Ling who brought Coleman here because he said in his interview, just before Jackett was sacked.
He said he had been following Coleman for two years, and finally was able to get him.
That was way before Jacket came here, so it was definitely Ling.
We need to know about the rest, because the whole episode was a disaster.
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2042
- Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2019 12:58 pm
- Has thanked: 155 times
- Been thanked: 550 times
Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings
Let’s just hope a condition in Richie Wellen’s contract stated, he has full control of transfers of who comes in/out.
He will have a mass clear out, half this squad will go.
Hopefully he will start with showing the current transfer committee the door!
He will have a mass clear out, half this squad will go.
Hopefully he will start with showing the current transfer committee the door!
- tuffers#1
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9998
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
- Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
- Has thanked: 6291 times
- Been thanked: 2728 times
Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings
Again falling into the TRAP !ComeOnYouOs wrote: ↑Tue Mar 29, 2022 10:43 pm it's time the owners told us fans, who was really responsible for bringing in the crap players in January.
No bullshit, the truth.
We know it was Ling who brought Coleman here because he said in his interview, just before Jackett was sacked.
He said he had been following Coleman for two years, and finally was able to get him.
That was way before Jacket came here, so it was definitely Ling.
We need to know about the rest, because the whole episode was a disaster.
Top 8 budget is doomed to FAILURE ,
A TOP 2 BUDGET guarentees SUCCESS !
- tuffers#1
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9998
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
- Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
- Has thanked: 6291 times
- Been thanked: 2728 times
Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings
Unless he has a A TOP 2 BUDGET ,
He wont succeed .
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12505
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 2556 times
Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings
If the transfer committee still insists on being involved with player recruitment next season after our poor January business then we deserve another season of failure
- tuffers#1
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9998
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
- Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
- Has thanked: 6291 times
- Been thanked: 2728 times
Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings
BIGGER SUMMER BUDGET means NO NEED for aWINTER ONE , Thats the difference between a top 8 budget & Top 2 BUDGET.RedDwarf 1881 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 30, 2022 1:52 amIf the transfer committee still insists on being involved with player recruitment next season after our poor January business then we deserve another season of failure
- tuffers#1
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9998
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
- Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
- Has thanked: 6291 times
- Been thanked: 2728 times
Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings
Sorry for the CAPS ,
I just want the HALF WITS to see it properly ,
then they might understand !
I just want the HALF WITS to see it properly ,
then they might understand !
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2598
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:15 am
- Has thanked: 106 times
- Been thanked: 627 times
Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings
So 2 of the teams that go up this season will be the top 2 budget teams in the league?
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1475
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:06 pm
- Has thanked: 162 times
- Been thanked: 443 times
Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings
For me this suggests that ML's list of 'contacts' is far less comprehensive than we would like to believe, it's an established pattern of sticking with what you know rather than being proactive and getting your hands dirty.
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 14325
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2511 times
- Been thanked: 3301 times
Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings
And still, some people don't understand how recruitment works.
- Rich Tea Wellin
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10551
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:01 pm
- Has thanked: 4569 times
- Been thanked: 3250 times
Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings
We will go round in circles with this. The club, just before sacking KJ, rallied around to basically put out the message that ‘the manager decides what players come in’ so KJ is squarely to blame, right?
Well, apart from the fact that we know that Coleman was on Lings radar when KJ was at Portsmouth, the alleged list of signings on the other board tbat KJ wanted and we failed to sign, and the fact that, in a bizarre move, as soon as the Jan signings were put in the team, the manager, who allegedly picked them, moaned constantly about how they didn’t have enough experience for league two.
So something doesn’t add up.
I think what’s pretty clear is that either the process is so convoluted that the owners, Ling, nor the manager actually knows who was responsible, or that the wording on how they work has been manipulated to suit Ling (and to a degree, the owners, when they fail).
Saying that, after hearing bits about Kenny, he doesn’t exactly sound like he was of sound judgement in his time here, and either he did have a level of say (even if that was, take this player or nothing), or he didn’t have the bollocks to stand up for himself and the team and say no to the sh*t he was given.
Regardless, what matters is we don’t continue to make the same mistakes. The new ceo, with fresh eyes, should be all over this already. Refine the process, what went wrong, who does Richie want to work going forward, etc… my only issue is that Nigel and Martin have been so insistent on the success of the process, I think they are a bit blinded by it. Challenge culture and all that, Nigel, let’s start putting that into practice and let’s really challenge what we know and what we think we know so Richie gets the best chance of success.
Well, apart from the fact that we know that Coleman was on Lings radar when KJ was at Portsmouth, the alleged list of signings on the other board tbat KJ wanted and we failed to sign, and the fact that, in a bizarre move, as soon as the Jan signings were put in the team, the manager, who allegedly picked them, moaned constantly about how they didn’t have enough experience for league two.
So something doesn’t add up.
I think what’s pretty clear is that either the process is so convoluted that the owners, Ling, nor the manager actually knows who was responsible, or that the wording on how they work has been manipulated to suit Ling (and to a degree, the owners, when they fail).
Saying that, after hearing bits about Kenny, he doesn’t exactly sound like he was of sound judgement in his time here, and either he did have a level of say (even if that was, take this player or nothing), or he didn’t have the bollocks to stand up for himself and the team and say no to the sh*t he was given.
Regardless, what matters is we don’t continue to make the same mistakes. The new ceo, with fresh eyes, should be all over this already. Refine the process, what went wrong, who does Richie want to work going forward, etc… my only issue is that Nigel and Martin have been so insistent on the success of the process, I think they are a bit blinded by it. Challenge culture and all that, Nigel, let’s start putting that into practice and let’s really challenge what we know and what we think we know so Richie gets the best chance of success.
- Rich Tea Wellin
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10551
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:01 pm
- Has thanked: 4569 times
- Been thanked: 3250 times
Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings
You’re obsession with this is a bit grating. I dunno where you’ve plucked this from, or if it’s tongue in cheek.tuffers#1 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 29, 2022 11:19 pmAgain falling into the TRAP !ComeOnYouOs wrote: ↑Tue Mar 29, 2022 10:43 pm it's time the owners told us fans, who was really responsible for bringing in the crap players in January.
No bullshit, the truth.
We know it was Ling who brought Coleman here because he said in his interview, just before Jackett was sacked.
He said he had been following Coleman for two years, and finally was able to get him.
That was way before Jacket came here, so it was definitely Ling.
We need to know about the rest, because the whole episode was a disaster.
Top 8 budget is doomed to FAILURE ,
A TOP 2 BUDGET guarentees SUCCESS !
Having more budget does not guarantee success if you put it in the wrong hands. All managers and DoF are restricted by a budget but the best ones think outside of the box on how to use it and are thinking 2-3 years in the future on building a team, not just players to fill out a squad for numbers.
With the same approach next year, we could have a budget 10 times higher than anyone else and we might just scrape the playoffs with a bit of luck.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12505
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 2556 times
Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings
Considering how much money we wasted during January we would have been better off actually signing at least two of Kenny's first choices . Instead the club went for quantity over quality .
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 7700
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:24 pm
- Has thanked: 3393 times
- Been thanked: 1750 times
Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings
Yup and instead of operating a thin squad back in August having a cover RB and additional senior pro CM would've avoided many of the squad issues that cost us over winter.RedDwarf 1881 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 30, 2022 7:50 amConsidering how much money we wasted during January we would have been better off actually signing at least two of Kenny's first choices . Instead the club went for quantity over quality .
Too many false economies, time for change.
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 243
- Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2022 9:39 pm
- Has thanked: 62 times
- Been thanked: 90 times
Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings
Isn’t the old saying that a horse designed by committee is a camel?
Well we now know that footballers signed by committee are donkeys.
Well we now know that footballers signed by committee are donkeys.
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2876
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 12:29 pm
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 566 times
Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings
Sunderland must have one of the biggest budgets in League One, but they are still finding it hard to get out of it.
- Max Fowler
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 5497
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2021 12:18 pm
- Has thanked: 509 times
- Been thanked: 1262 times
Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings
Yep, all of this.Apple Wumble wrote: ↑Wed Mar 30, 2022 7:42 am We will go round in circles with this. The club, just before sacking KJ, rallied around to basically put out the message that ‘the manager decides what players come in’ so KJ is squarely to blame, right?
Well, apart from the fact that we know that Coleman was on Lings radar when KJ was at Portsmouth, the alleged list of signings on the other board tbat KJ wanted and we failed to sign, and the fact that, in a bizarre move, as soon as the Jan signings were put in the team, the manager, who allegedly picked them, moaned constantly about how they didn’t have enough experience for league two.
So something doesn’t add up.
I think what’s pretty clear is that either the process is so convoluted that the owners, Ling, nor the manager actually knows who was responsible, or that the wording on how they work has been manipulated to suit Ling (and to a degree, the owners, when they fail).
Saying that, after hearing bits about Kenny, he doesn’t exactly sound like he was of sound judgement in his time here, and either he did have a level of say (even if that was, take this player or nothing), or he didn’t have the bollocks to stand up for himself and the team and say no to the sh*t he was given.
Regardless, what matters is we don’t continue to make the same mistakes. The new ceo, with fresh eyes, should be all over this already. Refine the process, what went wrong, who does Richie want to work going forward, etc… my only issue is that Nigel and Martin have been so insistent on the success of the process, I think they are a bit blinded by it. Challenge culture and all that, Nigel, let’s start putting that into practice and let’s really challenge what we know and what we think we know so Richie gets the best chance of success.
The fact Wellens has come in as Head Coach rather than Manager, as KJ was, kind of worries me that he won't be given full control and it'll still be The Committee ie Ling making calls on what players we bring in.
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 243
- Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2022 9:39 pm
- Has thanked: 62 times
- Been thanked: 90 times
Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings
Doesn’t the fact that KJ was called “manager” and still had to deal with the ineffective transfer committee show that these job titles are meaningless. If Wellens doesn’t have full control of who comes in and who goes out in the summer then the club may as well give up now.Gary the Plumber wrote: ↑Wed Mar 30, 2022 9:14 amYep, all of this.Apple Wumble wrote: ↑Wed Mar 30, 2022 7:42 am We will go round in circles with this. The club, just before sacking KJ, rallied around to basically put out the message that ‘the manager decides what players come in’ so KJ is squarely to blame, right?
Well, apart from the fact that we know that Coleman was on Lings radar when KJ was at Portsmouth, the alleged list of signings on the other board tbat KJ wanted and we failed to sign, and the fact that, in a bizarre move, as soon as the Jan signings were put in the team, the manager, who allegedly picked them, moaned constantly about how they didn’t have enough experience for league two.
So something doesn’t add up.
I think what’s pretty clear is that either the process is so convoluted that the owners, Ling, nor the manager actually knows who was responsible, or that the wording on how they work has been manipulated to suit Ling (and to a degree, the owners, when they fail).
Saying that, after hearing bits about Kenny, he doesn’t exactly sound like he was of sound judgement in his time here, and either he did have a level of say (even if that was, take this player or nothing), or he didn’t have the bollocks to stand up for himself and the team and say no to the sh*t he was given.
Regardless, what matters is we don’t continue to make the same mistakes. The new ceo, with fresh eyes, should be all over this already. Refine the process, what went wrong, who does Richie want to work going forward, etc… my only issue is that Nigel and Martin have been so insistent on the success of the process, I think they are a bit blinded by it. Challenge culture and all that, Nigel, let’s start putting that into practice and let’s really challenge what we know and what we think we know so Richie gets the best chance of success.
The fact Wellens has come in as Head Coach rather than Manager, as KJ was, kind of worries me that he won't be given full control and it'll still be The Committee ie Ling making calls on what players we bring in.
I am fairly certain that control of transfers would have been a negotiation point when trying to get Wellens through the door. My suspicion is that it took a significant increase in salary offering and concession of full control of transfers to convince RW to sign.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12505
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 2556 times
Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings
It felt like Kenny said what positions he wanted strengthening and Ling went out and signed who he thought he could for those positions . If Martin wants to target what players we sign then maybe he should put his tracksuit back on and manage the team himself . He might not be picking the team but he seems to be picking some signings . If we want to fail again next season just carry on has we are . In the Summer the club has to have a rethink on what direction they want to go in . This season we have flirted with relegation thanks to Kenny and our transfer committee . Personally I would choose to go with exactly who Richie wants without any interference from our inept transfer committee .lastly, if we’re unable to bring in our manager’s first, second or even third choice of players then we should just forget it and play our youngsters. If our January business is anything to go by we’d save money and be miles better of.