We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings

Chat about Leyton Orient (or anything else)

Moderator: Long slender neck

User avatar
ComeOnYouOs
Regular
Regular
Posts: 3841
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 12:22 pm
Awards: Colossal berk
Has thanked: 79 times
Been thanked: 1054 times

We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings

Post by ComeOnYouOs »

it's time the owners told us fans, who was really responsible for bringing in the crap players in January.
No bullshit, the truth.

We know it was Ling who brought Coleman here because he said in his interview, just before Jackett was sacked.
He said he had been following Coleman for two years, and finally was able to get him.

That was way before Jacket came here, so it was definitely Ling.
We need to know about the rest, because the whole episode was a disaster.
gshaw
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 7738
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:24 pm
Has thanked: 3420 times
Been thanked: 1769 times

Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings

Post by gshaw »

That post on the other board showed the initial targets for midfield but the club (DoF) failed to recruit any of them and we ended up with one from Ling's original spreadsheet, which many hoped had been shredded after the appointment of KJ.
Jman
Fresh Alias
Posts: 258
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2019 2:39 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 134 times

Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings

Post by Jman »

But how do you know Jackett didn’t rubber stamp the Coleman signing? I can’t imagine if Jackett had insisted we didn’t sign the kid, we still would have ploughed ahead
ComeOnYouOs wrote: Tue Mar 29, 2022 10:43 pm it's time the owners told us fans, who was really responsible for bringing in the crap players in January.
No bullshit, the truth.

We know it was Ling who brought Coleman here because he said in his interview, just before Jackett was sacked.
He said he had been following Coleman for two years, and finally was able to get him.

That was way before Jacket came here, so it was definitely Ling.
We need to know about the rest, because the whole episode was a disaster.
MrB
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1989
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 12:11 pm
Has thanked: 429 times
Been thanked: 333 times

Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings

Post by MrB »

ComeOnYouOs wrote: Tue Mar 29, 2022 10:43 pm it's time the owners told us fans, who was really responsible for bringing in the crap players in January.
No bullshit, the truth.

We know it was Ling who brought Coleman here because he said in his interview, just before Jackett was sacked.
He said he had been following Coleman for two years, and finally was able to get him.

That was way before Jacket came here, so it was definitely Ling.
We need to know about the rest, because the whole episode was a disaster.
We will never know,,,never!!
Jman
Fresh Alias
Posts: 258
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2019 2:39 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 134 times

Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings

Post by Jman »

Also, to follow the theme of another thread, the signing of Nouble was shocking. Anyone could have seen that from a mile off but apparently Jackett insisted on his signing because he’d had a few good games against teams of his in the past?

That says all you need to know about Kenny’s recruitment and judging of player ability in my opinion.
Frogger
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1029
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2019 9:35 pm
Has thanked: 150 times
Been thanked: 251 times

Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings

Post by Frogger »

Why did Ling wait 2 years to bring Coleman in? What did Ling see for 2 years that no one else could?
User avatar
Max Fowler
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 5497
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2021 12:18 pm
Has thanked: 509 times
Been thanked: 1262 times

Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings

Post by Max Fowler »

Jman wrote: Tue Mar 29, 2022 10:49 pm But how do you know Jackett didn’t rubber stamp the Coleman signing? I can’t imagine if Jackett had insisted we didn’t sign the kid, we still would have ploughed ahead
ComeOnYouOs wrote: Tue Mar 29, 2022 10:43 pm it's time the owners told us fans, who was really responsible for bringing in the crap players in January.
No bullshit, the truth.

We know it was Ling who brought Coleman here because he said in his interview, just before Jackett was sacked.
He said he had been following Coleman for two years, and finally was able to get him.

That was way before Jacket came here, so it was definitely Ling.
We need to know about the rest, because the whole episode was a disaster.
It was that or nothing. What else could KJ say?
Stan1972
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2049
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2019 12:58 pm
Has thanked: 156 times
Been thanked: 551 times

Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings

Post by Stan1972 »

Let’s just hope a condition in Richie Wellen’s contract stated, he has full control of transfers of who comes in/out.
He will have a mass clear out, half this squad will go.
Hopefully he will start with showing the current transfer committee the door!
User avatar
tuffers#1
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 9998
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
Has thanked: 6291 times
Been thanked: 2728 times

Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings

Post by tuffers#1 »

ComeOnYouOs wrote: Tue Mar 29, 2022 10:43 pm it's time the owners told us fans, who was really responsible for bringing in the crap players in January.
No bullshit, the truth.

We know it was Ling who brought Coleman here because he said in his interview, just before Jackett was sacked.
He said he had been following Coleman for two years, and finally was able to get him.

That was way before Jacket came here, so it was definitely Ling.
We need to know about the rest, because the whole episode was a disaster.
Again falling into the TRAP !
Top 8 budget is doomed to FAILURE ,
A TOP 2 BUDGET guarentees SUCCESS !
User avatar
tuffers#1
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 9998
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
Has thanked: 6291 times
Been thanked: 2728 times

Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings

Post by tuffers#1 »

Stan1972 wrote: Tue Mar 29, 2022 11:17 pm Let’s just hope a condition in Richie Wellen’s contract stated, he has full control of transfers of who comes in/out.
He will have a mass clear out, half this squad will go.
Hopefully he will start with showing the current transfer committee the door!
Unless he has a A TOP 2 BUDGET ,
He wont succeed .
RedDwarf 1881
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12539
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 2566 times

Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings

Post by RedDwarf 1881 »

Stan1972 wrote: Tue Mar 29, 2022 11:17 pm Let’s just hope a condition in Richie Wellen’s contract stated, he has full control of transfers of who comes in/out.
He will have a mass clear out, half this squad will go.
Hopefully he will start with showing the current transfer committee the door!
If the transfer committee still insists on being involved with player recruitment next season after our poor January business then we deserve another season of failure
User avatar
tuffers#1
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 9998
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
Has thanked: 6291 times
Been thanked: 2728 times

Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings

Post by tuffers#1 »

RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Wed Mar 30, 2022 1:52 am
Stan1972 wrote: Tue Mar 29, 2022 11:17 pm Let’s just hope a condition in Richie Wellen’s contract stated, he has full control of transfers of who comes in/out.
He will have a mass clear out, half this squad will go.
Hopefully he will start with showing the current transfer committee the door!
If the transfer committee still insists on being involved with player recruitment next season after our poor January business then we deserve another season of failure
BIGGER SUMMER BUDGET means NO NEED for aWINTER ONE , Thats the difference between a top 8 budget & Top 2 BUDGET.
User avatar
tuffers#1
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 9998
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
Has thanked: 6291 times
Been thanked: 2728 times

Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings

Post by tuffers#1 »

Sorry for the CAPS ,
I just want the HALF WITS to see it properly ,
then they might understand !
Adz
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2599
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:15 am
Has thanked: 106 times
Been thanked: 627 times

Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings

Post by Adz »

tuffers#1 wrote: Tue Mar 29, 2022 11:22 pm
Stan1972 wrote: Tue Mar 29, 2022 11:17 pm Let’s just hope a condition in Richie Wellen’s contract stated, he has full control of transfers of who comes in/out.
He will have a mass clear out, half this squad will go.
Hopefully he will start with showing the current transfer committee the door!
Unless he has a A TOP 2 BUDGET ,
He wont succeed .
So 2 of the teams that go up this season will be the top 2 budget teams in the league?
o-no
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1475
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:06 pm
Has thanked: 162 times
Been thanked: 443 times

Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings

Post by o-no »

Frogger wrote: Tue Mar 29, 2022 11:11 pm Why did Ling wait 2 years to bring Coleman in? What did Ling see for 2 years that no one else could?
For me this suggests that ML's list of 'contacts' is far less comprehensive than we would like to believe, it's an established pattern of sticking with what you know rather than being proactive and getting your hands dirty.
User avatar
Long slender neck
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 14354
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
Has thanked: 2524 times
Been thanked: 3313 times

Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings

Post by Long slender neck »

And still, some people don't understand how recruitment works.
User avatar
Rich Tea Wellin
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 10574
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:01 pm
Has thanked: 4581 times
Been thanked: 3265 times

Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings

Post by Rich Tea Wellin »

We will go round in circles with this. The club, just before sacking KJ, rallied around to basically put out the message that ‘the manager decides what players come in’ so KJ is squarely to blame, right?

Well, apart from the fact that we know that Coleman was on Lings radar when KJ was at Portsmouth, the alleged list of signings on the other board tbat KJ wanted and we failed to sign, and the fact that, in a bizarre move, as soon as the Jan signings were put in the team, the manager, who allegedly picked them, moaned constantly about how they didn’t have enough experience for league two.

So something doesn’t add up.

I think what’s pretty clear is that either the process is so convoluted that the owners, Ling, nor the manager actually knows who was responsible, or that the wording on how they work has been manipulated to suit Ling (and to a degree, the owners, when they fail).

Saying that, after hearing bits about Kenny, he doesn’t exactly sound like he was of sound judgement in his time here, and either he did have a level of say (even if that was, take this player or nothing), or he didn’t have the bollocks to stand up for himself and the team and say no to the sh*t he was given.

Regardless, what matters is we don’t continue to make the same mistakes. The new ceo, with fresh eyes, should be all over this already. Refine the process, what went wrong, who does Richie want to work going forward, etc… my only issue is that Nigel and Martin have been so insistent on the success of the process, I think they are a bit blinded by it. Challenge culture and all that, Nigel, let’s start putting that into practice and let’s really challenge what we know and what we think we know so Richie gets the best chance of success.
User avatar
Rich Tea Wellin
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 10574
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:01 pm
Has thanked: 4581 times
Been thanked: 3265 times

Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings

Post by Rich Tea Wellin »

tuffers#1 wrote: Tue Mar 29, 2022 11:19 pm
ComeOnYouOs wrote: Tue Mar 29, 2022 10:43 pm it's time the owners told us fans, who was really responsible for bringing in the crap players in January.
No bullshit, the truth.

We know it was Ling who brought Coleman here because he said in his interview, just before Jackett was sacked.
He said he had been following Coleman for two years, and finally was able to get him.

That was way before Jacket came here, so it was definitely Ling.
We need to know about the rest, because the whole episode was a disaster.
Again falling into the TRAP !
Top 8 budget is doomed to FAILURE ,
A TOP 2 BUDGET guarentees SUCCESS !
You’re obsession with this is a bit grating. I dunno where you’ve plucked this from, or if it’s tongue in cheek.

Having more budget does not guarantee success if you put it in the wrong hands. All managers and DoF are restricted by a budget but the best ones think outside of the box on how to use it and are thinking 2-3 years in the future on building a team, not just players to fill out a squad for numbers.

With the same approach next year, we could have a budget 10 times higher than anyone else and we might just scrape the playoffs with a bit of luck.
RedDwarf 1881
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12539
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 2566 times

Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings

Post by RedDwarf 1881 »

gshaw wrote: Tue Mar 29, 2022 10:47 pm That post on the other board showed the initial targets for midfield but the club (DoF) failed to recruit any of them and we ended up with one from Ling's original spreadsheet, which many hoped had been shredded after the appointment of KJ.
Considering how much money we wasted during January we would have been better off actually signing at least two of Kenny's first choices . Instead the club went for quantity over quality .
gshaw
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 7738
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:24 pm
Has thanked: 3420 times
Been thanked: 1769 times

Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings

Post by gshaw »

RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Wed Mar 30, 2022 7:50 am
gshaw wrote: Tue Mar 29, 2022 10:47 pm That post on the other board showed the initial targets for midfield but the club (DoF) failed to recruit any of them and we ended up with one from Ling's original spreadsheet, which many hoped had been shredded after the appointment of KJ.
Considering how much money we wasted during January we would have been better off actually signing at least two of Kenny's first choices . Instead the club went for quantity over quality .
Yup and instead of operating a thin squad back in August having a cover RB and additional senior pro CM would've avoided many of the squad issues that cost us over winter.

Too many false economies, time for change.
Chocolate_brownie
Fresh Alias
Posts: 243
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2022 9:39 pm
Has thanked: 62 times
Been thanked: 90 times

Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings

Post by Chocolate_brownie »

Isn’t the old saying that a horse designed by committee is a camel?

Well we now know that footballers signed by committee are donkeys.
Story of O
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2879
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 12:29 pm
Has thanked: 31 times
Been thanked: 566 times

Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings

Post by Story of O »

Sunderland must have one of the biggest budgets in League One, but they are still finding it hard to get out of it.
User avatar
Max Fowler
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 5497
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2021 12:18 pm
Has thanked: 509 times
Been thanked: 1262 times

Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings

Post by Max Fowler »

Apple Wumble wrote: Wed Mar 30, 2022 7:42 am We will go round in circles with this. The club, just before sacking KJ, rallied around to basically put out the message that ‘the manager decides what players come in’ so KJ is squarely to blame, right?

Well, apart from the fact that we know that Coleman was on Lings radar when KJ was at Portsmouth, the alleged list of signings on the other board tbat KJ wanted and we failed to sign, and the fact that, in a bizarre move, as soon as the Jan signings were put in the team, the manager, who allegedly picked them, moaned constantly about how they didn’t have enough experience for league two.

So something doesn’t add up.

I think what’s pretty clear is that either the process is so convoluted that the owners, Ling, nor the manager actually knows who was responsible, or that the wording on how they work has been manipulated to suit Ling (and to a degree, the owners, when they fail).

Saying that, after hearing bits about Kenny, he doesn’t exactly sound like he was of sound judgement in his time here, and either he did have a level of say (even if that was, take this player or nothing), or he didn’t have the bollocks to stand up for himself and the team and say no to the sh*t he was given.

Regardless, what matters is we don’t continue to make the same mistakes. The new ceo, with fresh eyes, should be all over this already. Refine the process, what went wrong, who does Richie want to work going forward, etc… my only issue is that Nigel and Martin have been so insistent on the success of the process, I think they are a bit blinded by it. Challenge culture and all that, Nigel, let’s start putting that into practice and let’s really challenge what we know and what we think we know so Richie gets the best chance of success.
Yep, all of this.

The fact Wellens has come in as Head Coach rather than Manager, as KJ was, kind of worries me that he won't be given full control and it'll still be The Committee ie Ling making calls on what players we bring in.
Chocolate_brownie
Fresh Alias
Posts: 243
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2022 9:39 pm
Has thanked: 62 times
Been thanked: 90 times

Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings

Post by Chocolate_brownie »

Gary the Plumber wrote: Wed Mar 30, 2022 9:14 am
Apple Wumble wrote: Wed Mar 30, 2022 7:42 am We will go round in circles with this. The club, just before sacking KJ, rallied around to basically put out the message that ‘the manager decides what players come in’ so KJ is squarely to blame, right?

Well, apart from the fact that we know that Coleman was on Lings radar when KJ was at Portsmouth, the alleged list of signings on the other board tbat KJ wanted and we failed to sign, and the fact that, in a bizarre move, as soon as the Jan signings were put in the team, the manager, who allegedly picked them, moaned constantly about how they didn’t have enough experience for league two.

So something doesn’t add up.

I think what’s pretty clear is that either the process is so convoluted that the owners, Ling, nor the manager actually knows who was responsible, or that the wording on how they work has been manipulated to suit Ling (and to a degree, the owners, when they fail).

Saying that, after hearing bits about Kenny, he doesn’t exactly sound like he was of sound judgement in his time here, and either he did have a level of say (even if that was, take this player or nothing), or he didn’t have the bollocks to stand up for himself and the team and say no to the sh*t he was given.

Regardless, what matters is we don’t continue to make the same mistakes. The new ceo, with fresh eyes, should be all over this already. Refine the process, what went wrong, who does Richie want to work going forward, etc… my only issue is that Nigel and Martin have been so insistent on the success of the process, I think they are a bit blinded by it. Challenge culture and all that, Nigel, let’s start putting that into practice and let’s really challenge what we know and what we think we know so Richie gets the best chance of success.
Yep, all of this.

The fact Wellens has come in as Head Coach rather than Manager, as KJ was, kind of worries me that he won't be given full control and it'll still be The Committee ie Ling making calls on what players we bring in.
Doesn’t the fact that KJ was called “manager” and still had to deal with the ineffective transfer committee show that these job titles are meaningless. If Wellens doesn’t have full control of who comes in and who goes out in the summer then the club may as well give up now.

I am fairly certain that control of transfers would have been a negotiation point when trying to get Wellens through the door. My suspicion is that it took a significant increase in salary offering and concession of full control of transfers to convince RW to sign.
RedDwarf 1881
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12539
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 2566 times

Re: We really need to know who's responsible for the January signings

Post by RedDwarf 1881 »

It felt like Kenny said what positions he wanted strengthening and Ling went out and signed who he thought he could for those positions . If Martin wants to target what players we sign then maybe he should put his tracksuit back on and manage the team himself . He might not be picking the team but he seems to be picking some signings . If we want to fail again next season just carry on has we are . In the Summer the club has to have a rethink on what direction they want to go in . This season we have flirted with relegation thanks to Kenny and our transfer committee . Personally I would choose to go with exactly who Richie wants without any interference from our inept transfer committee .lastly, if we’re unable to bring in our manager’s first, second or even third choice of players then we should just forget it and play our youngsters. If our January business is anything to go by we’d save money and be miles better of.
Post Reply