5 at the back- why?
Moderator: Long slender neck
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 14437
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2538 times
- Been thanked: 3330 times
5 at the back- why?
Why the hell did Jackett start setting us up like this?
Early in the season we were winning games with 433
Early in the season we were winning games with 433
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
-
- Regular
- Posts: 3547
- Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 3:20 pm
- Has thanked: 654 times
- Been thanked: 876 times
Re: 5 at the back- why?
Early in the season we had Archibald out wide left firing in crosses and giving some service to the strikers.Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Tue Jan 25, 2022 10:09 pm Why the hell did Jackett start setting us up like this?
Early in the season we were winning games with 433
Theo is sorely missed.
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 14437
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2538 times
- Been thanked: 3330 times
Re: 5 at the back- why?
He was playing in the front three thenCheshunto wrote: ↑Tue Jan 25, 2022 10:15 pmEarly in the season we had Archibald out wide left firing in crosses and giving some service to the strikers.Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Tue Jan 25, 2022 10:09 pm Why the hell did Jackett start setting us up like this?
Early in the season we were winning games with 433
Theo is sorely missed.
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 14437
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2538 times
- Been thanked: 3330 times
Re: 5 at the back- why?
Stop kidding yourself.
Moving Theo back there has been a disaster and Wood isnt capable. Its just like when they tried it with Brophy.
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2179
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 10:30 pm
- Has thanked: 1892 times
- Been thanked: 426 times
-
- Regular
- Posts: 3547
- Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 3:20 pm
- Has thanked: 654 times
- Been thanked: 876 times
Re: 5 at the back- why?
Yes, I know and I’d put him back there when he’s back fit.Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Tue Jan 25, 2022 10:17 pmHe was playing in the front three thenCheshunto wrote: ↑Tue Jan 25, 2022 10:15 pmEarly in the season we had Archibald out wide left firing in crosses and giving some service to the strikers.Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Tue Jan 25, 2022 10:09 pm Why the hell did Jackett start setting us up like this?
Early in the season we were winning games with 433
Theo is sorely missed.
Wood put in one decent cross tonight and Smith almost scored, but in general our strikers aren’t getting much service.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
-
- Regular
- Posts: 3547
- Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 3:20 pm
- Has thanked: 654 times
- Been thanked: 876 times
Re: 5 at the back- why?
Yes agreed , we could see that on Saturday, but KJ put him there again tonight, it was like playing with Two Left backs, Wood and Ogie……..we badly need Theo back.Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Tue Jan 25, 2022 10:42 pm Wood is a decent footballing left back. But he’s not a wig back.
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2108
- Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2019 12:58 pm
- Has thanked: 158 times
- Been thanked: 565 times
Re: 5 at the back- why?
With 2 games almost every week, Yep 4-3-3 is the formation which suits the squad of players we have and is what we should be playing.
Meaning
Wood & Moss playing as FB not WB.
2 from Mitchell, Beckles, Oggie, Thompson at CB
3 from Brown, Kyp, Pratt, Coleman, Young, Kemp
3 from Khan, Theo, Drinan, Smith, Smyth
Playing 2 games every week Drinan and Smith can alternate to keep fresh.
We need 2 more players:
FB to cover Wood & Moss
Winger to cover Khan & Theo.
Meaning
Wood & Moss playing as FB not WB.
2 from Mitchell, Beckles, Oggie, Thompson at CB
3 from Brown, Kyp, Pratt, Coleman, Young, Kemp
3 from Khan, Theo, Drinan, Smith, Smyth
Playing 2 games every week Drinan and Smith can alternate to keep fresh.
We need 2 more players:
FB to cover Wood & Moss
Winger to cover Khan & Theo.
- EliotNes
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10723
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:14 pm
- Location: Retired (4182)
- Has thanked: 2059 times
- Been thanked: 884 times
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 14437
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2538 times
- Been thanked: 3330 times
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
Re: 5 at the back- why?
I only saw the second half and the 5-1-2-2.
What formation did we play first half?
- EliotNes
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10723
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:14 pm
- Location: Retired (4182)
- Has thanked: 2059 times
- Been thanked: 884 times
Re: 5 at the back- why?
It looked to me to be alternating between 5-1-2-2 and 5-3-2 all game.Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 9:32 am
I only saw the second half and the 5-1-2-2.
What formation did we play first half?
- tuffers#1
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9998
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
- Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
- Has thanked: 6291 times
- Been thanked: 2728 times
Re: 5 at the back- why?
Dulcet Dave & his side-kick said we were playing a diamond 1st half .EliotNes wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 9:47 amIt looked to me to be alternating between 5-1-2-2 and 5-3-2 all game.Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 9:32 am
I only saw the second half and the 5-1-2-2.
What formation did we play first half?
It was rough as f*ck & uncut if we were !
- Thor
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10279
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:27 pm
- Location: Asgard
- Has thanked: 584 times
- Been thanked: 1348 times