Yeah, I don’t think anyone is sure how long it lasts for but fingers crossed if everyone gets omicron there will at least be some immunity for a time and perhaps to other variants.Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Sat Dec 11, 2021 6:44 pmWouldn't be so sure about natural immunity. I heard something about reinfection but can't be bothered to look it up.Apple Wumble wrote: ↑Sat Dec 11, 2021 12:33 pm Would be good to know. As I think I said earlier in the thread, if it isn’t as severe then it might end up being a good thing. Highly transmission means everyone gets natural immunity without getting ill. Would also mean that number of daily infections wouldn’t really matter too much and therefore restrictions can ease again.
Coronavirus
Moderator: Long slender neck
- Rich Tea Wellin
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10574
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:01 pm
- Has thanked: 4581 times
- Been thanked: 3265 times
Re: Coronavirus
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2879
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 12:29 pm
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 566 times
Re: Coronavirus
No luck finding it. Can you post link to actual article, that’s if it existsJack wrote: ↑Sat Dec 11, 2021 5:37 pmClick on the link below. Its Scottish Government Public Health Scotland ( not an anti vax site i assure you)Story of O wrote: ↑Sat Dec 11, 2021 1:57 pmIs there a link for this as I looked and could not find it
https://publichealthscotland.scot/publi ... mber-2021/
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2879
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 12:29 pm
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 566 times
Re: Coronavirus
Funny enough I have been having a conversation with someone who posted something very similar and they can’t post a link either
- Currywurst and Chips
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6249
- Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:40 am
- Has thanked: 389 times
- Been thanked: 1489 times
Re: Coronavirus
No, you don'tGeorge wrote: ↑Sat Dec 11, 2021 6:20 pmI have to prove nothing to you. Don’t really care what you think. If you have anything constructive to add to , what was a well mannered set of posts , please feel free.Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Sat Dec 11, 2021 5:46 pmIt's not down to me to prove your dangerous lies though is it?
Shame you won't admit you were lying when you lied about Omicron being basically the cold.
Given the amount you comment about the pandemic I'd of thought you'd have a semblance of credibility
But if you're going to spread lies, especially if they're dangerous, expect to be called out as the liar you are
- Rich Tea Wellin
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10574
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:01 pm
- Has thanked: 4581 times
- Been thanked: 3265 times
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 7326
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 12:32 pm
- Has thanked: 1099 times
- Been thanked: 1343 times
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 14350
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2524 times
- Been thanked: 3313 times
- StillSpike
- Regular
- Posts: 4182
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 5:18 pm
- Has thanked: 517 times
- Been thanked: 1200 times
Re: Coronavirus
Can you even find another graph anywhere on the Public Health Scotland site that's in the same sort of format? same colours? anything similar to this. Jack's not only found the image, but he's also stated as fact that the graph is from PHS as is "not an anti-vax" item. Sounds a bit more than "posting without comment" to be honest.Story of O wrote: ↑Sat Dec 11, 2021 7:32 pmNo luck finding it. Can you post link to actual article, that’s if it existsJack wrote: ↑Sat Dec 11, 2021 5:37 pmClick on the link below. Its Scottish Government Public Health Scotland ( not an anti vax site i assure you)Story of O wrote: ↑Sat Dec 11, 2021 1:57 pm
Is there a link for this as I looked and could not find it
https://publichealthscotland.scot/publi ... mber-2021/
I'm sure I've just missed the real chart on that site - in which case I'll be very happy to apologise to Jack - but otherwise, it looks awfully like posting false information for the purposes of undermining trust in the vaccine.
Over to you Jack - an actual link to the chart you posted, or the PHS dataset behind it, would certainly clear you of the charge of willfully spreading disinformation.
- Jack
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2021 12:44 pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 98 times
Re: Coronavirus
I got the chart on Twitter, but not from a anti vax site. Its from someone i know, but the web site is listed on the graph. I went on that. Its a complex site, and i believe its there someone, but im busy now and cant look. ill try tomorrow, but some of you on here are so taken by the governments lying, youll believe anything they tell you, without question.
i posted the graph in good faith, and will try tomorrow to find it on that site, as im sure its there somewhere.
I suspect, even if i find that its genuine, youll still not believe the vaccine is not the saviour of the human race.
Incidentally, im fully jabbed, but still think somethings wrong somewhere, and im questioning it all.
i posted the graph in good faith, and will try tomorrow to find it on that site, as im sure its there somewhere.
I suspect, even if i find that its genuine, youll still not believe the vaccine is not the saviour of the human race.
Incidentally, im fully jabbed, but still think somethings wrong somewhere, and im questioning it all.
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4714
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 3:36 pm
- Has thanked: 1126 times
- Been thanked: 762 times
Re: Coronavirus
Bullshit. You know it's false. You stated as a fact that the graph is from the PHS site so it's down to you to prove it. But you can't can you.Jack wrote: ↑Sat Dec 11, 2021 8:38 pm I got the chart on Twitter, but not from a anti vax site. Its from someone i know, but the web site is listed on the graph. I went on that. Its a complex site, and i believe its there someone, but im busy now and cant look. ill try tomorrow, but some of you on here are so taken by the governments lying, youll believe anything they tell you, without question.
i posted the graph in good faith, and will try tomorrow to find it on that site, as im sure its there somewhere.
I suspect, even if i find that its genuine, youll still not believe the vaccine is not the saviour of the human race.
Incidentally, im fully jabbed, but still think somethings wrong somewhere, and im questioning it all.
- Jack
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2021 12:44 pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 98 times
Re: Coronavirus
Listen you fool, i dont have to prove anything to you or anyone else. Youre totally brainwashed, so you believe what you like, That poster is genuine, its a fact. Ive seen the same thing in other places from epidemiologists . I have articles here from Daily Telegraph New Zealand edition, with stuff in it that our government censors, so they can brainwash fools like you.BoniO wrote: ↑Sat Dec 11, 2021 8:46 pmBullshit. You know it's false. You stated as a fact that the graph is from the PHS site so it's down to you to prove it. But you can't can you.Jack wrote: ↑Sat Dec 11, 2021 8:38 pm I got the chart on Twitter, but not from a anti vax site. Its from someone i know, but the web site is listed on the graph. I went on that. Its a complex site, and i believe its there someone, but im busy now and cant look. ill try tomorrow, but some of you on here are so taken by the governments lying, youll believe anything they tell you, without question.
i posted the graph in good faith, and will try tomorrow to find it on that site, as im sure its there somewhere.
I suspect, even if i find that its genuine, youll still not believe the vaccine is not the saviour of the human race.
Incidentally, im fully jabbed, but still think somethings wrong somewhere, and im questioning it all.
You carry on believing all the crap from the government, and ill carry on questioning it, based on articles from scientists, that aren't shackled by our authoritarian government.
Ill tell you this, i wish i hadnt took the vaccine for sure, but its in me now and i cant ever remove it. Worst thing i ever did
Im not engaging with any of you people on this subject from now on, because you havent got an open mind. Youve been got at, good and proper
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1519
- Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2019 7:43 pm
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 179 times
Re: Coronavirus
Now that you are calling me a liar , please provide the proof.Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Sat Dec 11, 2021 7:42 pmNo, you don'tGeorge wrote: ↑Sat Dec 11, 2021 6:20 pmI have to prove nothing to you. Don’t really care what you think. If you have anything constructive to add to , what was a well mannered set of posts , please feel free.Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Sat Dec 11, 2021 5:46 pm
It's not down to me to prove your dangerous lies though is it?
Shame you won't admit you were lying when you lied about Omicron being basically the cold.
Given the amount you comment about the pandemic I'd of thought you'd have a semblance of credibility
But if you're going to spread lies, especially if they're dangerous, expect to be called out as the liar you are
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1519
- Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2019 7:43 pm
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 179 times
Re: Coronavirus
And also please provide your beliefs on the symptoms of omicron. Looking forward to reading themGeorge wrote: ↑Sat Dec 11, 2021 8:56 pmNow that you are calling me a liar , please provide the proof.Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Sat Dec 11, 2021 7:42 pmNo, you don't
But if you're going to spread lies, especially if they're dangerous, expect to be called out as the liar you are
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 14350
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2524 times
- Been thanked: 3313 times
Re: Coronavirus
Has the vaccine impacted your life in some way? Not getting as good a 5G signal as you hoped?Jack wrote: ↑Sat Dec 11, 2021 8:55 pmListen you fool, i dont have to prove anything to you or anyone else. Youre totally brainwashed, so you believe what you like, That poster is genuine, its a fact. Ive seen the same thing in other places from epidemiologists . I have articles here from Daily Telegraph New Zealand edition, with stuff in it that our government censors, so they can brainwash fools like you.BoniO wrote: ↑Sat Dec 11, 2021 8:46 pmBullshit. You know it's false. You stated as a fact that the graph is from the PHS site so it's down to you to prove it. But you can't can you.Jack wrote: ↑Sat Dec 11, 2021 8:38 pm I got the chart on Twitter, but not from a anti vax site. Its from someone i know, but the web site is listed on the graph. I went on that. Its a complex site, and i believe its there someone, but im busy now and cant look. ill try tomorrow, but some of you on here are so taken by the governments lying, youll believe anything they tell you, without question.
i posted the graph in good faith, and will try tomorrow to find it on that site, as im sure its there somewhere.
I suspect, even if i find that its genuine, youll still not believe the vaccine is not the saviour of the human race.
Incidentally, im fully jabbed, but still think somethings wrong somewhere, and im questioning it all.
You carry on believing all the crap from the government, and ill carry on questioning it, based on articles from scientists, that aren't shackled by our authoritarian government.
Ill tell you this, i wish i hadnt took the vaccine for sure, but its in me now and i cant ever remove it. Worst thing i ever did
Im not engaging with any of you people on this subject from now on, because you havent got an open mind. Youve been got at, good and proper
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4714
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 3:36 pm
- Has thanked: 1126 times
- Been thanked: 762 times
Re: Coronavirus
OK - so you can’t demonstrate that the graph is from the PHS site. What a surprise. Are you related to Thor by any chance? You do have a similar style.Jack wrote: ↑Sat Dec 11, 2021 8:55 pmListen you fool, i dont have to prove anything to you or anyone else. Youre totally brainwashed, so you believe what you like, That poster is genuine, its a fact. Ive seen the same thing in other places from epidemiologists . I have articles here from Daily Telegraph New Zealand edition, with stuff in it that our government censors, so they can brainwash fools like you.BoniO wrote: ↑Sat Dec 11, 2021 8:46 pmBullshit. You know it's false. You stated as a fact that the graph is from the PHS site so it's down to you to prove it. But you can't can you.Jack wrote: ↑Sat Dec 11, 2021 8:38 pm I got the chart on Twitter, but not from a anti vax site. Its from someone i know, but the web site is listed on the graph. I went on that. Its a complex site, and i believe its there someone, but im busy now and cant look. ill try tomorrow, but some of you on here are so taken by the governments lying, youll believe anything they tell you, without question.
i posted the graph in good faith, and will try tomorrow to find it on that site, as im sure its there somewhere.
I suspect, even if i find that its genuine, youll still not believe the vaccine is not the saviour of the human race.
Incidentally, im fully jabbed, but still think somethings wrong somewhere, and im questioning it all.
You carry on believing all the crap from the government, and ill carry on questioning it, based on articles from scientists, that aren't shackled by our authoritarian government.
Ill tell you this, i wish i hadnt took the vaccine for sure, but its in me now and i cant ever remove it. Worst thing i ever did
Im not engaging with any of you people on this subject from now on, because you havent got an open mind. Youve been got at, good and proper
- Currywurst and Chips
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6249
- Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:40 am
- Has thanked: 389 times
- Been thanked: 1489 times
Re: Coronavirus
viewtopic.php?p=239976#p239976George wrote: ↑Sat Dec 11, 2021 8:56 pmNow that you are calling me a liar , please provide the proof.Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Sat Dec 11, 2021 7:42 pmNo, you don't
But if you're going to spread lies, especially if they're dangerous, expect to be called out as the liar you are
If you've found proof that the lie that Omricon is just like a cold then please present it and I'll retract
But you won't, because it was bollocks
- Jack
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2021 12:44 pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 98 times
Re: Coronavirus
At the moment no, but it has on my partner. within a day of having it, she has had nothing but health problems. Lost count of the times weve been to hospital for tests x rays scans etc.Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Sat Dec 11, 2021 9:09 pmHas the vaccine impacted your life in some way? Not getting as good a 5G signal as you hoped?Jack wrote: ↑Sat Dec 11, 2021 8:55 pmListen you fool, i dont have to prove anything to you or anyone else. Youre totally brainwashed, so you believe what you like, That poster is genuine, its a fact. Ive seen the same thing in other places from epidemiologists . I have articles here from Daily Telegraph New Zealand edition, with stuff in it that our government censors, so they can brainwash fools like you.
You carry on believing all the crap from the government, and ill carry on questioning it, based on articles from scientists, that aren't shackled by our authoritarian government.
Ill tell you this, i wish i hadnt took the vaccine for sure, but its in me now and i cant ever remove it. Worst thing i ever did
Im not engaging with any of you people on this subject from now on, because you havent got an open mind. Youve been got at, good and proper
none of us know of the medium and long term effects on us, because there havent been any long term tests.
Thousands have had terrible effects from the vaccine, including lots of deaths, which the msm wont publish.
she's really unwell since the vaccine
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2453
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 5:47 pm
- Has thanked: 86 times
- Been thanked: 301 times
Re: Coronavirus
Wasn’t wrong was I.Still wrong wrote: ↑Mon Nov 30, 2020 8:13 pmMy guess is the vaccines will be nowhere near as good as they claim and the Governments will have spunked the money up the wall.Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Mon Nov 30, 2020 8:09 pm It's worrying that the dates keep getting pushed back.
First it's they'll start vaccination in December and by spring we'll be normal, now we're hearing maybe summer.
I don’t suppose they have asked for a money back Guarantee if these vaccines don’t preform as they claim.
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 14350
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2524 times
- Been thanked: 3313 times
Re: Coronavirus
Sorry to hear that. AZ jab i suppose?Jack wrote: ↑Sat Dec 11, 2021 9:24 pmAt the moment no, but it has on my partner. within a day of having it, she has had nothing but health problems. Lost count of the times weve been to hospital for tests x rays scans etc.Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Sat Dec 11, 2021 9:09 pmHas the vaccine impacted your life in some way? Not getting as good a 5G signal as you hoped?Jack wrote: ↑Sat Dec 11, 2021 8:55 pm
Listen you fool, i dont have to prove anything to you or anyone else. Youre totally brainwashed, so you believe what you like, That poster is genuine, its a fact. Ive seen the same thing in other places from epidemiologists . I have articles here from Daily Telegraph New Zealand edition, with stuff in it that our government censors, so they can brainwash fools like you.
You carry on believing all the crap from the government, and ill carry on questioning it, based on articles from scientists, that aren't shackled by our authoritarian government.
Ill tell you this, i wish i hadnt took the vaccine for sure, but its in me now and i cant ever remove it. Worst thing i ever did
Im not engaging with any of you people on this subject from now on, because you havent got an open mind. Youve been got at, good and proper
none of us know of the medium and long term effects on us, because there havent been any long term tests.
Thousands have had terrible effects from the vaccine, including lots of deaths, which the msm wont publish.
she's really unwell since the vaccine
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 14350
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2524 times
- Been thanked: 3313 times
Re: Coronavirus
AZ was as cheap as could be and did what it was designed to do. Unreasonable to expect it to work against a heavily mutated virus.Still wrong wrote: ↑Sat Dec 11, 2021 9:37 pmWasn’t wrong was I.Still wrong wrote: ↑Mon Nov 30, 2020 8:13 pmMy guess is the vaccines will be nowhere near as good as they claim and the Governments will have spunked the money up the wall.Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Mon Nov 30, 2020 8:09 pm It's worrying that the dates keep getting pushed back.
First it's they'll start vaccination in December and by spring we'll be normal, now we're hearing maybe summer.
I don’t suppose they have asked for a money back Guarantee if these vaccines don’t preform as they claim.
Pfizer costs a lot more but at least it is still partially effecive against Omicron.
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1519
- Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2019 7:43 pm
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 179 times
Re: Coronavirus
Anyone interested may want to watch this . It gives a clear and up to date picture of the optimism among scientists that this variant manifests its way in a mild form. Much less troubling than the previous variants. You can click on links provided to check for yourself. Sit down and have a listen , curry crap and chips. You may learn something
- Currywurst and Chips
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6249
- Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:40 am
- Has thanked: 389 times
- Been thanked: 1489 times
Re: Coronavirus
You yourself called them dodgy and yet you posted them above
Admit you lied and stop quadrupling down
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4714
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 3:36 pm
- Has thanked: 1126 times
- Been thanked: 762 times
Re: Coronavirus
Any luck finding the link to that chart on the PHS site? I’m prepared to take you more seriously if you can. Otherwise the only alternative is to think you’re a swivel-eyed loon like that bloke Thor who used to spout the same rubbish.Jack wrote: ↑Sat Dec 11, 2021 9:24 pmAt the moment no, but it has on my partner. within a day of having it, she has had nothing but health problems. Lost count of the times weve been to hospital for tests x rays scans etc.Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Sat Dec 11, 2021 9:09 pmHas the vaccine impacted your life in some way? Not getting as good a 5G signal as you hoped?Jack wrote: ↑Sat Dec 11, 2021 8:55 pm
Listen you fool, i dont have to prove anything to you or anyone else. Youre totally brainwashed, so you believe what you like, That poster is genuine, its a fact. Ive seen the same thing in other places from epidemiologists . I have articles here from Daily Telegraph New Zealand edition, with stuff in it that our government censors, so they can brainwash fools like you.
You carry on believing all the crap from the government, and ill carry on questioning it, based on articles from scientists, that aren't shackled by our authoritarian government.
Ill tell you this, i wish i hadnt took the vaccine for sure, but its in me now and i cant ever remove it. Worst thing i ever did
Im not engaging with any of you people on this subject from now on, because you havent got an open mind. Youve been got at, good and proper
none of us know of the medium and long term effects on us, because there havent been any long term tests.
Thousands have had terrible effects from the vaccine, including lots of deaths, which the msm wont publish.
she's really unwell since the vaccine
- Jack
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2021 12:44 pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 98 times
Re: Coronavirus
No, Im not a swivel eyed loon, you're a brainwashed foolBoniO wrote: ↑Sat Dec 11, 2021 10:44 pmAny luck finding the link to that chart on the PHS site? I’m prepared to take you more seriously if you can. Otherwise the only alternative is to think you’re a swivel-eyed loon like that bloke Thor who used to spout the same rubbish.Jack wrote: ↑Sat Dec 11, 2021 9:24 pmAt the moment no, but it has on my partner. within a day of having it, she has had nothing but health problems. Lost count of the times weve been to hospital for tests x rays scans etc.Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Sat Dec 11, 2021 9:09 pm
Has the vaccine impacted your life in some way? Not getting as good a 5G signal as you hoped?
none of us know of the medium and long term effects on us, because there havent been any long term tests.
Thousands have had terrible effects from the vaccine, including lots of deaths, which the msm wont publish.
she's really unwell since the vaccine
Goodnight, its bed time
Re: Coronavirus
The raw numbers in the chart are correct, and come from https://publichealthscotland.scot/media ... report.pdf
That's not a defence of the chart (which itself according to Jack came from Twitter, which I have not seen, so I don't know the context in which it was posted). Anyone can cherry-pick numbers from published data and use it to present or support an argument.
When looking at hospitalizations/deaths you need to take into account the age distribution of the population you are sampling (in this case Scotland). This gives a set of age-standardized numbers, which is a much truer interpretation of vaccinated vs unvaccinated stats.
Eg (from the PHS report related to hospitalizations):
On average, unvaccinated individuals are younger than individuals with two or more doses of COVID-19 vaccine. Older individuals are more likely to be hospitalised than younger individuals. To account for the different age distribution of individuals in each vaccine status, age-standardised hospitalisation rates are reported in Table 14 and Figure 17. In all age groups, the age standardised hospitalisation rate of admissions per 100,000 were higher in unvaccinated individuals compared to vaccinated individuals.
As the PHS report concludes, taking into account the age standardized numbers, it is better to be vaccinated than not for both hospitalizations and deaths.
I do find the attacks on Jack a bit OTT, especially given what he said about his partner. I think people are entitled to look for explanations for their personal circumstances and it's not always easy to distinguish between what's true, what's lies, and what's somewhere in between (which perhaps the chart is, an out of context presentation of raw data).
That's not a defence of the chart (which itself according to Jack came from Twitter, which I have not seen, so I don't know the context in which it was posted). Anyone can cherry-pick numbers from published data and use it to present or support an argument.
When looking at hospitalizations/deaths you need to take into account the age distribution of the population you are sampling (in this case Scotland). This gives a set of age-standardized numbers, which is a much truer interpretation of vaccinated vs unvaccinated stats.
Eg (from the PHS report related to hospitalizations):
On average, unvaccinated individuals are younger than individuals with two or more doses of COVID-19 vaccine. Older individuals are more likely to be hospitalised than younger individuals. To account for the different age distribution of individuals in each vaccine status, age-standardised hospitalisation rates are reported in Table 14 and Figure 17. In all age groups, the age standardised hospitalisation rate of admissions per 100,000 were higher in unvaccinated individuals compared to vaccinated individuals.
As the PHS report concludes, taking into account the age standardized numbers, it is better to be vaccinated than not for both hospitalizations and deaths.
I do find the attacks on Jack a bit OTT, especially given what he said about his partner. I think people are entitled to look for explanations for their personal circumstances and it's not always easy to distinguish between what's true, what's lies, and what's somewhere in between (which perhaps the chart is, an out of context presentation of raw data).