Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Thu Nov 04, 2021 9:44 am It's just spam
I hope the moderator and Admin take appropriate action
SPAM SPAM.SPAM SPAM SPAM
Moderator: Long slender neck
Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Thu Nov 04, 2021 9:44 am It's just spam
I hope the moderator and Admin take appropriate action
Have to agree, not a fan of people who can barely spell and rely entirely on the public purse either.
The Public Purse is specifically for the Public &Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Sat Nov 06, 2021 6:25 pmHave to agree, not a fan of people who can barely spell and rely entirely on the public purse either.
Then you'll only attract the comfortable working class and ultra rich
Agreed with your conclusion.Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 4:37 pm It's a joke and should be ended... with a bit of a bump in their base pay (that'll never happen)
It's one of those scandals (like train prices going up) that regularly pops up then people shrug and go away.
I know it's whatabouterry but..... Corbyn was pulled up for taking £20k from the Iranian State propaganda arm to hold a phone in where people called in to berate jews and that was a smeer/awful depending on your team.
Ban second jobs with exceptions for working for the state to accommodate doctors etc
The public service/vocation argument is what successive governments have used to keep nurse/police/fire etc pay low/frozen and they get away with it because there's always people who want to do it.Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 5:43 pmAgreed with your conclusion.Currywurst and Chips wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 4:37 pm It's a joke and should be ended... with a bit of a bump in their base pay (that'll never happen)
It's one of those scandals (like train prices going up) that regularly pops up then people shrug and go away.
I know it's whatabouterry but..... Corbyn was pulled up for taking £20k from the Iranian State propaganda arm to hold a phone in where people called in to berate jews and that was a smeer/awful depending on your team.
Ban second jobs with exceptions for working for the state to accommodate doctors etc
I’m not convinced about upping the salary. I know it’s lower than could be earned in the private sector holding a similarly senior position but they should be doing this as a public service, not for the dosh.
Saying that, the likes of Johnson and Rees Mogg and Sunak etc to whom £100k p.a. Is an irrelevance would still be in these roles doing their damage because it’s not about the salary for their kind.
It's not a salary to be sniffed at for sure for most of usStillSpike wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 5:47 pm I think you could go further an provide serviced apartments for those who have to stay in town, rather than allowing second homes with all the costs paid by the state and the profits on them retained. If you're expecting people to work away from home and do late nights etc then I don't see anything wrong in providing them with decent digs.
Is £82 K (live in, plus staff and expenses) a low salary down there? It seems pretty big from up here.
A household income less that £90K actually qualifies you for some Affordable Housing products. Money ain't what it used to be.StillSpike wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 5:47 pm
Is £82 K (live in, plus staff and expenses) a low salary down there? It seems pretty big from up here.
Next you'll be telling me you pay more that £3.50 for a pint.Dunners wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 6:12 pmA household income less that £90K actually qualifies you for some Affordable Housing products. Money ain't what it used to be.StillSpike wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 5:47 pm
Is £82 K (live in, plus staff and expenses) a low salary down there? It seems pretty big from up here.