Azeem Rafiq
Moderator: Long slender neck
- tuffers#1
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9998
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
- Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
- Has thanked: 6291 times
- Been thanked: 2728 times
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2595
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:15 am
- Has thanked: 106 times
- Been thanked: 627 times
Re: Azeem Rafiq
Also I've never heard anyone say paki in australia and i've been here 15 years.Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 2:40 pmIn Australia, the word ‘paki’ is used freely because they’re about 50 years behind us.Stowaway wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 2:08 pmIt’s all about context. In Australia the word “paki” is used fairly freely without offence, because over there it’s never been used as an insult, unlike here in the UK where it’s obviously a derogatory term.Chief crazy horse wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 1:47 pm It's funny, but I've thought about this a lot in the past. Without really knowing why, p--i does somehow resonate as being a bit derogatory. And yet we don't bat an eyelid if we say: an 'Aussi, an Argi, or a Afghani?
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2595
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:15 am
- Has thanked: 106 times
- Been thanked: 627 times
Re: Azeem Rafiq
In the UK in the 80s and 90s Paki was used as a catch all term for people from india, pakistan, bangladesh, etc, in hate speech, hence its racial connotations. I suspect if people only called people from pakistan paki's and never used it in an aggressive context it wouldn't be seen as racistChief crazy horse wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 1:47 pm It's funny, but I've thought about this a lot in the past. Without really knowing why, p--i does somehow resonate as being a bit derogatory. And yet we don't bat an eyelid if we say: an 'Aussi, an Argi, or a Afghani?
Re: Azeem Rafiq
That sums it up pretty perfectly, thank you.Adz wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 11:03 pmIn the UK in the 80s and 90s Paki was used as a catch all term for people from india, pakistan, bangladesh, etc, in hate speech, hence its racial connotations. I suspect if people only called people from pakistan paki's and never used it in an aggressive context it wouldn't be seen as racistChief crazy horse wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 1:47 pm It's funny, but I've thought about this a lot in the past. Without really knowing why, p--i does somehow resonate as being a bit derogatory. And yet we don't bat an eyelid if we say: an 'Aussi, an Argi, or a Afghani?
P*** is a term of abuse, shouted at you in the street or written on your home.
Unfortunately it is also used generally by some people in a non-offensive context ("just going to the p*** shop for some bread" or as so-called "banter") hence some people say nothing offensive is meant by it - and in most of these cases nothing is.
But ask people who grew up in the 70s/80s/90s on the wrong end of it what they think of it, and what emotions it evokes when they hear it, and you'll probably get a different story.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
Re: Azeem Rafiq
That doesn’t sum it up perfectly, sorry. The suggestion that it was used in the 80s and 90s implies that it stopped being a racist insult in the 00s and 10s, which is obviously bollocks. (It also predates the 80s but that’s not the point).faldO wrote: ↑Wed Nov 03, 2021 8:01 amThat sums it up pretty perfectly, thank you.Adz wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 11:03 pmIn the UK in the 80s and 90s Paki was used as a catch all term for people from india, pakistan, bangladesh, etc, in hate speech, hence its racial connotations. I suspect if people only called people from pakistan paki's and never used it in an aggressive context it wouldn't be seen as racistChief crazy horse wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 1:47 pm It's funny, but I've thought about this a lot in the past. Without really knowing why, p--i does somehow resonate as being a bit derogatory. And yet we don't bat an eyelid if we say: an 'Aussi, an Argi, or a Afghani?
P*** is a term of abuse, shouted at you in the street or written on your home.
Unfortunately it is also used generally by some people in a non-offensive context ("just going to the p*** shop for some bread" or as so-called "banter") hence some people say nothing offensive is meant by it - and in most of these cases nothing is.
But ask people who grew up in the 70s/80s/90s on the wrong end of it what they think of it, and what emotions it evokes when they hear it, and you'll probably get a different story.
If you are saying you’re ‘just going to the paki shop’, you are being offensive and racist.
If you ‘jokingly’ ask an Asian person if their dad owns a shop on a corner, you are being racist.
Come on Pammy - you make your clever lefty baiting comments on these topics, which I’m sure keep you from boredom at work, but then these Dummies follow your lead and come out with this genuine racist nonsense.
Re: Azeem Rafiq
You might have found it useful to read what I actually wrote, rather than your gaslighted interpretation of it.Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Wed Nov 03, 2021 9:07 amThat doesn’t sum it up perfectly, sorry. The suggestion that it was used in the 80s and 90s implies that it stopped being a racist insult in the 00s and 10s, which is obviously bollocks. (It also predates the 80s but that’s not the point).faldO wrote: ↑Wed Nov 03, 2021 8:01 amThat sums it up pretty perfectly, thank you.Adz wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 11:03 pm
In the UK in the 80s and 90s Paki was used as a catch all term for people from india, pakistan, bangladesh, etc, in hate speech, hence its racial connotations. I suspect if people only called people from pakistan paki's and never used it in an aggressive context it wouldn't be seen as racist
P*** is a term of abuse, shouted at you in the street or written on your home.
Unfortunately it is also used generally by some people in a non-offensive context ("just going to the p*** shop for some bread" or as so-called "banter") hence some people say nothing offensive is meant by it - and in most of these cases nothing is.
But ask people who grew up in the 70s/80s/90s on the wrong end of it what they think of it, and what emotions it evokes when they hear it, and you'll probably get a different story.
If you are saying you’re ‘just going to the paki shop’, you are being offensive and racist.
If you ‘jokingly’ ask an Asian person if their dad owns a shop on a corner, you are being racist.
Come on Pammy - you make your clever lefty baiting comments on these topics, which I’m sure keep you from boredom at work, but then these Dummies follow your lead and come out with this genuine racist nonsense.
- KVN
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1248
- Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2021 9:28 pm
- Has thanked: 195 times
- Been thanked: 170 times
Re: Azeem Rafiq
Its too long, its not really an abbreviation or it would be barbquie and footballie and mosqiti
- Currywurst and Chips
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6223
- Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:40 am
- Has thanked: 389 times
- Been thanked: 1487 times
Re: Azeem Rafiq
Please don't link me to these dummiesRonnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Wed Nov 03, 2021 9:07 amThat doesn’t sum it up perfectly, sorry. The suggestion that it was used in the 80s and 90s implies that it stopped being a racist insult in the 00s and 10s, which is obviously bollocks. (It also predates the 80s but that’s not the point).faldO wrote: ↑Wed Nov 03, 2021 8:01 amThat sums it up pretty perfectly, thank you.Adz wrote: ↑Tue Nov 02, 2021 11:03 pm
In the UK in the 80s and 90s Paki was used as a catch all term for people from india, pakistan, bangladesh, etc, in hate speech, hence its racial connotations. I suspect if people only called people from pakistan paki's and never used it in an aggressive context it wouldn't be seen as racist
P*** is a term of abuse, shouted at you in the street or written on your home.
Unfortunately it is also used generally by some people in a non-offensive context ("just going to the p*** shop for some bread" or as so-called "banter") hence some people say nothing offensive is meant by it - and in most of these cases nothing is.
But ask people who grew up in the 70s/80s/90s on the wrong end of it what they think of it, and what emotions it evokes when they hear it, and you'll probably get a different story.
If you are saying you’re ‘just going to the paki shop’, you are being offensive and racist.
If you ‘jokingly’ ask an Asian person if their dad owns a shop on a corner, you are being racist.
Come on Pammy - you make your clever lefty baiting comments on these topics, which I’m sure keep you from boredom at work, but then these Dummies follow your lead and come out with this genuine racist nonsense.
I said the whole thing was toxic and needed calling out and that slurs linked to a person's country of origin isn't on.
Re: Azeem Rafiq
I'll restate/clarify what I wrote above so that any accusations of being a racist or a dummy can at least be based on what I meant and not on Ronnie's interpretation of it.
P*** is a term of abuse. It's nasty and racist and should be called out (I thought that would have been obvious from what I wrote but apparently not)
Some people use the term P*** as an abbreviation of Pakistani, and (wrongly) assume it's ok because they equate it with other similar abbreviations, for example, Aussie -> Australian. That should also be called out - though it's my opinion some people don't see anything wrong with it because they don't equate it with an insult (or at least say they don't) - see the Azeem Rafiq case. That not to condone or excuse it but that's how it is in some instances.
Racism existed before then, then, and now. It is evil and pernicious and I have no problem in condemning it.
P*** is a term of abuse. It's nasty and racist and should be called out (I thought that would have been obvious from what I wrote but apparently not)
Some people use the term P*** as an abbreviation of Pakistani, and (wrongly) assume it's ok because they equate it with other similar abbreviations, for example, Aussie -> Australian. That should also be called out - though it's my opinion some people don't see anything wrong with it because they don't equate it with an insult (or at least say they don't) - see the Azeem Rafiq case. That not to condone or excuse it but that's how it is in some instances.
It implies nothing of the sort - but you were right that it's obviously bollocks. Racism was arguably more visible in the UK in the 70s and 80s during the era of the NF/BM/skinheads which is why I mentioned those decades as an example, that's all it was. To suggest it implies there was no racism before or after those decades is as ridiculous as the suggestion itself.Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Wed Nov 03, 2021 9:07 am The suggestion that it was used in the 80s and 90s implies that it stopped being a racist insult in the 00s and 10s, which is obviously bollocks. (It also predates the 80s but that’s not the point).
Racism existed before then, then, and now. It is evil and pernicious and I have no problem in condemning it.
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2432
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 1:13 pm
- Has thanked: 244 times
- Been thanked: 1125 times
Re: Azeem Rafiq
That isn't what the Rafiq case shows at all. It's a glorified 'sorry if you were offended' defence where they accept an employee was racially abused but try to argue that it wasn't the intent. I really doubt anyone under the age of 50 is unaware that the term is racist.
- Dunners
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9038
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 1074 times
- Been thanked: 2499 times
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2659
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 3:54 pm
- Has thanked: 1026 times
- Been thanked: 919 times
Re: Azeem Rafiq
If a tree falls in the forest and nobody is around to hear it, does it make a sound?.
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1555
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 10:48 am
- Has thanked: 345 times
- Been thanked: 360 times
Re: Azeem Rafiq
I worked years in BT & there were a lot Asians who worked there. Banter was rife. The younger Whites, quickly caught on to the fact that if you asked an Indian if they were Pakistani, they got offended as Indians and Pakistanis have History. So quickly all Asians were dubbed Pakis- As a maximum impact banter insult. It didn't just end there. I knew someone who was Mr McHardy. So they said: "Oh! you're a Jock" He denied Scot's heritage vehemently. Within in a couple of years his missus would ring up asking for Jock. Despite the fact I was born in Tufnell Park, I was Taff or called a sheep shagger etc etc. The Brits bore these psuedo insults stoically.
But I believe more recent migrants to UK are sensitive Souls and the banter has been dropped.
As for the Azeem Rafiq affair I listened to a lady on Radio 4 Today. Gary Ballance's apology seemed to be more sorry that he got nailed rather than sorry for any offence. Then she said:" he got called a " Zimbi or a Zimbo " but that's alright as it the same as calling someone a Limey or Taff etc "Oh!
But I believe more recent migrants to UK are sensitive Souls and the banter has been dropped.
As for the Azeem Rafiq affair I listened to a lady on Radio 4 Today. Gary Ballance's apology seemed to be more sorry that he got nailed rather than sorry for any offence. Then she said:" he got called a " Zimbi or a Zimbo " but that's alright as it the same as calling someone a Limey or Taff etc "Oh!
- Admin
- Site Admin
- Posts: 3213
- Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2019 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 344 times
- Been thanked: 1124 times
Re: Azeem Rafiq
^ anyone care to interpret the dribblings above? Not sure if I’m misreading it but it seems Clive’s blaming migrants for being sensitive to racist terms.
Happy to be corrected if I’ve misunderstood
Happy to be corrected if I’ve misunderstood
- EliotNes
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10634
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:14 pm
- Location: Retired (4182)
- Has thanked: 2026 times
- Been thanked: 876 times
Re: Azeem Rafiq
I was called a "smooth talking Pommie b*s*a*d" by a lovely Australian lady once. I didn't take offence to the racist term Pommie or the accusation that I was born out of wedlock. But this was 1975.
BTTT - He played for Yorkshire for 10 years. If the culture was so bad, why stay? I would not have.
BTTT - He played for Yorkshire for 10 years. If the culture was so bad, why stay? I would not have.
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2876
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 12:29 pm
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 566 times
Re: Azeem Rafiq
P… was used a lot on tv in the last century. Not long ago I saw an episode of Only Fools where Del asks Rodney to nip down the p… shop.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
Re: Azeem Rafiq
Yes, that’s how I read it. They should be more thick skinned like him and his mate, because being called Taff, Jock, Pom* and a paki are basically the same thing.
* thank you to eliotnes for opening up and contributing the racism he has had to endure.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
Re: Azeem Rafiq
And yes, it seems the phrase Zimbo is ok.Clive Evans wrote: ↑Thu Nov 04, 2021 2:55 pm
As for the Azeem Rafiq affair I listened to a lady on Radio 4 Today. Gary Ballance's apology seemed to be more sorry that he got nailed rather than sorry for any offence. Then she said:" he got called a " Zimbi or a Zimbo " but that's alright as it the same as calling someone a Limey or Taff etc "Oh!
https://www.zimbolivenews.com/
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1555
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 10:48 am
- Has thanked: 345 times
- Been thanked: 360 times
Re: Azeem Rafiq
Admin you have totally missed the point of my comments which I feel were objective rather than subjective. Just to put you straight I was pointing out, that this is a complex topic. Some people seem to take offence. Others are not bothered. I can see why some take offence, but then again I can see why some people are not bothered. In some walks of life you just have to put up with being called names. Again seemingly some commentators feel it is OK to call some groups people names ,but not to do the same for other groups. It is all bizarre.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 790
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 1:04 am
- Has thanked: 85 times
- Been thanked: 219 times
Re: Azeem Rafiq
AstoundingClive Evans wrote: ↑Thu Nov 04, 2021 10:21 pm In some walks of life you just have to put up with being called names.
- tuffers#1
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9998
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
- Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
- Has thanked: 6291 times
- Been thanked: 2728 times
Re: Azeem Rafiq
Im not Racist , ive got loads of ................ mates .Clive Evans wrote: ↑Thu Nov 04, 2021 10:21 pm Admin you have totally missed the point of my comments which I feel were objective rather than subjective. Just to put you straight I was pointing out, that this is a complex topic. Some people seem to take offence. Others are not bothered. I can see why some take offence, but then again I can see why some people are not bothered. In some walks of life you just have to put up with being called names. Again seemingly some commentators feel it is OK to call some groups people names ,but not to do the same for other groups. It is all bizarre.
Hmmmmm