Tory Watch

[tuffers#1]

No i wasnt

[George M]

I wonder how you think Labour would have dealt with an unprecedented Worldwide pandemic . We will never know , of course . I doubt they would have made much difference and numbers of deaths may have been greater.
And now that you have the benefit of hindsight , how can we prevent the deaths that are still occurring.

[George M]

https://www.google.com/search?q=uk+covi ... gws-wiz-hp


137,000 Deaths at the hands of the TORY SCUM .

Criminal & Needs Investigating .

So we all know , is it just the Uk Government who you think have been criminal in their handling of the pandemic or is it every European/World Government.

Perhaps reread your post that I responded to

[tuffers#1]

https://www.google.com/search?q=uk+covi ... gws-wiz-hp


137,000 Deaths at the hands of the TORY SCUM .

Criminal & Needs Investigating .

So we all know , is it just the Uk Government who you think have been criminal in their handling of the pandemic or is it every European/World Government.

Perhaps reread your post that I responded to

With a working track & trace then it would have been easier to control a vitus 0andemic
£29 billion spent on not controlling anything is Criminal & Scum to allow deaths to rise .
Hancock helped his sister become rich , while pretending to cry on telly for the public to go ahhh

Hancock Got off with his secretary whose job was created by public money so he could shaft her .

Criminal Scum .

why would i need to re read my post
everyone knows I hate the Tory Scum & will know i have called
them out for the handling of the pandemic & the 137000 deaths .

[tuffers#1]

I wonder how you think Labour would have dealt with an unprecedented Worldwide pandemic . We will never know , of course . I doubt they would have made much difference and numbers of deaths may have been greater.
And now that you have the benefit of hindsight , how can we prevent the deaths that are still occurring.

it is Irrelevant how Labour would have dealt with it as they were not in power
built on LIES BY A SCUMMY party full of CON artists .

However had they been in Power
they would have felt they did the RIGHT THING .

[George M]

I wonder how you think Labour would have dealt with an unprecedented Worldwide pandemic . We will never know , of course . I doubt they would have made much difference and numbers of deaths may have been greater.
And now that you have the benefit of hindsight , how can we prevent the deaths that are still occurring.

it is Irrelevant how Labour would have dealt with it as they were not in power
built on LIES BY A SCUMMY party full of CON artists .

However had they been in Power
they would have felt they did the RIGHT THING .

I expect the Tories feel they are doing the right thing.

[BoniO]

I wonder how you think Labour would have dealt with an unprecedented Worldwide pandemic . We will never know , of course . I doubt they would have made much difference and numbers of deaths may have been greater.
And now that you have the benefit of hindsight , how can we prevent the deaths that are still occurring.

it is Irrelevant how Labour would have dealt with it as they were not in power
built on LIES BY A SCUMMY party full of CON artists .

However had they been in Power
they would have felt they did the RIGHT THING .

I expect the Tories feel they are doing the right thing.

For their pockets, for sure.

[George M]

it is Irrelevant how Labour would have dealt with it as they were not in power
built on LIES BY A SCUMMY party full of CON artists .

However had they been in Power
they would have felt they did the RIGHT THING .

I expect the Tories feel they are doing the right thing.

For their pockets, for sure.

Perhaps, yes. Much the same as the Blair stamp duty avoidance scam that surfaced earlier

[tuffers#1]

I wonder how you think Labour would have dealt with an unprecedented Worldwide pandemic . We will never know , of course . I doubt they would have made much difference and numbers of deaths may have been greater.
And now that you have the benefit of hindsight , how can we prevent the deaths that are still occurring.

it is Irrelevant how Labour would have dealt with it as they were not in power
built on LIES BY A SCUMMY party full of CON artists .

However had they been in Power
they would have felt they did the RIGHT THING .

I expect the Tories feel they are doing the right thing.

The Tories are NOT INTERESTED in doing THE RIGHT THING
they are only Interested IN MAKING THEMSELVES RICHER .

Nothing else matters

[George M]

it is Irrelevant how Labour would have dealt with it as they were not in power
built on LIES BY A SCUMMY party full of CON artists .

However had they been in Power
they would have felt they did the RIGHT THING .

I expect the Tories feel they are doing the right thing.

The Tories are NOT INTERESTED in doing THE RIGHT THING
they are only Interested IN MAKING THEMSELVES RICHER .

Nothing else matters

See my previous Blair post

[tuffers#1]

I expect the Tories feel they are doing the right thing.

For their pockets, for sure.

Perhaps, yes. Much the same as the Blair stamp duty avoidance scam that surfaced earlier

Avoidance scam ?

It isnt umlawful to play by rules that exist .

it is unlawfult to break rules that do exist .
Hancock passed insider knowledge to his sister ( umlawful)
Blair bought a building & avoided stamp duty ( not unlawful)

i see why you always back a Tory ,
you dont seem to understand the difference between right & wrong
especially when applied in theeyes of the LAW .

[tuffers#1]

I expect the Tories feel they are doing the right thing.

The Tories are NOT INTERESTED in doing THE RIGHT THING
they are only Interested IN MAKING THEMSELVES RICHER .

Nothing else matters

See my previous Blair post

Blair broke NO RULES
Hancock did .

Big Big difference

[George M]

For their pockets, for sure.

Perhaps, yes. Much the same as the Blair stamp duty avoidance scam that surfaced earlier

Avoidance scam ?

It isnt umlawful to play by rules that exist .

it is unlawfult to break rules that do exist .
Hancock passed insider knowledge to his sister ( umlawful)
Blair bought a building & avoided stamp duty ( not unlawful)

i see why you always back a Tory ,
you dont seem to understand the difference between right & wrong
especially when applied in theeyes of the LAW .

Hilarious. Its fine for your hero , the mass murderer Blair, to avoid paying tax that could have gone to the homeless, less well off. I thought that’s who the Labour Party represented.

[Rich Tea Wellin]

I wonder how you think Labour would have dealt with an unprecedented Worldwide pandemic . We will never know , of course . I doubt they would have made much difference and numbers of deaths may have been greater.
And now that you have the benefit of hindsight , how can we prevent the deaths that are still occurring.

What a weird response with loads of people needlessly dying at the hands of incompetency.

If people won’t hold a government account of actual deaths we’ve got no hope.

[George M]

I wonder how you think Labour would have dealt with an unprecedented Worldwide pandemic . We will never know , of course . I doubt they would have made much difference and numbers of deaths may have been greater.
And now that you have the benefit of hindsight , how can we prevent the deaths that are still occurring.

What a weird response with loads of people needlessly dying at the hands of incompetency.

If people won’t hold a government account of actual deaths we’ve got no hope.

I don’t disagree. Of course they should be held to account. Even if only to be better next time.
Even Starmer knows that mud slinging and blame won’t win any votes. That’s why he hasn’t.

[tuffers#1]

Perhaps, yes. Much the same as the Blair stamp duty avoidance scam that surfaced earlier

Avoidance scam ?

It isnt umlawful to play by rules that exist .

it is unlawfult to break rules that do exist .
Hancock passed insider knowledge to his sister ( umlawful)
Blair bought a building & avoided stamp duty ( not unlawful)

i see why you always back a Tory ,
you dont seem to understand the difference between right & wrong
especially when applied in theeyes of the LAW .

Hilarious. Its fine for your hero , the mass murderer Blair, to avoid paying tax that could have gone to the homeless, less well off. I thought that’s who the Labour Party represented.

Surley this is a blatant rule break Moderators
Claims being made that Blair is a "MASS MURDERER " are
false & Misleading . surely there is a ban for this ?
( " Message Board Rules

DO NOT post allegations against a person, organisation, company or group without making it clear that your comment is an allegation and do not present it as a fact. When making an allegation, this must be supported by evidence from a reputable source.") .


As for buying a company & a Building , this was done in 2017
A whole 10 years after he was the leader of the labour party
or indeed even an mp !

[BoniO]

I expect the Tories feel they are doing the right thing.

For their pockets, for sure.

Perhaps, yes. Much the same as the Blair stamp duty avoidance scam that surfaced earlier

All a question of scale isn't it. Not defending Blair but the saving he made is small fry compared to the institutionalised thieving and corruption under the Tories. Tens of billions of pounds have gone into the pockets of Tories and their supporters. No comparison to Blair really is there?

[George M]

Avoidance scam ?

It isnt umlawful to play by rules that exist .

it is unlawfult to break rules that do exist .
Hancock passed insider knowledge to his sister ( umlawful)
Blair bought a building & avoided stamp duty ( not unlawful)

i see why you always back a Tory ,
you dont seem to understand the difference between right & wrong
especially when applied in theeyes of the LAW .

Hilarious. Its fine for your hero , the mass murderer Blair, to avoid paying tax that could have gone to the homeless, less well off. I thought that’s who the Labour Party represented.

Surley this is a blatant rule break Moderators
Claims being made that Blair is a "MASS MURDERER " are
false & Misleading . surely there is a ban for this ?
( " Message Board Rules

DO NOT post allegations against a person, organisation, company or group without making it clear that your comment is an allegation and do not present it as a fact. When making an allegation, this must be supported by evidence from a reputable source.") .


As for buying a company & a Building , this was done in 2017
A whole 10 years after he was the leader of the labour party
or indeed even an mp !

Have you forgotten the war in Iraq

[tuffers#1]

Hilarious. Its fine for your hero , the mass murderer Blair, to avoid paying tax that could have gone to the homeless, less well off. I thought that’s who the Labour Party represented.

Surley this is a blatant rule break Moderators
Claims being made that Blair is a "MASS MURDERER " are
false & Misleading . surely there is a ban for this ?
( " Message Board Rules

DO NOT post allegations against a person, organisation, company or group without making it clear that your comment is an allegation and do not present it as a fact. When making an allegation, this must be supported by evidence from a reputable source.") .


As for buying a company & a Building , this was done in 2017
A whole 10 years after he was the leader of the labour party
or indeed even an mp !

Have you forgotten the war in Iraq

Nope .

Tell me what Murders he committed please .

[tuffers#1]

George ?

Where are you George ?

[George M]

George ?

Where are you George ?

Foolish man. It was an illegal war. Blair was Prime Minister then just as Boris is now. Boris is responsible for any Government crime. Blair was then.

[George M]

For their pockets, for sure.

Perhaps, yes. Much the same as the Blair stamp duty avoidance scam that surfaced earlier

All a question of scale isn't it. Not defending Blair but the saving he made is small fry compared to the institutionalised thieving and corruption under the Tories. Tens of billions of pounds have gone into the pockets of Tories and their supporters. No comparison to Blair really is there?

Once again , I agree. I am happy to accept criticism of the Tories and Boris , and hopefully any wrongdoing will be investigated and those responsible, punished. So please tell me , why is it right to criticise the Amazons and Apples of the world for avoiding tax , but not Blair.

[BoniO]

Perhaps, yes. Much the same as the Blair stamp duty avoidance scam that surfaced earlier

All a question of scale isn't it. Not defending Blair but the saving he made is small fry compared to the institutionalised thieving and corruption under the Tories. Tens of billions of pounds have gone into the pockets of Tories and their supporters. No comparison to Blair really is there?

Once again , I agree. I am happy to accept criticism of the Tories and Boris , and hopefully any wrongdoing will be investigated and those responsible, punished. So please tell me , why is it right to criticise the Amazons and Apples of the world for avoiding tax , but not Blair.

Point out where I've said "don't criticise Blair" - helpful hint - I haven't. But comparing his use of the law to reduce his tax burden with the actions of this government is farcical. The schemes/cons/corruption of this government are unparalleled.

[tuffers#1]

George ?

Where are you George ?

Foolish man. It was an illegal war. Blair was Prime Minister then just as Boris is now. Boris is responsible for any Government crime. Blair was then.

Britain was involved in an Ilegal war ?

I think you will find that Blair & Therefore Britain
were under threat of attack from the U.S.A if they
as your name sake puts it
" WITH US or AGAINST US " .

[tuffers#1]

Blair should be treated as a Hero for aligning Britain with the
Anti Terror U.S.A side & saving all who live here from being over run by Yankee Troops .