The Rolling Stones v The Beatles
Moderator: Long slender neck
- Thor
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10279
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:27 pm
- Location: Asgard
- Has thanked: 584 times
- Been thanked: 1348 times
The Rolling Stones v The Beatles
I was taking the children to school this morning and on the way we play a game of who is the group and what is the name of the song.
At that moment Jumping Jack Flash came on and after a hint my daughter correctly named the group. So she was asking questions and I naturally said that the Beatles were there main competitors and some say the stones were the best and some say the Beatles were the best.
Personally I’m a stones man, heavily influenced I guess from my fathers taste in music, so where do you stand? Who do you think is the best? Maybe a reason why.
At that moment Jumping Jack Flash came on and after a hint my daughter correctly named the group. So she was asking questions and I naturally said that the Beatles were there main competitors and some say the stones were the best and some say the Beatles were the best.
Personally I’m a stones man, heavily influenced I guess from my fathers taste in music, so where do you stand? Who do you think is the best? Maybe a reason why.
- Rich Tea Wellin
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10551
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:01 pm
- Has thanked: 4569 times
- Been thanked: 3251 times
Re: The Rolling Stones v The Beatles
They were around at the same time, but are so different. Its a bit like when Blur and Oasis were compared...completely different music.
I like both but the Beatles easily win out for pure consistency of quality. The stones singles might be better in some cases but a lot of their albums are filled with 12 bar blues numbers, even later in their career. The Beatles broke barriers with recording techniques as well as redefining what pop music was about and the Stones didn't get close to anything the Beatles released from Rubber Soul onwards imo.
Live the Stones were obviously better and I loved them at Glasto a few years ago, but the Beatles are the greatest band of all time sooo...
I like both but the Beatles easily win out for pure consistency of quality. The stones singles might be better in some cases but a lot of their albums are filled with 12 bar blues numbers, even later in their career. The Beatles broke barriers with recording techniques as well as redefining what pop music was about and the Stones didn't get close to anything the Beatles released from Rubber Soul onwards imo.
Live the Stones were obviously better and I loved them at Glasto a few years ago, but the Beatles are the greatest band of all time sooo...
-
- Regular
- Posts: 3777
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 11:04 am
- Has thanked: 263 times
- Been thanked: 324 times
Re: The Rolling Stones v The Beatles
I saw Rolling Stones at IOW Festival few years back they where truly awful only made betterApple Wumble wrote: ↑Thu Jun 20, 2019 10:05 am They were around at the same time, but are so different. Its a bit like when Blur and Oasis were compared...completely different music.
I like both but the Beatles easily win out for pure consistency of quality. The stones singles might be better in some cases but a lot of their albums are filled with 12 bar blues numbers, even later in their career. The Beatles broke barriers with recording techniques as well as redefining what pop music was about and the Stones didn't get close to anything the Beatles released from Rubber Soul onwards imo.
Live the Stones were obviously better and I loved them at Glasto a few years ago, but the Beatles are the greatest band of all time sooo...
With a couple of numbers from Amy Whitehouse saw Paul McCartney few years later same Festival he was brilliant and that’s said with no bias
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 188
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 6:50 pm
- Has thanked: 43 times
- Been thanked: 24 times
Re: The Rolling Stones v The Beatles
At the time I was all over the Mersey beat, I had a Beatles jacket. Mod haircut etc. But nowadays I would rather listen to Wild Horses than She Loves You (yeah yeah yeah)..
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:52 pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 7 times
Re: The Rolling Stones v The Beatles
Absolutely on the nail, Wumble. Yeah, Yeah, Yeah.Apple Wumble wrote: ↑Thu Jun 20, 2019 10:05 am They were around at the same time, but are so different. Its a bit like when Blur and Oasis were compared...completely different music.
I like both but the Beatles easily win out for pure consistency of quality. The stones singles might be better in some cases but a lot of their albums are filled with 12 bar blues numbers, even later in their career. The Beatles broke barriers with recording techniques as well as redefining what pop music was about and the Stones didn't get close to anything the Beatles released from Rubber Soul onwards imo.
Live the Stones were obviously better and I loved them at Glasto a few years ago, but the Beatles are the greatest band of all time sooo...
- Thor
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10279
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:27 pm
- Location: Asgard
- Has thanked: 584 times
- Been thanked: 1348 times
Re: The Rolling Stones v The Beatles
McCartney can’t sing anymore his voice is gone. My claim dates back to the concert out the front of Buckingham palace and the olympics, he can’t sing anymore like he used to. He needs to retire gracefully imho.Lucky7 wrote: ↑Thu Jun 20, 2019 10:10 amI saw Rolling Stones at IOW Festival few years back they where truly awful only made betterApple Wumble wrote: ↑Thu Jun 20, 2019 10:05 am They were around at the same time, but are so different. Its a bit like when Blur and Oasis were compared...completely different music.
I like both but the Beatles easily win out for pure consistency of quality. The stones singles might be better in some cases but a lot of their albums are filled with 12 bar blues numbers, even later in their career. The Beatles broke barriers with recording techniques as well as redefining what pop music was about and the Stones didn't get close to anything the Beatles released from Rubber Soul onwards imo.
Live the Stones were obviously better and I loved them at Glasto a few years ago, but the Beatles are the greatest band of all time sooo...
With a couple of numbers from Amy Whitehouse saw Paul McCartney few years later same Festival he was brilliant and that’s said with no bias
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:52 pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 7 times
Re: The Rolling Stones v The Beatles
Roffey's Left Foot will be the defining post on this thread, as he is the music guru on here, that's even if he posts here anymore.
-
- Regular
- Posts: 3777
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 11:04 am
- Has thanked: 263 times
- Been thanked: 324 times
Re: The Rolling Stones v The Beatles
They all need to retire gracefullyThor wrote: ↑Thu Jun 20, 2019 10:21 amMcCartney can’t sing anymore his voice is gone. My claim dates back to the concert out the front of Buckingham palace and the olympics, he can’t sing anymore like he used to. He needs to retire gracefully imho.Lucky7 wrote: ↑Thu Jun 20, 2019 10:10 amI saw Rolling Stones at IOW Festival few years back they where truly awful only made betterApple Wumble wrote: ↑Thu Jun 20, 2019 10:05 am They were around at the same time, but are so different. Its a bit like when Blur and Oasis were compared...completely different music.
I like both but the Beatles easily win out for pure consistency of quality. The stones singles might be better in some cases but a lot of their albums are filled with 12 bar blues numbers, even later in their career. The Beatles broke barriers with recording techniques as well as redefining what pop music was about and the Stones didn't get close to anything the Beatles released from Rubber Soul onwards imo.
Live the Stones were obviously better and I loved them at Glasto a few years ago, but the Beatles are the greatest band of all time sooo...
With a couple of numbers from Amy Whitehouse saw Paul McCartney few years later same Festival he was brilliant and that’s said with no bias
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2661
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 3:54 pm
- Has thanked: 1027 times
- Been thanked: 919 times
Re: The Rolling Stones v The Beatles
Most of The Rolling Stones music is just loud noise. Not for me thank you. Beatles were geniuses.
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 5960
- Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2019 10:12 am
- Has thanked: 5596 times
- Been thanked: 1071 times
Re: The Rolling Stones v The Beatles
Beatles were on a different level as regards 60s and 70s groups. Geniuses, yes of course. Like the very best composers of Classical Music such as Mozart, Beethoven, Chopin, Tchaikovsky etc, their music will live on for many years after they are gone.
- ComeOnYouOs
- Regular
- Posts: 3841
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 12:22 pm
- Awards: Colossal berk
- Has thanked: 79 times
- Been thanked: 1054 times
Re: The Rolling Stones v The Beatles
No contest IMO. the Beatles were the greatest band ever. Paul Mac particularly is a genius....a much overused term these days, but so true in his case.
Its like saying whats the best, a Roller or a Corsa. Theres no comparison to be made here
Its like saying whats the best, a Roller or a Corsa. Theres no comparison to be made here
- RientO
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1316
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:54 pm
- Has thanked: 198 times
- Been thanked: 91 times
Re: The Rolling Stones v The Beatles
The Who or The Kinks. Incredible that four great bands all came about at the same time. Arguably no better bands since.
I would say The Beatles just about edge out The Stones, but Gimme Shelter, Paint It Black and Sympathy for the Devil are better than anything The Beatles did and Baba O'Reilly and Won't Get Fooled Again are better that anything the Stones or the Beatles ever did. Who's Next is in my opinion is one of the greatest LPs ever.
I would say The Beatles just about edge out The Stones, but Gimme Shelter, Paint It Black and Sympathy for the Devil are better than anything The Beatles did and Baba O'Reilly and Won't Get Fooled Again are better that anything the Stones or the Beatles ever did. Who's Next is in my opinion is one of the greatest LPs ever.
Last edited by RientO on Thu Jun 20, 2019 11:35 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 5960
- Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2019 10:12 am
- Has thanked: 5596 times
- Been thanked: 1071 times
Re: The Rolling Stones v The Beatles
I also used to like the ''The Beach Boys, Hollies, The Searchers, Freddie and the Dreamers, Gerry & The Pacemakers' The list is endless.
There were so many great groups around in the 60s and then 70s era.
Not much to shout about in the last 15 years or so. Manufactured girl and boy bands singing songs with the same words repeated again and again with far too much overuse of auto tune with the solo singers. Its all rather like instant plastic disposable type performers now, here one minute, gone the next.
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4726
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:48 pm
- Has thanked: 2072 times
- Been thanked: 1698 times
Re: The Rolling Stones v The Beatles
There's never been a decent band from Liverpool. Echo and the Bunnymen were alright but that's about it.
- ComeOnYouOs
- Regular
- Posts: 3841
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 12:22 pm
- Awards: Colossal berk
- Has thanked: 79 times
- Been thanked: 1054 times
Re: The Rolling Stones v The Beatles
Autotune is used because many of them cant sing. Without it, they wouldnt last 5 minutesSid Bishop wrote: ↑Thu Jun 20, 2019 11:29 amI also used to like the ''The Beach Boys, Hollies, The Searchers, Freddie and the Dreamers, Gerry & The Pacemakers' The list is endless.
There were so many great groups around in the 60s and then 70s era.
Not much to shout about in the last 15 years or so. Manufactured girl and boy bands singing songs with the same words repeated again and again with far too much overuse of auto tune with the solo singers. Its all rather like instant plastic disposable type performers now, here one minute, gone the next.
- RientO
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1316
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:54 pm
- Has thanked: 198 times
- Been thanked: 91 times
- RientO
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1316
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:54 pm
- Has thanked: 198 times
- Been thanked: 91 times
Re: The Rolling Stones v The Beatles
So many great bands from London (or thereabouts). Stones, Kinks, Who, Pistols, Clash, Jam, Squeeze, Damned, T.Rex, etc. And the greatest of all, David Bowie (though admittedly not a band!)
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2658
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 9:34 pm
- Has thanked: 102 times
- Been thanked: 411 times
Re: The Rolling Stones v The Beatles
The Stones, unquestionably. Twist and Shout and Let it Be, but the rest is mainly middle of the road stuff.
- Max B Gold
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12349
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
- Has thanked: 989 times
- Been thanked: 2814 times
Re: The Rolling Stones v The Beatles
The Jam were from Woking.
As for this Beatles v Stones argument. I opt for the Beatles and I once met Sir George Martin.
- RientO
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1316
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:54 pm
- Has thanked: 198 times
- Been thanked: 91 times
Re: The Rolling Stones v The Beatles
That's why I wrote thereabouts. Though they came from Woking, their initial gigs were mostly in London and the early songs reflected that.
- Max B Gold
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12349
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
- Has thanked: 989 times
- Been thanked: 2814 times
Re: The Rolling Stones v The Beatles
I know I come from Woking, and you say I'm a fraudRientO wrote: ↑Thu Jun 20, 2019 12:15 pmThat's why I wrote thereabouts. Though they came from Woking, their initial gigs were mostly in London and the early songs reflected that.
But my heart's in the city, where it belongs.
Clearly from Woking and City not specified. I win.
- F*ck The Poor & Fat
- Regular
- Posts: 3101
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 11:12 am
- Has thanked: 238 times
- Been thanked: 380 times
Re: The Rolling Stones v The Beatles
Stones for me. Saw them short time ago and years ago too. Voodoo Lounge. Awesome.
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2162
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 391 times
- Been thanked: 433 times
Re: The Rolling Stones v The Beatles
The Rolling Stones have always been the “Greatest Rock and Roll Band in the World “
Still selling out the biggest venues in the world, seen them since the early sixties up to last year at Twickenham, still amazing .
The Beatles were very good but the Stones are the Greatest ever.
Still selling out the biggest venues in the world, seen them since the early sixties up to last year at Twickenham, still amazing .
The Beatles were very good but the Stones are the Greatest ever.