Yes what a load of nonsense that was ! From what I understand, the thinking previously was that with the players available to him, he could only play 4-3-3 ! Seems like these people go on FA coaching courses and have all the flare and imagination knocked out of them, that is if they had it in the first place !! Thinking on your feet and changing tactics and formations according to the different teams you are going to play, also when you need a different game plan whilst the game is ongoing, its all part of being a good football manager. Also the ability to spot a good up and coming player and the foresight to be able to use a player to good effect in a position he has not played in before, in fact a case of necessity when you only have a small squad to choose from.Monkey Boy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 11:57 amYes agreed he’s been quite cleaver considering this team can only play 433 apparentlySid Bishop wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 11:39 amJobi also knows how to set a team up and make the best of the players available to him in the squad.
Jobi and Danny Senda are a good team and let us hope the better form ( and luck ! ) continues !
Ratings.
Moderator: Long slender neck
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 5943
- Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2019 10:12 am
- Has thanked: 5568 times
- Been thanked: 1066 times
Re: Ratings.
Last edited by Sid Bishop on Mon Mar 29, 2021 1:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 5943
- Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2019 10:12 am
- Has thanked: 5568 times
- Been thanked: 1066 times
Re: Ratings.
Yes I have one who follows most of my comments, I just blocked him, so ignore him.Monkey Boy wrote: ↑Sun Mar 28, 2021 3:31 pmPersonally Sid I wouldn’t rise to it, I’ve only been on here a short while and already worked out that there are a few on here that would argue with a corpse in a phone box just for a reaction, sure we are all have a point of view but some just take it to the next level for what ever reason. We are all entitled to our opinion and right or wrong. I’m with you on Ross but I appreciate that others liked him.Sid Bishop wrote: ↑Sun Mar 28, 2021 2:56 pmLike others on this forum, I take no instructions from anyone as to what to say and what not to say and likewise I would never instruct anyone else as to what they should or shouldn't write in their comments.
Seems though like some of the Ross cheer leaders on here took it hard to accept him going and are still fighting his cause.
Lastly I notice your assumed name only joined a few weeks ago yet already pitching in like a long time regular.............say no more !
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 205
- Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2021 8:47 pm
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 26 times
Re: Ratings.
I didnt . Its an old English tradition Sid . When the king dies you dont dwell on the old KingSid Bishop wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 11:36 amGlad that you once considered Ross as your King !MungOgogo wrote: ↑Sun Mar 28, 2021 3:52 pmNo arguments from me .Monkey Boy wrote: ↑Sun Mar 28, 2021 3:31 pm
Personally Sid I wouldn’t rise to it, I’ve only been on here a short while and already worked out that there are a few on here that would argue with a corpse in a phone box just for a reaction, sure we are all have a point of view but some just take it to the next level for what ever reason. We are all entitled to our opinion and right or wrong. I’m with you on Ross but I appreciate that others liked him.
Just pointing out that Sid was mentioning about Ross & Jobi & then later says time to move on .
Ross is gone a while now & yet is still part of the conversation . How is that moving on .
The King is Dead , Long Live the King !
You move forwards . Stiff Upper Lip old boy .
Last edited by MungOgogo on Mon Mar 29, 2021 3:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
Re: Ratings.
I think the argument is more that we can’t play 4-4-2 because we don’t have two ‘traditional’ CMs that can defend and tackle and pass and score the odd goal.Sid Bishop wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 1:04 pmYes what a load of nonsense that was ! From what I understand, the thinking previously was that with the players available to him, he could only play 4-3-3 ! Seems like these people go on FA coaching courses and have all the flare and imagination knocked out of them, that is if they had it in the first place !! Thinking on your feet and changing tactics and formations according to the different teams you are going to play, also when you need a different game plan whilst the game is ongoing, its all part of being a good football manager. Also the ability to spot a good up and coming player and the foresight to be able to use a player to good effect in a position he has not played in before, in fact a case of necessity when you only have a small squad to choose from.Monkey Boy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 11:57 amYes agreed he’s been quite cleaver considering this team can only play 433 apparentlySid Bishop wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 11:39 am
Jobi also knows how to set a team up and make the best of the players available to him in the squad.
Jobi and Danny Senda are a good team and let us hope the better form ( and luck ! ) continues !
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2757
- Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2021 4:54 pm
- Has thanked: 736 times
- Been thanked: 747 times
Re: Ratings.
Yes when you go on these coaching courses you have to adhere to what the instructor asked you to do and there’s no room for imagination or to do something different. Bit like a driving test really but in there defence they only want to see if you can do the job they set out.What you do afterwards is down to the individual. Perhaps some on here have passed there badge?so might have an idea what I’m going on about. As for some on here that just want to argue (for what ever reason) I have no time for but most have a good knowledge of football have good points of view and know Orient wellSid Bishop wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 1:04 pmYes what a load of nonsense that was ! From what I understand, the thinking previously was that with the players available to him, he could only play 4-3-3 ! Seems like these people go on FA coaching courses and have all the flare and imagination knocked out of them, that is if they had it in the first place !! Thinking on your feet and changing tactics and formations according to the different teams you are going to play, also when you need a different game plan whilst the game is ongoing, its all part of being a good football manager. Also the ability to spot a good up and coming player and the foresight to be able to use a player to good effect in a position he has not played in before, in fact a case of necessity when you only have a small squad to choose from.Monkey Boy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 11:57 amYes agreed he’s been quite cleaver considering this team can only play 433 apparentlySid Bishop wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 11:39 am
Jobi also knows how to set a team up and make the best of the players available to him in the squad.
Jobi and Danny Senda are a good team and let us hope the better form ( and luck ! ) continues !
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2757
- Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2021 4:54 pm
- Has thanked: 736 times
- Been thanked: 747 times
Re: Ratings.
I find it difficult to understand how a team can’t play 442 mr hotdogs, I know your point about the 2 central midfielders is a valid one however IMO a decent squad should be able to adapt to most formations but maybe there lies the problem?
-
- Regular
- Posts: 3169
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 9:03 pm
- Has thanked: 1639 times
- Been thanked: 900 times
Re: Ratings.
Having done a few coaching courses (abeit a decade ago) I don't buy that. I think coaches of a lesser ability adopt a preferred playing system (and style) and then do not have enough imagination to see beyond it when situations demand it. Do that for a sustained period and you might end up with players or a squad that suit the chosen system. There's nothing I see in our make up that stops the O's playing as badly in a 442 as they do in a 433.Sid Bishop wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 1:04 pmYes what a load of nonsense that was ! From what I understand, the thinking previously was that with the players available to him, he could only play 4-3-3 ! Seems like these people go on FA coaching courses and have all the flare and imagination knocked out of them, that is if they had it in the first place !! Thinking on your feet and changing tactics and formations according to the different teams you are going to play, also when you need a different game plan whilst the game is ongoing, its all part of being a good football manager. Also the ability to spot a good up and coming player and the foresight to be able to use a player to good effect in a position he has not played in before, in fact a case of necessity when you only have a small squad to choose from.Monkey Boy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 11:57 amYes agreed he’s been quite cleaver considering this team can only play 433 apparentlySid Bishop wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 11:39 am
Jobi also knows how to set a team up and make the best of the players available to him in the squad.
Jobi and Danny Senda are a good team and let us hope the better form ( and luck ! ) continues !
FWIW I don't think we did play a 433 Saturday. Kemp was making every attempt to play in an advanced central midfield role. Can't quite be sure what formation it was because a PC is too one dimensional to be sure.
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 205
- Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2021 8:47 pm
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 26 times
Re: Ratings.
Unless youve had a stint at Largs , i cant take you seriously .Monkey Boy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 1:42 pmYes when you go on these coaching courses you have to adhere to what the instructor asked you to do and there’s no room for imagination or to do something different. Bit like a driving test really but in there defence they only want to see if you can do the job they set out.What you do afterwards is down to the individual. Perhaps some on here have passed there badge?so might have an idea what I’m going on about. As for some on here that just want to argue (for what ever reason) I have no time for but most have a good knowledge of football have good points of view and know Orient wellSid Bishop wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 1:04 pmYes what a load of nonsense that was ! From what I understand, the thinking previously was that with the players available to him, he could only play 4-3-3 ! Seems like these people go on FA coaching courses and have all the flare and imagination knocked out of them, that is if they had it in the first place !! Thinking on your feet and changing tactics and formations according to the different teams you are going to play, also when you need a different game plan whilst the game is ongoing, its all part of being a good football manager. Also the ability to spot a good up and coming player and the foresight to be able to use a player to good effect in a position he has not played in before, in fact a case of necessity when you only have a small squad to choose from.Monkey Boy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 11:57 am
Yes agreed he’s been quite cleaver considering this team can only play 433 apparently
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 5943
- Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2019 10:12 am
- Has thanked: 5568 times
- Been thanked: 1066 times
Re: Ratings.
I think it is a 4-2-3-1 with a standard back four, then something on the lines of Cisse and Clay as twin central holding midfielders, then Kemp as an advanced central midfielder and Wilkinson on the right side of this advanced 3 midfielders and Brophy on the left. Johnson playing on his own as a central striker. I would sooner Johnson had a Matt Harrold/ Mickey Bullock/Joe Mayo type target man alongside him with Johnson feeding off him in a 4-4-2 formation. Anyway, things are getting better so see how the team evolves !LittleMate wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 2:58 pmHaving done a few coaching courses (abeit a decade ago) I don't buy that. I think coaches of a lesser ability adopt a preferred playing system (and style) and then do not have enough imagination to see beyond it when situations demand it. Do that for a sustained period and you might end up with players or a squad that suit the chosen system. There's nothing I see in our make up that stops the O's playing as badly in a 442 as they do in a 433.Sid Bishop wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 1:04 pmYes what a load of nonsense that was ! From what I understand, the thinking previously was that with the players available to him, he could only play 4-3-3 ! Seems like these people go on FA coaching courses and have all the flare and imagination knocked out of them, that is if they had it in the first place !! Thinking on your feet and changing tactics and formations according to the different teams you are going to play, also when you need a different game plan whilst the game is ongoing, its all part of being a good football manager. Also the ability to spot a good up and coming player and the foresight to be able to use a player to good effect in a position he has not played in before, in fact a case of necessity when you only have a small squad to choose from.Monkey Boy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 11:57 am
Yes agreed he’s been quite cleaver considering this team can only play 433 apparently
FWIW I don't think we did play a 433 Saturday. Kemp was making every attempt to play in an advanced central midfield role. Can't quite be sure what formation it was because a PC is too one dimensional to be sure.
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2757
- Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2021 4:54 pm
- Has thanked: 736 times
- Been thanked: 747 times
Re: Ratings.
Now your talking Joe Mayo, Mickey (am I offside) Bullock. I don’t like 433 ( but wouldn’t rule it completely out) because you end up playing to narrow (3 in the middle) leaving the flanks exposed or playing a little wider leaving the middle exsposed.Jobi seems to have addressed this to his credit.As to having coaches of a lesser ability in a club and not being able to change well I think they have just got rid of one,but we don’t want to bring that up again do we Mungo LOL
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 5943
- Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2019 10:12 am
- Has thanked: 5568 times
- Been thanked: 1066 times
Re: Ratings.
From my late teenage years, I read many books on various football tactics dating from the 1920s upwards. When you run your own teams, you can evolve your own tactics to suit the players you have available and also the different styles of teams you may meet. Some teams may have had a key player that I would put a tight man to man marker on. In one cup game it necessitated using the 5-4-1 formation used by the Inter Milan coach Helenio Herrera in the 1960s. We played a 3 central defenders with one acting as a sweeper, stifled the opposition in the midfield and reduced them to putting in long balls which our central defenders could have dealt with all day, let their back 4 push up to the halfway line, and our very fast centre forward got 4 breakaway goals goals in a brilliant 4-1 victory !Monkey Boy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 1:42 pmYes when you go on these coaching courses you have to adhere to what the instructor asked you to do and there’s no room for imagination or to do something different. Bit like a driving test really but in there defence they only want to see if you can do the job they set out.What you do afterwards is down to the individual. Perhaps some on here have passed there badge?so might have an idea what I’m going on about. As for some on here that just want to argue (for what ever reason) I have no time for but most have a good knowledge of football have good points of view and know Orient wellSid Bishop wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 1:04 pmYes what a load of nonsense that was ! From what I understand, the thinking previously was that with the players available to him, he could only play 4-3-3 ! Seems like these people go on FA coaching courses and have all the flare and imagination knocked out of them, that is if they had it in the first place !! Thinking on your feet and changing tactics and formations according to the different teams you are going to play, also when you need a different game plan whilst the game is ongoing, its all part of being a good football manager. Also the ability to spot a good up and coming player and the foresight to be able to use a player to good effect in a position he has not played in before, in fact a case of necessity when you only have a small squad to choose from.Monkey Boy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 11:57 am
Yes agreed he’s been quite cleaver considering this team can only play 433 apparently
- Thor
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10279
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:27 pm
- Location: Asgard
- Has thanked: 584 times
- Been thanked: 1348 times
Re: Ratings.
From your posts and words you use I’d say you took the old prelim badge followed by the full one, am I right?Monkey Boy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 1:42 pmYes when you go on these coaching courses you have to adhere to what the instructor asked you to do and there’s no room for imagination or to do something different. Bit like a driving test really but in there defence they only want to see if you can do the job they set out.What you do afterwards is down to the individual. Perhaps some on here have passed there badge?so might have an idea what I’m going on about. As for some on here that just want to argue (for what ever reason) I have no time for but most have a good knowledge of football have good points of view and know Orient wellSid Bishop wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 1:04 pmYes what a load of nonsense that was ! From what I understand, the thinking previously was that with the players available to him, he could only play 4-3-3 ! Seems like these people go on FA coaching courses and have all the flare and imagination knocked out of them, that is if they had it in the first place !! Thinking on your feet and changing tactics and formations according to the different teams you are going to play, also when you need a different game plan whilst the game is ongoing, its all part of being a good football manager. Also the ability to spot a good up and coming player and the foresight to be able to use a player to good effect in a position he has not played in before, in fact a case of necessity when you only have a small squad to choose from.Monkey Boy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 11:57 am
Yes agreed he’s been quite cleaver considering this team can only play 433 apparently
The trouble back then was you had to swallow the Charles Hughes manual and implement what he said you had to do otherwise you’d never pass your badges. It still goes on today as the course is set up for you to attain a level which is based on the classroom teachings, on field work etc. And if you don’t follow it well, you won’t pass. Don’t matter how good you might be you have to follow the syllabus, like in school before you can get your gcse.
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2757
- Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2021 4:54 pm
- Has thanked: 736 times
- Been thanked: 747 times
Re: Ratings.
UEFA BThor wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 8:53 pmFrom your posts and words you use I’d say you took the old prelim badge followed by the full one, am I right?Monkey Boy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 1:42 pmYes when you go on these coaching courses you have to adhere to what the instructor asked you to do and there’s no room for imagination or to do something different. Bit like a driving test really but in there defence they only want to see if you can do the job they set out.What you do afterwards is down to the individual. Perhaps some on here have passed there badge?so might have an idea what I’m going on about. As for some on here that just want to argue (for what ever reason) I have no time for but most have a good knowledge of football have good points of view and know Orient wellSid Bishop wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 1:04 pm
Yes what a load of nonsense that was ! From what I understand, the thinking previously was that with the players available to him, he could only play 4-3-3 ! Seems like these people go on FA coaching courses and have all the flare and imagination knocked out of them, that is if they had it in the first place !! Thinking on your feet and changing tactics and formations according to the different teams you are going to play, also when you need a different game plan whilst the game is ongoing, its all part of being a good football manager. Also the ability to spot a good up and coming player and the foresight to be able to use a player to good effect in a position he has not played in before, in fact a case of necessity when you only have a small squad to choose from.
The trouble back then was you had to swallow the Charles Hughes manual and implement what he said you had to do otherwise you’d never pass your badges. It still goes on today as the course is set up for you to attain a level which is based on the classroom teachings, on field work etc. And if you don’t follow it well, you won’t pass. Don’t matter how good you might be you have to follow the syllabus, like in school before you can get your gcse.
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2757
- Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2021 4:54 pm
- Has thanked: 736 times
- Been thanked: 747 times
Re: Ratings.
On reflection Thor you were partly right I did the prelim then went on to do UEFB and what you went on to was true too.
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 5943
- Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2019 10:12 am
- Has thanked: 5568 times
- Been thanked: 1066 times
Re: Ratings.
Some of the most brilliant footballers of the past, learnt their ball control and dribbling skills by playing street or playground football, kicking cans or tennis balls around, or in the case of the many brilliant Brazilian players like Pele, Garrincha etc, many honed their wonderful close control ball skills from a young age by playing beach football. Too much coaching can take natural talent away and discourage young players from the old fashioned skills of dribbling the ball and going on a run taking on players etc. Instead they are drilled to keep team possession of the ball by non stop passing from one to the other thus a slow build up and endless sideways and backwards passing movements. Thus the demise of ball playing wingers like George Best, Peter Thompson, Stanley Mathews etc to name but a few of the great wingers of days gone by. The times I have watched kids games where the youngsters are being instructed to pass the ball and get shouted at if they lose possession of the ball. Youngsters should just be left to enjoy and explore the game, develop their own skills and learn to enjoy the thrill of attempting to dribble the ball past their opponents.Thor wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 8:53 pmFrom your posts and words you use I’d say you took the old prelim badge followed by the full one, am I right?Monkey Boy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 1:42 pmYes when you go on these coaching courses you have to adhere to what the instructor asked you to do and there’s no room for imagination or to do something different. Bit like a driving test really but in there defence they only want to see if you can do the job they set out.What you do afterwards is down to the individual. Perhaps some on here have passed there badge?so might have an idea what I’m going on about. As for some on here that just want to argue (for what ever reason) I have no time for but most have a good knowledge of football have good points of view and know Orient wellSid Bishop wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 1:04 pm
Yes what a load of nonsense that was ! From what I understand, the thinking previously was that with the players available to him, he could only play 4-3-3 ! Seems like these people go on FA coaching courses and have all the flare and imagination knocked out of them, that is if they had it in the first place !! Thinking on your feet and changing tactics and formations according to the different teams you are going to play, also when you need a different game plan whilst the game is ongoing, its all part of being a good football manager. Also the ability to spot a good up and coming player and the foresight to be able to use a player to good effect in a position he has not played in before, in fact a case of necessity when you only have a small squad to choose from.
The trouble back then was you had to swallow the Charles Hughes manual and implement what he said you had to do otherwise you’d never pass your badges. It still goes on today as the course is set up for you to attain a level which is based on the classroom teachings, on field work etc. And if you don’t follow it well, you won’t pass. Don’t matter how good you might be you have to follow the syllabus, like in school before you can get your gcse.
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 5943
- Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2019 10:12 am
- Has thanked: 5568 times
- Been thanked: 1066 times
Re: Ratings.
Well I get on ok in football discussions with both Monkeyboy and Thor, but disagree with Thor on other things like his views on Covid Vaccination. conspiracy theories etc. If you are thinking that all the names you quoted are the one and same person, well I can assure you that speaking for myself I do not go into ( as some do on this forum ! ) having multiple accounts where they back up mates who they know in person or even reply to themselves via different accounts. I have just the one account and do not know anyone on this forum in person other than by exchanging views on the many different threads that are discussed on this forum !
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2589
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:15 am
- Has thanked: 106 times
- Been thanked: 626 times
Re: Ratings.
I think you're being disingenuous Sid, there's been hundreds of amazing ball playing wingers since the days of Best and Matthews.Sid Bishop wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 11:20 pm Some of the most brilliant footballers of the past, learnt their ball control and dribbling skills by playing street or playground football, kicking cans or tennis balls around, or in the case of the many brilliant Brazilian players like Pele, Garrincha etc, many honed their wonderful close control ball skills from a young age by playing beach football. Too much coaching can take natural talent away and discourage young players from the old fashioned skills of dribbling the ball and going on a run taking on players etc. Instead they are drilled to keep team possession of the ball by non stop passing from one to the other thus a slow build up and endless sideways and backwards passing movements. Thus the demise of ball playing wingers like George Best, Peter Thompson, Stanley Mathews etc to name but a few of the great wingers of days gone by. The times I have watched kids games where the youngsters are being instructed to pass the ball and get shouted at if they lose possession of the ball. Youngsters should just be left to enjoy and explore the game, develop their own skills and learn to enjoy the thrill of attempting to dribble the ball past their opponents.
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2757
- Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2021 4:54 pm
- Has thanked: 736 times
- Been thanked: 747 times
Re: Ratings.
True ADZ but just sometimes coaches can destroy individualism, I watched Joe Cole coming through the ranks at West Ham and at the time he was going to be the next Paul Gascoigne but Harry Redknapp basically coached it out of him by constantly putting him on the bench and making him more of a team player.Trust me if he had left him alone he would have been twice the player he was, admittedly he became an international but he could have been even better. Thus the he move to Chelsea in the end. I believe things go in circles nowadays it’s all about the short passing game especially young kids,pace and first touch.However look at some of your best players over the years like Paul Scholes and Steven Gerrard who could hit a ball 40/50 yards right to there feet. That’s not coached any more. As for littleRons comment perhaps we are a little older or just on the same wavelength?? I think the younger ones on here have a different view point and rightly so and good luck to them . Things move on like mungo said
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
Re: Ratings.
It was better in the older days when aliases like these disagreed with each other. The sponge v shrek stuff springs to mind.
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 5943
- Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2019 10:12 am
- Has thanked: 5568 times
- Been thanked: 1066 times
Re: Ratings.
Ask Admin if I am an alias on this forum, no way, cannot be bothered with kids stuff like that !Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 9:01 amIt was better in the older days when aliases like these disagreed with each other. The sponge v shrek stuff springs to mind.
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 5943
- Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2019 10:12 am
- Has thanked: 5568 times
- Been thanked: 1066 times
Re: Ratings.
How many in recent years can you think of ? Paul Gascoigne before he got his ACL knee injury was one of the last breed of English players who had amazing ball control. flair and dribbling skills. As Monkey Boy states, more and more individual skills are being coached out of young players and replaced with the short passing mantra, constantly being told to keep the ball on the move, multiple passing leading to too much negative and boring to watch possession style of football.Adz wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 12:06 amI think you're being disingenuous Sid, there's been hundreds of amazing ball playing wingers since the days of Best and Matthews.Sid Bishop wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 11:20 pm Some of the most brilliant footballers of the past, learnt their ball control and dribbling skills by playing street or playground football, kicking cans or tennis balls around, or in the case of the many brilliant Brazilian players like Pele, Garrincha etc, many honed their wonderful close control ball skills from a young age by playing beach football. Too much coaching can take natural talent away and discourage young players from the old fashioned skills of dribbling the ball and going on a run taking on players etc. Instead they are drilled to keep team possession of the ball by non stop passing from one to the other thus a slow build up and endless sideways and backwards passing movements. Thus the demise of ball playing wingers like George Best, Peter Thompson, Stanley Mathews etc to name but a few of the great wingers of days gone by. The times I have watched kids games where the youngsters are being instructed to pass the ball and get shouted at if they lose possession of the ball. Youngsters should just be left to enjoy and explore the game, develop their own skills and learn to enjoy the thrill of attempting to dribble the ball past their opponents.
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2757
- Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2021 4:54 pm
- Has thanked: 736 times
- Been thanked: 747 times
Re: Ratings.
Careful Sid we will be accused of being brothers soon but do I care...nah the only people I care about are close friends and family. Don’t mind in the slightest if people disagree with me that’s there right no probs, but when they get personal? However I fully agree with your comments above wholeheartedly.I think Southgate and Grealish is a fair example, although Grealish isn’t in the Gascoigne league he’s a bit of a Maverick compared to some and that’s why Southgate didn’t pick him until recently under pressure from the press and public. I still believe he wouldn’t of picked him now but for the pressure. They just don’t like individualism so much now daysSid Bishop wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 9:47 amHow many in recent years can you think of ? Paul Gascoigne before he got his ACL knee injury was one of the last breed of English players who had amazing ball control. flair and dribbling skills. As Monkey Boy states, more and more individual skills are being coached out of young players and replaced with the short passing mantra, constantly being told to keep the ball on the move, multiple passing leading to too much negative and boring to watch possession style of football.Adz wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 12:06 amI think you're being disingenuous Sid, there's been hundreds of amazing ball playing wingers since the days of Best and Matthews.Sid Bishop wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 11:20 pm Some of the most brilliant footballers of the past, learnt their ball control and dribbling skills by playing street or playground football, kicking cans or tennis balls around, or in the case of the many brilliant Brazilian players like Pele, Garrincha etc, many honed their wonderful close control ball skills from a young age by playing beach football. Too much coaching can take natural talent away and discourage young players from the old fashioned skills of dribbling the ball and going on a run taking on players etc. Instead they are drilled to keep team possession of the ball by non stop passing from one to the other thus a slow build up and endless sideways and backwards passing movements. Thus the demise of ball playing wingers like George Best, Peter Thompson, Stanley Mathews etc to name but a few of the great wingers of days gone by. The times I have watched kids games where the youngsters are being instructed to pass the ball and get shouted at if they lose possession of the ball. Youngsters should just be left to enjoy and explore the game, develop their own skills and learn to enjoy the thrill of attempting to dribble the ball past their opponents.
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2589
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:15 am
- Has thanked: 106 times
- Been thanked: 626 times
Re: Ratings.
There was a spate of wingers 10 years ago that made their career out of being able to dribble with nothing else in their game, Wright Philips, Walcott, etc. Players are much better now, look at grealish, foden, sancho, sterling, etc who can do it all. There was definitely mistakes made with coaching in the past 20 years, but with the quality of young players coming through at the moment I think they must be getting a lot right. When was the last time we had 4 world class right backs? Not in my lifetime.
Southgate will probably kill all the good work though
Southgate will probably kill all the good work though
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2757
- Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2021 4:54 pm
- Has thanked: 736 times
- Been thanked: 747 times
Re: Ratings.
Think those players you mentioned ADZ Walcott ect only had pace and not much else IMO they couldn’t cross a ball to save there lives. As for Southgate don’t get me started on him,there will be a lot of England supporters very disappointed in the coming competitions. It’s history repeating itself. It’s Sven all over again. We have the best squad of young players we’ve had for years and the worst manager. Bit like the O’s and Embleton only we don’t have the squad.