Womens World Cup

Chat about Leyton Orient (or anything else)

Moderator: Long slender neck

User avatar
slacker
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1764
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:39 am
Has thanked: 80 times
Been thanked: 346 times

Womens World Cup

Post by slacker »

Starts Friday. Many games on BBC1.

Stand by for jokes about dodgy keepers. England have a tough group, including Scotland, Argentina & Japan - but will be disappointed if they don’t reach the latter stages of the competition.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/48503530
User avatar
Bergen
Regular
Regular
Posts: 4145
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:07 pm
Has thanked: 358 times
Been thanked: 828 times

Re: Womens World Cup

Post by Bergen »

Club level is not that good, but international level is much better IMO. I look forward to it.

Norway have one of the best player in world, Ada Hegeberg (BBC Women's Footballer of the Year in 2018), but she doesn`t want to play for our national team.
one o in huntingdon
Fresh Alias
Posts: 799
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2019 10:55 am
Has thanked: 20 times
Been thanked: 206 times

Re: Womens World Cup

Post by one o in huntingdon »

slacker wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2019 4:41 pm Starts Friday. Many games on BBC1.

Stand by for jokes about dodgy keepers.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/48503530

Keepers are generally poor though, most seem reluctant to dive and if they do its after the ball has sailed by.
Must be a reason why goalkeeping is such a poor aspect of the women's game.
User avatar
Long slender neck
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 14289
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
Has thanked: 2501 times
Been thanked: 3290 times

Re: Womens World Cup

Post by Long slender neck »

Apparently they want to make the goals smaller.
User avatar
Disoriented
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 6534
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:06 pm
Location: Valhalla
Awards: Idiot of the year 2020
Has thanked: 509 times
Been thanked: 305 times

Re: Womens World Cup

Post by Disoriented »

Prestige Worldwide wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2019 5:07 pm Apparently they want to make the goals smaller.
Sexist post. Reported.
User avatar
RientO
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1316
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:54 pm
Has thanked: 198 times
Been thanked: 91 times

Re: Womens World Cup

Post by RientO »

Prestige Worldwide wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2019 5:07 pm Apparently they want to make the goals smaller.
What good is making the goals smaller if the pitch is the same size?

I remember when I used to play under 11 football over the marshes on full size pitches with full size goals and the ridiculous scores like 30-0 because teams with 12 and 13 year old ringers would just chip the goalkeeper on the line. And the keeper could barely kick the ball out of the area.

In many countries (and also in lots of soccer schools) they play on smaller pitches with smaller balls and smaller goals so the game is at the same scale.

In golf, women's tees are in front of men's tees. I think it would be better if goals, pitches and balls were set appropriately.
Lucky7
Regular
Regular
Posts: 3777
Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 11:04 am
Has thanked: 263 times
Been thanked: 324 times

Re: Womens World Cup

Post by Lucky7 »

I played on smaller pitches at school it was the norm
Also some of the pitches at the marshes and Douglas Eyre where made smaller to accommodate younger teams etc
WickfordO
Fresh Alias
Posts: 640
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 9:12 pm
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 96 times

Re: Womens World Cup

Post by WickfordO »

Not keen on womens footie.
User avatar
RientO
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1316
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:54 pm
Has thanked: 198 times
Been thanked: 91 times

Re: Womens World Cup

Post by RientO »

Lucky7 wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2019 7:31 pm I played on smaller pitches at school it was the norm
Also some of the pitches at the marshes and Douglas Eyre where made smaller to accommodate younger teams etc
Over the marshes, 18 yard boxes were still the same size, even if pitches were narrower and shorter, And goals were same size.
one o in huntingdon
Fresh Alias
Posts: 799
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2019 10:55 am
Has thanked: 20 times
Been thanked: 206 times

Re: Womens World Cup

Post by one o in huntingdon »

WickfordO wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2019 7:48 pm Not keen on womens footie.
Me neither, not sure why exactly, just seems to be lacking something
gshaw
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 7686
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:24 pm
Has thanked: 3383 times
Been thanked: 1748 times

Re: Womens World Cup

Post by gshaw »

one o in huntingdon wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2019 5:01 pm
slacker wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2019 4:41 pm Starts Friday. Many games on BBC1.

Stand by for jokes about dodgy keepers.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/48503530

Keepers are generally poor though, most seem reluctant to dive and if they do its after the ball has sailed by.
Must be a reason why goalkeeping is such a poor aspect of the women's game.
It is odd. The passing, movement and technical ability of outfield players has always been good and standard has improved as new crops of players come through yet the keepers don't seem to have moved on that much in comparison.

Is it poor coaching or something else? I don't buy the smaller goals arguments as the clangers that people notice aren't top corner shots or being beaten when at full stretch but far more basic errors.
Beradogs
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2658
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 3:54 pm
Has thanked: 1026 times
Been thanked: 919 times

Re: Womens World Cup

Post by Beradogs »

I like women’s rugby. The slower pace seems to suit the game. Women’s football is terrible. Football played badly is not a good watch unless really badly like a terrible Sunday league side which is hilarious.
User avatar
Thor
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 10279
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:27 pm
Location: Asgard
Has thanked: 584 times
Been thanked: 1348 times

Re: Womens World Cup

Post by Thor »

Disoriented wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:06 pm
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2019 5:07 pm Apparently they want to make the goals smaller.
Sexist post. Reported.
No it’s not, it’s true, keep up with the news dis.
User avatar
ComeOnYouOs
Regular
Regular
Posts: 3841
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 12:22 pm
Awards: Colossal berk
Has thanked: 79 times
Been thanked: 1054 times

Re: Womens World Cup

Post by ComeOnYouOs »

one o in huntingdon wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2019 8:15 pm
WickfordO wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2019 7:48 pm Not keen on womens footie.
Me neither, not sure why exactly, just seems to be lacking something
Phsicality. Theres little physical contact, and the tempo is much slower. I find womens football terrible to watch because of that
User avatar
Long slender neck
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 14289
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
Has thanked: 2501 times
Been thanked: 3290 times

Re: Womens World Cup

Post by Long slender neck »

Sounds like they'd give us a good game.
User avatar
Disoriented
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 6534
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:06 pm
Location: Valhalla
Awards: Idiot of the year 2020
Has thanked: 509 times
Been thanked: 305 times

Re: Womens World Cup

Post by Disoriented »

Thor wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2019 10:00 pm
Disoriented wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:06 pm
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2019 5:07 pm Apparently they want to make the goals smaller.
Sexist post. Reported.
No it’s not, it’s true, keep up with the news dis.
Still sexist Thora.
Real Al
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2210
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:49 pm
Has thanked: 14 times
Been thanked: 421 times

Re: Womens World Cup

Post by Real Al »

Old farts on messageboard in 'dissing women's football because it's not men's football' shock
JimbO
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1164
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:20 pm
Has thanked: 137 times
Been thanked: 218 times

Re: Womens World Cup

Post by JimbO »

Disoriented wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:06 pm
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2019 5:07 pm Apparently they want to make the goals smaller.
Sexist post. Reported.
It was comments made by the manager of the Chelsea women's team pointing out the differences in stature between men and women. It was along the lines of they're generally shorter than men so the goals should be adjusted to compensate.
JimbO
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1164
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:20 pm
Has thanked: 137 times
Been thanked: 218 times

Re: Womens World Cup

Post by JimbO »

Tbh I'll probably watch the England games only in the eat stages and little else as I'm trying to get my daughter into playing the game.
eppinggas
Fresh Alias
Posts: 38
Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2019 12:37 pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Womens World Cup

Post by eppinggas »

Slight tangent. Women's teams participating at the WC are being given £24mil. Men's teams were given £315mil in 2018:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/48535933. Complaints about "male chauvinism".
I would 100% advocate equal pay when the broadcasting rights, general level of interest and attendances are in line with the men's game.
Until they are - the women's game will earn less money. The gap is closing, which I believe is a good thing as the women's game grows.
But I don't understand the whining when economics dictates how money is allocated.
User avatar
Thor
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 10279
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:27 pm
Location: Asgard
Has thanked: 584 times
Been thanked: 1348 times

Re: Womens World Cup

Post by Thor »

JimbO wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2019 9:17 am
Disoriented wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:06 pm
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2019 5:07 pm Apparently they want to make the goals smaller.
Sexist post. Reported.
It was comments made by the manager of the Chelsea women's team pointing out the differences in stature between men and women. It was along the lines of they're generally shorter than men so the goals should be adjusted to compensate.
You are wasting your time Jimbo as hes blinkered at times.
User avatar
Disoriented
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 6534
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:06 pm
Location: Valhalla
Awards: Idiot of the year 2020
Has thanked: 509 times
Been thanked: 305 times

Re: Womens World Cup

Post by Disoriented »

JimbO wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2019 9:17 am
Disoriented wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:06 pm
Prestige Worldwide wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2019 5:07 pm Apparently they want to make the goals smaller.
Sexist post. Reported.
It was comments made by the manager of the Chelsea women's team pointing out the differences in stature between men and women. It was along the lines of they're generally shorter than men so the goals should be adjusted to compensate.
Thanks for the update fella.
User avatar
Disoriented
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 6534
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:06 pm
Location: Valhalla
Awards: Idiot of the year 2020
Has thanked: 509 times
Been thanked: 305 times

Re: Womens World Cup

Post by Disoriented »

Thor wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2019 9:59 am
JimbO wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2019 9:17 am
Disoriented wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:06 pm

Sexist post. Reported.
It was comments made by the manager of the Chelsea women's team pointing out the differences in stature between men and women. It was along the lines of they're generally shorter than men so the goals should be adjusted to compensate.
You are wasting your time Jimbo as hes blinkered at times.
😮
Real Al
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2210
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:49 pm
Has thanked: 14 times
Been thanked: 421 times

Re: Womens World Cup

Post by Real Al »

eppinggas wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2019 9:26 am Slight tangent. Women's teams participating at the WC are being given £24mil. Men's teams were given £315mil in 2018:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/48535933. Complaints about "male chauvinism".
I would 100% advocate equal pay when the broadcasting rights, general level of interest and attendances are in line with the men's game.
Until they are - the women's game will earn less money. The gap is closing, which I believe is a good thing as the women's game grows.
But I don't understand the whining when economics dictates how money is allocated.
You can't really expect wages to be high if there are less than 2000 watching your matches, or prizemoney be high if the income from ticket sales, TV rights and merchandise aren't huge.

However, if you are representing your country at the highest level, your expenses and remuneration should be the same whether male or female
eppinggas
Fresh Alias
Posts: 38
Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2019 12:37 pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Womens World Cup

Post by eppinggas »

Real Al wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2019 8:12 pm
eppinggas wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2019 9:26 am Slight tangent. Women's teams participating at the WC are being given £24mil. Men's teams were given £315mil in 2018:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/48535933. Complaints about "male chauvinism".
I would 100% advocate equal pay when the broadcasting rights, general level of interest and attendances are in line with the men's game.
Until they are - the women's game will earn less money. The gap is closing, which I believe is a good thing as the women's game grows.
But I don't understand the whining when economics dictates how money is allocated.
You can't really expect wages to be high if there are less than 2000 watching your matches, or prizemoney be high if the income from ticket sales, TV rights and merchandise aren't huge.

However, if you are representing your country at the highest level, your expenses and remuneration should be the same whether male or female
But that money I was referring to comes from FIFA... I''m not against the men's game subsidising the women's game to a degree. But to demand anything approaching equal pay is IMHO just ridiculous.
Post Reply