I think the comment is would be overwhelmed if nothing was done. Something is being done so the hospitals are not.
If you, like me, have been trying to get medical appointments of late you will realise just how difficult it is to talk to your GP over the phone and lead times for a simple blood test are stupid. My nephew needed an operation, lead time given about one year. So he paid to go private. My sister could not even get to talk to her GP. Finally called NHS helpline to get something done. Chaos out there.
Don’t know about lies but life out there is sodding difficult for people.
All part of the plan to get rid of the NHS.
After this you will be charged for a GP appointment and minor operations.
I very much doubt that. 1.5 million dead around the world. An international plot to destroy the NHS.
Who the hell said it was a international plot?
After this the country will not be able to afford the NHS in its current guise and this is part of the softening up process.
Thor wrote: ↑Mon Nov 30, 2020 8:14 pm
The virus will have died down again like it did this year in the spring as the weather heats up. To get this vaccine approved needs a proper review by the bodies responsible and in my view the numbers involved in the tests seem to be lacking in numbers.
We will see.
Exactly what I have been saying.
They have not tested enough to back up these ridiculous claims.
Pfizers has over 41000 people having received both injections.
Moderna had over 30000, and the 95% rate for preventing catching Covid is spectacular in terms of keeping society as a whole safe, the fact there were zero severe cases compared to the 30 poor folk who ended up in the placebo stream shows how it'll be a real life saver.
Personally I reckon overall they are a better sample size than the hunch of a couple of borders?
Thor wrote: ↑Mon Nov 30, 2020 8:14 pm
The virus will have died down again like it did this year in the spring as the weather heats up. To get this vaccine approved needs a proper review by the bodies responsible and in my view the numbers involved in the tests seem to be lacking in numbers.
We will see.
Exactly what I have been saying.
They have not tested enough to back up these ridiculous claims.
Pfizers has over 41000 people having received both injections.
Moderna had over 30000, and the 95% rate for preventing catching Covid is spectacular in terms of keeping society as a whole safe, the fact there were zero severe cases compared to the 30 poor folk who ended up in the placebo stream shows how it'll be a real life saver.
Personally I reckon overall they are a better sample size than the hunch of a couple of borders?
If you want to survive on this board you can cut out the common sense straight away. As for using data to back up your arguments, well I can't see a single link to a whacko far right site so that won't do at all. You'll have Thor on your case in no time.
Thor wrote: ↑Mon Nov 30, 2020 8:14 pm
The virus will have died down again like it did this year in the spring as the weather heats up. To get this vaccine approved needs a proper review by the bodies responsible and in my view the numbers involved in the tests seem to be lacking in numbers.
We will see.
Exactly what I have been saying.
They have not tested enough to back up these ridiculous claims.
Pfizers has over 41000 people having received both injections.
Moderna had over 30000, and the 95% rate for preventing catching Covid is spectacular in terms of keeping society as a whole safe, the fact there were zero severe cases compared to the 30 poor folk who ended up in the placebo stream shows how it'll be a real life saver.
Personally I reckon overall they are a better sample size than the hunch of a couple of borders?
Blimey you believe all that?
Well if that is the case then they should guarantee refunds if the vaccine comes up short.
Exactly what I have been saying.
They have not tested enough to back up these ridiculous claims.
Pfizers has over 41000 people having received both injections.
Moderna had over 30000, and the 95% rate for preventing catching Covid is spectacular in terms of keeping society as a whole safe, the fact there were zero severe cases compared to the 30 poor folk who ended up in the placebo stream shows how it'll be a real life saver.
Personally I reckon overall they are a better sample size than the hunch of a couple of borders?
Blimey you believe all that?
Well if that is the case then they should guarantee refunds if the vaccine comes up short.
Disoriented wrote: ↑Tue Dec 01, 2020 8:20 pm
Cavalier and Thor at the back of the queue then.
Simple.
Works for me - as long as they have to wear masks whenever they leave their houses. I reckon for about another year or so until everyone else is vaccinated.
All part of the plan to get rid of the NHS.
After this you will be charged for a GP appointment and minor operations.
I very much doubt that. 1.5 million dead around the world. An international plot to destroy the NHS.
Who the hell said it was a international plot?
After this the country will not be able to afford the NHS in its current guise and this is part of the softening up process.
I very much doubt that. 1.5 million dead around the world. An international plot to destroy the NHS.
Who the hell said it was a international plot?
After this the country will not be able to afford the NHS in its current guise and this is part of the softening up process.
Who the hell said it was a international plot?
After this the country will not be able to afford the NHS in its current guise and this is part of the softening up process.
Covid is international, not a U.K. only issue.
The NHS IS A UK Issue.
Of course, the U.K. manufactured the whole covid mess so they could attack the NHS at home.
Thor wrote: ↑Mon Nov 30, 2020 8:14 pm
The virus will have died down again like it did this year in the spring as the weather heats up. To get this vaccine approved needs a proper review by the bodies responsible and in my view the numbers involved in the tests seem to be lacking in numbers.
We will see.
Exactly what I have been saying.
They have not tested enough to back up these ridiculous claims.
Pfizers has over 41000 people having received both injections.
Moderna had over 30000, and the 95% rate for preventing catching Covid is spectacular in terms of keeping society as a whole safe, the fact there were zero severe cases compared to the 30 poor folk who ended up in the placebo stream shows how it'll be a real life saver.
Personally I reckon overall they are a better sample size than the hunch of a couple of borders?
Nice to see an old school boarder back on here, assuming you are the old school LNF
BoniO wrote: ↑Wed Dec 02, 2020 11:39 am
BTW Cavalier, and apologies to others if this has already been posted, but are you Orient1 or Bywaters as was?
Yes he is, but he still hasn't admitted he was wrong.
Haha - I thought I recognised the dogged stupidity. Still, shouldn't be long until he has to walk the plank again. Just don't ask him why he thinks Walthamstow is a sh*t-hole.
BoniO wrote: ↑Wed Dec 02, 2020 11:39 am
BTW Cavalier, and apologies to others if this has already been posted, but are you Orient1 or Bywaters as was?
Yes he is, but he still hasn't admitted he was wrong.
Haha - I thought I recognised the dogged stupidity. Still, shouldn't be long until he has to walk the plank again. Just don't ask him why he thinks Walthamstow is a sh*t-hole.
BoniO wrote: ↑Wed Dec 02, 2020 11:39 am
BTW Cavalier, and apologies to others if this has already been posted, but are you Orient1 or Bywaters as was?
Yes he is, but he still hasn't admitted he was wrong.
Haha - I thought I recognised the dogged stupidity. Still, shouldn't be long until he has to walk the plank again. Just don't ask him why he thinks Walthamstow is a sh*t-hole.
Yes he is, but he still hasn't admitted he was wrong.
Haha - I thought I recognised the dogged stupidity. Still, shouldn't be long until he has to walk the plank again. Just don't ask him why he thinks Walthamstow is a sh*t-hole.
Oh, and thanks for confirming SF.
Not the only alias though is he?
Nope. Not by a long chalk. I'm very happy to confirm any of my former names though. I have changed mine occasionally out of boredom not because of being banned or found out as a racist etc.
Haha - no probs, and by the way there is a difference to having multiple aliases (ii) at the same time and just having updated your username for your single account occasionally. I changed mine mostly when new boards were created - as did many others.
So, I've been LothariO & Helicopter Boy (years ago). I can't recall any others but I might have missed one. Pretty boring stuff tbh.
Haha - no probs, and by the way there is a difference to having multiple aliases (ii) at the same time and just having updated your username for your single account occasionally. I changed mine mostly when new boards were created - as did many others.
So, I've been LothariO & Helicopter Boy (years ago). I can't recall any others but I might have missed one. Pretty boring stuff tbh.
Haha - no probs, and by the way there is a difference to having multiple aliases (ii) at the same time and just having updated your username for your single account occasionally. I changed mine mostly when new boards were created - as did many others.
So, I've been LothariO & Helicopter Boy (years ago). I can't recall any others but I might have missed one. Pretty boring stuff tbh.
How about you PW? Reveal all.
This is my only name on this forum.
Are you denying you are Huxley then?
Hahaha - now let me think about that.... yes, I think I am denying that. I know Huxley Road if that helps?
