Labour Watch
Moderator: Long slender neck
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
- Max B Gold
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12349
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
- Has thanked: 989 times
- Been thanked: 2813 times
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
Re: Labour Watch
Who said that? I've foe'd you etc.
- Dunners
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9043
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 1075 times
- Been thanked: 2500 times
Re: Labour Watch
f***, how did I miss that? That's some impeccable timing.Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 8:41 pmE10EU wrote: ↑Thu Oct 29, 2020 8:27 pm Steve Bell's illustration of events:
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... yn-cartoon
- ComeOnYouOs
- Regular
- Posts: 3841
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 12:22 pm
- Awards: Colossal berk
- Has thanked: 79 times
- Been thanked: 1054 times
Re: Labour Watch
Personally, i would like to see the big unions stop funding Labour. Len Mcluskey mentioned something about this a few weeks ago.
Labour is moving right at alarming speed, and certainly isnt a party for socialists now
Labour is moving right at alarming speed, and certainly isnt a party for socialists now
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2900
- Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:03 pm
- Has thanked: 308 times
- Been thanked: 661 times
Re: Labour Watch
Moving right does not mean it becomes a right wing party, just not far left. Maybe to an area where the majority of people it claims to represent reside themselves. It needs to be the party for the many, not the few. I’m sure I’ve seen that tag line before.ComeOnYouOs wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 10:00 am Personally, i would like to see the big unions stop funding Labour. Len Mcluskey mentioned something about this a few weeks ago.
Labour is moving right at alarming speed, and certainly isnt a party for socialists now
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
Re: Labour Watch
Renationalising the trains and rolling out broadband across the country is not far left you absolute fud.
- Currywurst and Chips
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6233
- Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:40 am
- Has thanked: 389 times
- Been thanked: 1487 times
Re: Labour Watch
Corbs comments on the problem being overstated, whether you agree with it or not has no relevance to the EHRC judgement.
It's just Corbs comidifying victimhood again, something he can't help himself but do every time he's criticised for genuine reasons (and there's been plenty of unwarranted attacks)
His messaging is and has always been consistently awful.
It's just Corbs comidifying victimhood again, something he can't help himself but do every time he's criticised for genuine reasons (and there's been plenty of unwarranted attacks)
His messaging is and has always been consistently awful.
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1165
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:20 pm
- Has thanked: 138 times
- Been thanked: 218 times
Re: Labour Watch
Yes Please I subscribe to unite and you're supposed to be able to stop the portion of your money that they give to the party.ComeOnYouOs wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 10:00 am Personally, i would like to see the big unions stop funding Labour. Len Mcluskey mentioned something about this a few weeks ago.
Labour is moving right at alarming speed, and certainly isnt a party for socialists now
Despite numerous requests they still take it.
I don't vote Labour never have though if Starmer does a half decent job I'd give it consideration. As i won't vote for Bozo, voted to get Brexit done to bring an end to it. He was a poo poo mayor and is the same prime minister.
- Currywurst and Chips
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6233
- Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:40 am
- Has thanked: 389 times
- Been thanked: 1487 times
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2900
- Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:03 pm
- Has thanked: 308 times
- Been thanked: 661 times
Re: Labour Watch
The Labour agenda in one sentence. Followed by insults. Hmmmmm. Grow up.Ronnie Hotdogs wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 10:14 am Renationalising the trains and rolling out broadband across the country is not far left you absolute fud.
- Disoriented
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6534
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:06 pm
- Location: Valhalla
- Awards: Idiot of the year 2020
- Has thanked: 509 times
- Been thanked: 305 times
Re: Labour Watch
McCluskey is an absolute meathead. No rational person would listen to anything he says.ComeOnYouOs wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 10:00 am Personally, i would like to see the big unions stop funding Labour. Len Mcluskey mentioned something about this a few weeks ago.
Labour is moving right at alarming speed, and certainly isnt a party for socialists now
You are right though that Labour is moving right - at last they realise that socialism is for trogladytes.
Time for I-Keir to lead us to government.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
- Currywurst and Chips
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6233
- Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:40 am
- Has thanked: 389 times
- Been thanked: 1487 times
Re: Labour Watch
That, young man, is called a considerable Labour poll lead
Back in my day they were plentiful but these days they're almost impossible to see so feel blessed
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2433
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 1:13 pm
- Has thanked: 244 times
- Been thanked: 1126 times
Re: Labour Watch
Worth pointing out that the report highlighted the interference from the leaders office in a complaint made by a Jewish member over his - imo very hard to defend- comments about that anti-Semitic mural. That in itself is problematic as it was in direct contravention of party rules.
I think it's bollox to suggest that this problem didn't preexist Corbyns leadership. Livingstone has been making offensive comments for years, Corbyn invited a notorious anti-Semite to Westminster whilst campaigning him to let into the country, the way the word Zionist is used by a fair chunk of membership and some MPs/councillors is pretty uncomfortable. Corbyn needed to show humility and accept yesterday as a moment that could allow Labour to move on. Instead his martyr complex demanded he make it about how he was stitched up. That was always going to look awful and further underlines why he should never have been party leader.
I think it's bollox to suggest that this problem didn't preexist Corbyns leadership. Livingstone has been making offensive comments for years, Corbyn invited a notorious anti-Semite to Westminster whilst campaigning him to let into the country, the way the word Zionist is used by a fair chunk of membership and some MPs/councillors is pretty uncomfortable. Corbyn needed to show humility and accept yesterday as a moment that could allow Labour to move on. Instead his martyr complex demanded he make it about how he was stitched up. That was always going to look awful and further underlines why he should never have been party leader.
- Max B Gold
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12349
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
- Has thanked: 989 times
- Been thanked: 2813 times
Re: Labour Watch
Isn't it a truism that divided parties don't win elections?Digby Chicken Caesar wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 11:10 amThat, young man, is called a considerable Labour poll lead
Back in my day they were plentiful but these days they're almost impossible to see so feel blessed
-
- Bored office worker
- Posts: 2900
- Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:03 pm
- Has thanked: 308 times
- Been thanked: 661 times
Re: Labour Watch
Some woman on TV just now said We’ve tried Corbynism and it has been rejected. Now is the time for Labour to decide if it wants to be a pure Socialist party or become a mainstream party with a chance to get elected.Disoriented wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 10:57 amMcCluskey is an absolute meathead. No rational person would listen to anything he says.ComeOnYouOs wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 10:00 am Personally, i would like to see the big unions stop funding Labour. Len Mcluskey mentioned something about this a few weeks ago.
Labour is moving right at alarming speed, and certainly isnt a party for socialists now
You are right though that Labour is moving right - at last they realise that socialism is for trogladytes.
Time for I-Keir to lead us to government.
For me this has always been the issue. Corbyn, Momemtum, McClusky et al may well have strong beliefs about their vision for the country. Their right. Sadly for them their vision is not shared by enough people to get them elected.
They remain a party of protest whilst the Tories stay in power. Or they accept the realities of the world we live in and understand the people they claim to represent, move right, but not right wing. And stand a chance of winning an election.
- Max B Gold
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12349
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
- Has thanked: 989 times
- Been thanked: 2813 times
Re: Labour Watch
Mainstream party you say.
Is that one which accepts a grossly unequal society and all the horrors that produces and worships the "free" market?
If so, what would differentiate them from any of the other parties?
Aren't voters allowed a choice.
Is that one which accepts a grossly unequal society and all the horrors that produces and worships the "free" market?
If so, what would differentiate them from any of the other parties?
Aren't voters allowed a choice.
- Dunners
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9043
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 1075 times
- Been thanked: 2500 times
Re: Labour Watch
How true is that, though? Both the main parties exist in a permanent state of division to some extent, only the Tories are generally more focused on their main objectives and priorities. I think it also depends where the divide exists.Max B Gold wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 11:20 am Isn't it a truism that divided parties don't win elections?
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1219
- Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2020 5:07 pm
- Awards: Funniest boarder 2011, 2014
- Has thanked: 126 times
- Been thanked: 382 times
Re: Labour Watch
I think that sorta proves it does though, right? As you say, the Tories hold their noses a little easier than Labour does.Dunners wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 11:29 amHow true is that, though? Both the main parties exist in a permanent state of division to some extent, only the Tories are generally more focused on their main objectives and priorities. I think it also depends where the divide exists.Max B Gold wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 11:20 am Isn't it a truism that divided parties don't win elections?
I also think its important as to how ideologically tied to your party you are for the non-main parties.
I'd suggest UKIP'ers, BNP etc would find it easier to put a vote in a Tory box than a Green or Lib Dem might in a Labour box. The right is better at sicking to its cause and coming together than the left is. They are much better at collective effort.
- Max B Gold
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12349
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
- Has thanked: 989 times
- Been thanked: 2813 times
Re: Labour Watch
Correct. Case closed.PoliticOs wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 11:35 amI think that sorta proves it does though, right? As you say, the Tories hold their noses a little easier than Labour does.Dunners wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 11:29 amHow true is that, though? Both the main parties exist in a permanent state of division to some extent, only the Tories are generally more focused on their main objectives and priorities. I think it also depends where the divide exists.Max B Gold wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 11:20 am Isn't it a truism that divided parties don't win elections?
- Dunners
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9043
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 1075 times
- Been thanked: 2500 times
Re: Labour Watch
Indeed. I'm off to grab a packet of biscuits.Max B Gold wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 11:49 amCorrect. Case closed.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
Re: Labour Watch
I meant what has happened between 23 and 28th Oct to cause this.Digby Chicken Caesar wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 11:10 amThat, young man, is called a considerable Labour poll lead
Back in my day they were plentiful but these days they're almost impossible to see so feel blessed
Genuine question, I’ve not looked at the news at all in weeks until Corbs hit the headlines yesterday.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
Re: Labour Watch
By hold noses, you mean have principles. Yes, that’s obviously the case.PoliticOs wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 11:35 amI think that sorta proves it does though, right? As you say, the Tories hold their noses a little easier than Labour does.Dunners wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 11:29 amHow true is that, though? Both the main parties exist in a permanent state of division to some extent, only the Tories are generally more focused on their main objectives and priorities. I think it also depends where the divide exists.Max B Gold wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 11:20 am Isn't it a truism that divided parties don't win elections?
I also think its important as to how ideologically tied to your party you are for the non-main parties.
I'd suggest UKIP'ers, BNP etc would find it easier to put a vote in a Tory box than a Green or Lib Dem might in a Labour box. The right is better at sicking to its cause and coming together than the left is. They are much better at collective effort.
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1219
- Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2020 5:07 pm
- Awards: Funniest boarder 2011, 2014
- Has thanked: 126 times
- Been thanked: 382 times
Re: Labour Watch
No, in my opinion, a UKIP'er going into the 2019 GE is more likely to go 'no way do I want Corbyn!' and give his vote to the Tories, than a Green or Lib Dem is to a Labour leader. See also; Brexiteers.