The Parole Board

[Long slender neck]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-kent-48367089

Do they have any idea what they're doing?

Career criminal, gangster and double murderer- yeah I'm sure he's no risk to the public at all.

[Ornchurch]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-kent-48367089

Do they have any idea what they're doing?

Career criminal, gangster and double murderer- yeah I'm sure he's no risk to the public at all.

Probably no more risk that the young 'gangsters' roaming the streets with knives nowadays.

[Clive Evans]

Par for the course in Brexit obsessed Britain.

[Disoriented]

Grass gets mown.

[F*ck The Poor & Fat]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-kent-48367089

Do they have any idea what they're doing?

Career criminal, gangster and double murderer- yeah I'm sure he's no risk to the public at all.

But he has his human rights. That and no doubt a multitude of do-Gooders who feel the poor soul had a difficult childhood warrants some compassion and understanding.

[Long slender neck]

What's worrying is we only hear about the high profile cases.

[Thor]

I am shocked he's being released. He is a feared man and one not to be messed with.

The Cameron case, there is more to it than what the press have written about, Google it, it's all out there. Also rumoured to be connected to the Essex Boys by way of the head bag that was in the Range Rover they were killed in. Again it's out there look it up.

One thing is for sure you don't mess with him.

[Lucky7]

I am shocked he's being released. He is a feared man and one not to be messed with.

The Cameron case, there is more to it than what the press have written about, Google it, it's all out there. Also rumoured to be connected to the Essex Boys by way of the head bag that was in the Range Rover they were killed in. Again it's out there look it up.

One thing is for sure you don't mess with him.

Don’t aNoye him

[greyhound]

Par for the course in Brexit obsessed Britain.

I suppose we lost the cup because of Brexit.

[Esteban]

The problem is that people who follow one certain religion (you all know what I mean) get away with stuff that those who follow another religion don’t (you all know what I mean).

It’s one rule for them (you all know what I mean) and another rule for us (you all know what I mean).

[tuffers#1]

The problem is that people who follow one certain religion (you all know what I mean) get away with stuff that those who follow another religion don’t (you all know what I mean).

It’s one rule for them (you all know what I mean) and another rule for us (you all know what I mean).

??


Is Kenneth Noye a Muslim Now Or did he convert to Christianlty ?

I dont know what to think now

[jamespevans]

The problem is that people who follow one certain religion (you all know what I mean) get away with stuff that those who follow another religion don’t (you all know what I mean).

It’s one rule for them (you all know what I mean) and another rule for us (you all know what I mean).

Do you normally go in for random comments that have nothing to do with the thread? Asking for a friend,.

[Disoriented]

The problem is that people who follow one certain religion (you all know what I mean) get away with stuff that those who follow another religion don’t (you all know what I mean).

It’s one rule for them (you all know what I mean) and another rule for us (you all know what I mean).

Totally bizarre.

Who were you in old money on Crapatalk?

[Esteban]

The problem is that people who follow one certain religion (you all know what I mean) get away with stuff that those who follow another religion don’t (you all know what I mean).

It’s one rule for them (you all know what I mean) and another rule for us (you all know what I mean).

Totally bizarre.

Who were you in old money on Crapatalk?

Hold on, so it’s perfectly fine to mention a certain religion as an example on a thread about a crime which has nothing to do with that particular religion (the nurse with the bible thread), but it’s “totally bizaree” to do the exact same thing on another thread?

This board really is confusing.

However I think I’ve got it. You’re allowed to randomly mention people of a certain religion if the thread is about people from another religion doing something bad, but not if it’s about somebody else from an unconfirmed religion doing something bad.

You’re only allowed to bring people from one religion into the conversation if the negative story is about somebody who is confirmed to be from another religion.

[Mick McQuaid]

[Thor]

The problem is that people who follow one certain religion (you all know what I mean) get away with stuff that those who follow another religion don’t (you all know what I mean).

It’s one rule for them (you all know what I mean) and another rule for us (you all know what I mean).

He’s been on the sherry, for real.

[Thor]

Quality and post of the week.

[Disoriented]

The problem is that people who follow one certain religion (you all know what I mean) get away with stuff that those who follow another religion don’t (you all know what I mean).

It’s one rule for them (you all know what I mean) and another rule for us (you all know what I mean).

Totally bizarre.

Who were you in old money on Crapatalk?

Hold on, so it’s perfectly fine to mention a certain religion as an example on a thread about a crime which has nothing to do with that particular religion (the nurse with the bible thread), but it’s “totally bizaree” to do the exact same thing on another thread?

This board really is confusing.

However I think I’ve got it. You’re allowed to randomly mention people of a certain religion if the thread is about people from another religion doing something bad, but not if it’s about somebody else from an unconfirmed religion doing something bad.

You’re only allowed to bring people from one religion into the conversation if the negative story is about somebody who is confirmed to be from another religion.

Still not really following you fella. My question was a simple non-religious one - who were you on Crapatalk?

[Long slender neck]

CEB

[F*ck The Poor & Fat]

The problem is that people who follow one certain religion (you all know what I mean) get away with stuff that those who follow another religion don’t (you all know what I mean).

It’s one rule for them (you all know what I mean) and another rule for us (you all know what I mean).

He’s been on the sherry, for real.

For sure (you all know what I mean)

[Esteban]

Totally bizarre.

Who were you in old money on Crapatalk?

Hold on, so it’s perfectly fine to mention a certain religion as an example on a thread about a crime which has nothing to do with that particular religion (the nurse with the bible thread), but it’s “totally bizaree” to do the exact same thing on another thread?

This board really is confusing.

However I think I’ve got it. You’re allowed to randomly mention people of a certain religion if the thread is about people from another religion doing something bad, but not if it’s about somebody else from an unconfirmed religion doing something bad.

You’re only allowed to bring people from one religion into the conversation if the negative story is about somebody who is confirmed to be from another religion.

Still not really following you fella. My question was a simple non-religious one - who were you on Crapatalk?

I wasn’t on the other board.

[Buddy Manucci]

What a terrible boarder you have quickly become on this version of the mb. You had some decent points on the pitch invasion thread, but it's been downhill from there.

[Thor]

Noye had today been released from prison a free man.

[spen666]

Noye had today been released from prison a free man.

Still on life licence