When is the (alleged ) Tory rapist to be charged?

[Clive Evans]

Anyone know?

[NuneatonO's]

31st December 2020 is a date that rings a bell, for some reason?

ERrrrrrr Gawd.......I wonder who it could be????

[Thor]

You've already named him elsewhere.

[NuneatonO's]

Tory MP accused of rape agrees not to attend Commons next month
Labour had called for the former minister to be suspended after his bail date was extended

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... to-commons

We can have a real-life game of 'Where's Wally' !

[spen666]

Tory MP accused of rape agrees not to attend Commons next month
Labour had called for the former minister to be suspended after his bail date was extended

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... to-commons

We can have a real-life game of 'Where's Wally' !

So a whole constituency is effectively disenfranchised, despite their MP not being charged, let alone convicted of anything.


A suspension from work should only happen if the person's presence would hinder the investigation.

It's innocent until proven guilty, suspending people just because an accusation had been made turns this presumption on its head.

[Long slender neck]

If somebody was accused of rape in the workplace, is it not reasonable they be suspended from that workplace until the investigation is complete?

[Rich Tea Wellin]

Tory MP accused of rape agrees not to attend Commons next month
Labour had called for the former minister to be suspended after his bail date was extended

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... to-commons

We can have a real-life game of 'Where's Wally' !

A load of rubbish as per.



So a whole constituency is effectively disenfranchised, despite their MP not being charged, let alone convicted of anything.


A suspension from work should only happen if the person's presence would hinder the investigation.

It's innocent until proven guilty, suspending people just because an accusation had been made turns this presumption on its head.

[NuneatonO's]

So a whole constituency is effectively disenfranchised, despite their MP not being charged, let alone convicted of anything.

A suspension from work should only happen if the person's presence would hinder the investigation.

It's innocent until proven guilty, suspending people just because an accusation had been made turns this presumption on its head.

Maybe the constituency should have been more selective in whom they chose to represent them in Parliament. If it's who we think it is, he's hardly the sharpest pencil in the box.

He is indeed innocent at the moment; any subsequent guilt will be proven by evidence, rather than accusation. This was proven most recently in the Alex Salmond case; when the politically-motivated mainstream media were basically trying to 'hang him out to dry'.

As an aside, I wonder how you felt about that case at the time; and whether Alex Salmond was being treated fairly?

Moreover, what's your view on the treatment of Julian Assange?

[Thor]

max b gold was on the salmond case hinting wait till the real story comes out. I see wee jimmy krankie has now been asked to answer what she knew and when. This is going to get interesting, if the rumours are true of course.

[tuffers#1]

max b gold was on the salmond case hinting wait till the real story comes out. I see wee jimmy krankie has now been asked to answer what she knew and when. This is going to get interesting, if the rumours are true of course.

Are you saying Maxy said something about asalmond or about sturgeon ?

Do make it clear Thory

[Thor]

it was about Salmonds case and krankies association to it.