Macauley Bonne in today's papers
Moderator: Long slender neck
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4553
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 4:12 pm
- Has thanked: 932 times
- Been thanked: 990 times
Re: Macauley Bonne in today's papers
Orient as a club need to know their place in the food chain. Letting Koroma, Bonne and Ekpiteta all go so cheaply (the latter for free) just shows the lack of a long term plan when it comes to transfers
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1207
- Joined: Mon May 13, 2019 1:27 pm
- Has thanked: 1790 times
- Been thanked: 305 times
Re: Macauley Bonne in today's papers
Well he was certainly better in more of a free role than the defensive role that Cisse took up. I was impressed with both.Tent Keague wrote: ↑Wed Jul 29, 2020 1:27 pm And another is Craig Clay. In the wrong set-up you wouldn't have him lacing your Jako boots in the National League North. Change the formation a bit and the players around him and in some of the games he looks like he's the new Iniesta.
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1207
- Joined: Mon May 13, 2019 1:27 pm
- Has thanked: 1790 times
- Been thanked: 305 times
Re: Macauley Bonne in today's papers
Cannot agree. Both Koroma and Bonne both had release clauses in their contracts to encourage them to stay and help us get promotion. We got decent fees for both. Ekpiteta had contract offers from us but he refused to accept over many months. Nowadays a long term plan for players is 2 years.BiggsyMalone wrote: ↑Wed Jul 29, 2020 3:11 pm Orient as a club need to know their place in the food chain. Letting Koroma, Bonne and Ekpiteta all go so cheaply (the latter for free) just shows the lack of a long term plan when it comes to transfers
- Top of the JES
- Regular
- Posts: 3728
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:38 pm
- Has thanked: 1288 times
- Been thanked: 1289 times
Re: Macauley Bonne in today's papers
As DuvB says above Orient re-negotiated deals with Koroma and Bonne that would allow them to leave with a year left on their contracts, allowing us to get a fee for them it also allowed us their services for a promotion season so it was mutually beneficial. We never let Marv go, we offered him new contracts over a period of months that he chose to refuse them,run down his contract and left as he was entitled to do.BiggsyMalone wrote: ↑Wed Jul 29, 2020 3:11 pm Orient as a club need to know their place in the food chain. Letting Koroma, Bonne and Ekpiteta all go so cheaply (the latter for free) just shows the lack of a long term plan when it comes to transfers
I think the club is well aware of their place in the food chain. As I have said before players largely call the shots when their contracts are expiring.
-
- Regular
- Posts: 4553
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 4:12 pm
- Has thanked: 932 times
- Been thanked: 990 times
Re: Macauley Bonne in today's papers
Proves my point completely.DuvB wrote: ↑Wed Jul 29, 2020 3:32 pmCannot agree. Both Koroma and Bonne both had release clauses in their contracts to encourage them to stay and help us get promotion. We got decent fees for both. Ekpiteta had contract offers from us but he refused to accept over many months. Nowadays a long term plan for players is 2 years.BiggsyMalone wrote: ↑Wed Jul 29, 2020 3:11 pm Orient as a club need to know their place in the food chain. Letting Koroma, Bonne and Ekpiteta all go so cheaply (the latter for free) just shows the lack of a long term plan when it comes to transfers
- Top of the JES
- Regular
- Posts: 3728
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:38 pm
- Has thanked: 1288 times
- Been thanked: 1289 times
Re: Macauley Bonne in today's papers
How would you have handled it differently?BiggsyMalone wrote: ↑Wed Jul 29, 2020 9:41 pmProves my point completely.DuvB wrote: ↑Wed Jul 29, 2020 3:32 pmCannot agree. Both Koroma and Bonne both had release clauses in their contracts to encourage them to stay and help us get promotion. We got decent fees for both. Ekpiteta had contract offers from us but he refused to accept over many months. Nowadays a long term plan for players is 2 years.BiggsyMalone wrote: ↑Wed Jul 29, 2020 3:11 pm Orient as a club need to know their place in the food chain. Letting Koroma, Bonne and Ekpiteta all go so cheaply (the latter for free) just shows the lack of a long term plan when it comes to transfers
Koroma could have walked away after we got relegated out of the football league but didn't, Bonne could have left after his first year and 20+ goals for the club but didn't.
Tell us what you would have done.
- Disoriented
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6534
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:06 pm
- Location: Valhalla
- Awards: Idiot of the year 2020
- Has thanked: 509 times
- Been thanked: 305 times
Re: Macauley Bonne in today's papers
Why?Top of the JES wrote: ↑Wed Jul 29, 2020 10:19 pmHow would you have handled it differently?BiggsyMalone wrote: ↑Wed Jul 29, 2020 9:41 pmProves my point completely.DuvB wrote: ↑Wed Jul 29, 2020 3:32 pm
Cannot agree. Both Koroma and Bonne both had release clauses in their contracts to encourage them to stay and help us get promotion. We got decent fees for both. Ekpiteta had contract offers from us but he refused to accept over many months. Nowadays a long term plan for players is 2 years.
Koroma could have walked away after we got relegated out of the football league but didn't, Bonne could have left after his first year and 20+ goals for the club but didn't.
Tell us what you would have done.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
Re: Macauley Bonne in today's papers
Koroma was 20, he couldn’t just walk away.Top of the JES wrote: ↑Wed Jul 29, 2020 10:19 pmHow would you have handled it differently?BiggsyMalone wrote: ↑Wed Jul 29, 2020 9:41 pmProves my point completely.DuvB wrote: ↑Wed Jul 29, 2020 3:32 pm
Cannot agree. Both Koroma and Bonne both had release clauses in their contracts to encourage them to stay and help us get promotion. We got decent fees for both. Ekpiteta had contract offers from us but he refused to accept over many months. Nowadays a long term plan for players is 2 years.
Koroma could have walked away after we got relegated out of the football league but didn't, Bonne could have left after his first year and 20+ goals for the club but didn't.
Tell us what you would have done.
- Top of the JES
- Regular
- Posts: 3728
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:38 pm
- Has thanked: 1288 times
- Been thanked: 1289 times
Re: Macauley Bonne in today's papers
He could. Because he was 20.meant we would get probably a tribunal fee for him but there was nothing to stop him leaving ,He could have taken the same route as porter and not signed, joined another club and we would have got a lot less for him than we did from Huddersfield.RedO wrote: ↑Thu Jul 30, 2020 6:46 amKoroma was 20, he couldn’t just walk away.Top of the JES wrote: ↑Wed Jul 29, 2020 10:19 pmHow would you have handled it differently?
Koroma could have walked away after we got relegated out of the football league but didn't, Bonne could have left after his first year and 20+ goals for the club but didn't.
Tell us what you would have done.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
Re: Macauley Bonne in today's papers
So you agree, he couldnt just walk away, we would have received a fee from the club he went to.
Got to be honest, I’d have more faith in the tribunal committee negotiating a better deal than we can given the pittances we’ve received in recent years.
Got to be honest, I’d have more faith in the tribunal committee negotiating a better deal than we can given the pittances we’ve received in recent years.
- Top of the JES
- Regular
- Posts: 3728
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:38 pm
- Has thanked: 1288 times
- Been thanked: 1289 times
Re: Macauley Bonne in today's papers
He could though, he could have walked away and had nothing more to do with the club (As Porter did when he went to Burnley) but we pursuaded Josh to re-sign otherwise it would have been a tribunal offer and they very rarely favour the selling club, more so when you have just been relegated to non league, If he hadn't signed a new contract Josh would have been in the same position as Sotiriou is now. Thats would not be the clubs fault it's the way the power transfers to the player when their contract expires. The club did well to secure him at that point.
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 541
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 11:18 am
- Has thanked: 456 times
- Been thanked: 152 times
Re: Macauley Bonne in today's papers
Another example of someone who could play anywhere from non league to League One is Ollie Palmer.Tent Keague wrote: ↑Wed Jul 29, 2020 1:27 pm And another is Craig Clay. In the wrong set-up you wouldn't have him lacing your Jako boots in the National League North. Change the formation a bit and the players around him and in some of the games he looks like he's the new Iniesta.
viewtopic.php?t=4628
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Sun May 05, 2019 11:45 am
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 58 times
Re: Macauley Bonne in today's papers
We didn’t get a pittance for Koroma. You are deluding yourself if you think we’d have got more from a tribunal.
- Thor
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10279
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:27 pm
- Location: Asgard
- Has thanked: 584 times
- Been thanked: 1348 times
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1328
- Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2019 3:06 pm
- Has thanked: 20 times
- Been thanked: 274 times
Re: Macauley Bonne in today's papers
My understanding the fee for Koroma was500k and 200k for Bonne with sell on clauses. Ekpiteta was out of contract and decided to persue a new adventure with a higher league side. Cannot blame him for that.
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 541
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 11:18 am
- Has thanked: 456 times
- Been thanked: 152 times
Re: Macauley Bonne in today's papers
If those figures are accurate then I think we've done well. Out of interest how much have other strikers straight out of non league gone for?moonwalk19 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 01, 2020 7:30 pmMy understanding the fee for Koroma was500k and 200k for Bonne with sell on clauses. Ekpiteta was out of contract and decided to persue a new adventure with a higher league side. Cannot blame him for that.
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 806
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:23 pm
- Has thanked: 137 times
- Been thanked: 223 times
Re: Macauley Bonne in today's papers
There's a player who was at Barnet who's gone to Peterborough for up to a cool million apparantly although I'm not sure he was a striker even.Tent Keague wrote: ↑Sat Aug 01, 2020 7:43 pmIf those figures are accurate then I think we've done well. Out of interest how much have other strikers straight out of non league gone for?moonwalk19 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 01, 2020 7:30 pmMy understanding the fee for Koroma was500k and 200k for Bonne with sell on clauses. Ekpiteta was out of contract and decided to persue a new adventure with a higher league side. Cannot blame him for that.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
Re: Macauley Bonne in today's papers
How much did we get?Kitch’s Magic Toes wrote: ↑Sat Aug 01, 2020 7:00 pmWe didn’t get a pittance for Koroma. You are deluding yourself if you think we’d have got more from a tribunal.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
- Thor
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10279
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:27 pm
- Location: Asgard
- Has thanked: 584 times
- Been thanked: 1348 times
Re: Macauley Bonne in today's papers
Was it the striker we had? Colquist or something like that?kokomO wrote: ↑Sat Aug 01, 2020 8:15 pmThere's a player who was at Barnet who's gone to Peterborough for up to a cool million apparantly although I'm not sure he was a striker even.Tent Keague wrote: ↑Sat Aug 01, 2020 7:43 pmIf those figures are accurate then I think we've done well. Out of interest how much have other strikers straight out of non league gone for?moonwalk19 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 01, 2020 7:30 pm
My understanding the fee for Koroma was500k and 200k for Bonne with sell on clauses. Ekpiteta was out of contract and decided to persue a new adventure with a higher league side. Cannot blame him for that.
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 806
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:23 pm
- Has thanked: 137 times
- Been thanked: 223 times
Re: Macauley Bonne in today's papers
No, it was jack Taylor , midfielder, signed for peterborough for initial fee of £500k in Jan 2020 with add on's.Thor wrote: ↑Sat Aug 01, 2020 9:42 pmWas it the striker we had? Colquist or something like that?kokomO wrote: ↑Sat Aug 01, 2020 8:15 pmThere's a player who was at Barnet who's gone to Peterborough for up to a cool million apparantly although I'm not sure he was a striker even.Tent Keague wrote: ↑Sat Aug 01, 2020 7:43 pm
If those figures are accurate then I think we've done well. Out of interest how much have other strikers straight out of non league gone for?
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 8154
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:24 pm
- Has thanked: 3663 times
- Been thanked: 1867 times
Re: Macauley Bonne in today's papers
Koroma and Bonne were fair deals, their value to us was finishing the season and getting us promoted. Fees were reasonable given the situation. Ekpiteta situation is frustrating but even then we had 2 good seasons out of a player who cost us very little.
It's the academy that's a waste of time financially as even T&T admitted. Put in all the effort and get nothing in return.
It's the academy that's a waste of time financially as even T&T admitted. Put in all the effort and get nothing in return.
- Thor
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10279
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:27 pm
- Location: Asgard
- Has thanked: 584 times
- Been thanked: 1348 times
Re: Macauley Bonne in today's papers
Ahh did you miss the bit where it pays for itself over a ten year life cycle. Listening to the talk I’d suggest that the plan is to reduce down the life cycle to a lower number say maybe three years or less making it more sustainable and a contribution to the income stream of the club. Look at Brentfords buy and sell policy, it’s just we’d do it with our own home grown players.gshaw wrote: ↑Sun Aug 02, 2020 10:26 am Koroma and Bonne were fair deals, their value to us was finishing the season and getting us promoted. Fees were reasonable given the situation. Ekpiteta situation is frustrating but even then we had 2 good seasons out of a player who cost us very little.
It's the academy that's a waste of time financially as even T&T admitted. Put in all the effort and get nothing in return.
- Rich Tea Wellin
- MB Legend
- Posts: 11211
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:01 pm
- Has thanked: 4809 times
- Been thanked: 3503 times
Re: Macauley Bonne in today's papers
The same Brentford who got rid of their academy?Thor wrote: ↑Sun Aug 02, 2020 10:33 amAhh did you miss the bit where it pays for itself over a ten year life cycle. Listening to the talk I’d suggest that the plan is to reduce down the life cycle to a lower number say maybe three years or less making it more sustainable and a contribution to the income stream of the club. Look at Brentfords buy and sell policy, it’s just we’d do it with our own home grown players.gshaw wrote: ↑Sun Aug 02, 2020 10:26 am Koroma and Bonne were fair deals, their value to us was finishing the season and getting us promoted. Fees were reasonable given the situation. Ekpiteta situation is frustrating but even then we had 2 good seasons out of a player who cost us very little.
It's the academy that's a waste of time financially as even T&T admitted. Put in all the effort and get nothing in return.
- Thor
- MB Legend
- Posts: 10279
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:27 pm
- Location: Asgard
- Has thanked: 584 times
- Been thanked: 1348 times
Re: Macauley Bonne in today's papers
yes and like I said we'd do it with our own players. Rather than the brentford model to buy and sell others players who have yet to realise potential and sell on value, this punting whereas we'd be working with known players educated in the orient way.