Villa

Chat about Leyton Orient (or anything else)

Moderator: Long slender neck

JimbO
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1165
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:20 pm
Has thanked: 138 times
Been thanked: 218 times

Re: Villa

Post by JimbO »

Disoriented wrote: Mon Jul 27, 2020 10:15 am
DuvB wrote: Mon Jul 27, 2020 8:23 am Roy Keane is such an unbelievable misery slagging off Villa for their dressing room celebrations.
Why? He was quite right.
He's one of those people that can't believe everyone isn't as good as him. That's why he was such a resounding success as a manager.

Obviously doesn't know that success is judged at different levels for different clubs at different times.

Personally think he's a bit of a wally.
LittleMate
Regular
Regular
Posts: 3172
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 9:03 pm
Has thanked: 1642 times
Been thanked: 900 times

Re: Villa

Post by LittleMate »

ComeOnYouOs wrote: Mon Jul 27, 2020 10:04 am On purely football reasons, I think villa were dead lucky to stay up. They are really poor. Bournemouth are IMO much the better team, but were crucified by injuries early in the season.
Unless Villa strengthen massively, in the short close season, they are certs for the drop next season, particularly as they will probably lose their one class player to bigger & better things.
As an aside, it feels so weird to have the last weekend of the Premier League in the last few days of July, and the FA cup final in August!!!
Rose tinted glasses. You are forgetting how incredibly dire Bournemouth were for over half the season. they played like a team that did not want to be on a football pitch, let alone in the Premier League. As a result they dropped from 7th down into the relegation zone. As for Villa, their biggest bit of fortune was probably getting McGinn back on the park.

If Villa try to be more progressive and take on a new manager, then Dean Smith won't be long without a job. Hopefully he got a bonus for keeping them up and he should be set for life.
DuvB
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1163
Joined: Mon May 13, 2019 1:27 pm
Has thanked: 1635 times
Been thanked: 297 times

Re: Villa

Post by DuvB »

LittleMate wrote: Mon Jul 27, 2020 11:28 am
ComeOnYouOs wrote: Mon Jul 27, 2020 10:04 am On purely football reasons, I think villa were dead lucky to stay up. They are really poor. Bournemouth are IMO much the better team, but were crucified by injuries early in the season.
Unless Villa strengthen massively, in the short close season, they are certs for the drop next season, particularly as they will probably lose their one class player to bigger & better things.
As an aside, it feels so weird to have the last weekend of the Premier League in the last few days of July, and the FA cup final in August!!!
Rose tinted glasses. You are forgetting how incredibly dire Bournemouth were for over half the season. they played like a team that did not want to be on a football pitch, let alone in the Premier League. As a result they dropped from 7th down into the relegation zone. As for Villa, their biggest bit of fortune was probably getting McGinn back on the park.

If Villa try to be more progressive and take on a new manager, then Dean Smith won't be long without a job. Hopefully he got a bonus for keeping them up and he should be set for life.
I predict Eddie Howe to Palace
AckneyAwks
Fresh Alias
Posts: 695
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2019 8:11 pm
Has thanked: 299 times
Been thanked: 229 times

Re: Villa

Post by AckneyAwks »

Good shout!
FargO
Fresh Alias
Posts: 188
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 6:50 pm
Has thanked: 43 times
Been thanked: 24 times

Re: Villa

Post by FargO »

DuvB wrote: Mon Jul 27, 2020 2:57 pm
LittleMate wrote: Mon Jul 27, 2020 11:28 am
ComeOnYouOs wrote: Mon Jul 27, 2020 10:04 am On purely football reasons, I think villa were dead lucky to stay up. They are really poor. Bournemouth are IMO much the better team, but were crucified by injuries early in the season.
Unless Villa strengthen massively, in the short close season, they are certs for the drop next season, particularly as they will probably lose their one class player to bigger & better things.
As an aside, it feels so weird to have the last weekend of the Premier League in the last few days of July, and the FA cup final in August!!!
Rose tinted glasses. You are forgetting how incredibly dire Bournemouth were for over half the season. they played like a team that did not want to be on a football pitch, let alone in the Premier League. As a result they dropped from 7th down into the relegation zone. As for Villa, their biggest bit of fortune was probably getting McGinn back on the park.

If Villa try to be more progressive and take on a new manager, then Dean Smith won't be long without a job. Hopefully he got a bonus for keeping them up and he should be set for life.
I predict Eddie Howe to Palace
To be knighted?
LittleMate
Regular
Regular
Posts: 3172
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 9:03 pm
Has thanked: 1642 times
Been thanked: 900 times

Re: Villa

Post by LittleMate »

DuvB wrote: Mon Jul 27, 2020 2:57 pm
LittleMate wrote: Mon Jul 27, 2020 11:28 am
ComeOnYouOs wrote: Mon Jul 27, 2020 10:04 am On purely football reasons, I think villa were dead lucky to stay up. They are really poor. Bournemouth are IMO much the better team, but were crucified by injuries early in the season.
Unless Villa strengthen massively, in the short close season, they are certs for the drop next season, particularly as they will probably lose their one class player to bigger & better things.
As an aside, it feels so weird to have the last weekend of the Premier League in the last few days of July, and the FA cup final in August!!!
Rose tinted glasses. You are forgetting how incredibly dire Bournemouth were for over half the season. they played like a team that did not want to be on a football pitch, let alone in the Premier League. As a result they dropped from 7th down into the relegation zone. As for Villa, their biggest bit of fortune was probably getting McGinn back on the park.

If Villa try to be more progressive and take on a new manager, then Dean Smith won't be long without a job. Hopefully he got a bonus for keeping them up and he should be set for life.
I predict Eddie Howe to Palace
I live in south London (ish) and have a bunch of Palace mates. He seems to be the name on their lips, but I can't see it personally. The Palace ownership/board would need a real change in attitude to be able to tempt Eddie Howe there. At Bournemouth he's enjoying building a club (there's a lot going on regards training and youth development) whereas Palace don't seem to have a plan atm.
User avatar
Thor
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 10279
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:27 pm
Location: Asgard
Has thanked: 584 times
Been thanked: 1348 times

Re: Villa

Post by Thor »

I thought Dyche was going to Palace?
User avatar
Disoriented
Boardin' 24/7
Boardin' 24/7
Posts: 6534
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:06 pm
Location: Valhalla
Awards: Idiot of the year 2020
Has thanked: 509 times
Been thanked: 305 times

Re: Villa

Post by Disoriented »

JimbO wrote: Mon Jul 27, 2020 11:12 am
Disoriented wrote: Mon Jul 27, 2020 10:15 am
DuvB wrote: Mon Jul 27, 2020 8:23 am Roy Keane is such an unbelievable misery slagging off Villa for their dressing room celebrations.
Why? He was quite right.
He's one of those people that can't believe everyone isn't as good as him. That's why he was such a resounding success as a manager.

Obviously doesn't know that success is judged at different levels for different clubs at different times.

Personally think he's a bit of a wally.
He is, but I make him right with this.
Omygawd
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2420
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 5:12 pm
Has thanked: 761 times
Been thanked: 764 times

Re: Villa

Post by Omygawd »

When I spoke to Prince William yesterday he seemed very happy with Deano.
HeyO
Fresh Alias
Posts: 519
Joined: Mon May 04, 2020 5:21 am
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 43 times

Re: Villa

Post by HeyO »

Omygawd wrote: Tue Jul 28, 2020 9:07 am When I spoke to Prince William yesterday he seemed very happy with Deano.
David Cameron too?
User avatar
RientO
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1316
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:54 pm
Has thanked: 198 times
Been thanked: 91 times

Re: Villa

Post by RientO »

Villa should be thrown out of the Premier League for not turning on the goal line technology after the COVID break.

Image

Image
JimbO
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1165
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:20 pm
Has thanked: 138 times
Been thanked: 218 times

Re: Villa

Post by JimbO »

RientO wrote: Tue Jul 28, 2020 9:50 am Villa should be thrown out of the Premier League for not turning on the goal line technology after the COVID break.

Image

Image
Bournemouth are considering a legal challenge over this.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/53571916
RedDwarf 1881
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 12501
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:06 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 2555 times

Re: Villa

Post by RedDwarf 1881 »

How many times does this type of thing happen everywhere during a season . Officials get a lot of things wrong , we all know that . That's football , some you win , some you lose . If this goes to court it will open up a whole can of worms for the game .
User avatar
RientO
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1316
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:54 pm
Has thanked: 198 times
Been thanked: 91 times

Re: Villa

Post by RientO »

RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Wed Jul 29, 2020 10:12 am How many times does this type of thing happen everywhere during a season . Officials get a lot of things wrong , we all know that . That's football , some you win , some you lose . If this goes to court it will open up a whole can of worms for the game .
I guess it is the magnitude of what happened. And that it was the first and only occasion where goal line technology had failed. Had that Sheffield United goal counted, Villa would have been relegated rather than Bournemouth. Also in terms of fair play, the Villa keeper should have admitted it was a goal at the time as he knew he had the ball behind the posts. In golf and snooker, players call their own fouls even if not seen by officials.

That written, I don't see Bournemouth being successful in any compensation claim. And if they were, the Germans will be making one for the third goal in 1966...
EH16
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1170
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:28 pm
Has thanked: 176 times
Been thanked: 272 times

Re: Villa

Post by EH16 »

RientO wrote: Wed Jul 29, 2020 10:33 am
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Wed Jul 29, 2020 10:12 am How many times does this type of thing happen everywhere during a season . Officials get a lot of things wrong , we all know that . That's football , some you win , some you lose . If this goes to court it will open up a whole can of worms for the game .
I guess it is the magnitude of what happened. And that it was the first and only occasion where goal line technology had failed. Had that Sheffield United goal counted, Villa would have been relegated rather than Bournemouth. Also in terms of fair play, the Villa keeper should have admitted it was a goal at the time as he knew he had the ball behind the posts. In golf and snooker, players call their own fouls even if not seen by officials.

That written, I don't see Bournemouth being successful in any compensation claim. And if they were, the Germans will be making one for the third goal in 1966...
Stand to be corrected on this but I make it that even if this 'goal' had been given then Villa would still stay up by virtue of scoring 1 goal more than Bournemouth. Would also have made no difference to Sheff Utds final placing.
Give it to Jabo
Bored office worker
Bored office worker
Posts: 2656
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 9:34 pm
Has thanked: 102 times
Been thanked: 411 times

Re: Villa

Post by Give it to Jabo »

I was in the stands at Highbury when Villa lost 2-0 but won the league. Of note: just before the teams emerged that the great Pele was at the ground. He did a lap of honour: everyone, but everyone leapt to their feet to celebrate. A cynic like me thought there may be such a thing as a football family.
kokomO
Fresh Alias
Posts: 806
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:23 pm
Has thanked: 137 times
Been thanked: 223 times

Re: Villa

Post by kokomO »

EH16 wrote: Wed Jul 29, 2020 11:06 am
RientO wrote: Wed Jul 29, 2020 10:33 am
RedDwarf 1881 wrote: Wed Jul 29, 2020 10:12 am How many times does this type of thing happen everywhere during a season . Officials get a lot of things wrong , we all know that . That's football , some you win , some you lose . If this goes to court it will open up a whole can of worms for the game .
I guess it is the magnitude of what happened. And that it was the first and only occasion where goal line technology had failed. Had that Sheffield United goal counted, Villa would have been relegated rather than Bournemouth. Also in terms of fair play, the Villa keeper should have admitted it was a goal at the time as he knew he had the ball behind the posts. In golf and snooker, players call their own fouls even if not seen by officials.

That written, I don't see Bournemouth being successful in any compensation claim. And if they were, the Germans will be making one for the third goal in 1966...
Stand to be corrected on this but I make it that even if this 'goal' had been given then Villa would still stay up by virtue of scoring 1 goal more than Bournemouth. Would also have made no difference to Sheff Utds final placing.
Make you bang right about that EH, same points, same gd, one goal more. Which begs the question what are Bournemouth protesting for. just take the point off villa, tin pot club anyway (bournemouth that is)
User avatar
RientO
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1316
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:54 pm
Has thanked: 198 times
Been thanked: 91 times

Re: Villa

Post by RientO »

kokomO wrote: Wed Jul 29, 2020 11:53 am
EH16 wrote: Wed Jul 29, 2020 11:06 am
Stand to be corrected on this but I make it that even if this 'goal' had been given then Villa would still stay up by virtue of scoring 1 goal more than Bournemouth. Would also have made no difference to Sheff Utds final placing.
Make you bang right about that EH, same points, same gd, one goal more. Which begs the question what are Bournemouth protesting for. just take the point off villa, tin pot club anyway (bournemouth that is)
Bournemouth's goal difference was one better, so if Sheffield United had got the goal it would have been 2 better. Also because Villa would have lost a point, they would be level on on points, so Bournemouth would have stayed up.
kokomO
Fresh Alias
Posts: 806
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:23 pm
Has thanked: 137 times
Been thanked: 223 times

Re: Villa

Post by kokomO »

Actually , it wouldn't, they would be worse off by two goal difference , ignore what I wrote above. :roll:
kokomO
Fresh Alias
Posts: 806
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:23 pm
Has thanked: 137 times
Been thanked: 223 times

Re: Villa

Post by kokomO »

RientO wrote: Wed Jul 29, 2020 12:30 pm
kokomO wrote: Wed Jul 29, 2020 11:53 am
EH16 wrote: Wed Jul 29, 2020 11:06 am
Stand to be corrected on this but I make it that even if this 'goal' had been given then Villa would still stay up by virtue of scoring 1 goal more than Bournemouth. Would also have made no difference to Sheff Utds final placing.
Make you bang right about that EH, same points, same gd, one goal more. Which begs the question what are Bournemouth protesting for. just take the point off villa, tin pot club anyway (bournemouth that is)
Bournemouth's goal difference was one better, so if Sheffield United had got the goal it would have been 2 better. Also because Villa would have lost a point, they would be level on on points, so Bournemouth would have stayed up.
Yeah you're right rient , just realised that I did the goal difference the wrong way haha, good job I'm not on these panels that decide such things.... Schoolboy error!!! :~
User avatar
RientO
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1316
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:54 pm
Has thanked: 198 times
Been thanked: 91 times

Re: Villa

Post by RientO »

Had the Sheffield United goal been given...

Bournemouth 38 9 7 22 40 65 -25 34
Aston Villa 38 9 7 22 41 68 -27 34
User avatar
Rich Tea Wellin
MB Legend
MB Legend
Posts: 10538
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:01 pm
Has thanked: 4569 times
Been thanked: 3236 times

Re: Villa

Post by Rich Tea Wellin »

RientO wrote: Wed Jul 29, 2020 12:30 pm
kokomO wrote: Wed Jul 29, 2020 11:53 am
EH16 wrote: Wed Jul 29, 2020 11:06 am
Stand to be corrected on this but I make it that even if this 'goal' had been given then Villa would still stay up by virtue of scoring 1 goal more than Bournemouth. Would also have made no difference to Sheff Utds final placing.
Make you bang right about that EH, same points, same gd, one goal more. Which begs the question what are Bournemouth protesting for. just take the point off villa, tin pot club anyway (bournemouth that is)
Bournemouth's goal difference was one better, so if Sheffield United had got the goal it would have been 2 better. Also because Villa would have lost a point, they would be level on on points, so Bournemouth would have stayed up.
Would the referee had blown the final whistle after that went in? Or could villa have scored 2 goals in the second half?

Seem to remember villa not getting a pen in that game as well.
User avatar
RientO
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1316
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:54 pm
Has thanked: 198 times
Been thanked: 91 times

Re: Villa

Post by RientO »

Apple Wumble wrote: Wed Jul 29, 2020 12:36 pm Would the referee had blown the final whistle after that went in? Or could villa have scored 2 goals in the second half?

Seem to remember villa not getting a pen in that game as well.
Lots of ifs, buts and maybes, decisions for and decisions against for Bournemouth and Villa. Would Villa have come back and equalised if that goal went In? Would they have let in more chasing the game?
However Bournemouth can claim that they have been relegated as a result of the first and only error with goal line technology in over 9,000 matches. Of course, they could have done better throughout the season, but there is a fine margin between staying up and going down.
User avatar
RientO
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1316
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:54 pm
Has thanked: 198 times
Been thanked: 91 times

Re: Villa

Post by RientO »

another interesting view that excludes that goal (maybe)

VAR OVERTURNS (NET SCORE)

AFC Bournemouth -2
Aston Villa -3

AFC Bournemouth -2
Overturns: 12
Leading to goals for: 2
Disallowed goals for: 5
Leading to goals against: 1
Disallowed goals against: 1
Net goal score: -3
Subjective decisions for: 2
Subjective decisions against: 4
Net subjective score: -2

Game: Southampton (A; Sept. 20)
Incident: Josh King scored for the Cherries, but he was offside, 25th minute - AGAINST
Game: West Ham (H; Sept. 28)
Incident: Josh King goal, originally ruled out for offside, cleared by the VAR, 17th minute - FOR
Game: Chelsea (A; Dec. 14)
Incident: Dan Gosling goal, originally disallowed for offside, given by the VAR, 84th minute - FOR
Game: Brighton (A; Dec. 28)
Incident: Dan Burn goal ruled out for offside, 58th minute - FOR
Game: West Ham (A; Jan. 1)
Incident: Aaron Cresswell red card downgraded to yellow, 76th minute - AGAINST
Game: Norwich (A; Jan. 18)
Incident: Red card for Ben Godfrey for foul on Callum Wilson, 76th minute - FOR
Game: Burnley (A; Feb. 22)
Incident: Goal for Josh King ruled out for handball in build-up by Philip Billing, 22nd minute - AGAINST
Incident: Goal for Harry Wilson ruled out for handball by Bournemouth's Adam Smith, penalty awarded and scored by Jay Rodriguez, 57th minute - AGAINST
Game: Tottenham (H; July 9)
Incident: Goal for Callum Wilson ruled out for handball by Josh King, 90th minute - AGAINST
Game: Man City (A; July 15)
Incident: Man City penalty, for a foul on Gabriel Jesus by Steve Cook, overturned, 71st minute - FOR
Game: Southampton (H; July 19)
Incident: Penalty awarded (missed by Danny Ings) for handball by Harry Wilson, 57th minute - AGAINST
Incident: Sam Surridge goal disallowed, Callum Wilson offside, 94th minute - AGAINST


Aston Villa -3
Overturns: 7
Leading to goals for: 0
Disallowed goals for: 3
Leading to goals against: 1
Disallowed goals against: 1
Net goal score: -3
Subjective decisions for: 2
Subjective decisions against: 3
Net subjective score: -1
Game: Burnley (H; Sept. 28)
Incident: Goal for John McGinn ruled out on review, Conor Hourihane offside in build-up, 25th minute - AGAINST
Game: Brighton (H; Oct. 19)
Incident: Conor Hourihane goal ruled out for a foul by Wesley on Mat Ryan, 42nd minute - AGAINST
Game: Sheffield United (A; Dec. 14)
Incident: Penalty awarded (missed by Jack Grealish) for handball by John Egan, 76th minute - FOR
Game: Burnley (A; Jan. 1)
Incident: Goal for Villa's Jack Grealish ruled out on review, Wesley offside in build-up, 11th minute - AGAINST
Game: Tottenham (H; Feb. 16)
Incident: Penalty (missed by Son Heung-Min but scored on the rebound) awarded for foul by Bjorn Engels on Steven Bergwijn, 45th minute - AGAINST
Game: Crystal Palace (H; July 12)
Incident: Mamadou Sakho goal ruled out for handball, 7th minute - FOR
Incident: Penalty cancelled, awarded for foul on Jack Grealish by Patrick van Aanholt, 47th minute - AGAINST
User avatar
RientO
Tiresome troll
Tiresome troll
Posts: 1316
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:54 pm
Has thanked: 198 times
Been thanked: 91 times

Re: Villa

Post by RientO »

Post Reply