Coronavirus
Moderator: Long slender neck
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1043
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 12:14 am
- Has thanked: 311 times
- Been thanked: 244 times
Re: Coronavirus
Here's the range of measures they are taking at Schools in China:
Meanwhile, can you guess which Country this will be?
'Stay Alert'.
Use Hazard Tape.
Meanwhile, can you guess which Country this will be?
'Stay Alert'.
Use Hazard Tape.
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1475
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:06 pm
- Has thanked: 162 times
- Been thanked: 443 times
Re: Coronavirus
Do you think it is possible that the 'Tory Fibs' twitter feed might possibly not be completely objective, or perhaps bend the facts a little.
Like for example, the '8 minute' study that did not involve C19 or any other virus. In fact, all this amounts to, is when people breathe out, your breath contains some moist particles (a bit like breathing out on a cold winter morning). Maybe the teachers could wear masks to keep these droplets in?
Like for example, the '8 minute' study that did not involve C19 or any other virus. In fact, all this amounts to, is when people breathe out, your breath contains some moist particles (a bit like breathing out on a cold winter morning). Maybe the teachers could wear masks to keep these droplets in?
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
Re: Coronavirus
Good luck trying to muffle your instruction to a classroom full of 4 and 5 year olds through a face mask.
- Currywurst and Chips
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6240
- Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:40 am
- Has thanked: 389 times
- Been thanked: 1488 times
Re: Coronavirus
Tory Fibs sounds like an impartial account that in no way could be stupid enough to share state propaganda that's then shared by other idiots.
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 14343
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2519 times
- Been thanked: 3310 times
Re: Coronavirus
Doesn't seem much point in kids distancing. But I read that it only takes one kid to die and media would be all over it, which is what the govt are bothered about, not the kid dying.
Re: Coronavirus
So far the evidence suggests little risk of major outbreaks in schools. One study in Australia, and the British Medical Journal concluding 'Governments worldwide should allow all children back to school'
That should not diminish the justified fears of parents about safety of their children and it should be up to them whether they send their children back.
But that does not mean schools should stay shut or implement the drastic measures shown in the "Tory Fibs" twitter feed.
It's going to be the big political and press issue this week.
That should not diminish the justified fears of parents about safety of their children and it should be up to them whether they send their children back.
But that does not mean schools should stay shut or implement the drastic measures shown in the "Tory Fibs" twitter feed.
It's going to be the big political and press issue this week.
- Currywurst and Chips
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 6240
- Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 10:40 am
- Has thanked: 389 times
- Been thanked: 1488 times
Re: Coronavirus
Great bit of news locally here
After months of inactivity and multiple rumours it wasn't happening. Builders have returned to the new Waitrose site
After months of inactivity and multiple rumours it wasn't happening. Builders have returned to the new Waitrose site
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 732
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 3:41 pm
- Has thanked: 150 times
- Been thanked: 89 times
Re: Coronavirus
I think some people on this forum should think about moving to some of the States in the US. Perhaps you would get that freedom you cringe for. The rest of us will not unduly risk heading back into an even more extended lockdown.
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1043
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 12:14 am
- Has thanked: 311 times
- Been thanked: 244 times
Re: Coronavirus
Senior minister Michael Gove told parents it was safe to send their kids back to school... then seconds later changed his mind.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/ ... r-22042537
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/ ... r-22042537
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1165
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:20 pm
- Has thanked: 139 times
- Been thanked: 218 times
Re: Coronavirus
My Daughter will be going back to school as soon as she's allowed for both her sanity and her parents. We have no-one in our family who's considered high risk and me and the other half are both in our 40's. If she stays off school till there's a vaccine then she'll be off for a year and will harm her education considerably.
-
- Tiresome troll
- Posts: 1165
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:20 pm
- Has thanked: 139 times
- Been thanked: 218 times
Re: Coronavirus
I actually watched thisNuneatonO's wrote: ↑Mon May 18, 2020 11:32 am Senior minister Michael Gove told parents it was safe to send their kids back to school... then seconds later changed his mind.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/ ... r-22042537
What he actually said was that they'll be as safe as the general public and that everyone is at risk of getting it unless they stay locked up in there own homes for 12 months. Which is bleedin obvious to most of us. The daily mirror surely wouldn't have any bias against the tory party would it.
- Dunners
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9049
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 1075 times
- Been thanked: 2501 times
Re: Coronavirus
Kids have more chance of being killed in a RTA on the way to school than they do of contracting the virus and subsequently dying of it.
But this whole mess is causing a load of policy issues, as well as anxious reading of public liability insurance policies. There's just no risk-free way out of this.
But this whole mess is causing a load of policy issues, as well as anxious reading of public liability insurance policies. There's just no risk-free way out of this.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
-
- Fresh Alias
- Posts: 519
- Joined: Mon May 04, 2020 5:21 am
- Has thanked: 12 times
- Been thanked: 43 times
Re: Coronavirus
Complete speculative nonsense.Dunners wrote: ↑Mon May 18, 2020 11:57 am Kids have more chance of being killed in a RTA on the way to school than they do of contracting the virus and subsequently dying of it.
But this whole mess is causing a load of policy issues, as well as anxious reading of public liability insurance policies. There's just no risk-free way out of this.
- Dunners
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9049
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 1075 times
- Been thanked: 2501 times
Re: Coronavirus
Easy (see below). Accept that there's a higher risk of kids bringing the virus back into households, where people at greater risk may catch it. Gove, however, is calling this right, IMO. Little by little we need to start getting back to normal. Either we start this now or we'll do it later anyway, but the more we wait the greater the damage on the economy and other aspects of our lives.
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 14343
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2519 times
- Been thanked: 3310 times
-
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 7326
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 12:32 pm
- Has thanked: 1099 times
- Been thanked: 1343 times
Re: Coronavirus
How do we read this? For example, for a 90 year old there is a 10% chance of dying each year but does the 10% chance of dying of Coronavirus get added to that or is it separate (i.e. is there now a 20% chance of dying or is it still 10%?)
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
Re: Coronavirus
So anyone under the age of 60 has less risk of dying if they catch coronavirus? Seems legit.
-
- MB Legend
- Posts: 13069
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:40 pm
- Has thanked: 831 times
- Been thanked: 2637 times
Re: Coronavirus
Dunners wrote: ↑Mon May 18, 2020 12:59 pmEasy (see below). Accept that there's a higher risk of kids bringing the virus back into households, where people at greater risk may catch it. Gove, however, is calling this right, IMO. Little by little we need to start getting back to normal. Either we start this now or we'll do it later anyway, but the more we wait the greater the damage on the economy and other aspects of our lives.
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 14343
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2519 times
- Been thanked: 3310 times
Re: Coronavirus
Yes added I believeSmendrick Feaselberg wrote: ↑Mon May 18, 2020 1:29 pmHow do we read this? For example, for a 90 year old there is a 10% chance of dying each year but does the 10% chance of dying of Coronavirus get added to that or is it separate (i.e. is there now a 20% chance of dying or is it still 10%?)
- StillSpike
- Regular
- Posts: 4181
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 5:18 pm
- Has thanked: 517 times
- Been thanked: 1200 times
Re: Coronavirus
So after you're 60, your risk of dying doubles if you catch coronavirus?, under 60 it merely increases by, say, 80-90% ?
- tuffers#1
- Boardin' 24/7
- Posts: 9998
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:11 pm
- Awards: Boarder of the year 2020 #1 Wordle cheat
- Has thanked: 6291 times
- Been thanked: 2728 times
Re: Coronavirus
JimbO wrote: ↑Mon May 18, 2020 11:39 amI actually watched thisNuneatonO's wrote: ↑Mon May 18, 2020 11:32 am Senior minister Michael Gove told parents it was safe to send their kids back to school... then seconds later changed his mind.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/ ... r-22042537
What he actually said was that they'll be as safe as the general public and that everyone is at risk of getting it unless they stay locked up in there own homes for 12 months. Which is bleedin obvious to most of us. The daily mirror surely wouldn't have any bias against the tory party would it.
Some schools wont be opening though .
I wonder why ?
- Long slender neck
- MB Legend
- Posts: 14343
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:13 am
- Has thanked: 2519 times
- Been thanked: 3310 times
Re: Coronavirus
Yes but when your baseline risk is 0.01-0.1% it doesn't seem like a big deal.StillSpike wrote: ↑Mon May 18, 2020 2:07 pm So after you're 60, your risk of dying doubles if you catch coronavirus?, under 60 it merely increases by, say, 80-90% ?
- StillSpike
- Regular
- Posts: 4181
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 5:18 pm
- Has thanked: 517 times
- Been thanked: 1200 times
Re: Coronavirus
Absolutely, and this highlights how headlines stating "xyz can halve the risk from ..." or "doing this thing now and again doubles your risk of abc" are so easily misunderstood - despite being quite exciting headlines and technically correct.Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Mon May 18, 2020 3:31 pmYes but when your baseline risk is 0.01-0.1% it doesn't seem like a big deal.StillSpike wrote: ↑Mon May 18, 2020 2:07 pm So after you're 60, your risk of dying doubles if you catch coronavirus?, under 60 it merely increases by, say, 80-90% ?
I remember fondly, explaining probability relating to lottery tickets to CEB all those years ago - eventually managing to put him right on one or two things he was unsure of.
- Max B Gold
- MB Legend
- Posts: 12357
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:12 pm
- Has thanked: 992 times
- Been thanked: 2818 times
Re: Coronavirus
InconceivableStillSpike wrote: ↑Mon May 18, 2020 4:03 pmAbsolutely, and this highlights how headlines stating "xyz can halve the risk from ..." or "doing this thing now and again doubles your risk of abc" are so easily misunderstood - despite being quite exciting headlines and technically correct.Prestige Worldwide wrote: ↑Mon May 18, 2020 3:31 pmYes but when your baseline risk is 0.01-0.1% it doesn't seem like a big deal.StillSpike wrote: ↑Mon May 18, 2020 2:07 pm So after you're 60, your risk of dying doubles if you catch coronavirus?, under 60 it merely increases by, say, 80-90% ?
I remember fondly, explaining probability relating to lottery tickets to CEB all those years ago - eventually managing to put him right on one or two things he was unsure of.